btrfs: make extent_range_clear_dirty_for_io() to handle sector size < page size cases

For btrfs with sector size < page size (e.g. 4K sector size, 64K page
size), and enable the sector perfect compression support, then the
following dirty range can lead to problems:

   0     32K     64K     96K    128K
   |     |///////||//////|    |/|
                              124K

In above case, if we start writeback for that inode, the last dirty
range [124K, 128K) will not be submitted and cause reserved space
leakage:

- Start writeback for page 0
  We find the range [32K, 96K) is suitable for compression, and queue it
  into a workqueue to do the delayed compression and submission.

- Compression happens for range [32K, 96K)
  Function extent_range_clear_dirty_for_io() is called, however it is
  only doing full page handling, not considering any the extra bitmaps
  for subpage cases.

  That function will clear page dirty for both page 0 and page 64K.

- Writeback for the inode is done
  Because page 64K has its dirty flag cleared, it will not be considered
  as a writeback target.

This means the range [124K, 128K) will not be submitted, and reserved
space for it will be leaked.

Fix this problem by using the subpage helper to clear the dirty flag.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 1e4ca1e7d2e5..686d39309410 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -902,7 +902,8 @@ static int extent_range_clear_dirty_for_io(struct inode *inode, u64 start, u64 e
 				ret = PTR_ERR(folio);
 			continue;
 		}
-		folio_clear_dirty_for_io(folio);
+		btrfs_folio_clamp_clear_dirty(inode_to_fs_info(inode), folio, start,
+					      end + 1 - start);
 		folio_put(folio);
 	}
 	return ret;