summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-06-29mm/oom_kill.c: fix uninitialized oc->constraintYafang Shao
In dump_oom_summary() oc->constraint is used to show oom_constraint_text, but it hasn't been set before. So the value of it is always the default value 0. We should inititialize it before. Bellow is the output when memcg oom occurs, before this patch: oom-kill:constraint=CONSTRAINT_NONE,nodemask=(null), cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0,oom_memcg=/foo,task_memcg=/foo,task=bash,pid=7997,uid=0 after this patch: oom-kill:constraint=CONSTRAINT_MEMCG,nodemask=(null), cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0,oom_memcg=/foo,task_memcg=/foo,task=bash,pid=13681,uid=0 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1560522038-15879-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com Fixes: ef8444ea01d7 ("mm, oom: reorganize the oom report in dump_header") Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Wind Yu <yuzhoujian@didichuxing.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-06-29mm: hugetlb: soft-offline: dissolve_free_huge_page() return zero on !PageHugeNaoya Horiguchi
madvise(MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE) often returns -EBUSY when calling soft offline for hugepages with overcommitting enabled. That was caused by the suboptimal code in current soft-offline code. See the following part: ret = migrate_pages(&pagelist, new_page, NULL, MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL, MIGRATE_SYNC, MR_MEMORY_FAILURE); if (ret) { ... } else { /* * We set PG_hwpoison only when the migration source hugepage * was successfully dissolved, because otherwise hwpoisoned * hugepage remains on free hugepage list, then userspace will * find it as SIGBUS by allocation failure. That's not expected * in soft-offlining. */ ret = dissolve_free_huge_page(page); if (!ret) { if (set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page(page)) num_poisoned_pages_inc(); } } return ret; Here dissolve_free_huge_page() returns -EBUSY if the migration source page was freed into buddy in migrate_pages(), but even in that case we actually has a chance that set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page() succeeds. So that means current code gives up offlining too early now. dissolve_free_huge_page() checks that a given hugepage is suitable for dissolving, where we should return success for !PageHuge() case because the given hugepage is considered as already dissolved. This change also affects other callers of dissolve_free_huge_page(), which are cleaned up together. [n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com: v3] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1560761476-4651-3-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.comLink: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1560154686-18497-3-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com Fixes: 6bc9b56433b76 ("mm: fix race on soft-offlining") Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Reported-by: Chen, Jerry T <jerry.t.chen@intel.com> Tested-by: Chen, Jerry T <jerry.t.chen@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Xishi Qiu <xishi.qiuxishi@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: "Chen, Jerry T" <jerry.t.chen@intel.com> Cc: "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [4.19+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-06-29mm: soft-offline: return -EBUSY if set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page() failsNaoya Horiguchi
The pass/fail of soft offline should be judged by checking whether the raw error page was finally contained or not (i.e. the result of set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page()), but current code do not work like that. It might lead us to misjudge the test result when set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page() fails. Without this fix, there are cases where madvise(MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE) may not offline the original page and will not return an error. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1560154686-18497-2-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Fixes: 6bc9b56433b76 ("mm: fix race on soft-offlining") Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Xishi Qiu <xishi.qiuxishi@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: "Chen, Jerry T" <jerry.t.chen@intel.com> Cc: "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [4.19+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-06-29signal: remove the wrong signal_pending() check in restore_user_sigmask()Oleg Nesterov
This is the minimal fix for stable, I'll send cleanups later. Commit 854a6ed56839 ("signal: Add restore_user_sigmask()") introduced the visible change which breaks user-space: a signal temporary unblocked by set_user_sigmask() can be delivered even if the caller returns success or timeout. Change restore_user_sigmask() to accept the additional "interrupted" argument which should be used instead of signal_pending() check, and update the callers. Eric said: : For clarity. I don't think this is required by posix, or fundamentally to : remove the races in select. It is what linux has always done and we have : applications who care so I agree this fix is needed. : : Further in any case where the semantic change that this patch rolls back : (aka where allowing a signal to be delivered and the select like call to : complete) would be advantage we can do as well if not better by using : signalfd. : : Michael is there any chance we can get this guarantee of the linux : implementation of pselect and friends clearly documented. The guarantee : that if the system call completes successfully we are guaranteed that no : signal that is unblocked by using sigmask will be delivered? Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604134117.GA29963@redhat.com Fixes: 854a6ed56839a40f6b5d02a2962f48841482eec4 ("signal: Add restore_user_sigmask()") Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Reported-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> Tested-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [5.0+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-06-29fs/binfmt_flat.c: make load_flat_shared_library() workJann Horn
load_flat_shared_library() is broken: It only calls load_flat_file() if prepare_binprm() returns zero, but prepare_binprm() returns the number of bytes read - so this only happens if the file is empty. Instead, call into load_flat_file() if the number of bytes read is non-negative. (Even if the number of bytes is zero - in that case, load_flat_file() will see nullbytes and return a nice -ENOEXEC.) In addition, remove the code related to bprm creds and stop using prepare_binprm() - this code is loading a library, not a main executable, and it only actually uses the members "buf", "file" and "filename" of the linux_binprm struct. Instead, call kernel_read() directly. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190524201817.16509-1-jannh@google.com Fixes: 287980e49ffc ("remove lots of IS_ERR_VALUE abuses") Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-06-29mm/mempolicy.c: fix an incorrect rebind node in mpol_rebind_nodemaskzhong jiang
mpol_rebind_nodemask() is called for MPOL_BIND and MPOL_INTERLEAVE mempoclicies when the tasks's cpuset's mems_allowed changes. For policies created without MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES or MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES, it works by remapping the policy's allowed nodes (stored in v.nodes) using the previous value of mems_allowed (stored in w.cpuset_mems_allowed) as the domain of map and the new mems_allowed (passed as nodes) as the range of the map (see the comment of bitmap_remap() for details). The result of remapping is stored back as policy's nodemask in v.nodes, and the new value of mems_allowed should be stored in w.cpuset_mems_allowed to facilitate the next rebind, if it happens. However, 213980c0f23b ("mm, mempolicy: simplify rebinding mempolicies when updating cpusets") introduced a bug where the result of remapping is stored in w.cpuset_mems_allowed instead. Thus, a mempolicy's allowed nodes can evolve in an unexpected way after a series of rebinding due to cpuset mems_allowed changes, possibly binding to a wrong node or a smaller number of nodes which may e.g. overload them. This patch fixes the bug so rebinding again works as intended. [vbabka@suse.cz: new changlog] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ef6a69c6-c052-b067-8f2c-9d615c619bb9@suse.cz Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1558768043-23184-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com Fixes: 213980c0f23b ("mm, mempolicy: simplify rebinding mempolicies when updating cpusets") Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-06-29fs/proc/array.c: allow reporting eip/esp for all coredumping threadsJohn Ogness
0a1eb2d474ed ("fs/proc: Stop reporting eip and esp in /proc/PID/stat") stopped reporting eip/esp and fd7d56270b52 ("fs/proc: Report eip/esp in /prod/PID/stat for coredumping") reintroduced the feature to fix a regression with userspace core dump handlers (such as minicoredumper). Because PF_DUMPCORE is only set for the primary thread, this didn't fix the original problem for secondary threads. Allow reporting the eip/esp for all threads by checking for PF_EXITING as well. This is set for all the other threads when they are killed. coredump_wait() waits for all the tasks to become inactive before proceeding to invoke a core dumper. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/87y32p7i7a.fsf@linutronix.de Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190522161614.628-1-jlu@pengutronix.de Fixes: fd7d56270b526ca3 ("fs/proc: Report eip/esp in /prod/PID/stat for coredumping") Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de> Reported-by: Jan Luebbe <jlu@pengutronix.de> Tested-by: Jan Luebbe <jlu@pengutronix.de> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-06-29mm/dev_pfn: exclude MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE while computing virtual addressAnshuman Khandual
The presence of struct page does not guarantee linear mapping for the pfn physical range. Device private memory which is non-coherent is excluded from linear mapping during devm_memremap_pages() though they will still have struct page coverage. Change pfn_t_to_virt() to just check for device private memory before giving out virtual address for a given pfn. pfn_t_to_virt() actually has no callers. Let's fix it for the 5.2 kernel and remove it in 5.3. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1558089514-25067-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-06-28drm/panfrost: Fix a double-free errorBoris Brezillon
drm_gem_shmem_create_with_handle() returns a GEM object and attach a handle to it. When the user closes the DRM FD, the core releases all GEM handles along with their backing GEM objs, which can lead to a double-free issue if panfrost_ioctl_create_bo() failed and went through the err_free path where drm_gem_object_put_unlocked() is called without deleting the associate handle. Replace this drm_gem_object_put_unlocked() call by a drm_gem_handle_delete() one to fix that. Fixes: f3ba91228e8e ("drm/panfrost: Add initial panfrost driver") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190627172414.27231-1-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
2019-06-28tracing/snapshot: Resize spare buffer if size changedEiichi Tsukata
Current snapshot implementation swaps two ring_buffers even though their sizes are different from each other, that can cause an inconsistency between the contents of buffer_size_kb file and the current buffer size. For example: # cat buffer_size_kb 7 (expanded: 1408) # echo 1 > events/enable # grep bytes per_cpu/cpu0/stats bytes: 1441020 # echo 1 > snapshot // current:1408, spare:1408 # echo 123 > buffer_size_kb // current:123, spare:1408 # echo 1 > snapshot // current:1408, spare:123 # grep bytes per_cpu/cpu0/stats bytes: 1443700 # cat buffer_size_kb 123 // != current:1408 And also, a similar per-cpu case hits the following WARNING: Reproducer: # echo 1 > per_cpu/cpu0/snapshot # echo 123 > buffer_size_kb # echo 1 > per_cpu/cpu0/snapshot WARNING: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1946 at kernel/trace/trace.c:1607 update_max_tr_single.part.0+0x2b8/0x380 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 1946 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.2.0-rc6 #20 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-2.fc30 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:update_max_tr_single.part.0+0x2b8/0x380 Code: ff e8 dc da f9 ff 0f 0b e9 88 fe ff ff e8 d0 da f9 ff 44 89 ee bf f5 ff ff ff e8 33 dc f9 ff 41 83 fd f5 74 96 e8 b8 da f9 ff <0f> 0b eb 8d e8 af da f9 ff 0f 0b e9 bf fd ff ff e8 a3 da f9 ff 48 RSP: 0018:ffff888063e4fca0 EFLAGS: 00010093 RAX: ffff888066214380 RBX: ffffffff99850fe0 RCX: ffffffff964298a8 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000fffffff5 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 1ffff1100c7c9f96 R08: ffff888066214380 R09: ffffed100c7c9f9b R10: ffffed100c7c9f9a R11: 0000000000000003 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00000000ffffffea R14: ffff888066214380 R15: ffffffff99851060 FS: 00007f9f8173c700(0000) GS:ffff88806d000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000714dc0 CR3: 0000000066fa6000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: ? trace_array_printk_buf+0x140/0x140 ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x10/0x10 tracing_snapshot_write+0x4c8/0x7f0 ? trace_printk_init_buffers+0x60/0x60 ? selinux_file_permission+0x3b/0x540 ? tracer_preempt_off+0x38/0x506 ? trace_printk_init_buffers+0x60/0x60 __vfs_write+0x81/0x100 vfs_write+0x1e1/0x560 ksys_write+0x126/0x250 ? __ia32_sys_read+0xb0/0xb0 ? do_syscall_64+0x1f/0x390 do_syscall_64+0xc1/0x390 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe This patch adds resize_buffer_duplicate_size() to check if there is a difference between current/spare buffer sizes and resize a spare buffer if necessary. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190625012910.13109-1-devel@etsukata.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: ad909e21bbe69 ("tracing: Add internal tracing_snapshot() functions") Signed-off-by: Eiichi Tsukata <devel@etsukata.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2019-06-28dt: leds-lm36274.txt: fix a broken reference to ti-lmu.txtMauro Carvalho Chehab
There's a typo there: ti_lmu.txt -> ti-lmu.txt Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Acked-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
2019-06-28docs: leds: convert to ReSTMauro Carvalho Chehab
Rename the leds documentation files to ReST, add an index for them and adjust in order to produce a nice html output via the Sphinx build system. At its new index.rst, let's add a :orphan: while this is not linked to the main index.rst file, in order to avoid build warnings. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
2019-06-28tracing: Fix memory leak in tracing_err_log_open()Takeshi Misawa
When tracing_err_log_open() calls seq_open(), allocated memory is not freed. kmemleak report: unreferenced object 0xffff92c0781d1100 (size 128): comm "tail", pid 15116, jiffies 4295163855 (age 22.704s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 f0 08 e5 c0 92 ff ff 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<000000000d0687d5>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x11f/0x1e0 [<000000003e3039a8>] seq_open+0x2f/0x90 [<000000008dd36b7d>] tracing_err_log_open+0x67/0x140 [<000000005a431ae2>] do_dentry_open+0x1df/0x3a0 [<00000000a2910603>] vfs_open+0x2f/0x40 [<0000000038b0a383>] path_openat+0x2e8/0x1690 [<00000000fe025bda>] do_filp_open+0x9b/0x110 [<00000000483a5091>] do_sys_open+0x1ba/0x260 [<00000000c558b5fd>] __x64_sys_openat+0x20/0x30 [<000000006881ec07>] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x130 [<00000000571c2e94>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Fix this by calling seq_release() in tracing_err_log_fops.release(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190628105640.GA1863@DESKTOP Fixes: 8a062902be725 ("tracing: Add tracing error log") Reviewed-by: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Takeshi Misawa <jeliantsurux@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2019-06-28ftrace/x86: Add a comment to why we take text_mutex in ↵Steven Rostedt (VMware)
ftrace_arch_code_modify_prepare() Taking the text_mutex in ftrace_arch_code_modify_prepare() is to fix a race against module loading and live kernel patching that might try to change the text permissions while ftrace has it as read/write. This really needs to be documented in the code. Add a comment that does such. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190627211819.5a591f52@gandalf.local.home Suggested-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2019-06-28ftrace/x86: Remove possible deadlock between register_kprobe() and ↵Petr Mladek
ftrace_run_update_code() The commit 9f255b632bf12c4dd7 ("module: Fix livepatch/ftrace module text permissions race") causes a possible deadlock between register_kprobe() and ftrace_run_update_code() when ftrace is using stop_machine(). The existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (text_mutex){+.+.}: validate_chain.isra.21+0xb32/0xd70 __lock_acquire+0x4b8/0x928 lock_acquire+0x102/0x230 __mutex_lock+0x88/0x908 mutex_lock_nested+0x32/0x40 register_kprobe+0x254/0x658 init_kprobes+0x11a/0x168 do_one_initcall+0x70/0x318 kernel_init_freeable+0x456/0x508 kernel_init+0x22/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x34 kernel_thread_starter+0x0/0xc -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: check_prev_add+0x90c/0xde0 validate_chain.isra.21+0xb32/0xd70 __lock_acquire+0x4b8/0x928 lock_acquire+0x102/0x230 cpus_read_lock+0x62/0xd0 stop_machine+0x2e/0x60 arch_ftrace_update_code+0x2e/0x40 ftrace_run_update_code+0x40/0xa0 ftrace_startup+0xb2/0x168 register_ftrace_function+0x64/0x88 klp_patch_object+0x1a2/0x290 klp_enable_patch+0x554/0x980 do_one_initcall+0x70/0x318 do_init_module+0x6e/0x250 load_module+0x1782/0x1990 __s390x_sys_finit_module+0xaa/0xf0 system_call+0xd8/0x2d0 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(text_mutex); lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem); lock(text_mutex); lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem); It is similar problem that has been solved by the commit 2d1e38f56622b9b ("kprobes: Cure hotplug lock ordering issues"). Many locks are involved. To be on the safe side, text_mutex must become a low level lock taken after cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem. This can't be achieved easily with the current ftrace design. For example, arm calls set_all_modules_text_rw() already in ftrace_arch_code_modify_prepare(), see arch/arm/kernel/ftrace.c. This functions is called: + outside stop_machine() from ftrace_run_update_code() + without stop_machine() from ftrace_module_enable() Fortunately, the problematic fix is needed only on x86_64. It is the only architecture that calls set_all_modules_text_rw() in ftrace path and supports livepatching at the same time. Therefore it is enough to move text_mutex handling from the generic kernel/trace/ftrace.c into arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c: ftrace_arch_code_modify_prepare() ftrace_arch_code_modify_post_process() This patch basically reverts the ftrace part of the problematic commit 9f255b632bf12c4dd7 ("module: Fix livepatch/ftrace module text permissions race"). And provides x86_64 specific-fix. Some refactoring of the ftrace code will be needed when livepatching is implemented for arm or nds32. These architectures call set_all_modules_text_rw() and use stop_machine() at the same time. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190627081334.12793-1-pmladek@suse.com Fixes: 9f255b632bf12c4dd7 ("module: Fix livepatch/ftrace module text permissions race") Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reported-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> [ As reviewed by Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>, removed return value of ftrace_run_update_code() as it is a void function. ] Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2019-06-28Merge branch 'for-mingo' of ↵Ingo Molnar
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu into core/rcu Pull rcu/next + tools/memory-model changes from Paul E. McKenney: - RCU flavor consolidation cleanups and optmizations - Documentation updates - Miscellaneous fixes - SRCU updates - RCU-sync flavor consolidation - Torture-test updates - Linux-kernel memory-consistency-model updates, most notably the addition of plain C-language accesses Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-28NFS/flexfiles: Use the correct TCP timeout for flexfiles I/OTrond Myklebust
Fix a typo where we're confusing the default TCP retrans value (NFS_DEF_TCP_RETRANS) for the default TCP timeout value. Fixes: 15d03055cf39f ("pNFS/flexfiles: Set reasonable default ...") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.8+ Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2019-06-28SUNRPC: Fix up calculation of client message lengthTrond Myklebust
In the case where a record marker was used, xs_sendpages() needs to return the length of the payload + record marker so that we operate correctly in the case of a partial transmission. When the callers check return value, they therefore need to take into account the record marker length. Fixes: 06b5fc3ad94e ("Merge tag 'nfs-rdma-for-5.1-1'...") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.1+ Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2019-06-28ASoC: rt1308: Add RT1308 amplifier driverDerek Fang
This is the initial amplifier driver for rt1308. Signed-off-by: Derek Fang <derek.fang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28spi: stm32-qspi: remove signal sensitive on completionLudovic Barre
On umount step a sigkill signal is set (without user specific action), due to sigkill signal the completion will be interrupted and the data transfer can't be finished if a sync is needed. Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28dt-bindings: spi: stm32-qspi: add dma propertiesLudovic Barre
This patch adds description of dma properties (optional). Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: soc-utils: respawn dummy PlatformKuninori Morimoto
commit 64ee5067cf64 ("ASoC: soc-utils: remove dummy Platform") removed dummy Platform from ALSA SoC, but it is over-kill. This patch respawn it. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: rockchip: rk3399_gru_sound: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 961fb3c206dc ("ASoC: rockchip: rk3399_gru_sound: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 961fb3c206dc ("ASoC: rockchip: rk3399_gru_sound: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: qcom: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 0814c6412967 ("ASoC: qcom: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 0814c6412967 ("ASoC: qcom: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: simple-card-utils: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 6f0437445735 ("ASoC: simple-card-utils: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 6f0437445735 ("ASoC: simple-card-utils: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: ux500: mop500: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 9ae6cdb184b6 ("ASoC: ux500: mop500: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 9ae6cdb184b6 ("ASoC: ux500: mop500: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: ti: rx51: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit f0edc6c1ee48 ("ASoC: ti: rx51: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit f0edc6c1ee48 ("ASoC: ti: rx51: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: ti: omap-twl4030: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit bfe1273c65e1 ("ASoC: ti: omap-twl4030: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit bfe1273c65e1 ("ASoC: ti: omap-twl4030: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: ti: omap-hdmi: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit edba13aeae88 ("ASoC: ti: omap-hdmi: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit edba13aeae88 ("ASoC: ti: omap-hdmi: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: ti: omap-abe-twl6040: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 1306ab2eddd1 ("ASoC: ti: omap-abe-twl6040: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 1306ab2eddd1 ("ASoC: ti: omap-abe-twl6040: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: ti: davinci-evm: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit f46da1b9046e ("ASoC: ti: davinci-evm: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit f46da1b9046e ("ASoC: ti: davinci-evm: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: tegra: trimslice: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 567b374d9973 ("ASoC: tegra: trimslice: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 567b374d9973 ("ASoC: tegra: trimslice: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm9712: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 5d62677238e9 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm9712: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 5d62677238e9 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm9712: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8903: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit b28d98527157 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8903: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit b28d98527157 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8903: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8753: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 404b229b84af ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8753: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 404b229b84af ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8753: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: tegra: tegra_sgtl5000: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit cee1cf3f9f9e ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit cee1cf3f9f9e ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5677: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit d035d13b2277 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5677: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit d035d13b2277 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5677: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5640: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 1d641e1523ca ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5640: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 1d641e1523ca ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5640: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: tegra: tegra_max98090: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 4bfd08540b44 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_max98090: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 4bfd08540b44 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_max98090: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: tegra: tegra_alc5632: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit e7fc99e641da ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_alc5632: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit e7fc99e641da ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_alc5632: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-codec: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 3f780533bac9 ("ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-codec: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 3f780533bac9 ("ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-codec: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: sirf: sirf-audio: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit e562a5f13c94 ("ASoC: sirf: sirf-audio: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit e562a5f13c94 ("ASoC: sirf: sirf-audio: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: samsung: tm2_wm5110: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit ae7cbcc43b8c ("ASoC: samsung: tm2_wm5110: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit ae7cbcc43b8c ("ASoC: samsung: tm2_wm5110: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: samsung: snow: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit a555b6a959e6 ("ASoC: samsung: snow: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit a555b6a959e6 ("ASoC: samsung: snow: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit d815e0f08fdd ("ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit d815e0f08fdd ("ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: samsung: arndale_rt5631: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 33949eb5019d ("ASoC: samsung: arndale_rt5631: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 33949eb5019d ("ASoC: samsung: arndale_rt5631: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_rt5645: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 27a37973a6f1 ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_rt5645: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 27a37973a6f1 ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_rt5645: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_max98090: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 7df405ae5895 ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_max98090: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 7df405ae5895 ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_max98090: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: rockchip: rk3288_hdmi_analog: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 9c21e82c165c ("ASoC: rockchip: rk3288_hdmi_analog: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 9c21e82c165c ("ASoC: rockchip: rk3288_hdmi_analog: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2019-06-28ASoC: qcom: storm: consider CPU-Platform possibilityKuninori Morimoto
commit 3caf11fa88a9 ("ASoC: qcom: storm: don't select unnecessary Platform") Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd, and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component. Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver, because it assumed these are same component. But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name. In other words, there are some components which are different but have same of_node/name. In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even though it is same as CPU. It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver. This patch reverts above patch. Fixes: commit 3caf11fa88a9 ("ASoC: qcom: storm: don't select unnecessary Platform") Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>