| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Add various definitions from NVMe 1.3 TP 4005.
Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
|
ANA Phase 3 draft had the 'reserved' field in the group descriptor
format set to '23:17' (so that the first namespace identifier started
at byte 24), but that got move with the approved TP to '31:17'
(so that the first namespace identifier started at byte 32).
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ryan Lee <ryans.lee@maximintegrated.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
The offset of the DSP core needs to be taken into account for the DSP
preloader control get and put. Currently the dsp->preloaded variable
will only ever be read/updated on the first DSP, whilst this doesn't
affect the operation of the control the readback will be incorrect.
Signed-off-by: Ajit Pandey <ajit.pandey@cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
|
|
Replace GPL v2.0+ license statements with SPDX license
identifiers.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
Replace GPL v2.0 and v2.0+ license statements with SPDX license
identifiers.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
The driver expects to find the device id in rt5677_of_match.data, however
it is currently assigned to rt5677_of_match.type. Fix this.
The problem was found with the help of clang:
sound/soc/codecs/rt5677.c:5010:36: warning: expression which evaluates to
zero treated as a null pointer constant of type 'const void *'
[-Wnon-literal-null-conversion]
{ .compatible = "realtek,rt5677", RT5677 },
^~~~~~
Fixes: ddc9e69b9dc2 ("ASoC: rt5677: Hide platform data in the module sources")
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
set_memory_np() is used to mark kernel mappings not present, but it has
it's own open coded mechanism which does not have the L1TF protection of
inverting the address bits.
Replace the open coded PTE manipulation with the L1TF protecting low level
PTE routines.
Passes the CPA self test.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
Some cases in THP like:
- MADV_FREE
- mprotect
- split
mark the PMD non present for temporarily to prevent races. The window for
an L1TF attack in these contexts is very small, but it wants to be fixed
for correctness sake.
Use the proper low level functions for pmd/pud_mknotpresent() to address
this.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
For kernel mappings PAGE_PROTNONE is not necessarily set for a non present
mapping, but the inversion logic explicitely checks for !PRESENT and
PROT_NONE.
Remove the PROT_NONE check and make the inversion unconditional for all not
present mappings.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip into clk-rockchip
Pull one final rockchip update from Heiko Stuebner:
pclk_rkpwm_pmu as critical clock, due to it supplying the pwm
used to drive the logic supply of the rk3399 core.
* tag 'v4.19-rockchip-clk2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip:
clk: rockchip: Add pclk_rkpwm_pmu to PMU critical clocks in rk3399
|
|
Get rid of unused struct member 'last_link'
Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Gustavo A. R. Silva says:
====================
net: ethernet: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, this patchset aims
to add some annotations in order to mark switch cases where we are
expecting to fall through.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114813 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141440 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1384500 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357414 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357415 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114811 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1410181 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1410184 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1384501 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1398869 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1410182 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1410183 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the code comments with
a proper "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting
to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114809 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114810 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114808 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114802 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114796 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114804 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114806 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114801 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114800 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114799 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 200521 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114797 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114794 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114795 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114792 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114793 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114791 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114790 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114789 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114788 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114787 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114784 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114785 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114786 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114782 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114781 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114780 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114777 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114778 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114779 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114910 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 143135 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114878 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114891 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114889 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
This patch does not change any functionality but avoids that gcc
reports the following warnings when building with W=1:
block/cfq-iosched.c: In function ?cfq_back_seek_max_store?:
block/cfq-iosched.c:4741:13: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
if (__data < (MIN)) \
^
block/cfq-iosched.c:4756:1: note: in expansion of macro ?STORE_FUNCTION?
STORE_FUNCTION(cfq_back_seek_max_store, &cfqd->cfq_back_max, 0, UINT_MAX, 0);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
block/cfq-iosched.c: In function ?cfq_slice_idle_store?:
block/cfq-iosched.c:4741:13: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
if (__data < (MIN)) \
^
block/cfq-iosched.c:4759:1: note: in expansion of macro ?STORE_FUNCTION?
STORE_FUNCTION(cfq_slice_idle_store, &cfqd->cfq_slice_idle, 0, UINT_MAX, 1);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
block/cfq-iosched.c: In function ?cfq_group_idle_store?:
block/cfq-iosched.c:4741:13: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
if (__data < (MIN)) \
^
block/cfq-iosched.c:4760:1: note: in expansion of macro ?STORE_FUNCTION?
STORE_FUNCTION(cfq_group_idle_store, &cfqd->cfq_group_idle, 0, UINT_MAX, 1);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
block/cfq-iosched.c: In function ?cfq_low_latency_store?:
block/cfq-iosched.c:4741:13: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
if (__data < (MIN)) \
^
block/cfq-iosched.c:4765:1: note: in expansion of macro ?STORE_FUNCTION?
STORE_FUNCTION(cfq_low_latency_store, &cfqd->cfq_latency, 0, 1, 0);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
block/cfq-iosched.c: In function ?cfq_slice_idle_us_store?:
block/cfq-iosched.c:4775:13: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
if (__data < (MIN)) \
^
block/cfq-iosched.c:4782:1: note: in expansion of macro ?USEC_STORE_FUNCTION?
USEC_STORE_FUNCTION(cfq_slice_idle_us_store, &cfqd->cfq_slice_idle, 0, UINT_MAX);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
block/cfq-iosched.c: In function ?cfq_group_idle_us_store?:
block/cfq-iosched.c:4775:13: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
if (__data < (MIN)) \
^
block/cfq-iosched.c:4783:1: note: in expansion of macro ?USEC_STORE_FUNCTION?
USEC_STORE_FUNCTION(cfq_group_idle_us_store, &cfqd->cfq_group_idle, 0, UINT_MAX);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
|
This patch avoids that gcc complains about fall-through when building
with W=1.
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
|
When building the VDSO with clang it appears to invoke ld without
specifying endianness, even though clang itself was provided with a -EB
or -EL flag. This results in the build failing due to a mismatch between
the objects that are the input to ld, and the output it is attempting to
create:
VDSO arch/mips/vdso/vdso.so.dbg.raw
mips-linux-ld: arch/mips/vdso/elf.o: compiled for a big endian system
and target is little endian
mips-linux-ld: arch/mips/vdso/elf.o: endianness incompatible with that
of the selected emulation
mips-linux-ld: failed to merge target specific data of file
arch/mips/vdso/elf.o
...
Work around this problem by explicitly specifying the link endianness
using -Wl,-EB or -Wl,-EL when -EB or -EL are part of KBUILD_CFLAGS. This
resolves the build failure when using clang, and doesn't have any
negative effect on gcc.
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
|
|
When building using clang, always specify -EB or -EL in order to ensure
we target the desired endianness.
Since clang cross compiles using a single compiler build with multiple
targets, our -dumpmachine tests which don't specify clang's --target
argument check output based upon the build machine rather than the
machine our build will target. This means our detection of whether to
specify -EB fails miserably & we never do. Providing the endianness flag
unconditionally for clang resolves this issue & simplifies the clang
path somewhat.
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
|
