summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-06-16drm/i915/selftests: Restore to default heartbeatChris Wilson
Since we temporarily disable the heartbeat and restore back to the default value, we can use the stored defaults on the engine and avoid using a local. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200519063123.20673-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit 3a230a554dbbc6cd5016cf1b56ee77cfcd48c7d8) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
2020-06-16mfd: mt6360: Fix register driver NULL pointer by adding driver nameGene Chen
The driver name was accidentally removed when .probe() by was replaced by .probe_new() during an early patch review. [ 121.243012] EAX: c2a8bc64 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000 [ 121.243012] ESI: c2a8bc79 EDI: 00000000 EBP: e54bdea8 ESP: e54bdea0 [ 121.243012] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 121.243012] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00000000 CR3: 02ec3000 CR4: 000006b0 [ 121.243012] Call Trace: [ 121.243012] kset_find_obj+0x3d/0xc0 [ 121.243012] driver_find+0x16/0x40 [ 121.243012] driver_register+0x49/0x100 [ 121.243012] ? i2c_for_each_dev+0x39/0x50 [ 121.243012] ? __process_new_adapter+0x20/0x20 [ 121.243012] ? cht_wc_driver_init+0x11/0x11 [ 121.243012] i2c_register_driver+0x30/0x80 [ 121.243012] ? intel_lpss_pci_driver_init+0x16/0x16 [ 121.243012] mt6360_pmu_driver_init+0xf/0x11 [ 121.243012] do_one_initcall+0x33/0x1a0 [ 121.243012] ? parse_args+0x1eb/0x3d0 [ 121.243012] ? __might_sleep+0x31/0x90 [ 121.243012] ? kernel_init_freeable+0x10a/0x17f [ 121.243012] kernel_init_freeable+0x12c/0x17f [ 121.243012] ? rest_init+0x110/0x110 [ 121.243012] kernel_init+0xb/0x100 [ 121.243012] ? schedule_tail_wrapper+0x9/0xc [ 121.243012] ret_from_fork+0x19/0x24 [ 121.243012] Modules linked in: [ 121.243012] CR2: 0000000000000000 [ 121.243012] random: get_random_bytes called from init_oops_id+0x3a/0x40 with crng_init=0 [ 121.243012] ---[ end trace 38a803400f1a2bee ]--- [ 121.243012] EIP: strcmp+0x11/0x30 Fixes: 7edd363421dab ("mfd: Add support for PMIC MT6360") Signed-off-by: Gene Chen <gene_chen@richtek.com> Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@kernel.org> [Lee: Taking the opportunity to fix the compatible string too 's/_/-/'] Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2020-06-16pinctrl: mcp23s08: Split to three parts: fix ptr_ret.cocci warningskernel test robot
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mcp23s08_spi.c:129:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be used Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO rather than if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/ptr_ret.cocci Fixes: 0f04a81784fe ("pinctrl: mcp23s08: Split to three parts: core, I²C, SPI") Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> CC: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200608010253.GA79576@44f7ab9e8d59 Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2020-06-16pinctrl: tegra: Use noirq suspend/resume callbacksVidya Sagar
Use noirq suspend/resume callbacks as other drivers which implement noirq suspend/resume callbacks (Ex:- PCIe) depend on pinctrl driver to configure the signals used by their respective devices in the noirq phase. Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200604174935.26560-1-vidyas@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2020-06-16pinctrl: qcom: spmi-gpio: fix warning about irq chip reusageDmitry Baryshkov
Fix the following warnings caused by reusage of the same irq_chip instance for all spmi-gpio gpio_irq_chip instances. Instead embed irq_chip into pmic_gpio_state struct. gpio gpiochip2: (c440000.qcom,spmi:pmic@2:gpio@c000): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver. gpio gpiochip3: (c440000.qcom,spmi:pmic@4:gpio@c000): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver. gpio gpiochip4: (c440000.qcom,spmi:pmic@a:gpio@c000): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200604002817.667160-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2020-06-15w1: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15tracing/probe: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15soc: ti: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15tifm: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15dmaengine: tegra-apb: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15stm class: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15Squashfs: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15ASoC: SOF: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15ima: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15sctp: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15phy: samsung: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15RxRPC: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15rapidio: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15media: pwc: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15firmware: pcdp: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15oprofile: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15block: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15tools/testing/nvdimm: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15libata: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15kprobes: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15keys: encrypted-type: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15kexec: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15KVM: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15jffs2: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15ibft: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15samples: mei: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15ia64: kernel: unwind_i.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15FS-Cache: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15firewire: ohci: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15cb710: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15drm/edid: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15drbd: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15crypto: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15can: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15can: peak_canfd: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15dmaengine: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15ARM: tegra: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15aio: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15firmware: google: vpd: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2020-06-15firmware: google: memconsole: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array ↵Gustavo A. R. Silva
member There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2020-06-15firmware: dmi-sysfs: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2020-06-15scsi: Wire up ata_scsi_dma_need_drain for SAS HBA driversChristoph Hellwig
We need ata_scsi_dma_need_drain for all drivers wired up to drive ATAPI devices through libata. That also includes the SAS HBA drivers in addition to native libata HBA drivers. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200615064624.37317-3-hch@lst.de Fixes: cc97923a5bcc ("block: move dma drain handling to scsi") Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Tested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Acked-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com> Acked-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
2020-06-15scsi: libata: Provide an ata_scsi_dma_need_drain stub for !CONFIG_ATAChristoph Hellwig
SAS drivers can be compiled with ata support disabled. Provide a stub so that the drivers don't have to ifdef around wiring up ata_scsi_dma_need_drain. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200615064624.37317-2-hch@lst.de Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
2020-06-16powerpc/64s: Fix KVM interrupt using wrong save areaNicholas Piggin
The CTR register reload in the KVM interrupt path used the wrong save area for SLB (and NMI) interrupts. Fixes: 9600f261acaa ("powerpc/64s/exception: Move KVM test to common code") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+ Reported-by: Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Tested-by: Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200615061247.1310763-1-npiggin@gmail.com
2020-06-15scsi: ufs-bsg: Fix runtime PM imbalance on errorDinghao Liu
When ufs_bsg_alloc_desc_buffer() returns an error code, a pairing runtime PM usage counter decrement is needed to keep the counter balanced. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200522045932.31795-1-dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn Fixes: 74e5e468b664 (scsi: ufs-bsg: Wake the device before sending raw upiu commands) Reviewed-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
generated by cgit (git 2.34.1) at 2025-09-21 07:16:42 +0000