| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
A comment in arch/s390/include/asm/unwind.h says:
> If 'first_frame' is not zero unwind_start skips unwind frames until it
> reaches the specified stack pointer.
> The end of the unwinding is indicated with unwind_done, this can be true
> right after unwind_start, e.g. with first_frame!=0 that can not be found.
> unwind_next_frame skips to the next frame.
> Once the unwind is completed unwind_error() can be used to check if there
> has been a situation where the unwinder could not correctly understand
> the tasks call chain.
With this change backchain unwinder now comply with behaviour
described. As well as matches orc unwinder implementation. Now unwinder
starts from reliable state, i.e. __unwind_start own stack frame is
taken or stack frame generated by __switch_to (ksp) - both known to be
valid. In case of pt_regs %r15 is better match for pt_regs psw, than
sometimes random "sp" caller passed.
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
|
|
Currently unwinder yields 2 entries when pt_regs are met:
sp="address of pt_regs itself" ip=pt_regs->psw
sp=pt_regs->gprs[15] ip="r14 from stack frame pointed by pt_regs->gprs[15]"
And neither of those 2 states (combination of sp and ip) ever happened.
reuse_sp has been introduced by commit a1d863ac3e10 ("s390/unwind: fix
mixing regs and sp"). reuse_sp=true makes unwinder keen to produce the
following result, when pt_regs are given (as an arg to unwind_start):
sp=pt_regs->gprs[15] ip=pt_regs->psw
sp=pt_regs->gprs[15] ip="r14 from stack frame pointed by pt_regs->gprs[15]"
The first state is an actual state in which a task was when pt_regs were
collected. The second state is marked unreliable and is for debugging
purposes to cover the case when a task has been interrupted in between
stack frame allocation and writing back_chain - in this case r14 might
show an actual caller.
Make unwinder behaviour enabled via reuse_sp=true default and drop the
special case handling.
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
|
|
Avoid mixture of task == NULL and task == current meaning the same
thing and simply always initialize task with current in unwind_start.
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
|
|
unwind_for_each_frame stops after the first frame if regs->gprs[15] <=
sp.
The reason is that in case regs are specified, the first frame should be
regs->psw.addr and the second frame should be sp->gprs[8]. However,
currently the second frame is regs->gprs[15], which confuses
outside_of_stack().
Fix by introducing a flag to distinguish this special case from
unwinding the interrupt handler, for which the current behavior is
appropriate.
Fixes: 78c98f907413 ("s390/unwind: introduce stack unwind API")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.2+
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
|
|
Kasan instrumentation of backchain unwinder stack reads is disabled
completely and simply uses READ_ONCE_NOCHECK now.
READ_ONCE_TASK_STACK macro is unused and could be removed.
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
|
|
Rework the dump_trace() stack unwinder interface to support different
unwinding algorithms. The new interface looks like this:
struct unwind_state state;
unwind_for_each_frame(&state, task, regs, start_stack)
do_something(state.sp, state.ip, state.reliable);
The unwind_bc.c file contains the implementation for the classic
back-chain unwinder.
One positive side effect of the new code is it now handles ftraced
functions gracefully. It prints the real name of the return function
instead of 'return_to_handler'.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
|
