summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-03-23btrfs: Remove block_rsv parameter from btrfs_drop_snapshotNikolay Borisov
It's no longer used following 30d40577e322 ("btrfs: reloc: Also queue orphan reloc tree for cleanup to avoid BUG_ON()"), so just remove it. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: Remove __ prefix from btrfs_block_rsv_releaseNikolay Borisov
Currently the non-prefixed version is a simple wrapper used to hide the 4th argument of the prefixed version. This doesn't bring much value in practice and only makes the code harder to follow by adding another level of indirection. Rectify this by removing the __ prefix and have only one public function to release bytes from a block reservation. No semantic changes. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: relocation: Check cancel request after each extent foundQu Wenruo
When relocating data block groups with tons of small extents, or large metadata block groups, there can be over 200,000 extents. We will iterate all extents of such block group in relocate_block_group(), where iteration itself can be kinda time-consuming. So when user want to cancel the balance, the extent iteration loop can be another target. This patch will add the cancelling check in the extent iteration loop of relocate_block_group() to make balance cancelling faster. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: relocation: Check cancel request after each data page readQu Wenruo
When relocating a data extents with large large data extents, we spend most of our time in relocate_file_extent_cluster() at stage "moving data extents": 1) | btrfs_relocate_block_group [btrfs]() { 1) | relocate_file_extent_cluster [btrfs]() { 1) $ 6586769 us | } 1) + 18.260 us | relocate_file_extent_cluster [btrfs](); 1) + 15.770 us | relocate_file_extent_cluster [btrfs](); 1) $ 8916340 us | } 1) | btrfs_relocate_block_group [btrfs]() { 1) | relocate_file_extent_cluster [btrfs]() { 1) $ 11611586 us | } 1) + 16.930 us | relocate_file_extent_cluster [btrfs](); 1) + 15.870 us | relocate_file_extent_cluster [btrfs](); 1) $ 14986130 us | } To make data relocation cancelling quicker, add extra balance cancelling check after each page read in relocate_file_extent_cluster(). Cleanup and error handling uses the same mechanism as if the whole process finished Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: relocation: add error injection points for cancelling balanceQu Wenruo
Introduce a new error injection point, should_cancel_balance(). It's just a wrapper of atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_cancel_req), but allows us to override the return value. Currently there are only one locations using this function: - btrfs_balance() It checks cancel before each block group. There are other locations checking fs_info->balance_cancel_req, but they are not used as an indicator to exit, so there is no need to use the wrapper. But there will be more locations coming, and some locations can cause kernel panic if not handled properly. So introduce this error injection to provide better test interface. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: Remove impossible BUG_ON in get_tree_block_keyNikolay Borisov
relocate_tree_blocks calls get_tree_block_key for a block iff that block has its ->key_ready equal false. Thus the BUG_ON in the latter function cannot ever be triggered so remove it. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: relocation: Remove is_cowonly_root()Qu Wenruo
This function is only used in read_fs_root(), which is just a wrapper of btrfs_get_fs_root(). For all the mentioned essential roots except log root tree, btrfs_get_fs_root() has its own quick path to grab them from fs_info directly, thus no need for key.offset modification. For subvolume trees, btrfs_get_fs_root() with key.offset == -1 is completely fine. For log trees and log root tree, it's impossible to hit them, as for relocation all backrefs are fetched from commit root, which never records log tree blocks. Log tree blocks either get freed in regular transaction commit, or replayed at mount time. At runtime we should never hit an backref for log tree in extent tree. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: rename btrfs_put_fs_root and btrfs_grab_fs_rootJosef Bacik
We are now using these for all roots, rename them to btrfs_put_root() and btrfs_grab_root(); Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: push btrfs_grab_fs_root into btrfs_get_fs_rootJosef Bacik
Now that all callers of btrfs_get_fs_root are subsequently calling btrfs_grab_fs_root and handling dropping the ref when they are done appropriately, go ahead and push btrfs_grab_fs_root up into btrfs_get_fs_root. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: push grab_fs_root into read_fs_rootJosef Bacik
All of relocation uses read_fs_root to lookup fs roots, so push the btrfs_grab_fs_root() up into that helper and remove the individual calls. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: hold a ref on the root in btrfs_recover_relocationJosef Bacik
We look up the fs root in various places in here when recovering from a crashed relcoation. Make sure we hold a ref on the root whenever we look them up. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: hold a ref on the root in create_reloc_inodeJosef Bacik
We're creating a reloc inode in the data reloc tree, we need to hold a ref on the root while we're doing that. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: hold a ref on the root in find_data_referencesJosef Bacik
We're looking up the data references for the bytenr in a root, we need to hold a ref on that root while we're doing that. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: hold a ref on the root in record_reloc_root_in_transJosef Bacik
We are recording this root in the transaction, so we need to hold a ref on it until we do that. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: hold a ref on the root in merge_reloc_rootsJosef Bacik
We look up the corresponding root for the reloc root, we need to hold a ref while we're messing with it. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: hold a ref on the root in prepare_to_mergeJosef Bacik
We look up the reloc roots corresponding root, we need to hold a ref on that root. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: hold a ref on the root in build_backref_treeJosef Bacik
This is trickier than the previous conversions. We have backref_node's that need to hold onto their root for their lifetime. Do the read of the root and grab the ref. If at any point we don't use the root we discard it, however if we use it in our backref node we don't free it until we free the backref node. Any time we switch the root's for the backref node we need to drop our ref on the old root and grab the ref on the new root, and if we dupe a node we need to get a ref on the root there as well. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: make relocation use btrfs_read_tree_root()Josef Bacik
Relocation has it's special roots, we don't want to save these in the root cache either, so swap it to use btrfs_read_tree_root(). However the reloc root does need REF_COWS set, so make sure we set it everywhere we use this helper, as it no longer does the REF_COWS setting. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-03-23btrfs: relocation: Add introduction of how relocation worksQu Wenruo
Relocation is one of the most complex part of btrfs, while it's also the foundation stone for online resizing, profile converting. For such a complex facility, we should at least have some introduction to it. This patch will add an basic introduction at pretty a high level, explaining: - What relocation does - How relocation is done Only mentioning how data reloc tree and reloc tree are involved in the operation. No details like the backref cache, or the data reloc tree contents. - Which function to refer. More detailed comments will be added for reloc tree creation, data reloc tree creation and backref cache. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-01-20btrfs: make btrfs_ordered_extent naming consistent with btrfs_file_extent_itemOmar Sandoval
ordered->start, ordered->len, and ordered->disk_len correspond to fi->disk_bytenr, fi->num_bytes, and fi->disk_num_bytes, respectively. It's confusing to translate between the two naming schemes. Since a btrfs_ordered_extent is basically a pending btrfs_file_extent_item, let's make the former use the naming from the latter. Note that I didn't touch the names in tracepoints just in case there are scripts depending on the current naming. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-01-20btrfs: relocation: Output current relocation stage at ↵Qu Wenruo
btrfs_relocate_block_group() There are two relocation stages but both print the same message. Add the description of the stage. This can help debugging or provides informative message to users. BTRFS info (device dm-5): balance: start -d -m -s BTRFS info (device dm-5): relocating block group 30408704 flags metadata|dup BTRFS info (device dm-5): found 2 extents, stage: move data extents BTRFS info (device dm-5): relocating block group 22020096 flags system|dup BTRFS info (device dm-5): found 1 extents, stage: move data extents BTRFS info (device dm-5): relocating block group 13631488 flags data BTRFS info (device dm-5): found 1 extents, stage: move data extents BTRFS info (device dm-5): found 1 extents, stage: update data pointers BTRFS info (device dm-5): balance: ended with status: 0 Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-01-13btrfs: relocation: fix reloc_root lifespan and accessQu Wenruo
[BUG] There are several different KASAN reports for balance + snapshot workloads. Involved call paths include: should_ignore_root+0x54/0xb0 [btrfs] build_backref_tree+0x11af/0x2280 [btrfs] relocate_tree_blocks+0x391/0xb80 [btrfs] relocate_block_group+0x3e5/0xa00 [btrfs] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x240/0x4d0 [btrfs] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x53/0xf0 [btrfs] btrfs_balance+0xc91/0x1840 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x416/0x4e0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x8af/0x3e60 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0x831/0xb10 create_reloc_root+0x9f/0x460 [btrfs] btrfs_reloc_post_snapshot+0xff/0x6c0 [btrfs] create_pending_snapshot+0xa9b/0x15f0 [btrfs] create_pending_snapshots+0x111/0x140 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x7a6/0x1360 [btrfs] btrfs_mksubvol+0x915/0x960 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x1d5/0x1e0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x1d3/0x270 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x241b/0x3e60 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0x831/0xb10 btrfs_reloc_pre_snapshot+0x85/0xc0 [btrfs] create_pending_snapshot+0x209/0x15f0 [btrfs] create_pending_snapshots+0x111/0x140 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x7a6/0x1360 [btrfs] btrfs_mksubvol+0x915/0x960 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x1d5/0x1e0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x1d3/0x270 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x241b/0x3e60 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0x831/0xb10 [CAUSE] All these call sites are only relying on root->reloc_root, which can undergo btrfs_drop_snapshot(), and since we don't have real refcount based protection to reloc roots, we can reach already dropped reloc root, triggering KASAN. [FIX] To avoid such access to unstable root->reloc_root, we should check BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE bit first. This patch introduces wrappers that provide the correct way to check the bit with memory barriers protection. Most callers don't distinguish merged reloc tree and no reloc tree. The only exception is should_ignore_root(), as merged reloc tree can be ignored, while no reloc tree shouldn't. [CRITICAL SECTION ANALYSIS] Although test_bit()/set_bit()/clear_bit() doesn't imply a barrier, the DEAD_RELOC_TREE bit has extra help from transaction as a higher level barrier, the lifespan of root::reloc_root and DEAD_RELOC_TREE bit are: NULL: reloc_root is NULL PTR: reloc_root is not NULL 0: DEAD_RELOC_ROOT bit not set DEAD: DEAD_RELOC_ROOT bit set (NULL, 0) Initial state __ | /\ Section A btrfs_init_reloc_root() \/ | __ (PTR, 0) reloc_root initialized /\ | | btrfs_update_reloc_root() | Section B | | (PTR, DEAD) reloc_root has been merged \/ | __ === btrfs_commit_transaction() ==================== | /\ clean_dirty_subvols() | | | Section C (NULL, DEAD) reloc_root cleanup starts \/ | __ btrfs_drop_snapshot() /\ | | Section D (NULL, 0) Back to initial state \/ Every have_reloc_root() or test_bit(DEAD_RELOC_ROOT) caller holds transaction handle, so none of such caller can cross transaction boundary. In Section A, every caller just found no DEAD bit, and grab reloc_root. In the cross section A-B, caller may get no DEAD bit, but since reloc_root is still completely valid thus accessing reloc_root is completely safe. No test_bit() caller can cross the boundary of Section B and Section C. In Section C, every caller found the DEAD bit, so no one will access reloc_root. In the cross section C-D, either caller gets the DEAD bit set, avoiding access reloc_root no matter if it's safe or not. Or caller get the DEAD bit cleared, then access reloc_root, which is already NULL, nothing will be wrong. The memory write barriers are between the reloc_root updates and bit set/clear, the pairing read side is before test_bit. Reported-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org> Fixes: d2311e698578 ("btrfs: relocation: Delay reloc tree deletion after merge_reloc_roots") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ barriers ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-12-13btrfs: do not leak reloc root if we fail to read the fs rootJosef Bacik
If we fail to read the fs root corresponding with a reloc root we'll just break out and free the reloc roots. But we remove our current reloc_root from this list higher up, which means we'll leak this reloc_root. Fix this by adding ourselves back to the reloc_roots list so we are properly cleaned up. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18btrfs: remove extent_map::bdevDavid Sterba
We can now remove the bdev from extent_map. Previous patches made sure that bio_set_dev is correctly in all places and that we don't need to grab it from latest_bdev or pass it around inside the extent map. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18btrfs: scrub: Don't check free space before marking a block group ROQu Wenruo
[BUG] When running btrfs/072 with only one online CPU, it has a pretty high chance to fail: btrfs/072 12s ... _check_dmesg: something found in dmesg (see xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.dmesg) - output mismatch (see xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.out.bad) --- tests/btrfs/072.out 2019-10-22 15:18:14.008965340 +0800 +++ /xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.out.bad 2019-11-14 15:56:45.877152240 +0800 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ QA output created by 072 Silence is golden +Scrub find errors in "-m dup -d single" test ... And with the following call trace: BTRFS info (device dm-5): scrub: started on devid 1 ------------[ cut here ]------------ BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -27) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 55087 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:1890 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x3e6/0x470 [btrfs] CPU: 0 PID: 55087 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W O 5.4.0-rc1-custom+ #13 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x3e6/0x470 [btrfs] Call Trace: __btrfs_end_transaction+0xdb/0x310 [btrfs] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_inc_block_group_ro+0x1c9/0x210 [btrfs] scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x264/0x940 [btrfs] btrfs_scrub_dev+0x45c/0x8f0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x31a1/0x3fb0 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0x636/0xaa0 ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x43/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x79/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe ---[ end trace 166c865cec7688e7 ]--- [CAUSE] The error number -27 is -EFBIG, returned from the following call chain: btrfs_end_transaction() |- __btrfs_end_transaction() |- btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() |- btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc() |- btrfs_add_system_chunk() This happens because we have used up all space of btrfs_super_block::sys_chunk_array. The root cause is, we have the following bad loop of creating tons of system chunks: 1. The only SYSTEM chunk is being scrubbed It's very common to have only one SYSTEM chunk. 2. New SYSTEM bg will be allocated As btrfs_inc_block_group_ro() will check if we have enough space after marking current bg RO. If not, then allocate a new chunk. 3. New SYSTEM bg is still empty, will be reclaimed During the reclaim, we will mark it RO again. 4. That newly allocated empty SYSTEM bg get scrubbed We go back to step 2, as the bg is already mark RO but still not cleaned up yet. If the cleaner kthread doesn't get executed fast enough (e.g. only one CPU), then we will get more and more empty SYSTEM chunks, using up all the space of btrfs_super_block::sys_chunk_array. [FIX] Since scrub/dev-replace doesn't always need to allocate new extent, especially chunk tree extent, so we don't really need to do chunk pre-allocation. To break above spiral, here we introduce a new parameter to btrfs_inc_block_group(), @do_chunk_alloc, which indicates whether we need extra chunk pre-allocation. For relocation, we pass @do_chunk_alloc=true, while for scrub, we pass @do_chunk_alloc=false. This should keep unnecessary empty chunks from popping up for scrub. Also, since there are two parameters for btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(), add more comment for it. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18btrfs: rename btrfs_block_group_cacheDavid Sterba
The type name is misleading, a single entry is named 'cache' while this normally means a collection of objects. Rename that everywhere. Also the identifier was quite long, making function prototypes harder to format. Suggested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18btrfs: add dedicated members for start and length of a block groupDavid Sterba
The on-disk format of block group item makes use of the key that stores the offset and length. This is further used in the code, although this makes thing harder to understand. The key is also packed so the offset/length is not properly aligned as u64. Add start (key.objectid) and length (key.offset) members to block group and remove the embedded key. When the item is searched or written, a local variable for key is used. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18btrfs: move block_group_item::used to block groupDavid Sterba
For unknown reasons, the member 'used' in the block group struct is stored in the b-tree item and accessed everywhere using the special accessor helper. Let's unify it and make it a regular member and only update the item before writing it to the tree. The item is still being used for flags and chunk_objectid, there's some duplication until the item is removed in following patches. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18btrfs: opencode extent_buffer_getDavid Sterba
The helper is trivial and we can understand what the atomic_inc on something named refs does. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18btrfs: drop unused parameter is_new from btrfs_igetDavid Sterba
The parameter is now always set to NULL and could be dropped. The last user was get_default_root but that got reworked in 05dbe6837b60 ("Btrfs: unify subvol= and subvolid= mounting") and the parameter became unused. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-15btrfs: qgroup: Always free PREALLOC META reserve in ↵Qu Wenruo
btrfs_delalloc_release_extents() [Background] Btrfs qgroup uses two types of reserved space for METADATA space, PERTRANS and PREALLOC. PERTRANS is metadata space reserved for each transaction started by btrfs_start_transaction(). While PREALLOC is for delalloc, where we reserve space before joining a transaction, and finally it will be converted to PERTRANS after the writeback is done. [Inconsistency] However there is inconsistency in how we handle PREALLOC metadata space. The most obvious one is: In btrfs_buffered_write(): btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(BTRFS_I(inode), reserve_bytes, true); We always free qgroup PREALLOC meta space. While in btrfs_truncate_block(): btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(BTRFS_I(inode), blocksize, (ret != 0)); We only free qgroup PREALLOC meta space when something went wrong. [The Correct Behavior] The correct behavior should be the one in btrfs_buffered_write(), we should always free PREALLOC metadata space. The reason is, the btrfs_delalloc_* mechanism works by: - Reserve metadata first, even it's not necessary In btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata() - Free the unused metadata space Normally in: btrfs_delalloc_release_extents() |- btrfs_inode_rsv_release() Here we do calculation on whether we should release or not. E.g. for 64K buffered write, the metadata rsv works like: /* The first page */ reserve_meta: num_bytes=calc_inode_reservations() free_meta: num_bytes=0 total: num_bytes=calc_inode_reservations() /* The first page caused one outstanding extent, thus needs metadata rsv */ /* The 2nd page */ reserve_meta: num_bytes=calc_inode_reservations() free_meta: num_bytes=calc_inode_reservations() total: not changed /* The 2nd page doesn't cause new outstanding extent, needs no new meta rsv, so we free what we have reserved */ /* The 3rd~16th pages */ reserve_meta: num_bytes=calc_inode_reservations() free_meta: num_bytes=calc_inode_reservations() total: not changed (still space for one outstanding extent) This means, if btrfs_delalloc_release_extents() determines to free some space, then those space should be freed NOW. So for qgroup, we should call btrfs_qgroup_free_meta_prealloc() other than btrfs_qgroup_convert_reserved_meta(). The good news is: - The callers are not that hot The hottest caller is in btrfs_buffered_write(), which is already fixed by commit 336a8bb8e36a ("btrfs: Fix wrong btrfs_delalloc_release_extents parameter"). Thus it's not that easy to cause false EDQUOT. - The trans commit in advance for qgroup would hide the bug Since commit f5fef4593653 ("btrfs: qgroup: Make qgroup async transaction commit more aggressive"), when btrfs qgroup metadata free space is slow, it will try to commit transaction and free the wrongly converted PERTRANS space, so it's not that easy to hit such bug. [FIX] So to fix the problem, remove the @qgroup_free parameter for btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(), and always pass true to btrfs_inode_rsv_release(). Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Fixes: 43b18595d660 ("btrfs: qgroup: Use separate meta reservation type for delalloc") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-11Btrfs: add missing extents release on file extent cluster relocation errorFilipe Manana
If we error out when finding a page at relocate_file_extent_cluster(), we need to release the outstanding extents counter on the relocation inode, set by the previous call to btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata(), otherwise the inode's block reserve size can never decrease to zero and metadata space is leaked. Therefore add a call to btrfs_delalloc_release_extents() in case we can't find the target page. Fixes: 8b62f87bad9c ("Btrfs: rework outstanding_extents") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-09-25btrfs: relocation: fix use-after-free on dead relocation rootsQu Wenruo
[BUG] One user reported a reproducible KASAN report about use-after-free: BTRFS info (device sdi1): balance: start -dvrange=1256811659264..1256811659265 BTRFS info (device sdi1): relocating block group 1256811659264 flags data|raid0 ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs] Write of size 8 at addr ffff88856f671710 by task kworker/u24:10/261579 CPU: 2 PID: 261579 Comm: kworker/u24:10 Tainted: P OE 5.2.11-arch1-1-kasan #4 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./X99 Extreme4, BIOS P3.80 04/06/2018 Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_endio_write_helper [btrfs] Call Trace: dump_stack+0x7b/0xba print_address_description+0x6c/0x22e ? btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs] __kasan_report.cold+0x1b/0x3b ? btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs] kasan_report+0x12/0x17 __asan_report_store8_noabort+0x17/0x20 btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs] record_root_in_trans+0x2a0/0x370 [btrfs] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0xf4/0x140 [btrfs] start_transaction+0x1ab/0xe90 [btrfs] btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x7bf/0x18a0 [btrfs] ? lock_repin_lock+0x400/0x400 ? __kmem_cache_shutdown.cold+0x140/0x1ad ? btrfs_unlink_subvol+0x9b0/0x9b0 [btrfs] finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs] normal_work_helper+0x1bd/0xca0 [btrfs] ? process_one_work+0x819/0x1720 ? kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 btrfs_endio_write_helper+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x8c9/0x1720 ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x2f0/0x2f0 ? worker_thread+0x1d9/0x1030 worker_thread+0x98/0x1030 kthread+0x2bb/0x3b0 ? process_one_work+0x1720/0x1720 ? kthread_park+0x120/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 Allocated by task 369692: __kasan_kmalloc.part.0+0x44/0xc0 __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.0+0xba/0xc0 kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x138/0x260 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x92/0x360 [btrfs] btrfs_read_fs_root+0x10/0xb0 [btrfs] create_reloc_root+0x47d/0xa10 [btrfs] btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x1e2/0x340 [btrfs] record_root_in_trans+0x2a0/0x370 [btrfs] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0xf4/0x140 [btrfs] start_transaction+0x1ab/0xe90 [btrfs] btrfs_start_transaction+0x1e/0x20 [btrfs] __btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x1c2/0xa00 [btrfs] btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x13/0x20 [btrfs] prealloc_file_extent_cluster+0x29f/0x570 [btrfs] relocate_file_extent_cluster+0x193/0xc30 [btrfs] relocate_data_extent+0x1f8/0x490 [btrfs] relocate_block_group+0x600/0x1060 [btrfs] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x3a0/0xa00 [btrfs] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x9e/0x180 [btrfs] btrfs_balance+0x14e4/0x2fc0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x47f/0x640 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x119d/0x8380 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0x9f5/0x1060 ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x73/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x370 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Freed by task 369692: __kasan_slab_free+0x14f/0x210 kasan_slab_free+0xe/0x10 kfree+0xd8/0x270 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x154c/0x1eb0 [btrfs] clean_dirty_subvols+0x227/0x340 [btrfs] relocate_block_group+0x972/0x1060 [btrfs] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x3a0/0xa00 [btrfs] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x9e/0x180 [btrfs] btrfs_balance+0x14e4/0x2fc0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x47f/0x640 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x119d/0x8380 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0x9f5/0x1060 ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x73/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x370 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88856f671100 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-4k of size 4096 The buggy address is located 1552 bytes inside of 4096-byte region [ffff88856f671100, ffff88856f672100) The buggy address belongs to the page: page:ffffea0015bd9c00 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff88864400e600 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0 flags: 0x2ffff0000010200(slab|head) raw: 02ffff0000010200 dead000000000100 dead000000000200 ffff88864400e600 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000070007 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected Memory state around the buggy address: ffff88856f671600: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ffff88856f671680: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb >ffff88856f671700: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ^ ffff88856f671780: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ffff88856f671800: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ================================================================== BTRFS info (device sdi1): 1 enospc errors during balance BTRFS info (device sdi1): balance: ended with status: -28 [CAUSE] The problem happens when finish_ordered_io() get called with balance still running, while the reloc root of that subvolume is already dead. (Tree is swap already done, but tree not yet deleted for possible qgroup usage.) That means root->reloc_root still exists, but that reloc_root can be under btrfs_drop_snapshot(), thus we shouldn't access it. The following race could cause the use-after-free problem: CPU1 | CPU2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | relocate_block_group() | |- unset_reloc_control(rc) | |- btrfs_commit_transaction() btrfs_finish_ordered_io() | |- clean_dirty_subvols() |- btrfs_join_transaction() | | |- record_root_in_trans() | | |- btrfs_init_reloc_root() | | |- if (root->reloc_root) | | | | |- root->reloc_root = NULL | | |- btrfs_drop_snapshot(reloc_root); |- reloc_root->last_trans| = trans->transid | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Use after free [FIX] Fix it by the following modifications: - Test if the root has dead reloc tree before accessing root->reloc_root If the root has BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE, then we don't need to create or update root->reloc_tree - Clear the BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE flag until we have fully dropped reloc tree To co-operate with above modification, so as long as BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE is still set, we won't try to re-create reloc tree at record_root_in_trans(). Reported-by: Cebtenzzre <cebtenzzre@gmail.com> Fixes: d2311e698578 ("btrfs: relocation: Delay reloc tree deletion after merge_reloc_roots") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.1+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-09-09btrfs: move basic block_group definitions to their own headerJosef Bacik
This is prep work for moving all of the block group cache code into its own file. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ minor comment updates ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-09-09btrfs: Remove leftover of in-band dedupeNikolay Borisov
It's unlikely in-band dedupe is going to land so just remove any leftovers - dedupe.h header as well as the 'dedupe' parameter to btrfs_set_extent_delalloc. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-04btrfs: migrate the delalloc space stuff to it's own homeJosef Bacik
We have code for data and metadata reservations for delalloc. There's quite a bit of code here, and it's used in a lot of places so I've separated it out to it's own file. inode.c and file.c are already pretty large, and this code is complicated enough to live in its own space. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-05-28btrfs: reloc: Also queue orphan reloc tree for cleanup to avoid BUG_ON()Qu Wenruo
[BUG] When a fs has orphan reloc tree along with unfinished balance: ... item 16 key (TREE_RELOC ROOT_ITEM FS_TREE) itemoff 12090 itemsize 439 generation 12 root_dirid 256 bytenr 300400640 level 1 refs 0 <<< lastsnap 8 byte_limit 0 bytes_used 1359872 flags 0x0(none) uuid 7c48d938-33a3-4aae-ab19-6e5c9d406e46 item 17 key (BALANCE TEMPORARY_ITEM 0) itemoff 11642 itemsize 448 temporary item objectid BALANCE offset 0 balance status flags 14 Then at mount time, we can hit the following kernel BUG_ON(): BTRFS info (device dm-3): relocating block group 298844160 flags metadata|dup ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1413! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 1 PID: 897 Comm: btrfs-balance Tainted: G O 5.2.0-rc1-custom #15 RIP: 0010:create_reloc_root+0x1eb/0x200 [btrfs] Call Trace: btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x96/0xb0 [btrfs] record_root_in_trans+0xb2/0xe0 [btrfs] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x55/0x70 [btrfs] select_reloc_root+0x7e/0x230 [btrfs] do_relocation+0xc4/0x620 [btrfs] relocate_tree_blocks+0x592/0x6a0 [btrfs] relocate_block_group+0x47b/0x5d0 [btrfs] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x183/0x2f0 [btrfs] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4e/0xe0 [btrfs] btrfs_balance+0x864/0xfa0 [btrfs] balance_kthread+0x3b/0x50 [btrfs] kthread+0x123/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 [CAUSE] In btrfs, reloc trees are used to record swapped tree blocks during balance. Reloc tree either get merged (replace old tree blocks of its parent subvolume) in next transaction if its ref is 1 (fresh). Or is already merged and will be cleaned up if its ref is 0 (orphan). After commit d2311e698578 ("btrfs: relocation: Delay reloc tree deletion after merge_reloc_roots"), reloc tree cleanup is delayed until one block group is balanced. Since fresh reloc roots are recorded during merge, as long as there is no power loss, those orphan reloc roots converted from fresh ones are handled without problem. However when power loss happens, orphan reloc roots can be recorded on-disk, thus at next mount time, we will have orphan reloc roots from on-disk data directly, and ignored by clean_dirty_subvols() routine. Then when background balance starts to balance another block group, and needs to create new reloc root for the same root, btrfs_insert_item() returns -EEXIST, and trigger that BUG_ON(). [FIX] For orphan reloc roots, also queue them to rc->dirty_subvol_roots, so all reloc roots no matter orphan or not, can be cleaned up properly and avoid above BUG_ON(). And to cooperate with above change, clean_dirty_subvols() will check if the queued root is a reloc root or a subvol root. For a subvol root, do the old work, and for a orphan reloc root, clean it up. Fixes: d2311e698578 ("btrfs: relocation: Delay reloc tree deletion after merge_reloc_roots") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.1 Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29btrfs: extent-tree: Use btrfs_ref to refactor btrfs_free_extent()Qu Wenruo
Similar to btrfs_inc_extent_ref(), use btrfs_ref to replace the long parameter list and the confusing @owner parameter. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29btrfs: extent-tree: Use btrfs_ref to refactor btrfs_inc_extent_ref()Qu Wenruo
Use the new btrfs_ref structure and replace parameter list to clean up the usage of owner and level to distinguish the extent types. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29btrfs: get fs_info from block group in lookup_free_space_inodeDavid Sterba
We can read fs_info from the block group cache structure and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29btrfs: Remove redundant inode argument from btrfs_add_ordered_sumNikolay Borisov
Ordered csums are keyed off of a btrfs_ordered_extent, which already has a reference to the inode. This implies that an explicit inode argument is redundant. So remove it. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29btrfs: fix panic during relocation after ENOSPC before writeback happensJosef Bacik
We've been seeing the following sporadically throughout our fleet panic: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4584! netversion: 5.0-0 Backtrace: #0 [ffffc90003adb880] machine_kexec at ffffffff81041da8 #1 [ffffc90003adb8c8] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8110396c #2 [ffffc90003adb988] crash_kexec at ffffffff811048ad #3 [ffffc90003adb9a0] oops_end at ffffffff8101c19a #4 [ffffc90003adb9c0] do_trap at ffffffff81019114 #5 [ffffc90003adba00] do_error_trap at ffffffff810195d0 #6 [ffffc90003adbab0] invalid_op at ffffffff81a00a9b [exception RIP: btrfs_reloc_cow_block+692] RIP: ffffffff8143b614 RSP: ffffc90003adbb68 RFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: fffffffffffffff7 RBX: ffff8806b9c32000 RCX: ffff8806aad00690 RDX: ffff880850b295e0 RSI: ffff8806b9c32000 RDI: ffff88084f205bd0 RBP: ffff880849415000 R8: ffffc90003adbbe0 R9: ffff88085ac90000 R10: ffff8805f7369140 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880850b295e0 R13: ffff88084f205bd0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #7 [ffffc90003adbbb0] __btrfs_cow_block at ffffffff813bf1cd #8 [ffffc90003adbc28] btrfs_cow_block at ffffffff813bf4b3 #9 [ffffc90003adbc78] btrfs_search_slot at ffffffff813c2e6c The way relocation moves data extents is by creating a reloc inode and preallocating extents in this inode and then copying the data into these preallocated extents. Once we've done this for all of our extents, we'll write out these dirty pages, which marks the extent written, and goes into btrfs_reloc_cow_block(). From here we get our current reloc_control, which _should_ match the reloc_control for the current block group we're relocating. However if we get an ENOSPC in this path at some point we'll bail out, never initiating writeback on this inode. Not a huge deal, unless we happen to be doing relocation on a different block group, and this block group is now rc->stage == UPDATE_DATA_PTRS. This trips the BUG_ON() in btrfs_reloc_cow_block(), because we expect to be done modifying the data inode. We are in fact done modifying the metadata for the data inode we're currently using, but not the one from the failed block group, and thus we BUG_ON(). (This happens when writeback finishes for extents from the previous group, when we are at btrfs_finish_ordered_io() which updates the data reloc tree (inode item, drops/adds extent items, etc).) Fix this by writing out the reloc data inode always, and then breaking out of the loop after that point to keep from tripping this BUG_ON() later. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [ add note from Filipe ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29btrfs: reloc: Fix NULL pointer dereference due to expanded reloc_root lifespanQu Wenruo
Commit d2311e698578 ("btrfs: relocation: Delay reloc tree deletion after merge_reloc_roots()") expands the life span of root->reloc_root. This breaks certain checs of fs_info->reloc_ctl. Before that commit, if we have a root with valid reloc_root, then it's ensured to have fs_info->reloc_ctl. But now since reloc_root doesn't always mean a valid fs_info->reloc_ctl, such check is unreliable and can cause the following NULL pointer dereference: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000005c1 IP: btrfs_reloc_pre_snapshot+0x20/0x50 [btrfs] PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 0 PID: 10379 Comm: snapperd Not tainted Call Trace: create_pending_snapshot+0xd7/0xfc0 [btrfs] create_pending_snapshots+0x8e/0xb0 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x2ac/0x8f0 [btrfs] btrfs_mksubvol+0x561/0x570 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x189/0x190 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x102/0x150 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x5c9/0x1e60 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0x90/0x5f0 SyS_ioctl+0x74/0x80 do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x150 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2 RIP: 0033:0x7fd7cdab8467 Fix it by explicitly checking fs_info->reloc_ctl other than using the implied root->reloc_root. Fixes: d2311e698578 ("btrfs: relocation: Delay reloc tree deletion after merge_reloc_roots") Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29btrfs: Introduce extent_io_tree::owner to distinguish different io_treesQu Wenruo
Btrfs has the following different extent_io_trees used: - fs_info::free_extents[2] - btrfs_inode::io_tree - for both normal inodes and the btree inode - btrfs_inode::io_failure_tree - btrfs_transaction::dirty_pages - btrfs_root::dirty_log_pages If we want to trace changes in those trees, it will be pretty hard to distinguish them. Instead of using hard-to-read pointer address, this patch will introduce a new member extent_io_tree::owner to track the owner. This modification needs all the callers of extent_io_tree_init() to accept a new parameter @owner. This patch provides the basis for later trace events. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29btrfs: Introduce fs_info to extent_io_treeQu Wenruo
This patch will add a new member fs_info to extent_io_tree. This provides the basis for later trace events to distinguish the output between different btrfs filesystems. While this increases the size of the structure, we want to know the source of the trace events and passing the fs_info as an argument to all contexts is not possible. The selftests are now allowed to set it to NULL as they don't use the tracepoints. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-02-25Btrfs: add missing error handling after doing leaf/node binary searchFilipe Manana
The function map_private_extent_buffer() can return an -EINVAL error, and it is called by generic_bin_search() which will return back the error. The btrfs_bin_search() function in turn calls generic_bin_search() and the key_search() function calls btrfs_bin_search(), so both can return the -EINVAL error coming from the map_private_extent_buffer() function. Some callers of these functions were ignoring that these functions can return an error, so fix them to deal with error return values. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-02-25btrfs: open code now trivial btrfs_set_lock_blockingDavid Sterba
btrfs_set_lock_blocking is now only a simple wrapper around btrfs_set_lock_blocking_write. The name does not bring any semantic value that could not be inferred from the new function so there's no point keeping it. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-02-25btrfs: qgroup: Use delayed subtree rescan for balanceQu Wenruo
Before this patch, qgroup code traces the whole subtree of subvolume and reloc trees unconditionally. This makes qgroup numbers consistent, but it could cause tons of unnecessary extent tracing, which causes a lot of overhead. However for subtree swap of balance, just swap both subtrees because they contain the same contents and tree structure, so qgroup numbers won't change. It's the race window between subtree swap and transaction commit could cause qgroup number change. This patch will delay the qgroup subtree scan until COW happens for the subtree root. So if there is no other operations for the fs, balance won't cause extra qgroup overhead. (best case scenario) Depending on the workload, most of the subtree scan can still be avoided. Only for worst case scenario, it will fall back to old subtree swap overhead. (scan all swapped subtrees) [[Benchmark]] Hardware: VM 4G vRAM, 8 vCPUs, disk is using 'unsafe' cache mode, backing device is SAMSUNG 850 evo SSD. Host has 16G ram. Mkfs parameter: --nodesize 4K (To bump up tree size) Initial subvolume contents: 4G data copied from /usr and /lib. (With enough regular small files) Snapshots: 16 snapshots of the original subvolume. each snapshot has 3 random files modified. balance parameter: -m So the content should be pretty similar to a real world root fs layout. And after file system population, there is no other activity, so it should be the best case scenario. | v4.20-rc1 | w/ patchset | diff ----------------------------------------------------------------------- relocated extents | 22615 | 22457 | -0.1% qgroup dirty extents | 163457 | 121606 | -25.6% time (sys) | 22.884s | 18.842s | -17.6% time (real) | 27.724s | 22.884s | -17.5% Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-02-25btrfs: qgroup: Introduce per-root swapped blocks infrastructureQu Wenruo
To allow delayed subtree swap rescan, btrfs needs to record per-root information about which tree blocks get swapped. This patch introduces the required infrastructure. The designed workflow will be: 1) Record the subtree root block that gets swapped. During subtree swap: O = Old tree blocks N = New tree blocks reloc tree subvolume tree X Root Root / \ / \ NA OB OA OB / | | \ / | | \ NC ND OE OF OC OD OE OF In this case, NA and OA are going to be swapped, record (NA, OA) into subvolume tree X. 2) After subtree swap. reloc tree subvolume tree X Root Root / \ / \ OA OB NA OB / | | \ / | | \ OC OD OE OF NC ND OE OF 3a) COW happens for OB If we are going to COW tree block OB, we check OB's bytenr against tree X's swapped_blocks structure. If it doesn't fit any, nothing will happen. 3b) COW happens for NA Check NA's bytenr against tree X's swapped_blocks, and get a hit. Then we do subtree scan on both subtrees OA and NA. Resulting 6 tree blocks to be scanned (OA, OC, OD, NA, NC, ND). Then no matter what we do to subvolume tree X, qgroup numbers will still be correct. Then NA's record gets removed from X's swapped_blocks. 4) Transaction commit Any record in X's swapped_blocks gets removed, since there is no modification to swapped subtrees, no need to trigger heavy qgroup subtree rescan for them. This will introduce 128 bytes overhead for each btrfs_root even qgroup is not enabled. This is to reduce memory allocations and potential failures. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-02-25btrfs: relocation: Delay reloc tree deletion after merge_reloc_rootsQu Wenruo
Relocation code will drop btrfs_root::reloc_root as soon as merge_reloc_root() finishes. However later qgroup code will need to access btrfs_root::reloc_root after merge_reloc_root() for delayed subtree rescan. So alter the timming of resetting btrfs_root:::reloc_root, make it happens after transaction commit. With this patch, we will introduce a new btrfs_root::state, BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE, to info part of btrfs_root::reloc_tree user that although btrfs_root::reloc_tree is still non-NULL, but still it's not used any more. The lifespan of btrfs_root::reloc tree will become: Old behavior | New ------------------------------------------------------------------------ btrfs_init_reloc_root() --- | btrfs_init_reloc_root() --- set reloc_root | | set reloc_root | | | | | | | merge_reloc_root() | | merge_reloc_root() | |- btrfs_update_reloc_root() --- | |- btrfs_update_reloc_root() -+- clear btrfs_root::reloc_root | set ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE | | record root into dirty | | roots rbtree | | | | reloc_block_group() Or | | btrfs_recover_relocation() | | | After transaction commit | | |- clean_dirty_subvols() --- | clear btrfs_root::reloc_root During ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE set lifespan, the only user of btrfs_root::reloc_tree should be qgroup. Since reloc root needs a longer life-span, this patch will also delay btrfs_drop_snapshot() call. Now btrfs_drop_snapshot() is called in clean_dirty_subvols(). This patch will increase the size of btrfs_root by 16 bytes. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
generated by cgit (git 2.34.1) at 2025-07-28 16:54:00 +0000