| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
All of our inode creation code paths duplicate the calls to
btrfs_init_inode_security() and btrfs_add_link(). Subvolume creation
additionally duplicates property inheritance and the call to
btrfs_set_inode_index(). Fix this by moving the common code into
btrfs_create_new_inode(). This accomplishes a few things at once:
1. It reduces code duplication.
2. It allows us to set up the inode completely before inserting the
inode item, removing calls to btrfs_update_inode().
3. It fixes a leak of an inode on disk in some error cases. For example,
in btrfs_create(), if btrfs_new_inode() succeeds, then we have
inserted an inode item and its inode ref. However, if something after
that fails (e.g., btrfs_init_inode_security()), then we end the
transaction and then decrement the link count on the inode. If the
transaction is committed and the system crashes before the failed
inode is deleted, then we leak that inode on disk. Instead, this
refactoring aborts the transaction when we can't recover more
gracefully.
4. It exposes various ways that subvolume creation diverges from mkdir
in terms of inheriting flags, properties, permissions, and POSIX
ACLs, a lot of which appears to be accidental. This patch explicitly
does _not_ change the existing non-standard behavior, but it makes
those differences more clear in the code and documents them so that
we can discuss whether they should be changed.
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The various inode creation code paths do not account for the compression
property, POSIX ACLs, or the parent inode item when starting a
transaction. Fix it by refactoring all of these code paths to use a new
function, btrfs_new_inode_prepare(), which computes the correct number
of items. To do so, it needs to know whether POSIX ACLs will be created,
so move the ACL creation into that function. To reduce the number of
arguments that need to be passed around for inode creation, define
struct btrfs_new_inode_args containing all of the relevant information.
btrfs_new_inode_prepare() will also be a good place to set up the
fscrypt context and encrypted filename in the future.
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_{mknod,create,mkdir}() are now identical other than the inode
initialization and some inconsequential function call order differences.
Factor out the common code to reduce code duplication.
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Instead of calling new_inode() and inode_init_owner() inside of
btrfs_new_inode(), do it in the callers. This allows us to pass in just
the inode instead of the mnt_userns and mode and removes the need for
memalloc_nofs_{save,restores}() since we do it before starting a
transaction. In create_subvol(), it also means we no longer have to look
up the inode again to instantiate it. This also paves the way for some
more cleanups in later patches.
This also removes the comments about Smack checking i_op, which are no
longer true since commit 5d6c31910bc0 ("xattr: Add
__vfs_{get,set,remove}xattr helpers"). Now it checks inode->i_opflags &
IOP_XATTR, which is set based on sb->s_xattr.
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Although we have btrfs_extent_buffer_leak_debug_check() (enabled by
CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG option) to detect and warn QA testers that we have
some extent buffer leakage, it's just pr_err(), not noisy enough for
fstests to cache.
So here we trigger a WARN_ON() if the allocated_ebs list is not empty.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_dev_replace_finishing
In the function btrfs_dev_replace_finishing, we dereferenced
fs_info->fs_devices 6 times. Use keep local variable for that.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This function can be simplified by refactoring to use the new iterator
macro. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This function can be simplified by refactoring to use the new iterator
macro. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This function can be simplified by refactoring to use the new iterator
macro. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This function can be simplified by refactoring to use the new iterator
macro. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This function can be simplified by refactoring to use the new iterator
macro. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This function can be simplified by refactoring to use the new iterator
macro. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This function can be simplified by refactoring to use the new iterator
macro. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This function can be simplified by refactoring to use the new iterator
macro. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This function can be simplified by refactoring to use the new iterator
macro. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This function can be simplified by refactoring to use the new iterator
macro. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This function can be simplified by refactoring to use the new iterator
macro. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This function can be simplified by refactoring to use the new iterator
macro. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This function can be simplified by refactoring to use the new iterator
macro. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
There is a common pattern when searching for a key in btrfs:
* Call btrfs_search_slot to find the slot for the key
* Enter an endless loop:
* If the found slot is larger than the no. of items in the current
leaf, check the next leaf
* If it's still not found in the next leaf, terminate the loop
* Otherwise do something with the found key
* Increment the current slot and continue
To reduce code duplication, we can replace this code pattern with an
iterator macro, similar to the existing for_each_X macros found
elsewhere in the kernel. This also makes the code easier to understand
for newcomers by putting a name to the encapsulated functionality.
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Since the subpage support for scrub, one page no longer always represents
one sector, thus scrub_bio::pagev and scrub_bio::sector_count are no
longer accurate.
Rename them to scrub_bio::sectors and scrub_bio::sector_count respectively.
This also involves scrub_ctx::pages_per_bio and other macros involved.
Now the renaming of pages involved in scrub is be finished.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Since the subpage support of scrub, scrub_sector is in fact just
representing one sector.
Thus the name scrub_page is no longer correct, rename it to
scrub_sector.
This also involves the following renames:
- spage -> sector
Normally we would just replace "page" with "sector" and result
something like "ssector".
But the repeating 's' is not really eye friendly.
So here we just simple use "sector", as there is nothing from MM layer
called "sector" to cause any confusion.
- scrub_parity::spages -> sectors_list
Normally we use plural to indicate an array, not a list.
Rename it to @sectors_list to be more explicit on the list part.
- Also reformat and update comments that get changed
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The following will be renamed in this patch:
- scrub_block::pagev -> sectors
- scrub_block::page_count -> sector_count
- SCRUB_MAX_PAGES_PER_BLOCK -> SCRUB_MAX_SECTORS_PER_BLOCK
- page_num -> sector_num to iterate scrub_block::sectors
For now scrub_page is not yet renamed to keep the patch reasonable and
it will be updated in a followup.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The function btrfs_read_buffer() is useless, it just calls
btree_read_extent_buffer_pages() with exactly the same arguments.
So remove it and rename btree_read_extent_buffer_pages() to
btrfs_read_extent_buffer(), which is a shorter name, has the "btrfs_"
prefix (since it's used outside disk-io.c) and the name is clear enough
about what it does.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The comment at the top of read_block_for_search() is very outdated, as it
refers to the blocking versus spinning path locking modes. We no longer
have these two locking modes after we switched the btree locks from custom
code to rw semaphores. So update the comment to stop referring to the
blocking mode and put it more up to date.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When reading a btree node (or leaf), at read_block_for_search(), if we
can't find its extent buffer in the cache (the fs_info->buffer_radix
radix tree), then we unlock all upper level nodes before reading the
btree node/leaf from disk, to prevent blocking other tasks for too long.
However if we find that the extent buffer is in the cache but it is not
up to date, we don't unlock upper level nodes before reading it from disk,
potentially blocking other tasks on upper level nodes for too long.
Fix this inconsistent behaviour by unlocking upper level nodes if we need
to read a node/leaf from disk because its in-memory extent buffer is not
up to date. If we unlocked upper level nodes then we must return -EAGAIN
to the caller, just like the case where the extent buffer is not cached in
memory. And like that case, we determine if upper level nodes are locked
by checking only if the parent node is locked - if it isn't, then no other
upper level nodes are locked.
This is actually a rare case, as if we have an extent buffer in memory,
it typically has the uptodate flag set and passes all the checks done by
btrfs_buffer_uptodate().
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When reading a btree node, at read_block_for_search(), if we don't find
the node's (or leaf) extent buffer in the cache, we will read it from
disk. Since that requires waiting on IO, we release all upper level nodes
from our path before reading the target node/leaf, and then return -EAGAIN
to the caller, which will make the caller restart the while btree search.
However we are causing the restart of btree search even for cases where
it is not necessary:
1) We have a path with ->skip_locking set to true, typically when doing
a search on a commit root, so we are never holding locks on any node;
2) We are doing a read search (the "ins_len" argument passed to
btrfs_search_slot() is 0), or we are doing a search to modify an
existing key (the "cow" argument passed to btrfs_search_slot() has
a value of 1 and "ins_len" is 0), in which case we never hold locks
for upper level nodes;
3) We are doing a search to insert or delete a key, in which case we may
or may not have upper level nodes locked. That depends on the current
minimum write lock levels at btrfs_search_slot(), if we had to split
or merge parent nodes, if we had to COW upper level nodes and if
we ever visited slot 0 of an upper level node. It's still common to
not have upper level nodes locked, but our current node must be at
least at level 1, for insertions, or at least at level 2 for deletions.
In these cases when we have locks on upper level nodes, they are always
write locks.
These cases where we are not holding locks on upper level nodes far
outweigh the cases where we are holding locks, so it's completely wasteful
to retry the whole search when we have no upper nodes locked.
So change the logic to not return -EAGAIN, and make the caller retry the
search, when we don't have the parent node locked - when it's not locked
it means no other upper level nodes are locked as well.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_new_inode() inherits the inode flags from the parent directory and
the mount options _after_ we fill the inode item. This works because all
of the callers of btrfs_new_inode() make further changes to the inode
and then call btrfs_update_inode(). It'd be better to fully initialize
the inode once to avoid the extra update, so as a first step, set the
inode flags _before_ filling the inode item.
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Every call of btrfs_new_inode() is immediately preceded by a call to
btrfs_get_free_objectid(). Since getting an inode number is part of
creating a new inode, this is better off being moved into
btrfs_new_inode(). While we're here, get rid of the comment about
reclaiming inode numbers, since we only did that when using the ino
cache, which was removed by commit 5297199a8bca ("btrfs: remove inode
number cache feature").
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
For everything other than a subvolume root inode, we get the parent
objectid from the parent directory. For the subvolume root inode, the
parent objectid is the same as the inode's objectid. We can find this
within btrfs_new_inode() instead of passing it.
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The passed dentry already contains the name.
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Commit 4a8b34afa9c9 ("btrfs: handle ACLs on idmapped mounts") added this
parameter but didn't use it. __btrfs_set_acl() is the low-level helper
that writes an ACL to disk. The higher-level btrfs_set_acl() is the one
that translates the ACL based on the user namespace.
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_new_inode() already returns an inode with nlink set to 1 (via
inode_init_always()). Get rid of the unnecessary set.
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
new_inode() always returns an inode with i_blocks and i_bytes set to 0
(via inode_init_always()). Remove the unnecessary call to
inode_set_bytes() in btrfs_new_inode().
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_new_inode() always returns an inode with i_size and disk_i_size
set to 0 (via inode_init_always() and btrfs_alloc_inode(),
respectively). Remove the unnecessary calls to btrfs_i_size_write() in
btrfs_mkdir() and btrfs_create_subvol_root().
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This is a trivial wrapper around btrfs_add_link(). The only thing it
does other than moving arguments around is translating a > 0 return
value to -EEXIST. As far as I can tell, btrfs_add_link() won't return >
0 (and if it did, the existing callsites in, e.g., btrfs_mkdir() would
be broken). The check itself dates back to commit 2c90e5d65842 ("Btrfs:
still corruption hunting"), so it's probably left over from debugging.
Let's just get rid of btrfs_add_nondir().
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When btrfs_qgroup_inherit(), btrfs_alloc_tree_block, or
btrfs_insert_root() fail in create_subvol(), we return without freeing
anon_dev. Reorganize the error handling in create_subvol() to fix this.
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_rename() and btrfs_rename_exchange() don't account for enough
items. Replace the incorrect explanations with a specific breakdown of
the number of items and account them accurately.
Note that this glosses over RENAME_WHITEOUT because the next commit is
going to rework that, too.
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
__btrfs_unlink_inode() calls btrfs_update_inode() on the parent
directory in order to update its size and sequence number. Make sure we
account for it.
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
I've only converted the outer layers of the btrfs release_folio paths
to use folios; the use of folios should be pushed further down into
btrfs from here.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
|
|
With all implementations of aops->readpage converted to aops->read_folio,
we can stop checking whether it's set and remove the member from aops.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
|
|
This is a "weak" conversion which converts straight back to using pages.
A full conversion should be performed at some point, hopefully by
someone familiar with the filesystem.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
|
|
Change all the callers of ->readpage to call ->read_folio in preference,
if it exists. This is a transitional duplication, and will be removed
by the end of the series.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
|
|
Removes a couple of calls to compound_head and saves a few bytes.
Also convert verity's read_file_data_page() to be folio-based.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux
Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
"Regression fixes in zone activation:
- move a loop invariant out of the loop to avoid checking space
status
- properly handle unlimited activation
Other fixes:
- for subpage, force the free space v2 mount to avoid a warning and
make it easy to switch a filesystem on different page size systems
- export sysfs status of exclusive operation 'balance paused', so the
user space tools can recognize it and allow adding a device with
paused balance
- fix assertion failure when logging directory key range item"
* tag 'for-5.18-rc5-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
btrfs: sysfs: export the balance paused state of exclusive operation
btrfs: fix assertion failure when logging directory key range item
btrfs: zoned: activate block group properly on unlimited active zone device
btrfs: zoned: move non-changing condition check out of the loop
btrfs: force v2 space cache usage for subpage mount
|
|
The new state allowing device addition with paused balance is not
exported to user space so it can't recognize it and actually start the
operation.
Fixes: efc0e69c2fea ("btrfs: introduce exclusive operation BALANCE_PAUSED state")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.17
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When inserting a key range item (BTRFS_DIR_LOG_INDEX_KEY) while logging
a directory, we don't expect the insertion to fail with -EEXIST, because
we are holding the directory's log_mutex and we have dropped all existing
BTRFS_DIR_LOG_INDEX_KEY keys from the log tree before we started to log
the directory. However it's possible that during the logging we attempt
to insert the same BTRFS_DIR_LOG_INDEX_KEY key twice, but for this to
happen we need to race with insertions of items from other inodes in the
subvolume's tree while we are logging a directory. Here's how this can
happen:
1) We are logging a directory with inode number 1000 that has its items
spread across 3 leaves in the subvolume's tree:
leaf A - has index keys from the range 2 to 20 for example. The last
item in the leaf corresponds to a dir item for index number 20. All
these dir items were created in a past transaction.
leaf B - has index keys from the range 22 to 100 for example. It has
no keys from other inodes, all its keys are dir index keys for our
directory inode number 1000. Its first key is for the dir item with
a sequence number of 22. All these dir items were also created in a
past transaction.
leaf C - has index keys for our directory for the range 101 to 120 for
example. This leaf also has items from other inodes, and its first
item corresponds to the dir item for index number 101 for our directory
with inode number 1000;
2) When we finish processing the items from leaf A at log_dir_items(),
we log a BTRFS_DIR_LOG_INDEX_KEY key with an offset of 21 and a last
offset of 21, meaning the log is authoritative for the index range
from 21 to 21 (a single sequence number). At this point leaf B was
not yet modified in the current transaction;
3) When we return from log_dir_items() we have released our read lock on
leaf B, and have set *last_offset_ret to 21 (index number of the first
item on leaf B minus 1);
4) Some other task inserts an item for other inode (inode number 1001 for
example) into leaf C. That resulted in pushing some items from leaf C
into leaf B, in order to make room for the new item, so now leaf B
has dir index keys for the sequence number range from 22 to 102 and
leaf C has the dir items for the sequence number range 103 to 120;
5) At log_directory_changes() we call log_dir_items() again, passing it
a 'min_offset' / 'min_key' value of 22 (*last_offset_ret from step 3
plus 1, so 21 + 1). Then btrfs_search_forward() leaves us at slot 0
of leaf B, since leaf B was modified in the current transaction.
We have also initialized 'last_old_dentry_offset' to 20 after calling
btrfs_previous_item() at log_dir_items(), as it left us at the last
item of leaf A, which refers to the dir item with sequence number 20;
6) We then call process_dir_items_leaf() to process the dir items of
leaf B, and when we process the first item, corresponding to slot 0,
sequence number 22, we notice the dir item was created in a past
transaction and its sequence number is greater than the value of
*last_old_dentry_offset + 1 (20 + 1), so we decide to log again a
BTRFS_DIR_LOG_INDEX_KEY key with an offset of 21 and an end range
of 21 (key.offset - 1 == 22 - 1 == 21), which results in an -EEXIST
error from insert_dir_log_key(), as we have already inserted that
key at step 2, triggering the assertion at process_dir_items_leaf().
The trace produced in dmesg is like the following:
assertion failed: ret != -EEXIST, in fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:3857
[198255.980839][ T7460] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[198255.981666][ T7460] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3617!
[198255.983141][ T7460] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
[198255.984080][ T7460] CPU: 0 PID: 7460 Comm: repro-ghost-dir Not tainted 5.18.0-5314c78ac373-misc-next+
[198255.986027][ T7460] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
[198255.988600][ T7460] RIP: 0010:assertfail.constprop.0+0x1c/0x1e
[198255.989465][ T7460] Code: 8b 4c 89 (...)
[198255.992599][ T7460] RSP: 0018:ffffc90007387188 EFLAGS: 00010282
[198255.993414][ T7460] RAX: 000000000000003d RBX: 0000000000000065 RCX: 0000000000000000
[198255.996056][ T7460] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff8b62b180 RDI: fffff52000e70e24
[198255.997668][ T7460] RBP: ffffc90007387188 R08: 000000000000003d R09: ffff8881f0e16507
[198255.999199][ T7460] R10: ffffed103e1c2ca0 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 00000000ffffffef
[198256.000683][ T7460] R13: ffff88813befc630 R14: ffff888116c16e70 R15: ffffc90007387358
[198256.007082][ T7460] FS: 00007fc7f7c24640(0000) GS:ffff8881f0c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[198256.009939][ T7460] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[198256.014133][ T7460] CR2: 0000560bb16d0b78 CR3: 0000000140b34005 CR4: 0000000000170ef0
[198256.015239][ T7460] Call Trace:
[198256.015674][ T7460] <TASK>
[198256.016313][ T7460] log_dir_items.cold+0x16/0x2c
[198256.018858][ T7460] ? replay_one_extent+0xbf0/0xbf0
[198256.025932][ T7460] ? release_extent_buffer+0x1d2/0x270
[198256.029658][ T7460] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x16/0x80
[198256.031114][ T7460] ? lock_acquired+0xbe/0x660
[198256.032633][ T7460] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x16/0x80
[198256.034386][ T7460] ? lock_release+0xcf/0x8a0
[198256.036152][ T7460] log_directory_changes+0xf9/0x170
[198256.036993][ T7460] ? log_dir_items+0xba0/0xba0
[198256.037661][ T7460] ? do_raw_write_unlock+0x7d/0xe0
[198256.038680][ T7460] btrfs_log_inode+0x233b/0x26d0
[198256.041294][ T7460] ? log_directory_changes+0x170/0x170
[198256.042864][ T7460] ? btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x60/0x60
[198256.045130][ T7460] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x16/0x80
[198256.046568][ T7460] ? lock_release+0xcf/0x8a0
[198256.047504][ T7460] ? lock_downgrade+0x420/0x420
[198256.048712][ T7460] ? ilookup5_nowait+0x81/0xa0
[198256.049747][ T7460] ? lock_downgrade+0x420/0x420
[198256.050652][ T7460] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa9/0x100
[198256.051618][ T7460] ? __might_resched+0x128/0x1c0
[198256.052511][ T7460] ? __might_sleep+0x66/0xc0
[198256.053442][ T7460] ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
[198256.054251][ T7460] ? iget5_locked+0xbd/0x150
[198256.054986][ T7460] ? run_delayed_iput_locked+0x110/0x110
[198256.055929][ T7460] ? btrfs_iget+0xc7/0x150
[198256.056630][ T7460] ? btrfs_orphan_cleanup+0x4a0/0x4a0
[198256.057502][ T7460] ? free_extent_buffer+0x13/0x20
[198256.058322][ T7460] btrfs_log_inode+0x2654/0x26d0
[198256.059137][ T7460] ? log_directory_changes+0x170/0x170
[198256.060020][ T7460] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x16/0x80
[198256.060930][ T7460] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x16/0x80
[198256.061905][ T7460] ? lock_contended+0x770/0x770
[198256.062682][ T7460] ? btrfs_log_inode_parent+0xd04/0x1750
[198256.063582][ T7460] ? lock_downgrade+0x420/0x420
[198256.064432][ T7460] ? preempt_count_sub+0x18/0xc0
[198256.065550][ T7460] ? __mutex_lock+0x580/0xdc0
[198256.066654][ T7460] ? stack_trace_save+0x94/0xc0
[198256.068008][ T7460] ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x20
[198256.072149][ T7460] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x12a/0x430
[198256.073145][ T7460] ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0xcd0/0xcd0
[198256.074341][ T7460] ? wait_for_completion_io_timeout+0x20/0x20
[198256.075345][ T7460] ? lock_downgrade+0x420/0x420
[198256.076142][ T7460] ? lock_contended+0x770/0x770
[198256.076939][ T7460] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x1c0/0x1c0
[198256.078401][ T7460] ? btrfs_sync_file+0x5e6/0xa40
[198256.080598][ T7460] btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x523/0x1750
[198256.081991][ T7460] ? wait_current_trans+0xc8/0x240
[198256.083320][ T7460] ? lock_downgrade+0x420/0x420
[198256.085450][ T7460] ? btrfs_end_log_trans+0x70/0x70
[198256.086362][ T7460] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x16/0x80
[198256.087544][ T7460] ? lock_release+0xcf/0x8a0
[198256.088305][ T7460] ? lock_downgrade+0x420/0x420
[198256.090375][ T7460] ? dget_parent+0x8e/0x300
[198256.093538][ T7460] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x1c0/0x1c0
[198256.094918][ T7460] ? lock_downgrade+0x420/0x420
[198256.097815][ T7460] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa9/0x100
[198256.101822][ T7460] ? dget_parent+0xb7/0x300
[198256.103345][ T7460] btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x48/0x60
[198256.105052][ T7460] btrfs_sync_file+0x629/0xa40
[198256.106829][ T7460] ? start_ordered_ops.constprop.0+0x120/0x120
[198256.109655][ T7460] ? __fget_files+0x161/0x230
[198256.110760][ T7460] vfs_fsync_range+0x6d/0x110
[198256.111923][ T7460] ? start_ordered_ops.constprop.0+0x120/0x120
[198256.113556][ T7460] __x64_sys_fsync+0x45/0x70
[198256.114323][ T7460] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xc0
[198256.115084][ T7460] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x3b/0x50
[198256.116030][ T7460] ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0xc0
[198256.116768][ T7460] ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0xc0
[198256.117555][ T7460] ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0xc0
[198256.118324][ T7460] ? sysvec_call_function_single+0x57/0xc0
[198256.119308][ T7460] ? asm_sysvec_call_function_single+0xa/0x20
[198256.120363][ T7460] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[198256.121334][ T7460] RIP: 0033:0x7fc7fe97b6ab
[198256.122067][ T7460] Code: 0f 05 48 (...)
[198256.125198][ T7460] RSP: 002b:00007fc7f7c23950 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a
[198256.126568][ T7460] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fc7f7c239f0 RCX: 00007fc7fe97b6ab
[198256.127942][ T7460] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 000056167536bcf0 RDI: 0000000000000004
[198256.129302][ T7460] RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000007ffffeb8
[198256.130670][ T7460] R10: 00000000000001ff R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000000000001
[198256.132046][ T7460] R13: 0000561674ca8140 R14: 00007fc7f7c239d0 R15: 000056167536dab8
[198256.133403][ T7460] </TASK>
Fix this by treating -EEXIST as expected at insert_dir_log_key() and have
it update the item with an end offset corresponding to the maximum between
the previously logged end offset and the new requested end offset. The end
offsets may be different due to dir index key deletions that happened as
part of unlink operations while we are logging a directory (triggered when
fsyncing some other inode parented by the directory) or during renames
which always attempt to log a single dir index deletion.
Reported-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/YmyefE9mc2xl5ZMz@hungrycats.org/
Fixes: 732d591a5d6c12 ("btrfs: stop copying old dir items when logging a directory")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_zone_activate() checks if it activated all the underlying zones in
the loop. However, that check never hit on an unlimited activate zone
device (max_active_zones == 0).
Fortunately, it still works without ENOSPC because btrfs_zone_activate()
returns true in the end, even if block_group->zone_is_active == 0. But, it
is confusing to have non zone_is_active block group still usable for
allocation. Also, we are wasting CPU time to iterate the loop every time
btrfs_zone_activate() is called for the blog groups.
Since error case in the loop is handled by out_unlock, we can just set
zone_is_active and do the list stuff after the loop.
Fixes: f9a912a3c45f ("btrfs: zoned: make zone activation multi stripe capable")
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_zone_activate() checks if block_group->alloc_offset ==
block_group->zone_capacity every time it iterates the loop. But, it is
not depending on the index. Move out the check and do it only once.
Fixes: f9a912a3c45f ("btrfs: zoned: make zone activation multi stripe capable")
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
[BUG]
For a 4K sector sized btrfs with v1 cache enabled and only mounted on
systems with 4K page size, if it's mounted on subpage (64K page size)
systems, it can cause the following warning on v1 space cache:
BTRFS error (device dm-1): csum mismatch on free space cache
BTRFS warning (device dm-1): failed to load free space cache for block group 84082688, rebuilding it now
Although not a big deal, as kernel can rebuild it without problem, such
warning will bother end users, especially if they want to switch the
same btrfs seamlessly between different page sized systems.
[CAUSE]
V1 free space cache is still using fixed PAGE_SIZE for various bitmap,
like BITS_PER_BITMAP.
Such hard-coded PAGE_SIZE usage will cause various mismatch, from v1
cache size to checksum.
Thus kernel will always reject v1 cache with a different PAGE_SIZE with
csum mismatch.
[FIX]
Although we should fix v1 cache, it's already going to be marked
deprecated soon.
And we have v2 cache based on metadata (which is already fully subpage
compatible), and it has almost everything superior than v1 cache.
So just force subpage mount to use v2 cache on mount.
Reported-by: Matt Corallo <blnxfsl@bluematt.me>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/61aa27d1-30fc-c1a9-f0f4-9df544395ec3@bluematt.me/
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
