| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This is new API which caters to the following requirements:
- Pack or unpack a large number of fields to/from a buffer with a small
code footprint. The current alternative is to open-code a large number
of calls to pack() and unpack(), or to use packing() to reduce that
number to half. But packing() is not const-correct.
- Use unpacked numbers stored in variables smaller than u64. This
reduces the rodata footprint of the stored field arrays.
- Perform error checking at compile time, rather than runtime, and return
void from the API functions. Because the C preprocessor can't generate
variable length code (loops), this is a bit tricky to do with macros.
To handle this, implement macros which sanity check the packed field
definitions based on their size. Finally, a single macro with a chain of
__builtin_choose_expr() is used to select the appropriate macros. We
enforce the use of ascending or descending order to avoid O(N^2) scaling
when checking for overlap. Note that the macros are written with care to
ensure that the compilers can correctly evaluate the resulting code at
compile time. In particular, care was taken with avoiding too many nested
statement expressions. Nested statement expressions trip up some
compilers, especially when passing down variables created in previous
statement expressions.
There are two key design choices intended to keep the overall macro code
size small. First, the definition of each CHECK_PACKED_FIELDS_N macro is
implemented recursively, by calling the N-1 macro. This avoids needing
the code to repeat multiple times.
Second, the CHECK_PACKED_FIELD macro enforces that the fields in the
array are sorted in order. This allows checking for overlap only with
neighboring fields, rather than the general overlap case where each field
would need to be checked against other fields.
The overlap checks use the first two fields to determine the order of the
remaining fields, thus allowing either ascending or descending order.
This enables drivers the flexibility to keep the fields ordered in which
ever order most naturally fits their hardware design and its associated
documentation.
The CHECK_PACKED_FIELDS macro is directly called from within pack_fields
and unpack_fields, ensuring that all drivers using the API receive the
benefits of the compile-time checks. Users do not need to directly call
any of the macros directly.
The CHECK_PACKED_FIELDS and its helper macros CHECK_PACKED_FIELDS_(0..50)
are generated using a simple C program in scripts/gen_packed_field_checks.c
This program can be compiled on demand and executed to generate the
macro code in include/linux/packing.h. This will aid in the event that a
driver needs more than 50 fields. The generator can be updated with a new
size, and used to update the packing.h header file. In practice, the ice
driver will need to support 27 fields, and the sja1105 driver will need
to support 0 fields. This on-demand generation avoids the need to modify
Kbuild. We do not anticipate the maximum number of fields to grow very
often.
- Reduced rodata footprint for the storage of the packed field arrays.
To that end, we have struct packed_field_u8 and packed_field_u16, which
define the fields with the associated type. More can be added as
needed (unlikely for now). On these types, the same generic pack_fields()
and unpack_fields() API can be used, thanks to the new C11 _Generic()
selection feature, which can call pack_fields_u8() or pack_fields_16(),
depending on the type of the "fields" array - a simplistic form of
polymorphism. It is evaluated at compile time which function will actually
be called.
Over time, packing() is expected to be completely replaced either with
pack() or with pack_fields().
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Co-developed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241210-packing-pack-fields-and-ice-implementation-v10-3-ee56a47479ac@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
packing() is now used in some hot paths, and it would be good to get rid
of some ifs and buts that depend on "op", to speed things up a little bit.
With the main implementations now taking size_t endbit, we no longer
have to check for negative values. Update the local integer variables to
also be size_t to match.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241002-packing-kunit-tests-and-split-pack-unpack-v2-5-8373e551eae3@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Geert Uytterhoeven described packing() as "really bad API" because of
not being able to enforce const correctness. The same function is used
both when "pbuf" is input and "uval" is output, as in the other way
around.
Create 2 wrapper functions where const correctness can be ensured.
Do ugly type casts inside, to be able to reuse packing() as currently
implemented - which will _not_ modify the input argument.
Also, take the opportunity to change the type of startbit and endbit to
size_t - an unsigned type - in these new function prototypes. When int,
an extra check for negative values is necessary. Hopefully, when
packing() goes away completely, that check can be dropped.
My concern is that code which does rely on the conditional directionality
of packing() is harder to refactor without blowing up in size. So it may
take a while to completely eliminate packing(). But let's make alternatives
available for those who do not need that.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210223112003.2223332-1-geert+renesas@glider.be/
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241002-packing-kunit-tests-and-split-pack-unpack-v2-4-8373e551eae3@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
It is not necessary to have the kernel-doc duplicated both in the
header and in the implementation. It is better to have it near the
implementation of the function, since in C, a function can have N
declarations, but only one definition.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241002-packing-kunit-tests-and-split-pack-unpack-v2-3-8373e551eae3@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
NXP Legal insists that the following are not fine:
- Saying "NXP Semiconductors" instead of "NXP", since the company's
registered name is "NXP"
- Putting a "(c)" sign in the copyright string
- Putting a comma in the copyright string
The only accepted copyright string format is "Copyright <year-range> NXP".
This patch changes the copyright headers in the networking files that
were sent by me, or derived from code sent by me.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
This provides an unified API for accessing register bit fields
regardless of memory layout. The basic unit of data for these API
functions is the u64. The process of transforming an u64 from native CPU
encoding into the peripheral's encoding is called 'pack', and
transforming it from peripheral to native CPU encoding is 'unpack'.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
