summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm/hugetlb.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-05-05mm,hugetlb: drop clearing of flag from prep_new_huge_pageOscar Salvador
Pages allocated via the page allocator or CMA get its private field cleared by means of post_alloc_hook(). Pages allocated during boot, that is directly from the memblock allocator, get cleared by paging_init()-> .. ->memmap_init_zone-> .. ->__init_single_page() before any memblock allocation. Based on this ground, let us remove the clearing of the flag from prep_new_huge_page() as it is not needed. This was a leftover from commit 6c0371490140 ("hugetlb: convert PageHugeFreed to HPageFreed flag"). Previously the explicit clearing was necessary because compound allocations do not get this initialization (see prep_compound_page). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210419075413.1064-4-osalvador@suse.de Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05hugetlb: add lockdep_assert_held() calls for hugetlb_lockMike Kravetz
After making hugetlb lock irq safe and separating some functionality done under the lock, add some lockdep_assert_held to help verify locking. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-9-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05hugetlb: make free_huge_page irq safeMike Kravetz
Commit c77c0a8ac4c5 ("mm/hugetlb: defer freeing of huge pages if in non-task context") was added to address the issue of free_huge_page being called from irq context. That commit hands off free_huge_page processing to a workqueue if !in_task. However, this doesn't cover all the cases as pointed out by 0day bot lockdep report [1]. : Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: : : CPU0 CPU1 : ---- ---- : lock(hugetlb_lock); : local_irq_disable(); : lock(slock-AF_INET); : lock(hugetlb_lock); : <Interrupt> : lock(slock-AF_INET); Shakeel has later explained that this is very likely TCP TX zerocopy from hugetlb pages scenario when the networking code drops a last reference to hugetlb page while having IRQ disabled. Hugetlb freeing path doesn't disable IRQ while holding hugetlb_lock so a lock dependency chain can lead to a deadlock. This commit addresses the issue by doing the following: - Make hugetlb_lock irq safe. This is mostly a simple process of changing spin_*lock calls to spin_*lock_irq* calls. - Make subpool lock irq safe in a similar manner. - Revert the !in_task check and workqueue handoff. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/000000000000f1c03b05bc43aadc@google.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-8-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05hugetlb: change free_pool_huge_page to remove_pool_huge_pageMike Kravetz
free_pool_huge_page was called with hugetlb_lock held. It would remove a hugetlb page, and then free the corresponding pages to the lower level allocators such as buddy. free_pool_huge_page was called in a loop to remove hugetlb pages and these loops could hold the hugetlb_lock for a considerable time. Create new routine remove_pool_huge_page to replace free_pool_huge_page. remove_pool_huge_page will remove the hugetlb page, and it must be called with the hugetlb_lock held. It will return the removed page and it is the responsibility of the caller to free the page to the lower level allocators. The hugetlb_lock is dropped before freeing to these allocators which results in shorter lock hold times. Add new helper routine to call update_and_free_page for a list of pages. Note: Some changes to the routine return_unused_surplus_pages are in need of explanation. Commit e5bbc8a6c992 ("mm/hugetlb.c: fix reservation race when freeing surplus pages") modified this routine to address a race which could occur when dropping the hugetlb_lock in the loop that removes pool pages. Accounting changes introduced in that commit were subtle and took some thought to understand. This commit removes the cond_resched_lock() and the potential race. Therefore, remove the subtle code and restore the more straight forward accounting effectively reverting the commit. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-7-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05hugetlb: call update_and_free_page without hugetlb_lockMike Kravetz
With the introduction of remove_hugetlb_page(), there is no need for update_and_free_page to hold the hugetlb lock. Change all callers to drop the lock before calling. With additional code modifications, this will allow loops which decrease the huge page pool to drop the hugetlb_lock with each page to reduce long hold times. The ugly unlock/lock cycle in free_pool_huge_page will be removed in a subsequent patch which restructures free_pool_huge_page. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-6-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05hugetlb: create remove_hugetlb_page() to separate functionalityMike Kravetz
The new remove_hugetlb_page() routine is designed to remove a hugetlb page from hugetlbfs processing. It will remove the page from the active or free list, update global counters and set the compound page destructor to NULL so that PageHuge() will return false for the 'page'. After this call, the 'page' can be treated as a normal compound page or a collection of base size pages. update_and_free_page no longer decrements h->nr_huge_pages{_node} as this is performed in remove_hugetlb_page. The only functionality performed by update_and_free_page is to free the base pages to the lower level allocators. update_and_free_page is typically called after remove_hugetlb_page. remove_hugetlb_page is to be called with the hugetlb_lock held. Creating this routine and separating functionality is in preparation for restructuring code to reduce lock hold times. This commit should not introduce any changes to functionality. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-5-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05hugetlb: add per-hstate mutex to synchronize user adjustmentsMike Kravetz
The helper routine hstate_next_node_to_alloc accesses and modifies the hstate variable next_nid_to_alloc. The helper is used by the routines alloc_pool_huge_page and adjust_pool_surplus. adjust_pool_surplus is called with hugetlb_lock held. However, alloc_pool_huge_page can not be called with the hugetlb lock held as it will call the page allocator. Two instances of alloc_pool_huge_page could be run in parallel or alloc_pool_huge_page could run in parallel with adjust_pool_surplus which may result in the variable next_nid_to_alloc becoming invalid for the caller and pages being allocated on the wrong node. Both alloc_pool_huge_page and adjust_pool_surplus are only called from the routine set_max_huge_pages after boot. set_max_huge_pages is only called as the reusult of a user writing to the proc/sysfs nr_hugepages, or nr_hugepages_mempolicy file to adjust the number of hugetlb pages. It makes little sense to allow multiple adjustment to the number of hugetlb pages in parallel. Add a mutex to the hstate and use it to only allow one hugetlb page adjustment at a time. This will synchronize modifications to the next_nid_to_alloc variable. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-4-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05hugetlb: no need to drop hugetlb_lock to call cma_releaseMike Kravetz
Now that cma_release is non-blocking and irq safe, there is no need to drop hugetlb_lock before calling. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-3-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05mm/hugeltb: handle the error case in hugetlb_fix_reserve_counts()Miaohe Lin
A rare out of memory error would prevent removal of the reserve map region for a page. hugetlb_fix_reserve_counts() handles this rare case to avoid dangling with incorrect counts. Unfortunately, hugepage_subpool_get_pages and hugetlb_acct_memory could possibly fail too. We should correctly handle these cases. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210410072348.20437-5-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: b5cec28d36f5 ("hugetlbfs: truncate_hugepages() takes a range of pages") Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Feilong Lin <linfeilong@huawei.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05mm/hugeltb: clarify (chg - freed) won't go negative in hugetlb_unreserve_pages()Miaohe Lin
The resv_map could be NULL since this routine can be called in the evict inode path for all hugetlbfs inodes and we will have chg = 0 in this case. But (chg - freed) won't go negative as Mike pointed out: "If resv_map is NULL, then no hugetlb pages can be allocated/associated with the file. As a result, remove_inode_hugepages will never find any huge pages associated with the inode and the passed value 'freed' will always be zero." Add a comment clarifying this to make it clear and also avoid confusion. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210410072348.20437-4-linmiaohe@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Feilong Lin <linfeilong@huawei.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05mm/hugeltb: simplify the return code of __vma_reservation_common()Miaohe Lin
It's guaranteed that the vma is associated with a resv_map, i.e. either VM_MAYSHARE or HPAGE_RESV_OWNER, when the code reaches here or we would have returned via !resv check above. So it's unneeded to check whether HPAGE_RESV_OWNER is set here. Simplify the return code to make it more clear. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210410072348.20437-3-linmiaohe@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Feilong Lin <linfeilong@huawei.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05mm/hugeltb: remove redundant VM_BUG_ON() in region_add()Miaohe Lin
Patch series "Cleanup and fixup for hugetlb", v2. This series contains cleanups to remove redundant VM_BUG_ON() and simplify the return code. Also this handles the error case in hugetlb_fix_reserve_counts() correctly. More details can be found in the respective changelogs. This patch (of 5): The same VM_BUG_ON() check is already done in the callee. Remove this extra one to simplify the code slightly. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210410072348.20437-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210410072348.20437-2-linmiaohe@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Feilong Lin <linfeilong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05mm/hugetlb: simplify the code when alloc_huge_page() failed in hugetlb_no_page()Miaohe Lin
Rework the error handling code when alloc_huge_page() failed to remove some duplicated code and simplify the code slightly. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210308112809.26107-5-linmiaohe@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05mm/hugetlb: optimize the surplus state transfer code in move_hugetlb_state()Miaohe Lin
We should not transfer the per-node surplus state when we do not cross the node in order to save some cpu cycles Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210308112809.26107-3-linmiaohe@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05mm/hugetlb: use some helper functions to cleanup codeMiaohe Lin
Patch series "Some cleanups for hugetlb". This series contains cleanups to remove unnecessary VM_BUG_ON_PAGE, use helper function and so on. I also collect some previous patches into this series in case they are forgotten. This patch (of 5): We could use pages_per_huge_page to get the number of pages per hugepage, use get_hstate_idx to calculate hstate index, and use hstate_is_gigantic to check if a hstate is gigantic to make code more succinct. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210308112809.26107-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210308112809.26107-2-linmiaohe@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05mm/hugetlb: remove redundant reservation check condition in alloc_huge_page()Miaohe Lin
vma_resv_map(vma) checks if a reserve map is associated with the vma. The routine vma_needs_reservation() will check vma_resv_map(vma) and return 1 if no reserv map is present. map_chg is set to the return value of vma_needs_reservation(). Therefore, !vma_resv_map(vma) is redundant in the expression: map_chg || avoid_reserve || !vma_resv_map(vma); Remove the redundant check. [Thanks Mike Kravetz for reshaping this commit message!] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301104726.45159-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05hugetlb/userfaultfd: unshare all pmds for hugetlbfs when register wpPeter Xu
Huge pmd sharing for hugetlbfs is racy with userfaultfd-wp because userfaultfd-wp is always based on pgtable entries, so they cannot be shared. Walk the hugetlb range and unshare all such mappings if there is, right before UFFDIO_REGISTER will succeed and return to userspace. This will pair with want_pmd_share() in hugetlb code so that huge pmd sharing is completely disabled for userfaultfd-wp registered range. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210218231206.15524-1-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05mm/hugetlb: move flush_hugetlb_tlb_range() into hugetlb.hPeter Xu
Prepare for it to be called outside of mm/hugetlb.c. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210218231204.15474-1-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05hugetlb/userfaultfd: forbid huge pmd sharing when uffd enabledPeter Xu
Huge pmd sharing could bring problem to userfaultfd. The thing is that userfaultfd is running its logic based on the special bits on page table entries, however the huge pmd sharing could potentially share page table entries for different address ranges. That could cause issues on either: - When sharing huge pmd page tables for an uffd write protected range, the newly mapped huge pmd range will also be write protected unexpectedly, or, - When we try to write protect a range of huge pmd shared range, we'll first do huge_pmd_unshare() in hugetlb_change_protection(), however that also means the UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT could be silently skipped for the shared region, which could lead to data loss. While at it, a few other things are done altogether: - Move want_pmd_share() from mm/hugetlb.c into linux/hugetlb.h, because that's definitely something that arch code would like to use too - ARM64 currently directly check against CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE when trying to share huge pmd. Switch to the want_pmd_share() helper. - Move vma_shareable() from huge_pmd_share() into want_pmd_share(). [peterx@redhat.com: fix build with !ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210310185359.88297-1-peterx@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210218231202.15426-1-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05hugetlb: pass vma into huge_pte_alloc() and huge_pmd_share()Peter Xu
Patch series "hugetlb: Disable huge pmd unshare for uffd-wp", v4. This series tries to disable huge pmd unshare of hugetlbfs backed memory for uffd-wp. Although uffd-wp of hugetlbfs is still during rfc stage, the idea of this series may be needed for multiple tasks (Axel's uffd minor fault series, and Mike's soft dirty series), so I picked it out from the larger series. This patch (of 4): It is a preparation work to be able to behave differently in the per architecture huge_pte_alloc() according to different VMA attributes. Pass it deeper into huge_pmd_share() so that we can avoid the find_vma() call. [peterx@redhat.com: build fix] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210304164653.GB397383@xz-x1Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210218230633.15028-1-peterx@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210218230633.15028-2-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Suggested-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-04-30mm/page_alloc: combine __alloc_pages and __alloc_pages_nodemaskMatthew Wilcox (Oracle)
There are only two callers of __alloc_pages() so prune the thicket of alloc_page variants by combining the two functions together. Current callers of __alloc_pages() simply add an extra 'NULL' parameter and current callers of __alloc_pages_nodemask() call __alloc_pages() instead. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210225150642.2582252-4-willy@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-03-25hugetlb_cgroup: fix imbalanced css_get and css_put pair for shared mappingsMiaohe Lin
The current implementation of hugetlb_cgroup for shared mappings could have different behavior. Consider the following two scenarios: 1.Assume initial css reference count of hugetlb_cgroup is 1: 1.1 Call hugetlb_reserve_pages with from = 1, to = 2. So css reference count is 2 associated with 1 file_region. 1.2 Call hugetlb_reserve_pages with from = 2, to = 3. So css reference count is 3 associated with 2 file_region. 1.3 coalesce_file_region will coalesce these two file_regions into one. So css reference count is 3 associated with 1 file_region now. 2.Assume initial css reference count of hugetlb_cgroup is 1 again: 2.1 Call hugetlb_reserve_pages with from = 1, to = 3. So css reference count is 2 associated with 1 file_region. Therefore, we might have one file_region while holding one or more css reference counts. This inconsistency could lead to imbalanced css_get() and css_put() pair. If we do css_put one by one (i.g. hole punch case), scenario 2 would put one more css reference. If we do css_put all together (i.g. truncate case), scenario 1 will leak one css reference. The imbalanced css_get() and css_put() pair would result in a non-zero reference when we try to destroy the hugetlb cgroup. The hugetlb cgroup directory is removed __but__ associated resource is not freed. This might result in OOM or can not create a new hugetlb cgroup in a busy workload ultimately. In order to fix this, we have to make sure that one file_region must hold exactly one css reference. So in coalesce_file_region case, we should release one css reference before coalescence. Also only put css reference when the entire file_region is removed. The last thing to note is that the caller of region_add() will only hold one reference to h_cg->css for the whole contiguous reservation region. But this area might be scattered when there are already some file_regions reside in it. As a result, many file_regions may share only one h_cg->css reference. In order to ensure that one file_region must hold exactly one css reference, we should do css_get() for each file_region and release the reference held by caller when they are done. [linmiaohe@huawei.com: fix imbalanced css_get and css_put pair for shared mappings] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210316023002.53921-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301120540.37076-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: 075a61d07a8e ("hugetlb_cgroup: add accounting for shared mappings") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> (auto build test ERROR) Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-03-13hugetlb: do early cow when page pinned on src mmPeter Xu
This is the last missing piece of the COW-during-fork effort when there're pinned pages found. One can reference 70e806e4e645 ("mm: Do early cow for pinned pages during fork() for ptes", 2020-09-27) for more information, since we do similar things here rather than pte this time, but just for hugetlb. Note that after Jason's recent work on 57efa1fe5957 ("mm/gup: prevent gup_fast from racing with COW during fork", 2020-12-15) which is safer and easier to understand, we're safe now within the whole copy_page_range() against gup-fast, we don't need the wr-protect trick that proposed in 70e806e4e645 anymore. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210217233547.93892-6-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Cc: Gal Pressman <galpress@amazon.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com> Cc: VMware Graphics <linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com> Cc: Wei Zhang <wzam@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-03-13mm: use is_cow_mapping() across tree where properPeter Xu
After is_cow_mapping() is exported in mm.h, replace some manual checks elsewhere throughout the tree but start to use the new helper. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210217233547.93892-5-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: VMware Graphics <linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com> Cc: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Cc: Gal Pressman <galpress@amazon.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Wei Zhang <wzam@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-03-13hugetlb: break earlier in add_reservation_in_range() when we canPeter Xu
All the regions maintained in hugetlb reserved map is inclusive on "from" but exclusive on "to". We can break earlier even if rg->from==t because it already means no possible intersection. This does not need a Fixes in all cases because when it happens (rg->from==t) we'll not break out of the loop while we should, however the next thing we'd do is still add the last file_region we'd need and quit the loop in the next round. So this change is not a bugfix (since the old code should still run okay iiuc), but we'd better still touch it up to make it logically sane. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210217233547.93892-3-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Cc: Gal Pressman <galpress@amazon.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com> Cc: VMware Graphics <linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com> Cc: Wei Zhang <wzam@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-03-13hugetlb: dedup the code to add a new file_regionPeter Xu
Patch series "mm/hugetlb: Early cow on fork, and a few cleanups", v5. As reported by Gal [1], we still miss the code clip to handle early cow for hugetlb case, which is true. Again, it still feels odd to fork() after using a few huge pages, especially if they're privately mapped to me.. However I do agree with Gal and Jason in that we should still have that since that'll complete the early cow on fork effort at least, and it'll still fix issues where buffers are not well under control and not easy to apply MADV_DONTFORK. The first two patches (1-2) are some cleanups I noticed when reading into the hugetlb reserve map code. I think it's good to have but they're not necessary for fixing the fork issue. The last two patches (3-4) are the real fix. I tested this with a fork() after some vfio-pci assignment, so I'm pretty sure the page copy path could trigger well (page will be accounted right after the fork()), but I didn't do data check since the card I assigned is some random nic. https://github.com/xzpeter/linux/tree/fork-cow-pin-huge [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/27564187-4a08-f187-5a84-3df50009f6ca@amazon.com/ Introduce hugetlb_resv_map_add() helper to add a new file_region rather than duplication the similar code twice in add_reservation_in_range(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210217233547.93892-1-peterx@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210217233547.93892-2-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Gal Pressman <galpress@amazon.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Wei Zhang <wzam@amazon.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com> Cc: VMware Graphics <linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24mm/hugetlb: change hugetlb_reserve_pages() to type boolMike Kravetz
While reviewing a bug in hugetlb_reserve_pages, it was noticed that all callers ignore the return value. Any failure is considered an ENOMEM error by the callers. Change the function to be of type bool. The function will return true if the reservation was successful, false otherwise. Callers currently assume a zero return code indicates success. Change the callers to look for true to indicate success. No functional change, only code cleanup. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201221192542.15732-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24hugetlb: fix uninitialized subpool pointerMike Kravetz
Gerald Schaefer reported a panic on s390 in hugepage_subpool_put_pages() with linux-next 5.12.0-20210222. Call trace: hugepage_subpool_put_pages.part.0+0x2c/0x138 __free_huge_page+0xce/0x310 alloc_pool_huge_page+0x102/0x120 set_max_huge_pages+0x13e/0x350 hugetlb_sysctl_handler_common+0xd8/0x110 hugetlb_sysctl_handler+0x48/0x58 proc_sys_call_handler+0x138/0x238 new_sync_write+0x10e/0x198 vfs_write.part.0+0x12c/0x238 ksys_write+0x68/0xf8 do_syscall+0x82/0xd0 __do_syscall+0xb4/0xc8 system_call+0x72/0x98 This is a result of the change which moved the hugetlb page subpool pointer from page->private to page[1]->private. When new pages are allocated from the buddy allocator, the private field of the head page will be cleared, but the private field of subpages is not modified. Therefore, old values may remain. Fix by initializing hugetlb page subpool pointer in prep_new_huge_page(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210223215544.313871-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Fixes: f1280272ae4d ("hugetlb: use page.private for hugetlb specific page flags") Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reported-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24hugetlb: convert PageHugeFreed to HPageFreed flagMike Kravetz
Use new hugetlb specific HPageFreed flag to replace the PageHugeFreed interfaces. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210122195231.324857-6-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24hugetlb: convert PageHugeTemporary() to HPageTemporary flagMike Kravetz
Use new hugetlb specific HPageTemporary flag to replace the PageHugeTemporary() interfaces. PageHugeTemporary does contain a PageHuge() check. However, this interface is only used within hugetlb code where we know we are dealing with a hugetlb page. Therefore, the check can be eliminated. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210122195231.324857-5-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24hugetlb: convert page_huge_active() HPageMigratable flagMike Kravetz
Use the new hugetlb page specific flag HPageMigratable to replace the page_huge_active interfaces. By it's name, page_huge_active implied that a huge page was on the active list. However, that is not really what code checking the flag wanted to know. It really wanted to determine if the huge page could be migrated. This happens when the page is actually added to the page cache and/or task page table. This is the reasoning behind the name change. The VM_BUG_ON_PAGE() calls in the *_huge_active() interfaces are not really necessary as we KNOW the page is a hugetlb page. Therefore, they are removed. The routine page_huge_active checked for PageHeadHuge before testing the active bit. This is unnecessary in the case where we hold a reference or lock and know it is a hugetlb head page. page_huge_active is also called without holding a reference or lock (scan_movable_pages), and can race with code freeing the page. The extra check in page_huge_active shortened the race window, but did not prevent the race. Offline code calling scan_movable_pages already deals with these races, so removing the check is acceptable. Add comment to racy code. [songmuchun@bytedance.com: remove set_page_huge_active() declaration from include/linux/hugetlb.h] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAMZfGtUda+KoAZscU0718TN61cSFwp4zy=y2oZ=+6Z2TAZZwng@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210122195231.324857-3-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24hugetlb: use page.private for hugetlb specific page flagsMike Kravetz
Patch series "create hugetlb flags to consolidate state", v3. While discussing a series of hugetlb fixes in [1], it became evident that the hugetlb specific page state information is stored in a somewhat haphazard manner. Code dealing with state information would be easier to read, understand and maintain if this information was stored in a consistent manner. This series uses page.private of the hugetlb head page for storing a set of hugetlb specific page flags. Routines are priovided for test, set and clear of the flags. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210106084739.63318-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com This patch (of 4): As hugetlbfs evolved, state information about hugetlb pages was added. One 'convenient' way of doing this was to use available fields in tail pages. Over time, it has become difficult to know the meaning or contents of fields simply by looking at a small bit of code. Sometimes, the naming is just confusing. For example: The PagePrivate flag indicates a huge page reservation was consumed and needs to be restored if an error is encountered and the page is freed before it is instantiated. The page.private field contains the pointer to a subpool if the page is associated with one. In an effort to make the code more readable, use page.private to contain hugetlb specific page flags. These flags will have test, set and clear functions similar to those used for 'normal' page flags. More importantly, an enum of flag values will be created with names that actually reflect their purpose. In this patch, - Create infrastructure for hugetlb specific page flag functions - Move subpool pointer to page[1].private to make way for flags Create routines with meaningful names to modify subpool field - Use new HPageRestoreReserve flag instead of PagePrivate Conversion of other state information will happen in subsequent patches. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210122195231.324857-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210122195231.324857-2-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24mm/hugetlb: suppress wrong warning info when alloc gigantic pageChen Wandun
If hugetlb_cma is enabled, it will skip boot time allocation when allocating gigantic page, that doesn't means allocation failure, so suppress this warning info. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210219123909.13130-1-chenwandun@huawei.com Fixes: cf11e85fc08c ("mm: hugetlb: optionally allocate gigantic hugepages using cma") Signed-off-by: Chen Wandun <chenwandun@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24hugetlb: fix update_and_free_page contig page struct assumptionMike Kravetz
page structs are not guaranteed to be contiguous for gigantic pages. The routine update_and_free_page can encounter a gigantic page, yet it assumes page structs are contiguous when setting page flags in subpages. If update_and_free_page encounters non-contiguous page structs, we can see “BUG: Bad page state in process …” errors. Non-contiguous page structs are generally not an issue. However, they can exist with a specific kernel configuration and hotplug operations. For example: Configure the kernel with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM and !CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP. Then, hotplug add memory for the area where the gigantic page will be allocated. Zi Yan outlined steps to reproduce here [1]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/16F7C58B-4D79-41C5-9B64-A1A1628F4AF2@nvidia.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210217184926.33567-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Fixes: 944d9fec8d7a ("hugetlb: add support for gigantic page allocation at runtime") Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24mm/hugetlb: use helper huge_page_size() to get hugepage sizeMiaohe Lin
We can use helper huge_page_size() to get the hugepage size directly to simplify the code slightly. [linmiaohe@huawei.com: use helper huge_page_size() to get hugepage size] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210209021803.49211-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210208082450.15716-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24mm/hugetlb: remove unnecessary VM_BUG_ON_PAGE on putback_active_hugepage()Miaohe Lin
All callers know they are operating on a hugetlb head page. So this VM_BUG_ON_PAGE can not catch anything useful. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210209071151.44731-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24mm/hugetlb: use helper function range_in_vma() in page_table_shareable()Miaohe Lin
We could use helper function range_in_vma() to check whether the vma is in the desired range to simplify the code. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210204112949.43051-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24mm/hugetlb.c: fix typos in commentsZhiyuan Dai
Fix typo in comment. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1612256106-9436-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn Signed-off-by: Zhiyuan Dai <daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24mm/hugetlb: remove redundant check in preparing and destroying gigantic pageYanfei Xu
Gigantic page is a compound page and its order is more than 1. Thus it must be available for hpage_pincount. Let's remove the redundant check for gigantic page. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210202112002.73170-1-yanfei.xu@windriver.com Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24mm/hugetlb: fix some comment typosMiaohe Lin
Fix typos sasitfy to satisfy, reservtion to reservation, hugegpage to hugepage and uniprocesor to uniprocessor in comments. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210128112028.64831-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24mm/hugetlb: refactor subpage recordingJoao Martins
For a given hugepage backing a VA, there's a rather ineficient loop which is solely responsible for storing subpages in GUP @pages/@vmas array. For each subpage we check whether it's within range or size of @pages and keep increment @pfn_offset and a couple other variables per subpage iteration. Simplify this logic and minimize the cost of each iteration to just store the output page/vma. Instead of incrementing number of @refs iteratively, we do it through pre-calculation of @refs and only with a tight loop for storing pinned subpages/vmas. Additionally, retain existing behaviour with using mem_map_offset() when recording the subpages for configurations that don't have a contiguous mem_map. pinning consequently improves bringing us close to {pin,get}_user_pages_fast: - 16G with 1G huge page size gup_test -f /mnt/huge/file -m 16384 -r 30 -L -S -n 512 -w PIN_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK: ~12.8k us -> ~5.8k us PIN_FAST_BENCHMARK: ~3.7k us Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210128182632.24562-3-joao.m.martins@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24mm/hugetlb: grab head page refcount once for group of subpagesJoao Martins
Patch series "mm/hugetlb: follow_hugetlb_page() improvements", v2. While looking at ZONE_DEVICE struct page reuse particularly the last patch[0], I found two possible improvements for follow_hugetlb_page() which is solely used for get_user_pages()/pin_user_pages(). The first patch batches page refcount updates while the second tidies up storing the subpages/vmas. Both together bring the cost of slow variant of gup() cost from ~87.6k usecs to ~5.8k usecs. libhugetlbfs tests seem to pass as well gup_test benchmarks with hugetlbfs vmas. This patch (of 2): follow_hugetlb_page() once it locks the pmd/pud, checks all its N subpages in a huge page and grabs a reference for each one. Similar to gup-fast, have follow_hugetlb_page() grab the head page refcount only after counting all its subpages that are part of the just faulted huge page. Consequently we reduce the number of atomics necessary to pin said huge page, which improves non-fast gup() considerably: - 16G with 1G huge page size gup_test -f /mnt/huge/file -m 16384 -r 10 -L -S -n 512 -w PIN_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK: ~87.6k us -> ~12.8k us Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210128182632.24562-1-joao.m.martins@oracle.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210128182632.24562-2-joao.m.martins@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24mm/hugetlb: simplify the calculation of variablesJiapeng Zhong
Fix the following coccicheck warnings: mm/hugetlb.c:3372:20-22: WARNING !A || A && B is equivalent to !A || B. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1611643468-52233-1-git-send-email-abaci-bugfix@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Zhong <abaci-bugfix@linux.alibaba.com> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24mm/hugetlb: fix use after free when subpool max_hpages accounting is not enabledMiaohe Lin
If a hugetlbfs filesystem is created with the min_size option and without the size option, used_hpages is always 0 and might lead to release subpool prematurely because it indicates no pages are used now while there might be. In order to fix this issue, we should check used_hpages == 0 iff max_hpages accounting is enabled. As max_hpages accounting should be enabled in most common case, this is not worth a Cc stable. [mike.kravetz@oracle.com: new changelog] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210126115510.53374-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Hongxiang Lou <louhongxiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24mm/hugetlb: use helper huge_page_order and pages_per_huge_pageMiaohe Lin
Since commit a5516438959d ("hugetlb: modular state for hugetlb page size"), we can use huge_page_order to access hstate->order and pages_per_huge_page to fetch the pages per huge page. But gather_bootmem_prealloc() forgot to use it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210114114435.40075-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24mm/hugetlb: avoid unnecessary hugetlb_acct_memory() callMiaohe Lin
When reservation accounting remains unchanged, hugetlb_acct_memory() will do nothing except holding and releasing hugetlb_lock. We should avoid this unnecessary hugetlb_lock lock/unlock cycle which is happening on 'most' hugetlb munmap operations by check delta against 0 at the beginning of hugetlb_acct_memory. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210115092013.61012-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24mm/hugetlb.c: fix unnecessary address expansion of pmd sharingLi Xinhai
The current code would unnecessarily expand the address range. Consider one example, (start, end) = (1G-2M, 3G+2M), and (vm_start, vm_end) = (1G-4M, 3G+4M), the expected adjustment should be keep (1G-2M, 3G+2M) without expand. But the current result will be (1G-4M, 3G+4M). Actually, the range (1G-4M, 1G) and (3G, 3G+4M) would never been involved in pmd sharing. After this patch, we will check that the vma span at least one PUD aligned size and the start,end range overlap the aligned range of vma. With above example, the aligned vma range is (1G, 3G), so if (start, end) range is within (1G-4M, 1G), or within (3G, 3G+4M), then no adjustment to both start and end. Otherwise, we will have chance to adjust start downwards or end upwards without exceeding (vm_start, vm_end). Mike: : The 'adjusted range' is used for calls to mmu notifiers and cache(tlb) : flushing. Since the current code unnecessarily expands the range in some : cases, more entries than necessary would be flushed. This would/could : result in performance degradation. However, this is highly dependent on : the user runtime. Is there a combination of vma layout and calls to : actually hit this issue? If the issue is hit, will those entries : unnecessarily flushed be used again and need to be unnecessarily reloaded? Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210104081631.2921415-1-lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com Fixes: 75802ca66354 ("mm/hugetlb: fix calculation of adjust_range_if_pmd_sharing_possible") Signed-off-by: Li Xinhai <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-24mm/hugetlb: fix potential double free in hugetlb_register_node() error pathMiaohe Lin
In hugetlb_sysfs_add_hstate(), we would do kobject_put() on hstate_kobjs when failed to create sysfs group but forget to set hstate_kobjs to NULL. Then in hugetlb_register_node() error path, we may free it again via hugetlb_unregister_node(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210107123249.36964-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: a3437870160c ("hugetlb: new sysfs interface") Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <smuchun@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-21Merge tag 'core-mm-2021-02-17' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull tlb gather updates from Ingo Molnar: "Theses fix MM (soft-)dirty bit management in the procfs code & clean up the TLB gather API" * tag 'core-mm-2021-02-17' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/ldt: Use tlb_gather_mmu_fullmm() when freeing LDT page-tables tlb: arch: Remove empty __tlb_remove_tlb_entry() stubs tlb: mmu_gather: Remove start/end arguments from tlb_gather_mmu() tlb: mmu_gather: Introduce tlb_gather_mmu_fullmm() tlb: mmu_gather: Remove unused start/end arguments from tlb_finish_mmu() mm: proc: Invalidate TLB after clearing soft-dirty page state
2021-02-05mm: hugetlb: fix missing put_page in gather_surplus_pages()Muchun Song
The VM_BUG_ON_PAGE avoids the generation of any code, even if that expression has side-effects when !CONFIG_DEBUG_VM. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210126031009.96266-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com Fixes: e5dfacebe4a4 ("mm/hugetlb.c: just use put_page_testzero() instead of page_count()") Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>