| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This just causes kernel-doc to complain at this spot, but
isn't actually needed anyway, so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230827135854.33a5591dfdeb.If4e7e1a1cb4c04f0afd83db7401c780404dca699@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
The sta info needs to be inserted before its links may be modified.
Add a few warnings to prevent accidental usage of these functions.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230827135854.eeb43b3cc9e3.I5fd8236f70e64bf6268f33c883f7a878d963b83e@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
This function will be used by the kunit tests within cfg80211. As it
is generally useful, move it from mac80211 to cfg80211.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230827135854.5af9391659f5.Ie534ed6591ba02be8572d4d7242394f29e3af04b@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
Add a unit test for the parsing of a fragmented sta profile
sub-element inside a fragmented multi-link element.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230827135854.333bc75df13f.I0ddfeb6a88a4d89e7c7850e8ef45a4b19b5a061a@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
Add a couple of tests for element defragmentation, to
see that the function works correctly.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230827135854.e2a5cead1816.I09f0edc19d162b54ee330991c728c1e9aa42ebf6@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
If a fragment is the last element, it's erroneously not
accepted. Fix that.
Fixes: f837a653a097 ("wifi: cfg80211: add element defragmentation helper")
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230827135854.adca9fbd3317.I6b2df45eb71513f3e48efd196ae3cddec362dc1c@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
This allows to finalize the CSA per link.
In case the switch didn't work, tear down the MLD connection.
Also pass the ieee80211_bss_conf to post_channel_switch to let the
driver know which link completed the switch.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230828130311.3d3eacc88436.Ic2d14e2285aa1646216a56806cfd4a8d0054437c@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
Many regulatories can have HE/EHT Operation as not permitted. In such
cases, AP should not be allowed to start if it is using a channel
having the no operation flag set. However, currently there is no such
check in place.
Fix this issue by validating such IEs sent during start AP against the
channel flags.
Signed-off-by: Aditya Kumar Singh <quic_adisi@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230905064857.1503-1-quic_adisi@quicinc.com
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
When connect to MLO AP with more than one link, and the assoc response of
AP is not success, then cfg80211_unhold_bss() is not called for all the
links' cfg80211_bss except the primary link which means the link used by
the latest successful association request. Thus the hold value of the
cfg80211_bss is not reset to 0 after the assoc fail, and then the
__cfg80211_unlink_bss() will not be called for the cfg80211_bss by
__cfg80211_bss_expire().
Then the AP always looks exist even the AP is shutdown or reconfigured
to another type, then it will lead error while connecting it again.
The detail info are as below.
When connect with muti-links AP, cfg80211_hold_bss() is called by
cfg80211_mlme_assoc() for each cfg80211_bss of all the links. When
assoc response from AP is not success(such as status_code==1), the
ieee80211_link_data of non-primary link(sdata->link[link_id]) is NULL
because ieee80211_assoc_success()->ieee80211_vif_update_links() is
not called for the links.
Then struct cfg80211_rx_assoc_resp resp in cfg80211_rx_assoc_resp() and
struct cfg80211_connect_resp_params cr in __cfg80211_connect_result()
will only have the data of the primary link, and finally function
cfg80211_connect_result_release_bsses() only call cfg80211_unhold_bss()
for the primary link. Then cfg80211_bss of the other links will never free
because its hold is always > 0 now.
Hence assign value for the bss and status from assoc_data since it is
valid for this case. Also assign value of addr from assoc_data when the
link is NULL because the addrs of assoc_data and link both represent the
local link addr and they are same value for success connection.
Fixes: 81151ce462e5 ("wifi: mac80211: support MLO authentication/association with one link")
Signed-off-by: Wen Gong <quic_wgong@quicinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230825070055.28164-1-quic_wgong@quicinc.com
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
In mesh_fast_tx_flush_addr() we already hold the lock, so
don't need additional hashtable RCU protection. Use the
rhashtable_lookup_fast() variant to avoid RCU protection
warnings.
Fixes: d5edb9ae8d56 ("wifi: mac80211: mesh fast xmit support")
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
There were are a number of cases in mac80211 and iwlwifi (at
least) that used the sband->iftype_data pointer directly,
instead of using the accessors to find the right array entry
to use.
Make sparse warn when such a thing is done.
To not have a lot of casts, add two helper functions/macros
- ieee80211_set_sband_iftype_data()
- for_each_sband_iftype_data()
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
As previously reported by Alexander, whose commit 69403bad97aa
("wifi: mac80211: sdata can be NULL during AMPDU start") I'm
reverting as part of this commit, there's a race between station
destruction and aggregation setup, where the aggregation setup
can happen while the station is being removed and queue the work
after ieee80211_sta_tear_down_BA_sessions() has already run in
__sta_info_destroy_part1(), and thus the worker will run with a
now freed station. In his case, this manifested in a NULL sdata
pointer, but really there's no guarantee whatsoever.
The real issue seems to be that it's possible at all to have a
situation where this occurs - we want to stop the BA sessions
when doing _part1, but we cannot be sure, and WLAN_STA_BLOCK_BA
isn't necessarily effective since we don't know that the setup
isn't concurrently running and already got past the check.
Simply call ieee80211_sta_tear_down_BA_sessions() again in the
second part of station destruction, since at that point really
nothing else can hold a reference to the station any more.
Also revert the sdata checks since those are just misleading at
this point.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
We currently call ieee80211_txq_teardown_flows() as part
of ieee80211_remove_interfaces(), but that's not really
right in case of HW registration failures, specifically
rate control. Call it separately to fix that issue.
Reported-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
Since we're now protecting everything with the wiphy mutex
(and were really using it for almost everything before),
there's no longer any real reason to have a separate wdev
mutex. It may feel better, but really has no value.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
Drivers might plausibly want to have this, but also the
locking assertions will need it later.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
We now hold the wiphy mutex everywhere that we use or
needed the iflist_mtx, so we don't need this mutex any
more in mac80211. However, drivers may also iterate,
and in some cases (e.g. mt76) do so from high-priority
contexts. Thus, keep the mutex around but remove its
usage in mac80211 apart from those driver-visible parts
that are still needed.
Most of this change was done automatically with spatch,
with the parts that are still needed as described above
reverted manually.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
We now hold the wiphy mutex everywhere that we use or
needed the local->mtx, so we don't need this mutex any
more. Remove it.
Most of this change was done automatically with spatch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
We now hold the wiphy mutex everywhere that we use or
needed the A-MPDU locking, so we don't need this mutex
any more. Remove it.
Most of this change was done automatically with spatch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
We now hold the wiphy mutex everywhere that we use or
needed the chanctx_mtx, so we don't need this mutex any
more. Remove it.
Most of this change was done automatically with spatch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
We now hold the wiphy mutex everywhere that we use or
needed the key_mtx, so we don't need this mutex any
more. Remove it.
Most of this change was done automatically with spatch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
We now hold the wiphy mutex everywhere that we use or
needed the sta_mtx, so we don't need this mutex any
more. Remove it.
Most of this change was done automatically with spatch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
We want to ensure everything holds the wiphy lock,
so also extend that to the MAC change callback.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
We want to extend the wiphy locking to the interface list,
so move that into the section locked with the wiphy lock.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
We want to replace the locking in mac80211 by just the wiphy
mutex, so hold the lock here around concurrency checks for
the future where the chanctx_mtx used inside goes away.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
We should hold the wiphy mutex here since we're going
to call the driver and want to remove the sta_mtx.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
This might seem pretty pointless rather than changing the locking
immediately, but it seems safer to run for a while with checks and
the old locking scheme, and then remove the wdev lock later.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
We have the RTNL here for the iteration, but we need to lock
each wiphy separately as well for using its data. Hold the
wiphy lock for all of the ones in the iteration. Note that
this implies we cannot already hold the wiphy mutex for the
wiphy passed by the argument, but that's true now.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
Since we will want to remove the wdev lock in the future,
lock the wiphy here to iterate and for checking the status
of the connections.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
Since we will want to remove the wdev lock in the future,
lock the wiphy here to iterate and check the flags.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
Check that we hold the wiphy mutex in the ops when
calling the driver, since we're now on our way to
always hold it, and simplify the locking.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
Again this should be per link and will get cancellation
issues, move it to a wiphy work.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
This work should be made per link as well, and then
will have cancellation issues. Moving it to a wiphy
work already fixes those beforehand.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
This again is intended for future cleanups that are
possible when mac80211 and drivers can assume the
wiphy is locked.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
One more work that will now execute with the wiphy
locked, for future cleanups.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
This way we hold the wiphy mutex there, as a step towards
removing some of the additional locks we have.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
Again, to have the wiphy locked for it.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
This also has the wiphy locked here then. We need to use
the _locked version of cfg80211_sched_scan_stopped() now,
which also fixes an old deadlock there.
Fixes: a05829a7222e ("cfg80211: avoid holding the RTNL when calling the driver")
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
Along with everything else, move the dynamic PS work
to be a wiphy work, to simplify locking later.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
We want to have the wiphy locked for these as well,
so move it to be a wiphy work.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
Make the offchannel works wiphy works to have the
wiphy locked for executing them.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
Lock the wiphy in the IP address notifier as another
place that should have it locked before calling into
the driver. This needs a bit of attention since the
notifier can be called while the wiphy is already
locked, when we remove an interface. Handle this by
not running the notifier in this case, and instead
calling out to the driver directly.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
Again this serves to simplify the locking in mac80211
in the future, since this is a relatively complex work.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
Move the scan work to wiphy work, which also simplifies
the way we handle the work vs. the scan configuration.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
Move the radar detect work to wiphy work in order
to lock the wiphy for it without doing it manually.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
Move the DFS CAC work over to hold the wiphy lock
there without worry about work cancellation.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
Add more might_sleep() checks and check sdata-in-driver
for one additional place.
type=feature
ticket=jira:WIFI-314309
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
Convert the A-MPDU work to wiphy work so it holds the
wiphy mutex and we can later guarantee that to drivers.
It might seem that we could run these concurrently for
different stations, but they're all on the ordered
mac80211 workqueue, so this shouldn't matter for that.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
Before converting more works to wiphy work, add
flushing in mac80211 where we also flush the
mac80211 workqueue. Not needed in suspend since
cfg80211 will have taken care of it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
There may be sometimes reasons to actually run the work
if it's pending, add flush functions for both regular and
delayed wiphy work that will do this.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
Add a new "for_each_rdev()" macro and check that we
hold the RTNL when calling it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
