summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2013-07-15ext4: fix error handling in ext4_ext_truncate()Theodore Ts'o
Previously ext4_ext_truncate() was ignoring potential error returns from ext4_es_remove_extent() and ext4_ext_remove_space(). This can lead to the on-diks extent tree and the extent status tree cache getting out of sync, which is particuarlly bad, and can lead to file system corruption and potential data loss. Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2013-07-15ARM i.MX53: mba53: Fix PWM backlight DT nodeLaurent Pinchart
The i.MX53 PWM controller uses two cells to describe the PWM specifier. Remove the extra unused values from the backlight DT node pwms property. Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
2013-07-15ARM: imx: fix vf610 enet module clock selectionShawn Guo
The fec/enet driver calculates MDC rate with the formula below. ref_freq / ((MII_SPEED + 1) x 2) The ref_freq here is the fec internal module clock, which is missing from clk-vf610 clock driver right now. And clk-vf610 driver mistakenly supplies RMII clock (50 MHz) as the source to fec. This results in the situation that fec driver gets ref_freq as 50 MHz, while physically it runs at 66 MHz (fec module clock physically sources from ipg which runs at 66 MHz). That's why software expects MDC runs at 2.5 MHz, while the measurement tells it runs at 3.3 MHz. And this causes the PHY KSZ8041 keeps swithing between Full and Half mode as below. libphy: 400d0000.etherne:00 - Link is Up - 100/Full libphy: 400d0000.etherne:00 - Link is Up - 100/Half libphy: 400d0000.etherne:00 - Link is Up - 100/Full libphy: 400d0000.etherne:00 - Link is Up - 100/Half libphy: 400d0000.etherne:00 - Link is Up - 100/Full libphy: 400d0000.etherne:00 - Link is Up - 100/Half Add the missing module clock for ENET0 and ENET1, and correct the clock supplying in device tree to fix above issue. Thanks to Alison Wang <b18965@freescale.com> for debugging the issue. Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
2013-07-15ARM: mxs: saif0 is the clock provider to sgtl5000Shawn Guo
These systems all use saif0 as the mclock provider to codec sgtl5000. Reflect that in device tree source, so that sgtl5000 can find the clock by calling clk_get(). Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
2013-07-15ARM: i.MX6Q: correct emi_sel clock muxingLiu Ying
The correct muxing for emi_sel clock should be 2b'00 - 396M PFD 2b'01 - PLL3 2b'10 - AXI clk root 2b'11 - 352M PFD This patch corrects the muxing in the clock driver. Signed-off-by: Liu Ying <Ying.Liu@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Acked-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>
2013-07-15ARM i.MX6Q: Fix IOMUXC GPR1 defines for ENET_CLK_SEL and IPU1/2_MUXPhilipp Zabel
Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
2013-07-15ARM: i.MX27: Typo fixAlexander Shiyan
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Acked-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
2013-07-15ARM: imx27: Fix documentation for SPLL clockMarkus Pargmann
spll_gate was added with commit b7eed2076183994dbda2c19bc7fba99b65a135e3 "ARM: imx27: add a clock gate to activate SPLL clock". spll_gate is missing in the devicetree clock documentation for imx27. This patch adds it to the list of clocks in the documentation. Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
2013-07-15ARM i.MX53: Fix UART pad configurationPhilipp Zabel
The current default pad configuration for UART RX and TX pads sets a 360k pull-down and writes 1 to a reserved bit (1 << 0). It doesn't seem right to me that in idle state, the UART has to keep the signal high against a pull-down resistor. This patch instead sets a 100k pull-up, which incidentally corresponds to the register reset value for all but one (MX53_PAD_KEY_ROW0__UART4_RXD_MUX) pad, and removes the write to the reserved bit. Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
2013-07-14block: delete __cpuinit usage from all block filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. This removes all the drivers/block uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14drivers: delete __cpuinit usage from all remaining drivers filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. This removes all the remaining one-off uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files in the drivers/* directory. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14kernel: delete __cpuinit usage from all core kernel filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. This removes all the uses of the __cpuinit macros from C files in the core kernel directories (kernel, init, lib, mm, and include) that don't really have a specific maintainer. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14rcu: delete __cpuinit usage from all rcu filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. This removes all the drivers/rcu uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@freedesktop.org> Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14net: delete __cpuinit usage from all net filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. This removes all the net/* uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14acpi: delete __cpuinit usage from all acpi filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. This removes all the drivers/acpi uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14hwmon: delete __cpuinit usage from all hwmon filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. This removes all the drivers/hwmon uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14cpufreq: delete __cpuinit usage from all cpufreq filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. This removes all the drivers/cpufreq uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 [v2: leave 2nd lines of args misaligned as requested by Viresh] Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14clocksource+irqchip: delete __cpuinit usage from all related filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. This removes all the drivers/clocksource and drivers/irqchip uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14x86: delete __cpuinit usage from all x86 filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c) are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings. As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless. This removes all the arch/x86 uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. x86 only had the one __CPUINIT used in assembly files, and it wasn't paired off with a .previous or a __FINIT, so we can delete it directly w/o any corresponding additional change there. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: x86@kernel.org Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14score: delete __cpuinit usage from all score filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c) are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings. As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless. This removes all the arch/score uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. Currently score does not have any __CPUINIT used in assembly files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@sunplusct.com> Cc: Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14xtensa: delete __cpuinit usage from all xtensa filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c) are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings. As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless. This removes all the arch/xtensa uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. Currently xtensa does not have any __CPUINIT used in assembly files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14openrisc: delete __cpuinit usage from all openrisc filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c) are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings. As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless. This removes all the arch/openrisc uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. Currently openrisc does not have any __CPUINIT used in assembly files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se> Cc: linux@lists.openrisc.net Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14m32r: delete __cpuinit usage from all m32r filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c) are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings. As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless. This removes all the arch/m32r uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. Currently m32r does not have any __CPUINIT used in assembly files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org> Cc: linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org Cc: linux-m32r-ja@ml.linux-m32r.org Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14hexagon: delete __cpuinit usage from all hexagon filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c) are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings. As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless. This removes all the arch/hexagon uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. Currently hexagon does not have any __CPUINIT used in assembly files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org> Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14frv: delete __cpuinit usage from all frv filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c) are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings. As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless. This removes all the arch/frv uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. Currently frv does not have any __CPUINIT used in assembly files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14cris: delete __cpuinit usage from all cris filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c) are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings. As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless. This removes all the arch/cris uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. Currently cris does not have any __CPUINIT used in assembly files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com> Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Cc: linux-cris-kernel@axis.com Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14metag: delete __cpuinit usage from all metag filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c) are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings. As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless. This removes all the arch/metag uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. Currently metag does not have any __CPUINIT used in assembly files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Acked-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14tile: delete __cpuinit usage from all tile filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c) are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings. As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless. This removes all the arch/tile uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. Currently tile does not have any __CPUINIT used in assembly files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14sh: delete __cpuinit usage from all sh filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c) are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings. As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless. This removes all the arch/sh uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. Currently sh does not have any __CPUINIT used in assembly files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14s390: delete __cpuinit usage from all s390 filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c) are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings. As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless. This removes all the arch/s390 uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. Currently s390 does not have any __CPUINIT used in assembly files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: linux390@de.ibm.com Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14blackfin: delete __cpuinit usage from all blackfin filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c) are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings. As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless. This removes all the arch/blackfin uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. Currently blackfin does not have any __CPUINIT used in assembly files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Cc: Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com> Cc: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com> Cc: uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14arm64: delete __cpuinit usage from all usersPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c) are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings. As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless. This removes all the arch/arm64 uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. Currently arm64 does not have any __CPUINIT used in assembly files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14sparc: delete __cpuinit/__CPUINIT usage from all usersPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c) are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings. As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless. This removes all the arch/sparc uses of the __cpuinit macros from C files and removes __CPUINIT from assembly files. Note that even though arch/sparc/kernel/trampoline_64.S has instances of ".previous" in it, they are all paired off against explicit ".section" directives, and not implicitly paired with __CPUINIT (unlike mips and arm were). [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14arm: delete __cpuinit/__CPUINIT usage from all ARM usersPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c) and are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from the arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings. As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit related content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless. This removes all the ARM uses of the __cpuinit macros from C code, and all __CPUINIT from assembly code. It also had two ".previous" section statements that were paired off against __CPUINIT (aka .section ".cpuinit.text") that also get removed here. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14MIPS: Delete __cpuinit/__CPUINIT usage from MIPS codePaul Gortmaker
commit 3747069b25e419f6b51395f48127e9812abc3596 upstream. The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c) and are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from the arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings. As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit related content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless. Here, we remove all the MIPS __cpuinit from C code and __CPUINIT from asm files. MIPS is interesting in this respect, because there are also uasm users hiding behind their own renamed versions of the __cpuinit macros. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 [ralf@linux-mips.org: Folded in Paul's followup fix.] Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5494/ Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5495/ Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5509/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2013-07-14parisc: delete __cpuinit usage from all usersPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. This removes all the parisc uses of the __cpuinit macros. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Acked-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-14alpha: delete __cpuinit usage from all usersPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. This removes all the alpha uses of the __cpuinit macros. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-07-15ACPI / dock: Drop unnecessary local variable from dock_add()Rafael J. Wysocki
The local variable id in dock_add() is not necessary, so drop it. While we're at it, use an initializer to clear the local variable ds and drop the memset() used for this purpose. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-07-15ACPI / dock / PCI: Drop ACPI dock notifier chainRafael J. Wysocki
The only user of the ACPI dock notifier chain is the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (acpiphp) driver that uses it to carry out post-dock fixups needed by some systems with broken _DCK. However, it is not necessary to use a separate notifier chain for that, as it can be simply replaced with a new callback in struct acpi_dock_ops. For this reason, add a new .fixup() callback to struct acpi_dock_ops and make hotplug_dock_devices() execute it for all dock devices with hotplug operations registered. Accordingly, make acpiphp point that callback to the function carrying out the post-dock fixups and do not register a separate dock notifier for each device registering dock operations. Finally, drop the ACPI dock notifier chain that has no more users. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-07-15ACPI / dock: Do not check CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK_MODULERafael J. Wysocki
Since commit 94add0f (ACPI / dock: Initialize ACPI dock subsystem upfront) the ACPI dock driver cannot be a module, so CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK_MODULE is never set. For this reason, simplify the preprocessor conditional in include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h referring to that sybbol unnecessarily. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-07-15ACPI / dock: Do not leak memory on falilures to add a dock stationRafael J. Wysocki
The function creating and registering dock station objects, dock_add(), leaks memory if there's an error after it's walked the ACPI namespace calling find_dock_devices(), because it doesn't free the list of dependent devices it's just created in those cases. Fix that issue by adding the missing code to free the list of dependent devices on errors. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-07-15ACPI: Drop ACPI bus notifier call chainRafael J. Wysocki
There are no users of the ACPI bus notifier call chain, acpi_bus_notify_list, any more, so drop it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-07-15ACPI / dock: Rework the handling of notificationsRafael J. Wysocki
The ACPI dock driver uses register_acpi_bus_notifier() which installs a notifier triggered globally for all system notifications. That first of all is inefficient, because the dock driver is only interested in notifications associated with the devices it handles, but it has to handle all system notifies for all devices. Moreover, it does that even if no docking stations are present in the system (CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK set is sufficient for that to happen). Besides, that is inconvenient, because it requires the driver to do extra work for each notification to find the target dock station object. For these reasons, rework the dock driver to install a notify handler individually for each dock station in the system using acpi_install_notify_handler(). This allows the dock station object to be passed directly to the notify handler and makes it possible to simplify the dock driver quite a bit. It also reduces the overhead related to the handling of all system notifies when CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK is set. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-07-15ACPI / dock: Simplify dock_init_hotplug() and dock_release_hotplug()Rafael J. Wysocki
Make dock_init_hotplug() and dock_release_hotplug() slightly simpler and move some checks in those functions to the code paths where they are needed. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-07-15ACPI / dock: Walk list in reverse order during removal of devicesRafael J. Wysocki
If there are indirect dependencies between devices in a dock station's dependent devices list, they may be broken if the devices are removed in the same order in which they have been added. For this reason, make the code in handle_eject_request() walk the list of dependent devices in reverse order. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-07-15ACPI / dock: Rework and simplify find_dock_devices()Rafael J. Wysocki
Since acpi_walk_namespace() calls find_dock_devices() during tree pre-order visit, the latter doesn't need to add devices whose parents have _EJD pointing to the docking station to the list of that station's dependent devices, because those parents are going to be added to that list anyway and the removal of a parent will take care of the removal of its children in those cases. For this reason, rework find_dock_devices() to only call add_dock_dependent_device() for devices whose _EJD point directy to the docking station represented by its context argument and simplify it slightly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-07-15ACPI / dock: Drop the hp_lock mutex from struct dock_stationRafael J. Wysocki
The only existing user of the hp_lock mutex in struct dock_station, hotplug_dock_devices(), is always called under acpi_scan_lock and cannot race with another instance of itself, so drop the mutex which is not necessary. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-07-15ACPI: simplify acpiphp driver with new helper functionsJiang Liu
Use the new helper functions introduced previously to simplify the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (acpiphp) driver. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-07-15ACPI: simplify dock driver with new helper functionsJiang Liu
Use helper functions introduced previously to simplify the ACPI dock driver. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-07-15ACPI: Export acpi_(bay)|(dock)_match() from scan.cJiang Liu
Functions acpi_dock_match() and acpi_bay_match() in scan.c can be shared with dock.c to reduce code duplication, so export them as global functions. Also add a new function acpi_ata_match() to check whether an ACPI device object represents an ATA device. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>