Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
smatch warns that the RC query code could go past the array size:
drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb-v2/rtl28xxu.c:1757 rtl2832u_rc_query() error: buffer overflow 'buf' 128 <= 130
drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb-v2/rtl28xxu.c:1758 rtl2832u_rc_query() error: buffer overflow 'buf' 128 <= 130
The driver logic gets the length of the IR RX buffer with:
ret = rtl28xxu_rd_reg(d, IR_RX_BC, &buf[0]);
...
len = buf[0];
In thesis, this could range between 0 and 255 [1].
While this should never happen in practice, due to hardware limits,
smatch is right when it complains about that, as there's nothing at
the logic that would prevent it. So, if for whatever reason, buf[0]
gets filled by rtl28xx read functions with a value bigger than 128,
it will go past the array.
So, add an explicit check.
[1] I've no idea why smatch thinks that the maximum value is 130.
I double-checked the code several times. Was unable to find any
reason for assuming 130. Perhaps smatch is not properly parsing
u8 here?
Fixes: b5cbaa43a676 ("[media] rtl28xx: initial support for rtl2832u")
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
|
|
As warned by smatch:
drivers/media/i2c/mt9v111.c:854 mt9v111_enum_frame_size() error: buffer overflow 'mt9v111_frame_sizes' 5 <= 5
drivers/media/i2c/mt9v111.c:855 mt9v111_enum_frame_size() error: buffer overflow 'mt9v111_frame_sizes' 5 <= 5
drivers/media/i2c/mt9v111.c:856 mt9v111_enum_frame_size() error: buffer overflow 'mt9v111_frame_sizes' 5 <= 5
drivers/media/i2c/mt9v111.c:857 mt9v111_enum_frame_size() error: buffer overflow 'mt9v111_frame_sizes' 5 <= 5
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
|
|
Gets rid of this build warning:
drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c:229: warning: Function parameter or member 'cmdpool' not described in 'vsp1_dl_manager'
Fixes: f3b98e3c4d2e ("media: vsp1: Provide support for extended command pools")
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
|
|
Instead of hardcoding the remapping of IO_SPACE_LIMIT - SZ_64K, use
resource_size().
However, we cannot use just IO_SPACE_LIMIT, because pci_ioremap_io() has
a bug and doesn't allow remapping the last 64 KB before IO_SPACE_LIMIT,
so we ensure that we do not exceed this limit. When the pci_ioremap_io()
issue is fixed, this work around can be dropped.
Note that this workaround already existed, since we were mapping only
up to IO_SPACE_LIMIT - SZ_64K.
Suggested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
[lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com: tweaked the commit log]
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
|
|
If there is no PCI I/O aperture configured in the Device Tree, it does
not make sense to create the virtual mapping for the PCI I/O space,
since we will anyway not create the MBus window that will allow to
access it. Therefore, do the pci_ioremap_io() only if necessary.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
|
|
pcie->realio.end should be the address of last byte of the area,
therefore using resource_size() of another resource is not correct, we
must substract 1 to get the address of the last byte.
Fixes: 11be65472a427 ("PCI: mvebu: Adapt to the new device tree layout")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
|
|
This is already done earlier in mvebu_pcie_probe().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
|
|
Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false
instead of an integer value. This code was detected with the help of
Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
|
When the user supplies a ctrl_loss_tmo < 0, we warn them that this will
cause the fabrics layer to attempt reconnection forever. However, in
reality the fabrics layer never attempts to reconnect because the
condition to test whether we should reconnect is backwards in this case.
Signed-off-by: Tal Shorer <tal.shorer@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
|
This patch implements the Namespace Write Protect feature described in
"NVMe TP 4005a Namespace Write Protect". In this version, we implement
No Write Protect and Write Protect states for target ns which can be
toggled by set-features commands from the host side.
For write-protect state transition, we need to flush the ns specified
as a part of command so we also add helpers for carrying out synchronous
flush operations.
Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
[hch: fixed an incorrect endianess conversion, minor cleanups]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
|
NVMe 1.3 TP 4005 introduces new filed (NSATTR). This field indicates
whether given namespace is write protected or not. This patch sets the
gendisk associated with the namespace to read only based on the identify
namespace nsattr field.
Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
|
Add various definitions from NVMe 1.3 TP 4005.
Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
|
ANA Phase 3 draft had the 'reserved' field in the group descriptor
format set to '23:17' (so that the first namespace identifier started
at byte 24), but that got move with the approved TP to '31:17'
(so that the first namespace identifier started at byte 32).
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ryan Lee <ryans.lee@maximintegrated.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
The offset of the DSP core needs to be taken into account for the DSP
preloader control get and put. Currently the dsp->preloaded variable
will only ever be read/updated on the first DSP, whilst this doesn't
affect the operation of the control the readback will be incorrect.
Signed-off-by: Ajit Pandey <ajit.pandey@cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
|
|
Replace GPL v2.0+ license statements with SPDX license
identifiers.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
Replace GPL v2.0 and v2.0+ license statements with SPDX license
identifiers.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
The driver expects to find the device id in rt5677_of_match.data, however
it is currently assigned to rt5677_of_match.type. Fix this.
The problem was found with the help of clang:
sound/soc/codecs/rt5677.c:5010:36: warning: expression which evaluates to
zero treated as a null pointer constant of type 'const void *'
[-Wnon-literal-null-conversion]
{ .compatible = "realtek,rt5677", RT5677 },
^~~~~~
Fixes: ddc9e69b9dc2 ("ASoC: rt5677: Hide platform data in the module sources")
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
set_memory_np() is used to mark kernel mappings not present, but it has
it's own open coded mechanism which does not have the L1TF protection of
inverting the address bits.
Replace the open coded PTE manipulation with the L1TF protecting low level
PTE routines.
Passes the CPA self test.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
Some cases in THP like:
- MADV_FREE
- mprotect
- split
mark the PMD non present for temporarily to prevent races. The window for
an L1TF attack in these contexts is very small, but it wants to be fixed
for correctness sake.
Use the proper low level functions for pmd/pud_mknotpresent() to address
this.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
For kernel mappings PAGE_PROTNONE is not necessarily set for a non present
mapping, but the inversion logic explicitely checks for !PRESENT and
PROT_NONE.
Remove the PROT_NONE check and make the inversion unconditional for all not
present mappings.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip into clk-rockchip
Pull one final rockchip update from Heiko Stuebner:
pclk_rkpwm_pmu as critical clock, due to it supplying the pwm
used to drive the logic supply of the rk3399 core.
* tag 'v4.19-rockchip-clk2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip:
clk: rockchip: Add pclk_rkpwm_pmu to PMU critical clocks in rk3399
|
|
Get rid of unused struct member 'last_link'
Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Gustavo A. R. Silva says:
====================
net: ethernet: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, this patchset aims
to add some annotations in order to mark switch cases where we are
expecting to fall through.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114813 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141440 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1384500 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357414 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357415 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114811 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1410181 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1410184 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1384501 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1398869 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1410182 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1410183 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the code comments with
a proper "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting
to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114809 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114810 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114808 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114802 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114796 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114804 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114806 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114801 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114800 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114799 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 200521 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114797 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114794 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114795 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114792 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114793 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114791 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114790 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114789 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114788 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114787 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114784 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114785 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114786 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114782 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114781 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114780 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|