summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-06-16drm/i915/tc: fix the reset of ln0Khaled Almahallawy
Setting ln0 similar to ln1 Fixes: 3b51be4e4061b ("drm/i915/tc: Update DP_MODE programming") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.5+ Signed-off-by: Khaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200608204537.28468-1-khaled.almahallawy@intel.com (cherry picked from commit 4f72a8ee819d57d7329d88f487a2fc9b45153177) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
2020-06-16drm/i915/gt: Prevent timeslicing into unpreemptable requestsChris Wilson
We have a I915_REQUEST_NOPREEMPT flag that we set when we must prevent the HW from preempting during the course of this request. We need to honour this flag and protect the HW even if we have a heartbeat request, or other maximum priority barrier, pending. As such, restrict the timeslicing check to avoid preempting into the topmost priority band, leaving the unpreemptable requests in blissful peace running uninterrupted on the HW. v2: Set the I915_PRIORITY_BARRIER to be less than I915_PRIORITY_UNPREEMPTABLE so that we never submit a request (heartbeat or barrier) that can legitimately preempt the current non-premptable request. Fixes: 2a98f4e65bba ("drm/i915: add infrastructure to hold off preemption on a request") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200527162418.24755-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit b72f02d78e4f257761ed003444ae52083f962076) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
2020-06-16drm/i915/selftests: Restore to default heartbeatChris Wilson
Since we temporarily disable the heartbeat and restore back to the default value, we can use the stored defaults on the engine and avoid using a local. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200519063123.20673-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit 3a230a554dbbc6cd5016cf1b56ee77cfcd48c7d8) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
2020-06-16mfd: mt6360: Fix register driver NULL pointer by adding driver nameGene Chen
The driver name was accidentally removed when .probe() by was replaced by .probe_new() during an early patch review. [ 121.243012] EAX: c2a8bc64 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000 [ 121.243012] ESI: c2a8bc79 EDI: 00000000 EBP: e54bdea8 ESP: e54bdea0 [ 121.243012] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 121.243012] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00000000 CR3: 02ec3000 CR4: 000006b0 [ 121.243012] Call Trace: [ 121.243012] kset_find_obj+0x3d/0xc0 [ 121.243012] driver_find+0x16/0x40 [ 121.243012] driver_register+0x49/0x100 [ 121.243012] ? i2c_for_each_dev+0x39/0x50 [ 121.243012] ? __process_new_adapter+0x20/0x20 [ 121.243012] ? cht_wc_driver_init+0x11/0x11 [ 121.243012] i2c_register_driver+0x30/0x80 [ 121.243012] ? intel_lpss_pci_driver_init+0x16/0x16 [ 121.243012] mt6360_pmu_driver_init+0xf/0x11 [ 121.243012] do_one_initcall+0x33/0x1a0 [ 121.243012] ? parse_args+0x1eb/0x3d0 [ 121.243012] ? __might_sleep+0x31/0x90 [ 121.243012] ? kernel_init_freeable+0x10a/0x17f [ 121.243012] kernel_init_freeable+0x12c/0x17f [ 121.243012] ? rest_init+0x110/0x110 [ 121.243012] kernel_init+0xb/0x100 [ 121.243012] ? schedule_tail_wrapper+0x9/0xc [ 121.243012] ret_from_fork+0x19/0x24 [ 121.243012] Modules linked in: [ 121.243012] CR2: 0000000000000000 [ 121.243012] random: get_random_bytes called from init_oops_id+0x3a/0x40 with crng_init=0 [ 121.243012] ---[ end trace 38a803400f1a2bee ]--- [ 121.243012] EIP: strcmp+0x11/0x30 Fixes: 7edd363421dab ("mfd: Add support for PMIC MT6360") Signed-off-by: Gene Chen <gene_chen@richtek.com> Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@kernel.org> [Lee: Taking the opportunity to fix the compatible string too 's/_/-/'] Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2020-06-16pinctrl: mcp23s08: Split to three parts: fix ptr_ret.cocci warningskernel test robot
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mcp23s08_spi.c:129:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be used Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO rather than if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/ptr_ret.cocci Fixes: 0f04a81784fe ("pinctrl: mcp23s08: Split to three parts: core, I²C, SPI") Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> CC: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200608010253.GA79576@44f7ab9e8d59 Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2020-06-16pinctrl: tegra: Use noirq suspend/resume callbacksVidya Sagar
Use noirq suspend/resume callbacks as other drivers which implement noirq suspend/resume callbacks (Ex:- PCIe) depend on pinctrl driver to configure the signals used by their respective devices in the noirq phase. Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200604174935.26560-1-vidyas@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2020-06-16pinctrl: qcom: spmi-gpio: fix warning about irq chip reusageDmitry Baryshkov
Fix the following warnings caused by reusage of the same irq_chip instance for all spmi-gpio gpio_irq_chip instances. Instead embed irq_chip into pmic_gpio_state struct. gpio gpiochip2: (c440000.qcom,spmi:pmic@2:gpio@c000): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver. gpio gpiochip3: (c440000.qcom,spmi:pmic@4:gpio@c000): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver. gpio gpiochip4: (c440000.qcom,spmi:pmic@a:gpio@c000): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200604002817.667160-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2020-06-15w1: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15tracing/probe: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15soc: ti: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15tifm: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15dmaengine: tegra-apb: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15stm class: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15Squashfs: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15ASoC: SOF: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15ima: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15sctp: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15phy: samsung: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15RxRPC: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15rapidio: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15media: pwc: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15firmware: pcdp: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15oprofile: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15block: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15tools/testing/nvdimm: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15libata: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15kprobes: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15keys: encrypted-type: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15kexec: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15KVM: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15jffs2: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15ibft: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15samples: mei: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15ia64: kernel: unwind_i.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15FS-Cache: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15firewire: ohci: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15cb710: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15drm/edid: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15drbd: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15crypto: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15can: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15can: peak_canfd: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15dmaengine: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15ARM: tegra: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15aio: Replace zero-length array with flexible-arrayGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-06-15firmware: google: vpd: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2020-06-15firmware: google: memconsole: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array ↵Gustavo A. R. Silva
member There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2020-06-15firmware: dmi-sysfs: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2020-06-15scsi: Wire up ata_scsi_dma_need_drain for SAS HBA driversChristoph Hellwig
We need ata_scsi_dma_need_drain for all drivers wired up to drive ATAPI devices through libata. That also includes the SAS HBA drivers in addition to native libata HBA drivers. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200615064624.37317-3-hch@lst.de Fixes: cc97923a5bcc ("block: move dma drain handling to scsi") Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Tested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Acked-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com> Acked-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
2020-06-15scsi: libata: Provide an ata_scsi_dma_need_drain stub for !CONFIG_ATAChristoph Hellwig
SAS drivers can be compiled with ata support disabled. Provide a stub so that the drivers don't have to ifdef around wiring up ata_scsi_dma_need_drain. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200615064624.37317-2-hch@lst.de Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
generated by cgit (git 2.34.1) at 2025-09-11 22:57:29 +0000