summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-09-11sched: Move update_other_load_avgs() to kernel/sched/pelt.cTejun Heo
96fd6c65efc6 ("sched: Factor out update_other_load_avgs() from __update_blocked_others()") added update_other_load_avgs() in kernel/sched/syscalls.c right above effective_cpu_util(). This location didn't fit that well in the first place, and with 5d871a63997f ("sched/fair: Move effective_cpu_util() and effective_cpu_util() in fair.c") moving effective_cpu_util() to kernel/sched/fair.c, it looks even more out of place. Relocate the function to kernel/sched/pelt.c where all its callees are. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
2024-09-11Merge branch 'tip/sched/core' into sched_ext/for-6.12Tejun Heo
Pull in tip/sched/core to resolve two merge conflicts: - 96fd6c65efc6 ("sched: Factor out update_other_load_avgs() from __update_blocked_others()") 5d871a63997f ("sched/fair: Move effective_cpu_util() and effective_cpu_util() in fair.c") A simple context conflict. The former added __update_blocked_others() in the same #ifdef CONFIG_SMP block that effective_cpu_util() and sched_cpu_util() are in and the latter moved those functions to fair.c. This makes __update_blocked_others() more out of place. Will follow up with a patch to relocate. - 96fd6c65efc6 ("sched: Factor out update_other_load_avgs() from __update_blocked_others()") 84d265281d6c ("sched/pelt: Use rq_clock_task() for hw_pressure") The former factored out the body of __update_blocked_others() into update_other_load_avgs(). The latter changed how update_hw_load_avg() is called in the body. Resolved by applying the change to update_other_load_avgs() instead. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2024-09-11sched/cpufreq: Use NSEC_PER_MSEC for deadline taskChristian Loehle
Convert the sugov deadline task attributes to use the available definitions to make them more readable. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813144348.1180344-5-christian.loehle@arm.com
2024-09-11cpufreq/cppc: Use NSEC_PER_MSEC for deadline taskChristian Loehle
Convert the cppc deadline task attributes to use the available definitions to make them more readable. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813144348.1180344-4-christian.loehle@arm.com
2024-09-11sched/deadline: Clarify nanoseconds in uapiChristian Loehle
Specify the time values of the deadline parameters of deadline, runtime, and period as being in nanoseconds explicitly as they always have been. Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813144348.1180344-3-christian.loehle@arm.com
2024-09-11sched/deadline: Convert schedtool example to chrtChristian Loehle
chrt has SCHED_DEADLINE support so convert the example instead of relying on a schedtool fork. While at it fix the wrong mentioning of microseconds, it was nanoseconds for both schedtool and chrt. Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813144348.1180344-2-christian.loehle@arm.com
2024-09-10sched_ext: Don't trigger ops.quiescent/runnable() on migrationsTejun Heo
A task moving across CPUs should not trigger quiescent/runnable task state events as the task is staying runnable the whole time and just stopping and then starting on different CPUs. Suppress quiescent/runnable task state events if task_on_rq_migrating(). Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Suggested-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Cc: Daniel Hodges <hodges.daniel.scott@gmail.com> Cc: Changwoo Min <multics69@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@linux.dev> Cc: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2024-09-10sched_ext: Synchronize bypass state changes with rq lockTejun Heo
While the BPF scheduler is being unloaded, the following warning messages trigger sometimes: NOHZ tick-stop error: local softirq work is pending, handler #80!!! This is caused by the CPU entering idle while there are pending softirqs. The main culprit is the bypassing state assertion not being synchronized with rq operations. As the BPF scheduler cannot be trusted in the disable path, the first step is entering the bypass mode where the BPF scheduler is ignored and scheduling becomes global FIFO. This is implemented by turning scx_ops_bypassing() true. However, the transition isn't synchronized against anything and it's possible for enqueue and dispatch paths to have different ideas on whether bypass mode is on. Make each rq track its own bypass state with SCX_RQ_BYPASSING which is modified while rq is locked. This removes most of the NOHZ tick-stop messages but not completely. I believe the stragglers are from the sched core bug where pick_task_scx() can be called without preceding balance_scx(). Once that bug is fixed, we should verify that all occurrences of this error message are gone too. v2: scx_enabled() test moved inside the for_each_possible_cpu() loop so that the per-cpu states are always synchronized with the global state. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reported-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
2024-09-10sched/debug: Fix the runnable tasks outputHuang Shijie
The current runnable tasks output looks like: runnable tasks: S task PID tree-key switches prio wait-time sum-exec sum-sleep ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ikworker/R-rcu_g 4 0.129049 E 0.620179 0.750000 0.002920 2 100 0.000000 0.002920 0.000000 0.000000 0 0 / Ikworker/R-sync_ 5 0.125328 E 0.624147 0.750000 0.001840 2 100 0.000000 0.001840 0.000000 0.000000 0 0 / Ikworker/R-slub_ 6 0.120835 E 0.628680 0.750000 0.001800 2 100 0.000000 0.001800 0.000000 0.000000 0 0 / Ikworker/R-netns 7 0.114294 E 0.634701 0.750000 0.002400 2 100 0.000000 0.002400 0.000000 0.000000 0 0 / I kworker/0:1 9 508.781746 E 511.754666 3.000000 151.575240 224 120 0.000000 151.575240 0.000000 0.000000 0 0 / Which is messy. Remove the duplicate printing of sum_exec_runtime and tidy up the layout to make it look like: runnable tasks: S task PID vruntime eligible deadline slice sum-exec switches prio wait-time sum-sleep sum-block node group-id group-path ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I kworker/0:3 1698 295.001459 E 297.977619 3.000000 38.862920 9 120 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0 0 / I kworker/0:4 1702 278.026303 E 281.026303 3.000000 9.918760 3 120 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0 0 / S NetworkManager 2646 0.377936 E 2.598104 3.000000 98.535880 314 120 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0 0 /system.slice/NetworkManager.service S virtqemud 2689 0.541016 E 2.440104 3.000000 50.967960 80 120 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0 0 /system.slice/virtqemud.service S gsd-smartcard 3058 73.604144 E 76.475904 3.000000 74.033320 88 120 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0 0 /user.slice/user-42.slice/session-c1.scope Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter (Ampere) <cl@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <shijie@os.amperecomputing.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240906053019.7874-1-shijie@os.amperecomputing.com
2024-09-10sched: Fix sched_delayed vs sched_corePeter Zijlstra
Completely analogous to commit dfa0a574cbc4 ("sched/uclamg: Handle delayed dequeue"), avoid double dequeue for the sched_core entries. Fixes: 152e11f6df29 ("sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-09-10kernel/sched: Fix util_est accounting for DELAY_DEQUEUEDietmar Eggemann
Remove delayed tasks from util_est even they are runnable. Exclude delayed task which are (a) migrating between rq's or (b) in a SAVE/RESTORE dequeue/enqueue. Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c49ef5fe-a909-43f1-b02f-a765ab9cedbf@arm.com
2024-09-10kthread: Fix task state in kthread worker if being frozenChen Yu
When analyzing a kernel waring message, Peter pointed out that there is a race condition when the kworker is being frozen and falls into try_to_freeze() with TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, which could trigger a might_sleep() warning in try_to_freeze(). Although the root cause is not related to freeze()[1], it is still worthy to fix this issue ahead. One possible race scenario: CPU 0 CPU 1 ----- ----- // kthread_worker_fn set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); suspend_freeze_processes() freeze_processes static_branch_inc(&freezer_active); freeze_kernel_threads pm_nosig_freezing = true; if (work) { //false __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); } else if (!freezing(current)) //false, been frozen freezing(): if (static_branch_unlikely(&freezer_active)) if (pm_nosig_freezing) return true; schedule() } // state is still TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE try_to_freeze() might_sleep() <--- warning Fix this by explicitly set the TASK_RUNNING before entering try_to_freeze(). Fixes: b56c0d8937e6 ("kthread: implement kthread_worker") Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Zs2ZoAcUsZMX2B%2FI@chenyu5-mobl2/ [1]
2024-09-10sched/pelt: Use rq_clock_task() for hw_pressureChen Yu
commit 97450eb90965 ("sched/pelt: Remove shift of thermal clock") removed the decay_shift for hw_pressure. This commit uses the sched_clock_task() in sched_tick() while it replaces the sched_clock_task() with rq_clock_pelt() in __update_blocked_others(). This could bring inconsistence. One possible scenario I can think of is in ___update_load_sum(): u64 delta = now - sa->last_update_time 'now' could be calculated by rq_clock_pelt() from __update_blocked_others(), and last_update_time was calculated by rq_clock_task() previously from sched_tick(). Usually the former chases after the latter, it cause a very large 'delta' and brings unexpected behavior. Fixes: 97450eb90965 ("sched/pelt: Remove shift of thermal clock") Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia2@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240827112607.181206-1-yu.c.chen@intel.com
2024-09-10sched/fair: Move effective_cpu_util() and effective_cpu_util() in fair.cVincent Guittot
Move effective_cpu_util() and sched_cpu_util() functions in fair.c file with others utilization related functions. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240904092417.20660-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
2024-09-10sched/core: Introduce SM_IDLE and an idle re-entry fast-path in __schedule()Peter Zijlstra
Since commit b2a02fc43a1f ("smp: Optimize send_call_function_single_ipi()") an idle CPU in TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG mode can be pulled out of idle by setting TIF_NEED_RESCHED flag to service an IPI without actually sending an interrupt. Even in cases where the IPI handler does not queue a task on the idle CPU, do_idle() will call __schedule() since need_resched() returns true in these cases. Introduce and use SM_IDLE to identify call to __schedule() from schedule_idle() and shorten the idle re-entry time by skipping pick_next_task() when nr_running is 0 and the previous task is the idle task. With the SM_IDLE fast-path, the time taken to complete a fixed set of IPIs using ipistorm improves noticeably. Following are the numbers from a dual socket Intel Ice Lake Xeon server (2 x 32C/64T) and 3rd Generation AMD EPYC system (2 x 64C/128T) (boost on, C2 disabled) running ipistorm between CPU8 and CPU16: cmdline: insmod ipistorm.ko numipi=100000 single=1 offset=8 cpulist=8 wait=1 ================================================================== Test : ipistorm (modified) Units : Normalized runtime Interpretation: Lower is better Statistic : AMean ======================= Intel Ice Lake Xeon ====================== kernel: time [pct imp] tip:sched/core 1.00 [baseline] tip:sched/core + SM_IDLE 0.80 [20.51%] ==================== 3rd Generation AMD EPYC ===================== kernel: time [pct imp] tip:sched/core 1.00 [baseline] tip:sched/core + SM_IDLE 0.90 [10.17%] ================================================================== [ kprateek: Commit message, SM_RTLOCK_WAIT fix ] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Not-yet-signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240809092240.6921-1-kprateek.nayak@amd.com
2024-09-09scx_qmap: Implement highpri boostingTejun Heo
Implement a silly boosting mechanism for nice -20 tasks. The only purpose is demonstrating and testing scx_bpf_dispatch_from_dsq(). The boosting only works within SHARED_DSQ and makes only minor differences with increased dispatch batch (-b). This exercises moving tasks to a user DSQ and all local DSQs from ops.dispatch() and BPF timerfn. v2: - Updated to use scx_bpf_dispatch_from_dsq_set_{slice|vtime}(). - Drop the workaround for the iterated tasks not being trusted by the verifier. The issue is fixed from BPF side. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Hodges <hodges.daniel.scott@gmail.com> Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Cc: Changwoo Min <multics69@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@linux.dev> Cc: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@gmail.com>
2024-09-09sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_dispatch[_vtime]_from_dsq()Tejun Heo
Once a task is put into a DSQ, the allowed operations are fairly limited. Tasks in the built-in local and global DSQs are executed automatically and, ignoring dequeue, there is only one way a task in a user DSQ can be manipulated - scx_bpf_consume() moves the first task to the dispatching local DSQ. This inflexibility sometimes gets in the way and is an area where multiple feature requests have been made. Implement scx_bpf_dispatch[_vtime]_from_dsq(), which can be called during DSQ iteration and can move the task to any DSQ - local DSQs, global DSQ and user DSQs. The kfuncs can be called from ops.dispatch() and any BPF context which dosen't hold a rq lock including BPF timers and SYSCALL programs. This is an expansion of an earlier patch which only allowed moving into the dispatching local DSQ: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/Zn4Cw4FDTmvXnhaf@slm.duckdns.org v2: Remove @slice and @vtime from scx_bpf_dispatch_from_dsq[_vtime]() as they push scx_bpf_dispatch_from_dsq_vtime() over the kfunc argument count limit and often won't be needed anyway. Instead provide scx_bpf_dispatch_from_dsq_set_{slice|vtime}() kfuncs which can be called only when needed and override the specified parameter for the subsequent dispatch. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Hodges <hodges.daniel.scott@gmail.com> Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Cc: Changwoo Min <multics69@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@linux.dev> Cc: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@gmail.com>
2024-09-09sched_ext: Compact struct bpf_iter_scx_dsq_kernTejun Heo
struct scx_iter_scx_dsq is defined as 6 u64's and scx_dsq_iter_kern was using 5 of them. We want to add two more u64 fields but it's better if we do so while staying within scx_iter_scx_dsq to maintain binary compatibility. The way scx_iter_scx_dsq_kern is laid out is rather inefficient - the node field takes up three u64's but only one bit of the last u64 is used. Turn the bool into u32 flags and only use the lower 16 bits freeing up 48 bits - 16 bits for flags, 32 bits for a u32 - for use by struct bpf_iter_scx_dsq_kern. This allows moving the dsq_seq and flags fields of bpf_iter_scx_dsq_kern into the cursor field reducing the struct size by a full u64. No behavior changes intended. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2024-09-09sched_ext: Replace consume_local_task() with move_local_task_to_local_dsq()Tejun Heo
- Rename move_task_to_local_dsq() to move_remote_task_to_local_dsq(). - Rename consume_local_task() to move_local_task_to_local_dsq() and remove task_unlink_from_dsq() and source DSQ unlocking from it. This is to make the migration code easier to reuse. No functional changes intended. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
2024-09-09sched_ext: Move consume_local_task() upwardTejun Heo
So that the local case comes first and two CONFIG_SMP blocks can be merged. No functional changes intended. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
2024-09-09sched_ext: Move sanity check and dsq_mod_nr() into task_unlink_from_dsq()Tejun Heo
All task_unlink_from_dsq() users are doing dsq_mod_nr(dsq, -1). Move it into task_unlink_from_dsq(). Also move sanity check into it. No functional changes intended. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
2024-09-09sched_ext: Reorder args for consume_local/remote_task()Tejun Heo
Reorder args for consistency in the order of: current_rq, p, src_[rq|dsq], dst_[rq|dsq]. No functional changes intended. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2024-09-09sched_ext: Restructure dispatch_to_local_dsq()Tejun Heo
Now that there's nothing left after the big if block, flip the if condition and unindent the body. No functional changes intended. v2: Add BUG() to clarify control can't reach the end of dispatch_to_local_dsq() in UP kernels per David. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
2024-09-09sched_ext: Fix processs_ddsp_deferred_locals() by unifying DTL_INVALID handlingTejun Heo
With the preceding update, the only return value which makes meaningful difference is DTL_INVALID, for which one caller, finish_dispatch(), falls back to the global DSQ and the other, process_ddsp_deferred_locals(), doesn't do anything. It should always fallback to the global DSQ. Move the global DSQ fallback into dispatch_to_local_dsq() and remove the return value. v2: Patch title and description updated to reflect the behavior fix for process_ddsp_deferred_locals(). Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
2024-09-09sched_ext: Make find_dsq_for_dispatch() handle SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ONTejun Heo
find_dsq_for_dispatch() handles all DSQ IDs except SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON. Instead, each caller is hanlding SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON before calling it. Move SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON lookup into find_dsq_for_dispatch() to remove duplicate code in direct_dispatch() and dispatch_to_local_dsq(). No functional changes intended. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
2024-09-09sched_ext: Refactor consume_remote_task()Tejun Heo
The tricky p->scx.holding_cpu handling was split across consume_remote_task() body and move_task_to_local_dsq(). Refactor such that: - All the tricky part is now in the new unlink_dsq_and_lock_src_rq() with consolidated documentation. - move_task_to_local_dsq() now implements straightforward task migration making it easier to use in other places. - dispatch_to_local_dsq() is another user move_task_to_local_dsq(). The usage is updated accordingly. This makes the local and remote cases more symmetric. No functional changes intended. v2: s/task_rq/src_rq/ for consistency. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
2024-09-09sched_ext: Rename scx_kfunc_set_sleepable to unlocked and relocateTejun Heo
Sleepables don't need to be in its own kfunc set as each is tagged with KF_SLEEPABLE. Rename to scx_kfunc_set_unlocked indicating that rq lock is not held and relocate right above the any set. This will be used to add kfuncs that are allowed to be called from SYSCALL but not TRACING. No functional changes intended. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
2024-09-09sched_ext: Add missing static to scx_dump_dataTejun Heo
scx_dump_data is only used inside ext.c but doesn't have static. Add it. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409070218.RB5WsQ07-lkp@intel.com/
2024-09-06sched_ext: Add missing static to scx_has_op[]Tejun Heo
scx_has_op[] is only used inside ext.c but doesn't have static. Add it. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409062337.m7qqI88I-lkp@intel.com/
2024-09-06sched_ext: Temporarily work around pick_task_scx() being called without ↵Tejun Heo
balance_scx() pick_task_scx() must be preceded by balance_scx() but there currently is a bug where fair could say yes on balance() but no on pick_task(), which then ends up calling pick_task_scx() without preceding balance_scx(). Work around by dropping WARN_ON_ONCE() and ignoring cases which don't make sense. This isn't great and can theoretically lead to stalls. However, for switch_all cases, this happens only while a BPF scheduler is being loaded or unloaded, and, for partial cases, fair will likely keep triggering this CPU. This will be reverted once the fair behavior is fixed. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-09-04Merge branch 'bpf/master' into for-6.12Tejun Heo
Pull bpf/master to receive baebe9aaba1e ("bpf: allow passing struct bpf_iter_<type> as kfunc arguments") and related changes in preparation for the DSQ iterator patchset. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2024-09-04sched_ext: Add a cgroup scheduler which uses flattened hierarchyTejun Heo
This patch adds scx_flatcg example scheduler which implements hierarchical weight-based cgroup CPU control by flattening the cgroup hierarchy into a single layer by compounding the active weight share at each level. This flattening of hierarchy can bring a substantial performance gain when the cgroup hierarchy is nested multiple levels. in a simple benchmark using wrk[8] on apache serving a CGI script calculating sha1sum of a small file, it outperforms CFS by ~3% with CPU controller disabled and by ~10% with two apache instances competing with 2:1 weight ratio nested four level deep. However, the gain comes at the cost of not being able to properly handle thundering herd of cgroups. For example, if many cgroups which are nested behind a low priority parent cgroup wake up around the same time, they may be able to consume more CPU cycles than they are entitled to. In many use cases, this isn't a real concern especially given the performance gain. Also, there are ways to mitigate the problem further by e.g. introducing an extra scheduling layer on cgroup delegation boundaries. v5: - Updated to specify SCX_OPS_HAS_CGROUP_WEIGHT instead of SCX_OPS_KNOB_CGROUP_WEIGHT. v4: - Revert reference counted kptr for cgv_node as the change caused easily reproducible stalls. v3: - Updated to reflect the core API changes including ops.init/exit_task() and direct dispatch from ops.select_cpu(). Fixes and improvements including additional statistics. - Use reference counted kptr for cgv_node instead of xchg'ing against stash location. - Dropped '-p' option. v2: - Use SCX_BUG[_ON]() to simplify error handling. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Vernet <dvernet@meta.com> Acked-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com> Acked-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Acked-by: Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com>
2024-09-04sched_ext: Add cgroup supportTejun Heo
Add sched_ext_ops operations to init/exit cgroups, and track task migrations and config changes. A BPF scheduler may not implement or implement only subset of cgroup features. The implemented features can be indicated using %SCX_OPS_HAS_CGOUP_* flags. If cgroup configuration makes use of features that are not implemented, a warning is triggered. While a BPF scheduler is being enabled and disabled, relevant cgroup operations are locked out using scx_cgroup_rwsem. This avoids situations like task prep taking place while the task is being moved across cgroups, making things easier for BPF schedulers. v7: - cgroup interface file visibility toggling is dropped in favor just warning messages. Dynamically changing interface visiblity caused more confusion than helping. v6: - Updated to reflect the removal of SCX_KF_SLEEPABLE. - Updated to use CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED_WEIGHT and fixes for !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED && CONFIG_EXT_GROUP_SCHED. v5: - Flipped the locking order between scx_cgroup_rwsem and cpus_read_lock() to avoid locking order conflict w/ cpuset. Better documentation around locking. - sched_move_task() takes an early exit if the source and destination are identical. This triggered the warning in scx_cgroup_can_attach() as it left p->scx.cgrp_moving_from uncleared. Updated the cgroup migration path so that ops.cgroup_prep_move() is skipped for identity migrations so that its invocations always match ops.cgroup_move() one-to-one. v4: - Example schedulers moved into their own patches. - Fix build failure when !CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED, reported by Andrea Righi. v3: - Make scx_example_pair switch all tasks by default. - Convert to BPF inline iterators. - scx_bpf_task_cgroup() is added to determine the current cgroup from CPU controller's POV. This allows BPF schedulers to accurately track CPU cgroup membership. - scx_example_flatcg added. This demonstrates flattened hierarchy implementation of CPU cgroup control and shows significant performance improvement when cgroups which are nested multiple levels are under competition. v2: - Build fixes for different CONFIG combinations. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Vernet <dvernet@meta.com> Acked-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com> Acked-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Acked-by: Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Cc: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
2024-09-04sched: Introduce CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED_WEIGHTTejun Heo
sched_ext will soon add cgroup cpu.weigh support. The cgroup interface code is currently gated behind CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED. As the fair class and/or SCX may implement the feature, put the interface code behind the new CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED_WEIGHT which is selected by CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED. This allows either sched class to enable the itnerface code without ading more complex CONFIG tests. When !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED, a dummy version of sched_group_set_shares() is added to support later CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED_WEIGHT && !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED builds. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2024-09-04sched: Make cpu_shares_read_u64() use tg_weight()Tejun Heo
Move tg_weight() upward and make cpu_shares_read_u64() use it too. This makes the weight retrieval shared between cgroup v1 and v2 paths and will be used to implement cgroup support for sched_ext. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2024-09-04sched: Expose css_tg()Tejun Heo
A new BPF extensible sched_class will use css_tg() in the init and exit paths to visit all task_groups by walking cgroups. v4: __setscheduler_prio() is already exposed. Dropped from this patch. v3: Dropped SCHED_CHANGE_BLOCK() as upstream is adding more generic cleanup mechanism. v2: Expose SCHED_CHANGE_BLOCK() too and update the description. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Vernet <dvernet@meta.com> Acked-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com> Acked-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Acked-by: Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com>
2024-09-04sched_ext: TASK_DEAD tasks must be switched into SCX on ops_enableTejun Heo
During scx_ops_enable(), SCX needs to invoke the sleepable ops.init_task() on every task. To do this, it does get_task_struct() on each iterated task, drop the lock and then call ops.init_task(). However, a TASK_DEAD task may already have lost all its usage count and be waiting for RCU grace period to be freed. If get_task_struct() is called on such task, use-after-free can happen. To avoid such situations, scx_ops_enable() skips initialization of TASK_DEAD tasks, which seems safe as they are never going to be scheduled again. Unfortunately, a racing sched_setscheduler(2) can grab the task before the task is unhashed and then continue to e.g. move the task from RT to SCX after TASK_DEAD is set and ops_enable skipped the task. As the task hasn't gone through scx_ops_init_task(), scx_ops_enable_task() called from switching_to_scx() triggers the following warning: sched_ext: Invalid task state transition 0 -> 3 for stress-ng-race-[2872] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 2367 at kernel/sched/ext.c:3327 scx_ops_enable_task+0x18f/0x1f0 ... RIP: 0010:scx_ops_enable_task+0x18f/0x1f0 ... switching_to_scx+0x13/0xa0 __sched_setscheduler+0x84e/0xa50 do_sched_setscheduler+0x104/0x1c0 __x64_sys_sched_setscheduler+0x18/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e As in the ops_disable path, it just doesn't seem like a good idea to leave any task in an inconsistent state, even when the task is dead. The root cause is ops_enable not being able to tell reliably whether a task is truly dead (no one else is looking at it and it's about to be freed) and was testing TASK_DEAD instead. Fix it by testing the task's usage count directly. - ops_init no longer ignores TASK_DEAD tasks. As now all users iterate all tasks, @include_dead is removed from scx_task_iter_next_locked() along with dead task filtering. - tryget_task_struct() is added. Tasks are skipped iff tryget_task_struct() fails. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-09-04sched_ext: TASK_DEAD tasks must be switched out of SCX on ops_disableTejun Heo
scx_ops_disable_workfn() only switches !TASK_DEAD tasks out of SCX while calling scx_ops_exit_task() on all tasks including dead ones. This can leave a dead task on SCX but with SCX_TASK_NONE state, which is inconsistent. If another task was in the process of changing the TASK_DEAD task's scheduling class and grabs the rq lock after scx_ops_disable_workfn() is done with the task, the task ends up calling scx_ops_disable_task() on the dead task which is in an inconsistent state triggering a warning: WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 3316 at kernel/sched/ext.c:3411 scx_ops_disable_task+0x12c/0x160 ... RIP: 0010:scx_ops_disable_task+0x12c/0x160 ... Call Trace: <TASK> check_class_changed+0x2c/0x70 __sched_setscheduler+0x8a0/0xa50 do_sched_setscheduler+0x104/0x1c0 __x64_sys_sched_setscheduler+0x18/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f140d70ea5b There is no reason to leave dead tasks on SCX when unloading the BPF scheduler. Fix by making scx_ops_disable_workfn() eject all tasks including the dead ones from SCX. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2024-09-03sched_ext: Remove sched_class->switch_class()Tejun Heo
With sched_ext converted to use put_prev_task() for class switch detection, there's no user of switch_class() left. Drop it. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-09-03sched_ext: Remove switch_class_scx()Tejun Heo
Now that put_prev_task_scx() is called with @next on task switches, there's no reason to use sched_class.switch_class(). Rename switch_class_scx() to switch_class() and call it from put_prev_task_scx(). Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2024-09-03sched_ext: Relocate functions in kernel/sched/ext.cTejun Heo
Relocate functions to ease the removal of switch_class_scx(). No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2024-09-03sched_ext: Unify regular and core-sched pick task pathsTejun Heo
Because the BPF scheduler's dispatch path is invoked from balance(), sched_ext needs to invoke balance_one() on all sibling rq's before picking the next task for core-sched. Before the recent pick_next_task() updates, sched_ext couldn't share pick task between regular and core-sched paths because pick_next_task() depended on put_prev_task() being called on the current task. Tasks currently running on sibling rq's can't be put when one rq is trying to pick the next task, so pick_task_scx() had to have a separate mechanism to pick between a sibling rq's current task and the first task in its local DSQ. However, with the preceding updates, pick_next_task_scx() no longer depends on the current task being put and can compare the current task and the next in line statelessly, and the pick task logic should be shareable between regular and core-sched paths. Unify regular and core-sched pick task paths: - There's no reason to distinguish local and sibling picks anymore. @local is removed from balance_one(). - pick_next_task_scx() is turned into pick_task_scx() by dropping the put_prev_set_next_task() call. - The old pick_task_scx() is dropped. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2024-09-03sched_ext: Replace SCX_TASK_BAL_KEEP with SCX_RQ_BAL_KEEPTejun Heo
SCX_TASK_BAL_KEEP is used by balance_one() to tell pick_next_task_scx() to keep running the current task. It's not really a task property. Replace it with SCX_RQ_BAL_KEEP which resides in rq->scx.flags and is a better fit for the usage. Also, the existing clearing rule is unnecessarily strict and makes it difficult to use with core-sched. Just clear it on entry to balance_one(). Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2024-09-03sched_ext: Don't call put_prev_task_scx() before picking the next taskTejun Heo
fd03c5b85855 ("sched: Rework pick_next_task()") changed the definition of pick_next_task() from: pick_next_task() := pick_task() + set_next_task(.first = true) to: pick_next_task(prev) := pick_task() + put_prev_task() + set_next_task(.first = true) making invoking put_prev_task() pick_next_task()'s responsibility. This reordering allows pick_task() to be shared between regular and core-sched paths and put_prev_task() to know the next task. sched_ext depended on put_prev_task_scx() enqueueing the current task before pick_next_task_scx() is called. While pulling sched/core changes, 70cc76aa0d80 ("Merge branch 'tip/sched/core' into for-6.12") added an explicit put_prev_task_scx() call for SCX tasks in pick_next_task_scx() before picking the first task as a workaround. Clean it up and adopt the conventions that other sched classes are following. The operation of keeping running the current task was spread and required the task to be put on the local DSQ before picking: - balance_one() used SCX_TASK_BAL_KEEP to indicate that the task is still runnable, hasn't exhausted its slice, and thus should keep running. - put_prev_task_scx() enqueued the task to local DSQ if SCX_TASK_BAL_KEEP is set. It also called do_enqueue_task() with SCX_ENQ_LAST if it is the only runnable task. do_enqueue_task() in turn decided whether to use the local DSQ depending on SCX_OPS_ENQ_LAST. Consolidate the logic in balance_one() as it always knows whether it is going to keep the current task. balance_one() now considers all conditions where the current task should be kept and uses SCX_TASK_BAL_KEEP to tell pick_next_task_scx() to keep the current task instead of picking one from the local DSQ. Accordingly, SCX_ENQ_LAST handling is removed from put_prev_task_scx() and do_enqueue_task() and pick_next_task_scx() is updated to pick the current task if SCX_TASK_BAL_KEEP is set. The workaround put_prev_task[_scx]() calls are replaced with put_prev_set_next_task(). This causes two behavior changes observable from the BPF scheduler: - When a task keep running, it no longer goes through enqueue/dequeue cycle and thus ops.stopping/running() transitions. The new behavior is better and all the existing schedulers should be able to handle the new behavior. - The BPF scheduler cannot keep executing the current task by enqueueing SCX_ENQ_LAST task to the local DSQ. If SCX_OPS_ENQ_LAST is specified, the BPF scheduler is responsible for resuming execution after each SCX_ENQ_LAST. SCX_OPS_ENQ_LAST is mostly useful for cases where scheduling decisions are not made on the local CPU - e.g. central or userspace-driven schedulin - and the new behavior is more logical and shouldn't pose any problems. SCX_OPS_ENQ_LAST demonstration from scx_qmap is dropped as it doesn't fit that well anymore and the last task handling is moved to the end of qmap_dispatch(). Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Cc: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com> Cc: Changwoo Min <multics69@gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Hodges <hodges.daniel.scott@gmail.com> Cc: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@gmail.com>
2024-09-03Merge branch 'tip/sched/core' into for-6.12Tejun Heo
- Resolve trivial context conflicts from dl_server clearing being moved around. - Add @next to put_prev_task_scx() and @prev to pick_next_task_scx() to match sched/core. - Merge sched_class->switch_class() addition from sched_ext with tip/sched/core changes in __pick_next_task(). - Make pick_next_task_scx() call put_prev_task_scx() to emulate the previous behavior where sched_class->put_prev_task() was called before sched_class->pick_next_task(). While this makes sched_ext build and function, the behavior is not in line with other sched classes. The follow-up patches will address the discrepancies and remove sched_class->switch_class(). Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2024-09-03sched: Add put_prev_task(.next)Peter Zijlstra
In order to tell the previous sched_class what the next task is, add put_prev_task(.next). Notable SCX will use this to: 1) determine the next task will leave the SCX sched class and push the current task to another CPU if possible. 2) statistics on how often and which other classes preempt it Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813224016.367421076@infradead.org
2024-09-03sched: Rework dl_serverPeter Zijlstra
When a task is selected through a dl_server, it will have p->dl_server set, such that it can account runtime to the dl_server, see update_curr_task(). Currently p->dl_server is set in pick*task() whenever it goes through the dl_server, clearing it is a bit of a mess though. The trivial solution is clearing it on the final put (now that we have this location). However, this gives a problem when: p = pick_task(rq); if (p) put_prev_set_next_task(rq, prev, next); picks the same task but through a different path, notably when it goes from picking through the dl_server to a direct pick or vice-versa. In that case we cannot readily determine wether we should clear or preserve p->dl_server. An additional complication is pick_*task() setting p->dl_server for a remote pick, it might still need to update runtime before it schedules the core_pick. Close all these holes and remove all the random clearing of p->dl_server by: - having pick_*task() manage rq->dl_server - having the final put_prev_task() clear p->dl_server - having the first set_next_task() set p->dl_server = rq->dl_server - complicate the core_sched code to save/restore rq->dl_server where appropriate. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813224016.259853414@infradead.org
2024-09-03sched: Combine the last put_prev_task() and the first set_next_task()Peter Zijlstra
Ensure the last put_prev_task() and the first set_next_task() always go together. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813224016.158454756@infradead.org
2024-09-03sched: Rework pick_next_task()Peter Zijlstra
The current rule is that: pick_next_task() := pick_task() + set_next_task(.first = true) And many classes implement it directly as such. Change things around to make pick_next_task() optional while also changing the definition to: pick_next_task(prev) := pick_task() + put_prev_task() + set_next_task(.first = true) The reason is that sched_ext would like to have a 'final' call that knows the next task. By placing put_prev_task() right next to set_next_task() (as it already is for sched_core) this becomes trivial. As a bonus, this is a nice cleanup on its own. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813224016.051225657@infradead.org
2024-09-03sched: Split up put_prev_task_balance()Peter Zijlstra
With the goal of pushing put_prev_task() after pick_task() / into pick_next_task(). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813224015.943143811@infradead.org