summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-01-14openrisc: Add support for restartable sequencesStafford Horne
Implement support for restartable sequences on OpenRISC by doing: - Select HAVE_RSEQ in Kconfig - Call rseq_syscall() on return to userspace when CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ is enabled. - Call rseq_signal_deliver() to fixup the pre-signal stack frame when a signal is delivered on top of a restartable sequence critical section Cc: Michael Jeanson <mjeanson@efficios.com> Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
2025-01-14openrisc: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API supportMichael Jeanson
Support for HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API needed for restartable sequences. The implementation has been copied from riscv and tested with the restartable sequences self tests. Note, pt-regs members are 'long' on openrisc which require casts for the api, someday we should try to update these to be 'unsigned long' as that's what they really are. Signed-off-by: Michael Jeanson <mjeanson@efficios.com> [stafford: Updated commit message] Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
2025-01-14openrisc: migrate to the generic rule for built-in DTBMasahiro Yamada
Commit 654102df2ac2 ("kbuild: add generic support for built-in boot DTBs") introduced generic support for built-in DTBs. Select GENERIC_BUILTIN_DTB to use the generic rule. To keep consistency across architectures, this commit also renames CONFIG_OPENRISC_BUILTIN_DTB_NAME to CONFIG_BUILTIN_DTB_NAME. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
2025-01-14blk-mq: Move more error handling into blk_mq_submit_bio()Bart Van Assche
The error handling code in blk_mq_get_new_requests() cannot be understood without knowing that this function is only called by blk_mq_submit_bio(). Hence move the code for handling blk_mq_get_new_requests() failures into blk_mq_submit_bio(). Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241218212246.1073149-3-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2025-01-14block: Reorder the request allocation code in blk_mq_submit_bio()Bart Van Assche
Help the CPU branch predictor in case of a cache hit by handling the cache hit scenario first. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241218212246.1073149-2-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2025-01-14drm/amdgpu: fix fw attestation for MP0_14_0_{2/3}Gui Chengming
FW attestation was disabled on MP0_14_0_{2/3}. V2: Move check into is_fw_attestation_support func. (Frank) Remove DRM_WARN log info. (Alex) Fix format. (Christian) Signed-off-by: Gui Chengming <Jack.Gui@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Frank.Min <Frank.Min@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <Christian.Koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit 62952a38d9bcf357d5ffc97615c48b12c9cd627c) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12.x
2025-01-14drm/amdgpu: always sync the GFX pipe on ctx switchChristian König
That is needed to enforce isolation between contexts. Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit def59436fb0d3ca0f211d14873d0273d69ebb405) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2025-01-14drm/amdgpu: disable gfxoff with the compute workload on gfx12Kenneth Feng
Disable gfxoff with the compute workload on gfx12. This is a workaround for the opencl test failure. Signed-off-by: Kenneth Feng <kenneth.feng@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit 2affe2bbc997b3920045c2c434e480c81a5f9707) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12.x
2025-01-14io_uring/rsrc: fixup io_clone_buffers() error handlingJens Axboe
Jann reports he can trigger a UAF if the target ring unregisters buffers before the clone operation is fully done. And additionally also an issue related to node allocation failures. Both of those stemp from the fact that the cleanup logic puts the buffers manually, rather than just relying on io_rsrc_data_free() doing it. Hence kill the manual cleanup code and just let io_rsrc_data_free() handle it, it'll put the nodes appropriately. Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Fixes: 3597f2786b68 ("io_uring/rsrc: unify file and buffer resource tables") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2025-01-14Merge patch series "Introduce support for Fabric Discovery and Login Services"Martin K. Petersen
Karan Tilak Kumar <kartilak@cisco.com> says: Hi Martin, reviewers, This cover letter describes the feature: add support for Fabric Discovery and Login Services (FDLS) to fnic driver. This functionality is needed to support port channel RSCN (PC-RSCN) handling and serves as a base to create FC-NVME initiators (planned later), and eCPU handling (planned later). It is used to discover the fabric and target ports associated with the fabric. It will then login to the target ports that are zoned to it. The driver uses the tport structure presented by FDLS. Port channel RSCN is a Cisco vendor specific RSCN event. It is applicable only to Cisco UCS fabrics. In cases where the eCPU in the UCS VIC (Unified Computing Services Virtual Interface Card) hangs, a fabric log out is sent to the fabric. Upon successful log out from the fabric, the IO path is failed over to a new path. Generally from a feature perspective, the code is divided into adding support for this functionality initially. Then, code has been added to modify the IO path and interfaces. Finally, support for port channel RSCN handling has been added. Here are the headers of some of the salient patches: o add headers and definitions for FDLS o add support for fabric based solicited requests and responses o add support for target based solicited requests and responses o add support for unsolicited requests and responses o add support for FDMI o add support for FIP o add functionality in fnic to support FDLS o modify IO path to use FDLS and tport o modify fnic interfaces to use FDLS o add support to handle port channel RSCN Even though the patches have been made into a series, some patches are heavier than others. But, every effort has been made to keep the purpose of each patch as a single-purpose, and to compile cleanly. All the individual patches compile cleanly. The compiler used is GCC 13.3. Some function calls have been coded as placeholders with appropriate comments to avoid compiler warnings. This patchset has been tested as a whole. Therefore, the tested-by fields have been added only to one patch in the set. I've refrained from adding tested-by to most of the patches, so as to not mislead the reviewer/reader. A brief note on the unit tests: o. Perform zone in zone out testing in a loop: remove a target port from the zone, add it to the zone in a loop. 1000+ iterations of this test have been successful. o. Configure multipathing, and run link flaps on single link. IOs drop briefly, but pick up as expected. o. Configure multipathing, and run link flaps on two links, with a 30 second delay in between. IOs drop briefly, but pick up as expected. o. Module load/unload test. o. Repeat the above tests with 1 queue and 64 queues. All tests were successful. Please consider this patch series for the next merge window. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241212020312.4786-1-kartilak@cisco.com Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
2025-01-14ASoC: fsl: Support micfil on i.MX943Mark Brown
Merge series from Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>: On i.MX943, the FIFO data address is changed and the bit width of CICOSR is changed. Add a new compatible string and update driver for these changes.
2025-01-14drm/amdgpu: Fix Circular Locking Dependency in AMDGPU GFX IsolationSrinivasan Shanmugam
This commit addresses a circular locking dependency issue within the GFX isolation mechanism. The problem was identified by a warning indicating a potential deadlock due to inconsistent lock acquisition order. - The `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use` and `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_end_use` functions previously acquired `enforce_isolation_mutex` and called `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl`, leading to potential deadlocks. ie., If `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is called while `enforce_isolation_mutex` is held, and `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler` is called while `kfd_sch_mutex` is held, it can create a circular dependency. By ensuring consistent lock usage, this fix resolves the issue: [ 606.297333] ====================================================== [ 606.297343] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 606.297353] 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof #19 Tainted: G OE [ 606.297365] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 606.297375] kworker/u96:3/3825 is trying to acquire lock: [ 606.297385] ffff9aa64e431cb8 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.297413] but task is already holding lock: [ 606.297423] ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.297725] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 606.297738] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 606.297749] -> #2 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 606.297765] __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930 [ 606.297776] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 606.297786] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298007] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298225] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.298412] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298603] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298866] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.298880] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.298890] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.298899] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.298908] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.298919] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.298929] -> #1 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 606.298947] __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930 [ 606.298956] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 606.298966] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler+0x87/0x370 [amdgpu] [ 606.299190] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.299199] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.299208] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.299217] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.299227] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.299236] -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 606.299257] __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810 [ 606.299267] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 606.299276] __flush_work+0x250/0x610 [ 606.299286] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80 [ 606.299296] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.299509] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.299723] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.299909] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300101] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300355] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.300369] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.300378] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.300387] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.300396] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.300406] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.300416] other info that might help us debug this: [ 606.300428] Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work) --> &adev->enforce_isolation_mutex --> &adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex [ 606.300458] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 606.300468] CPU0 CPU1 [ 606.300476] ---- ---- [ 606.300484] lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex); [ 606.300494] lock(&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex); [ 606.300508] lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex); [ 606.300521] lock((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)); [ 606.300536] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 606.300546] 5 locks held by kworker/u96:3/3825: [ 606.300555] #0: ffff9aa5aa1f5d58 ((wq_completion)comp_1.1.0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x3f5/0x680 [ 606.300577] #1: ffffaa53c3c97e40 ((work_completion)(&sched->work_run_job)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d6/0x680 [ 606.300600] #2: ffff9aa64e463c98 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x1c3/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300837] #3: ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.301062] #4: ffffffff8c1a5660 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __flush_work+0x70/0x610 [ 606.301083] stack backtrace: [ 606.301092] CPU: 14 PID: 3825 Comm: kworker/u96:3 Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof #19 [ 606.301109] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X570S GAMING X/X570S GAMING X, BIOS F7 03/22/2024 [ 606.301124] Workqueue: comp_1.1.0 drm_sched_run_job_work [gpu_sched] [ 606.301140] Call Trace: [ 606.301146] <TASK> [ 606.301154] dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0 [ 606.301166] dump_stack+0x10/0x20 [ 606.301175] print_circular_bug+0x26c/0x340 [ 606.301187] check_noncircular+0x157/0x170 [ 606.301197] ? register_lock_class+0x48/0x490 [ 606.301213] __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810 [ 606.301230] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 606.301239] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301250] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.301261] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90 [ 606.301274] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301284] __flush_work+0x250/0x610 [ 606.301293] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301305] ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10 [ 606.301318] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90 [ 606.301331] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.301345] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80 [ 606.301356] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.301661] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.302050] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.302069] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.302452] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.302862] ? drm_sched_entity_error+0x82/0x190 [gpu_sched] [ 606.302890] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.303366] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.303388] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.303409] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.303424] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303437] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.303449] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303463] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.303476] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303489] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.303512] </TASK> v2: Refactor lock handling to resolve circular dependency (Alex) - Introduced a `sched_work` flag to defer the call to `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` until after releasing `enforce_isolation_mutex`. - This change ensures that `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is called outside the critical section, preventing the circular dependency and deadlock. - The `sched_work` flag is set within the mutex-protected section if conditions are met, and the actual function call is made afterward. - This approach ensures consistent lock acquisition order. Fixes: afefd6f24502 ("drm/amdgpu: Implement Enforce Isolation Handler for KGD/KFD serialization") Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com> Suggested-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit 0b6b2dd38336d5fd49214f0e4e6495e658e3ab44) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2025-01-14platform/x86: lenovo-yoga-tab2-pro-1380-fastcharger: fix serdev raceChenyuan Yang
The yt2_1380_fc_serdev_probe() function calls devm_serdev_device_open() before setting the client ops via serdev_device_set_client_ops(). This ordering can trigger a NULL pointer dereference in the serdev controller's receive_buf handler, as it assumes serdev->ops is valid when SERPORT_ACTIVE is set. This is similar to the issue fixed in commit 5e700b384ec1 ("platform/chrome: cros_ec_uart: properly fix race condition") where devm_serdev_device_open() was called before fully initializing the device. Fix the race by ensuring client ops are set before enabling the port via devm_serdev_device_open(). Note, serdev_device_set_baudrate() and serdev_device_set_flow_control() calls should be after the devm_serdev_device_open() call. Fixes: b2ed33e8d486 ("platform/x86: Add lenovo-yoga-tab2-pro-1380-fastcharger driver") Signed-off-by: Chenyuan Yang <chenyuan0y@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250111180951.2277757-1-chenyuan0y@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
2025-01-14platform/x86: dell-uart-backlight: fix serdev raceChenyuan Yang
The dell_uart_bl_serdev_probe() function calls devm_serdev_device_open() before setting the client ops via serdev_device_set_client_ops(). This ordering can trigger a NULL pointer dereference in the serdev controller's receive_buf handler, as it assumes serdev->ops is valid when SERPORT_ACTIVE is set. This is similar to the issue fixed in commit 5e700b384ec1 ("platform/chrome: cros_ec_uart: properly fix race condition") where devm_serdev_device_open() was called before fully initializing the device. Fix the race by ensuring client ops are set before enabling the port via devm_serdev_device_open(). Note, serdev_device_set_baudrate() and serdev_device_set_flow_control() calls should be after the devm_serdev_device_open() call. Fixes: 484bae9e4d6a ("platform/x86: Add new Dell UART backlight driver") Signed-off-by: Chenyuan Yang <chenyuan0y@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250111180118.2274516-1-chenyuan0y@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
2025-01-14drm/amdgpu/gfx12: Add Cleaner Shader Support for GFX12.0 GPUsSrinivasan Shanmugam
This commit enables the cleaner shader feature for GFX12.0 and GFX12.0.1 GPUs. The cleaner shader is important for clearing GPU resources such as Local Data Share (LDS), Vector General Purpose Registers (VGPRs), and Scalar General Purpose Registers (SGPRs) between workloads. - This feature ensures that GPU resources are reset between workloads, preventing data leaks and ensuring accurate computation. By enabling the cleaner shader, this update enhances the security and reliability of GPU operations on GFX12.0 hardware. Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2025-01-14drm/amdgpu: Mark debug KFD module params as unsafeKent Russell
Mark options only meant to be used for debugging as unsafe so that the kernel is tainted when they are used. Signed-off-by: Kent Russell <kent.russell@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2025-01-14drm/amdgpu: fix fw attestation for MP0_14_0_{2/3}Gui Chengming
FW attestation was disabled on MP0_14_0_{2/3}. V2: Move check into is_fw_attestation_support func. (Frank) Remove DRM_WARN log info. (Alex) Fix format. (Christian) Signed-off-by: Gui Chengming <Jack.Gui@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Frank.Min <Frank.Min@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <Christian.Koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2025-01-14drm/amdgpu: always sync the GFX pipe on ctx switchChristian König
That is needed to enforce isolation between contexts. Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2025-01-14drm/amdgpu: mark a bunch of module parameters unsafeChristian König
We sometimes have people trying to use debugging options in production environments. Mark options only meant to be used for debugging as unsafe so that the kernel is tainted when they are used. Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Acked-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Acked-by: Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2025-01-14drm/amdgpu: Use DRM scheduler API in amdgpu_xcp_release_schedTvrtko Ursulin
Lets use the existing helper instead of peeking into the structure directly. Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Cc: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2025-01-14drm/amdgpu: disable gfxoff with the compute workload on gfx12Kenneth Feng
Disable gfxoff with the compute workload on gfx12. This is a workaround for the opencl test failure. Signed-off-by: Kenneth Feng <kenneth.feng@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2025-01-14dt-bindings: arm: coresight: Update the pattern of ete node nameMao Jinlong
The device full name is embedded trace extension. There is no good fit in generic names list for the embedded trace extension. ETE is abbreviation of embedded trace extension and the number is the CPU number that ete is associated. Change the pattern of the node name as it won't affect any device tree node as of now. Signed-off-by: Mao Jinlong <quic_jinlmao@quicinc.com> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250107090031.3319-2-quic_jinlmao@quicinc.com Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
2025-01-14ALSA: rawmidi: Make tied_device=0 as default / unknownTakashi Iwai
In the original change, rawmidi_info.tied_device showed -1 for the unknown or untied device. But this would require the user-space to check the protocol version and judge the value conditionally, which is rather error-prone. Instead, set the tied_device = 0 to be default as unknown, and indicate the real device with the offset 1, for achieving more backward compatibility. Suggested-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250114104711.19197-1-tiwai@suse.de Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2025-01-14bcachefs: Document issue with bch_stripe layoutKent Overstreet
We've got a problem with bch_stripe that is going to take an on disk format rev to fix - we can't access the block sector counts if the checksum type is unknown. Document it for now, there are a few other things to fix as well. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-01-14bcachefs: Fix self healing on read errorKent Overstreet
We were incorrectly checking if there'd been an io error. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-01-14bcachefs: Pop all the transactions from the abort oneAlan Huang
The transaction is going to abort, so there will be no cycle involving this transaction anymore. Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-01-14ftrace: Document that multiple function_graph tracing may have different timesSteven Rostedt
The function graph tracer now calculates the calltime internally and for each instance. If there are two instances that are running function graph tracer and are tracing the same functions, the timings of the length of those functions may be slightly different: # trace-cmd record -B foo -p function_graph -B bar -p function_graph sleep 5 # trace-cmd report [..] bar: sleep-981 [000] ...1. 1101.109027: funcgraph_entry: 0.764 us | mutex_unlock(); (ret=0xffff8abcc256c300) foo: sleep-981 [000] ...1. 1101.109028: funcgraph_entry: 0.748 us | mutex_unlock(); (ret=0xffff8abcc256c300) bar: sleep-981 [000] ..... 1101.109029: funcgraph_exit: 2.456 us | } (ret=0xffff8abcc256c300) foo: sleep-981 [000] ..... 1101.109029: funcgraph_exit: 2.403 us | } (ret=0xffff8abcc256c300) bar: sleep-981 [000] d..1. 1101.109031: funcgraph_entry: 0.844 us | fpregs_assert_state_consistent(); (ret=0x0) foo: sleep-981 [000] d..1. 1101.109032: funcgraph_entry: 0.803 us | fpregs_assert_state_consistent(); (ret=0x0) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250114101806.b2778cb01f34f5be9d23ad98@kernel.org/ Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250114101202.02e7bc68@gandalf.local.home Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2025-01-14bcachefs: Only abort the transactions in the cycleAlan Huang
When the cycle doesn't involve the initiator of the cycle detection, we might choose a transaction that is not involved in the cycle to abort. It shouldn't be that since it won't break the cycle, this patch therefore chooses the transaction in the cycle to abort. Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-01-14bcachefs: Introduce lock_graph_pop_fromAlan Huang
This patch introduces a helper function called lock_graph_pop_from, it pops the graph from i. Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-01-14bcachefs: Convert open-coded lock_graph_pop_all to helperAlan Huang
Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-01-14bcachefs: Do not allow no fail lock request to failAlan Huang
If the transaction chose itself as a victim before and restarted, it might request a no fail lock request this time. But it might be added to others' lock graph and be chose as the victim again, it's no longer safe without additional check. We can also convert the cycle detector to be fully RCU-based to solve that unsoundness, but the latency added to trans_put and additional memory required may not worth it. Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-01-14bcachefs: Merge the condition to avoid additional invocationAlan Huang
If the lock has been acquired and unlocked, we don't have to do clear and wakeup again, though harmless since we hold the intent lock. Merge the condition might be clearer. Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-01-14Revert "bcachefs: Fix bch2_btree_node_upgrade()"Alan Huang
This reverts commit 62448afee714354a26db8a0f3c644f58628f0792. six_lock_tryupgrade fails only if there is an intent lock held, it won't fail no matter how many read locks are held. Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2025-01-14drm/amdgpu: Fix Circular Locking Dependency in AMDGPU GFX IsolationSrinivasan Shanmugam
This commit addresses a circular locking dependency issue within the GFX isolation mechanism. The problem was identified by a warning indicating a potential deadlock due to inconsistent lock acquisition order. - The `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use` and `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_end_use` functions previously acquired `enforce_isolation_mutex` and called `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl`, leading to potential deadlocks. ie., If `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is called while `enforce_isolation_mutex` is held, and `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler` is called while `kfd_sch_mutex` is held, it can create a circular dependency. By ensuring consistent lock usage, this fix resolves the issue: [ 606.297333] ====================================================== [ 606.297343] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 606.297353] 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof #19 Tainted: G OE [ 606.297365] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 606.297375] kworker/u96:3/3825 is trying to acquire lock: [ 606.297385] ffff9aa64e431cb8 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.297413] but task is already holding lock: [ 606.297423] ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.297725] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 606.297738] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 606.297749] -> #2 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 606.297765] __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930 [ 606.297776] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 606.297786] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298007] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298225] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.298412] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298603] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298866] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.298880] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.298890] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.298899] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.298908] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.298919] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.298929] -> #1 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 606.298947] __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930 [ 606.298956] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 606.298966] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler+0x87/0x370 [amdgpu] [ 606.299190] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.299199] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.299208] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.299217] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.299227] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.299236] -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 606.299257] __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810 [ 606.299267] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 606.299276] __flush_work+0x250/0x610 [ 606.299286] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80 [ 606.299296] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.299509] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.299723] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.299909] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300101] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300355] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.300369] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.300378] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.300387] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.300396] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.300406] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.300416] other info that might help us debug this: [ 606.300428] Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work) --> &adev->enforce_isolation_mutex --> &adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex [ 606.300458] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 606.300468] CPU0 CPU1 [ 606.300476] ---- ---- [ 606.300484] lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex); [ 606.300494] lock(&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex); [ 606.300508] lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex); [ 606.300521] lock((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)); [ 606.300536] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 606.300546] 5 locks held by kworker/u96:3/3825: [ 606.300555] #0: ffff9aa5aa1f5d58 ((wq_completion)comp_1.1.0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x3f5/0x680 [ 606.300577] #1: ffffaa53c3c97e40 ((work_completion)(&sched->work_run_job)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d6/0x680 [ 606.300600] #2: ffff9aa64e463c98 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x1c3/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300837] #3: ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.301062] #4: ffffffff8c1a5660 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __flush_work+0x70/0x610 [ 606.301083] stack backtrace: [ 606.301092] CPU: 14 PID: 3825 Comm: kworker/u96:3 Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof #19 [ 606.301109] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X570S GAMING X/X570S GAMING X, BIOS F7 03/22/2024 [ 606.301124] Workqueue: comp_1.1.0 drm_sched_run_job_work [gpu_sched] [ 606.301140] Call Trace: [ 606.301146] <TASK> [ 606.301154] dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0 [ 606.301166] dump_stack+0x10/0x20 [ 606.301175] print_circular_bug+0x26c/0x340 [ 606.301187] check_noncircular+0x157/0x170 [ 606.301197] ? register_lock_class+0x48/0x490 [ 606.301213] __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810 [ 606.301230] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 606.301239] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301250] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.301261] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90 [ 606.301274] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301284] __flush_work+0x250/0x610 [ 606.301293] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301305] ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10 [ 606.301318] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90 [ 606.301331] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.301345] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80 [ 606.301356] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.301661] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.302050] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.302069] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.302452] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.302862] ? drm_sched_entity_error+0x82/0x190 [gpu_sched] [ 606.302890] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.303366] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.303388] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.303409] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.303424] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303437] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.303449] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303463] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.303476] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303489] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.303512] </TASK> v2: Refactor lock handling to resolve circular dependency (Alex) - Introduced a `sched_work` flag to defer the call to `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` until after releasing `enforce_isolation_mutex`. - This change ensures that `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is called outside the critical section, preventing the circular dependency and deadlock. - The `sched_work` flag is set within the mutex-protected section if conditions are met, and the actual function call is made afterward. - This approach ensures consistent lock acquisition order. Fixes: afefd6f24502 ("drm/amdgpu: Implement Enforce Isolation Handler for KGD/KFD serialization") Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com> Suggested-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2025-01-14spi-nand/spi-mem DTR supportMark Brown
Merge series from Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>: Here is a (big) series supposed to bring DTR support in SPI-NAND.
2025-01-14spi: ti-qspi: Use syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_argsKrzysztof Kozlowski
Use syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_args() which is a wrapper over syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle() combined with getting the syscon argument. Except simpler code this annotates within one line that given phandle has arguments, so grepping for code would be easier. There is also no real benefit in printing errors on missing syscon argument, because this is done just too late: runtime check on static/build-time data. Dtschema and Devicetree bindings offer the static/build-time check for this already. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250111185400.183760-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2025-01-14spi: amd: Fix -Wuninitialized in amd_spi_exec_mem_op()Nathan Chancellor
After commit e6204f39fe3a ("spi: amd: Drop redundant check"), clang warns (or errors with CONFIG_WERROR=y): drivers/spi/spi-amd.c:695:9: error: variable 'ret' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized] 695 | return ret; | ^~~ drivers/spi/spi-amd.c:673:9: note: initialize the variable 'ret' to silence this warning 673 | int ret; | ^ | = 0 1 error generated. ret is no longer set on anything other than the default switch path. Replace ret with a direct return of 0 at the end of the function and -EOPNOTSUPP in the default case to resolve the warning. Fixes: e6204f39fe3a ("spi: amd: Drop redundant check") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501112315.ugYQ7Ce7-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250111-spi-amd-fix-uninitialized-ret-v1-1-c66ab9f6a23d@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2025-01-14btrfs: selftests: add a selftest for deleting two out of three extentsJohannes Thumshirn
Add a selftest creating three extents and then deleting two out of the three extents. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-14btrfs: selftests: add test for punching a hole into 3 RAID stripe-extentsJohannes Thumshirn
Test creating a range of three RAID stripe-extents and then punch a hole in the middle, deleting all of the middle extents and partially deleting the "book ends". Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-14btrfs: selftests: add selftest for punching holes into the RAID stripe extentsJohannes Thumshirn
Add a selftest for punching a hole into a RAID stripe extent. The test create an 1M extent and punches a 64k bytes long hole at offset of 32k from the start of the extent. Afterwards it verifies the start and length of both resulting new extents "left" and "right" as well as the absence of the hole. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-14btrfs: selftests: test RAID stripe-tree deletion spanning two itemsJohannes Thumshirn
Add a selftest for RAID stripe-tree deletion with a delete range spanning two items, so that we're punching a hole into two adjacent RAID stripe extents truncating the first and "moving" the second to the right. The following diagram illustrates the operation: |--- RAID Stripe Extent ---||--- RAID Stripe Extent ---| |----- keep -----|--- drop ---|----- keep ----| Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-14btrfs: selftests: don't split RAID extents in halfJohannes Thumshirn
The selftests for partially deleting the start or tail of RAID stripe-extents split these extents in half. This can hide errors in the calculation, so don't split the RAID stripe-extents in half but delete the first or last 16K of the 64K extents. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-14btrfs: selftests: check for correct return value of failed lookupJohannes Thumshirn
Commit 5e72aabc1fff ("btrfs: return ENODATA in case RST lookup fails") changed btrfs_get_raid_extent_offset()'s return value to ENODATA in case the RAID stripe-tree lookup failed. Adjust the test cases which check for absence of a given range to check for ENODATA as return value in this case. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-14btrfs: don't use btrfs_set_item_key_safe on RAID stripe-extentsJohannes Thumshirn
Don't use btrfs_set_item_key_safe() to modify the keys in the RAID stripe-tree, as this can lead to corruption of the tree, which is caught by the checks in btrfs_set_item_key_safe(): BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): leaf 49168384 gen 15 total ptrs 194 free space 8329 owner 12 BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): refs 2 lock_owner 1030 current 1030 [ snip ] item 105 key (354549760 230 20480) itemoff 14587 itemsize 16 stride 0 devid 5 physical 67502080 item 106 key (354631680 230 4096) itemoff 14571 itemsize 16 stride 0 devid 1 physical 88559616 item 107 key (354631680 230 32768) itemoff 14555 itemsize 16 stride 0 devid 1 physical 88555520 item 108 key (354717696 230 28672) itemoff 14539 itemsize 16 stride 0 devid 2 physical 67604480 [ snip ] BTRFS critical (device nvme1n1): slot 106 key (354631680 230 32768) new key (354635776 230 4096) ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2602! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1055 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1+ #1464 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0xf7/0x270 Code: <snip> RSP: 0018:ffffc90001337ab0 EFLAGS: 00010287 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8881115fd000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 00000000ffffffff RBP: ffff888110ed6f50 R08: 00000000ffffefff R09: ffffffff8244c500 R10: 00000000ffffefff R11: 00000000ffffffff R12: ffff888100586000 R13: 00000000000000c9 R14: ffffc90001337b1f R15: ffff888110f23b58 FS: 00007f7d75c72740(0000) GS:ffff88813bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fa811652c60 CR3: 0000000111398001 CR4: 0000000000370eb0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body.cold+0x14/0x1a ? die+0x2e/0x50 ? do_trap+0xca/0x110 ? do_error_trap+0x65/0x80 ? btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0xf7/0x270 ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70 ? btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0xf7/0x270 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0xf7/0x270 btrfs_partially_delete_raid_extent+0xc4/0xe0 btrfs_delete_raid_extent+0x227/0x240 __btrfs_free_extent.isra.0+0x57f/0x9c0 ? exc_coproc_segment_overrun+0x40/0x40 __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x2fa/0xe80 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x81/0xe0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x2dd/0xbe0 ? preempt_count_add+0x52/0xb0 btrfs_sync_file+0x375/0x4c0 do_fsync+0x39/0x70 __x64_sys_fsync+0x13/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x54/0x110 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f7d7550ef90 Code: <snip> RSP: 002b:00007ffd70237248 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007f7d7550ef90 RDX: 000000000000013a RSI: 000000000040eb28 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 000000000000001b R08: 0000000000000078 R09: 00007ffd7023725c R10: 00007f7d75400390 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 028f5c28f5c28f5c R13: 8f5c28f5c28f5c29 R14: 000000000040b520 R15: 00007f7d75c726c8 </TASK> While the root cause of the tree order corruption isn't clear, using btrfs_duplicate_item() to copy the item and then adjusting both the key and the per-device physical addresses is a safe way to counter this problem. Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-14btrfs: implement hole punching for RAID stripe extentsJohannes Thumshirn
If the stripe extent we want to delete starts before the range we want to delete and ends after the range we want to delete we're punching a hole in the stripe extent: |--- RAID Stripe Extent ---| | keep |--- drop ---| keep | This means we need to a) truncate the existing item and b) create a second item for the remaining range. Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-14btrfs: fix deletion of a range spanning parts two RAID stripe extentsJohannes Thumshirn
When a user requests the deletion of a range that spans multiple stripe extents and btrfs_search_slot() returns us the second RAID stripe extent, we need to pick the previous item and truncate it, if there's still a range to delete left, move on to the next item. The following diagram illustrates the operation: |--- RAID Stripe Extent ---||--- RAID Stripe Extent ---| |--- keep ---|--- drop ---| While at it, comment the trivial case of a whole item delete as well. Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-14btrfs: fix tail delete of RAID stripe-extentsJohannes Thumshirn
Fix tail delete of RAID stripe-extents, if there is a range to be deleted as well after the tail delete of the extent. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-14btrfs: fix front delete range calculation for RAID stripe extentsJohannes Thumshirn
When deleting the front of a RAID stripe-extent the delete code miscalculates the size on how much to pad the remaining extent part in the front. Fix the calculation so we're always having the sizes we expect. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-14btrfs: assert RAID stripe-extent length is always greater than 0Johannes Thumshirn
When modifying a RAID stripe-extent, ASSERT() that the length of the new RAID stripe-extent is always greater than 0. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-14btrfs: don't try to delete RAID stripe-extents if we don't need toJohannes Thumshirn
Even if the RAID stripe-tree is not enabled in the filesystem, do_free_extent_accounting() still calls into btrfs_delete_raid_extent(). Check if the extent in question is on a block-group that has a profile which is used by RAID stripe-tree before attempting to delete a stripe extent. Return early if it doesn't, otherwise we're doing a unnecessary search. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
generated by cgit (git 2.34.1) at 2025-09-23 06:15:08 +0000