| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Currently, the condition "__this_cpu_read(ksoftirqd) == current" is used to
invoke rcu_softirq_qs() in ksoftirqd tasks context for non-RT kernels.
This works correctly as long as the context is actually task context but
this condition is wrong when:
- the current task is ksoftirqd
- the task is interrupted in a RCU read side critical section
- __do_softirq() is invoked on return from interrupt
Syzkaller triggered the following scenario:
-> finish_task_switch()
-> put_task_struct_rcu_user()
-> call_rcu(&task->rcu, delayed_put_task_struct)
-> __kasan_record_aux_stack()
-> pfn_valid()
-> rcu_read_lock_sched()
<interrupt>
__irq_exit_rcu()
-> __do_softirq)()
-> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) &&
__this_cpu_read(ksoftirqd) == current)
-> rcu_softirq_qs()
-> RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map))
The rcu quiescent state is reported in the rcu-read critical section, so
the lockdep warning is triggered.
Fix this by splitting out the inner working of __do_softirq() into a helper
function which takes an argument to distinguish between ksoftirqd task
context and interrupted context and invoke it from the relevant call sites
with the proper context information and use that for the conditional
invocation of rcu_softirq_qs().
Reported-by: syzbot+dce04ed6d1438ad69656@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240427102808.29356-1-qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8f281a10-b85a-4586-9586-5bbc12dc784f@paulmck-laptop/T/#mea8aba4abfcb97bbf499d169ce7f30c4cff1b0e3
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
Fix uninitialized symbol 'share' in smb2_tree_connect().
Fixes: e9d8c2f95ab8 ("ksmbd: add continuous availability share parameter")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
|
|
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull scheduler fixes from Ingo Molnar:
- Fix EEVDF corner cases
- Fix two nohz_full= related bugs that can cause boot crashes
and warnings
* tag 'sched-urgent-2024-04-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
sched/isolation: Fix boot crash when maxcpus < first housekeeping CPU
sched/isolation: Prevent boot crash when the boot CPU is nohz_full
sched/eevdf: Prevent vlag from going out of bounds in reweight_eevdf()
sched/eevdf: Fix miscalculation in reweight_entity() when se is not curr
sched/eevdf: Always update V if se->on_rq when reweighting
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull x86 fixes from Ingo Molnar:
- Make the CPU_MITIGATIONS=n interaction with conflicting
mitigation-enabling boot parameters a bit saner.
- Re-enable CPU mitigations by default on non-x86
- Fix TDX shared bit propagation on mprotect()
- Fix potential show_regs() system hang when PKE initialization
is not fully finished yet.
- Add the 0x10-0x1f model IDs to the Zen5 range
- Harden #VC instruction emulation some more
* tag 'x86-urgent-2024-04-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
cpu: Ignore "mitigations" kernel parameter if CPU_MITIGATIONS=n
cpu: Re-enable CPU mitigations by default for !X86 architectures
x86/tdx: Preserve shared bit on mprotect()
x86/cpu: Fix check for RDPKRU in __show_regs()
x86/CPU/AMD: Add models 0x10-0x1f to the Zen5 range
x86/sev: Check for MWAITX and MONITORX opcodes in the #VC handler
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull irq fix from Ingo Molnar:
"Fix a double free bug in the init error path of the GICv3 irqchip
driver"
* tag 'irq-urgent-2024-04-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
irqchip/gic-v3-its: Prevent double free on error
|
|
When erofs_kill_sb() is called in block dev based mode, s_bdev may not
have been initialised yet, and if CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ONDEMAND is enabled,
it will be mistaken for fscache mode, and then attempt to free an anon_dev
that has never been allocated, triggering the following warning:
============================================
ida_free called for id=0 which is not allocated.
WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 926 at lib/idr.c:525 ida_free+0x134/0x140
Modules linked in:
CPU: 14 PID: 926 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3-dirty #630
RIP: 0010:ida_free+0x134/0x140
Call Trace:
<TASK>
erofs_kill_sb+0x81/0x90
deactivate_locked_super+0x35/0x80
get_tree_bdev+0x136/0x1e0
vfs_get_tree+0x2c/0xf0
do_new_mount+0x190/0x2f0
[...]
============================================
Now when erofs_kill_sb() is called, erofs_sb_info must have been
initialised, so use sbi->fsid to distinguish between the two modes.
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240419123611.947084-3-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
|
|
Instead of allocating the erofs_sb_info in fill_super() allocate it during
erofs_init_fs_context() and ensure that erofs can always have the info
available during erofs_kill_sb(). After this erofs_fs_context is no longer
needed, replace ctx with sbi, no functional changes.
Suggested-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240419123611.947084-2-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
|
|
When prepare_ondemand_read failed, wrong error message is printed.
The prepare_read is also implemented in cachefiles, so we amend it.
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240424084247.759432-1-lihongbo22@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
|
|
We did not delay after the second strobe signal, so another immediately
following access could potentially corrupt the written value.
This is a purely speculative fix with no supporting evidence, but after
taking out the spinlocks around the writes, it seems plausible that a
modern processor could be actually too fast. Also, it's just cleaner to
be consistent.
Signed-off-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Message-ID: <20240428093716.3198666-7-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
|
|
A side effect of making the dock monitoring interrupt-driven was that
we'd be very quick to program a freshly connected dock. However, for
unclear reasons, the dock does not work when we do that - despite the
FPGA netlist upload going just fine. We work around this by adding a
delay before programming the dock; for safety, the value is several
times as much as was determined empirically.
Note that a badly timed dock hot-plug would have triggered the problem
even before the referenced commit - but now it would happen 100% instead
of about 3% of the time, thus making it impossible to work around by
re-plugging.
Fixes: fbb64eedf5a3 ("ALSA: emu10k1: make E-MU dock monitoring interrupt-driven")
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218584
Signed-off-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Message-ID: <20240428093716.3198666-6-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
|
|
The FPGA access through the GPIO port does not interfere with other
sound processor register access, so there is no need to subject it to
emu_lock. And after moving all FPGA access out of the interrupt handler,
it does not need to be IRQ-safe, either.
What's more, attaching the dock causes a firmware upload, which takes
several seconds. We really don't want to disable IRQs for this long, and
even less also have someone else spin with IRQs disabled waiting for us.
Therefore, use a mutex for FPGA access locking.
This makes the code somewhat more noisy, as we need to wrap bigger
sections into the mutex, as it needs to enclose the spinlocks.
The latter has the "side effect" of fixing dock FPGA programming in a
corner case: a really badly timed mixer access right between entering
FPGA programming mode and uploading the netlist would mess up the
protocol.
Signed-off-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Message-ID: <20240428093716.3198666-5-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
|
|
The actual event processing was already done by workqueue items. We can
move the event dispatching there as well, rather than doing it already
in the interrupt handler callback.
This change has a rather profound "side effect" on the reliability of
the FPGA programming: once we enter programming mode, we must not issue
any snd_emu1010_fpga_{read,write}() calls until we're done, as these
would badly mess up the programming protocol. But exactly that would
happen when trying to program the dock, as that triggers GPIO interrupts
as a side effect. This is mitigated by deferring the actual interrupt
handling, as workqueue items are not re-entrant.
To avoid scheduling the dispatcher on non-events, we now explicitly
ignore GPIO IRQs triggered by "uninteresting" pins, which happens a lot
as a side effect of calling snd_emu1010_fpga_{read,write}().
Fixes: fbb64eedf5a3 ("ALSA: emu10k1: make E-MU dock monitoring interrupt-driven")
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218584
Signed-off-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Message-ID: <20240428093716.3198666-4-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
|
|
Pulled out of the next patch to improve its legibility.
As the function is now available, call it directly from
snd_emu10k1_emu1010_init(), thus making the MicroDock firmware loading
synchronous - there isn't really a reason not to. Note that this does
not affect the AudioDocks of rev1 cards, as these have no independent
power supplies, and thus come up only a while after the main card is
initialized.
As a drive-by, adjust the priorities of two messages to better reflect
their impact.
Signed-off-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Message-ID: <20240428093716.3198666-3-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
|
|
While there are two separate IRQ status bits for dock attach and detach,
the hardware appears to mix them up more or less randomly, making them
useless for tracking what actually happened. It is much safer to check
the dock status separately and proceed based on that, as the old polling
code did.
Note that the code assumes that only the dock can be hot-plugged - if
other option card bits changed, the logic would break.
Fixes: fbb64eedf5a3 ("ALSA: emu10k1: make E-MU dock monitoring interrupt-driven")
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218584
Signed-off-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Message-ID: <20240428093716.3198666-2-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
|
|
housekeeping_setup() checks cpumask_intersects(present, online) to ensure
that the kernel will have at least one housekeeping CPU after smp_init(),
but this doesn't work if the maxcpus= kernel parameter limits the number of
processors available after bootup.
For example, a kernel with "maxcpus=2 nohz_full=0-2" parameters crashes at
boot time on a virtual machine with 4 CPUs.
Change housekeeping_setup() to use cpumask_first_and() and check that the
returned CPU number is valid and less than setup_max_cpus.
Another corner case is "nohz_full=0" on a machine with a single CPU or with
the maxcpus=1 kernel argument. In this case non_housekeeping_mask is empty
and tick_nohz_full_setup() makes no sense. And indeed, the kernel hits the
WARN_ON(tick_nohz_full_running) in tick_sched_do_timer().
And how should the kernel interpret the "nohz_full=" parameter? It should
be silently ignored, but currently cpulist_parse() happily returns the
empty cpumask and this leads to the same problem.
Change housekeeping_setup() to check cpumask_empty(non_housekeeping_mask)
and do nothing in this case.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240413141746.GA10008@redhat.com
|
|
Documentation/timers/no_hz.rst states that the "nohz_full=" mask must not
include the boot CPU, which is no longer true after:
08ae95f4fd3b ("nohz_full: Allow the boot CPU to be nohz_full").
However after:
aae17ebb53cd ("workqueue: Avoid using isolated cpus' timers on queue_delayed_work")
the kernel will crash at boot time in this case; housekeeping_any_cpu()
returns an invalid CPU number until smp_init() brings the first
housekeeping CPU up.
Change housekeeping_any_cpu() to check the result of cpumask_any_and() and
return smp_processor_id() in this case.
This is just the simple and backportable workaround which fixes the
symptom, but smp_processor_id() at boot time should be safe at least for
type == HK_TYPE_TIMER, this more or less matches the tick_do_timer_boot_cpu
logic.
There is no worry about cpu_down(); tick_nohz_cpu_down() will not allow to
offline tick_do_timer_cpu (the 1st online housekeeping CPU).
Fixes: aae17ebb53cd ("workqueue: Avoid using isolated cpus' timers on queue_delayed_work")
Reported-by: Chris von Recklinghausen <crecklin@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240411143905.GA19288@redhat.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240402105847.GA24832@redhat.com/
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warnings:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ul-pico-dwarf.dtb: pwm@2088000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ul-pico-hobbit.dtb: pwm@2088000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ul-pico-pi.dtb: pwm@2088000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warnings:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ul-kontron-bl.dtb: pwm@20fc000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ul-kontron-bl-43.dtb: pwm@20fc000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ull-kontron-bl.dtb: pwm@20fc000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warning:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ul-kontron-bl-43.dtb: pwm@20f8000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warnings:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ul-isiot-emmc.dtb: pwm@20fc000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ul-isiot-nand.dtb: pwm@20fc000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warnings:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ul-opos6uldev.dtb: pwm@2088000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ull-opos6uldev.dtb: pwm@2088000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warning:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ul-geam.dtb: pwm@20fc000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warning:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ul-ccimx6ulsbcpro.dtb: pwm@20f0000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warnings:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ul-14x14-evk.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ull-14x14-evk.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ulz-14x14-evk.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warnings:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6sx-softing-vining-2000.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6sx-softing-vining-2000.dtb: pwm@2084000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6sx-softing-vining-2000.dtb: pwm@22a8000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
There is no need for an explicit status = "okay" in the pwm nodes as
the soc dtsi doesn't disable these devices. Drop these properties, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warnings:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6sx-sdb-reva.dtb: pwm@2088000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6sx-sdb-sai.dtb: pwm@2088000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6sx-sdb.dtb: pwm@2088000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6sx-sdb-mqs.dtb: pwm@2088000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
There is no need for an explicit status = "okay" in the pwm node as
the soc dtsi doesn't disable this device. Drop this property, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warning:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6sx-nitrogen6sx.dtb: pwm@208c000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
There is no need for an explicit status = "okay" in the pwm node as
the soc dtsi doesn't disable this device. Drop this property, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warning:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6sll-evk.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
There is no need for an explicit status = "okay" in the pwm node as
the soc dtsi doesn't disable this device. Drop this property, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warning:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6sl-evk.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
There is no need for an explicit status = "okay" in the pwm node as
the soc dtsi doesn't disable these devices. Drop this property, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warning:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-var-dt6customboard.dtb: pwm@2084000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warning:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-prti6q.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warning:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-pistachio.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warning:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-novena.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warnings:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-kp-tpc.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-kp-tpc.dtb: pwm@2084000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warnings:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6dl-skov-revc-lt2.dtb: pwm@2084000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6dl-skov-revc-lt6.dtb: pwm@2084000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-skov-revc-lt2.dtb: pwm@2084000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-skov-revc-lt6.dtb: pwm@2084000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-skov-reve-mi1010ait-1cp1.dtb: pwm@2084000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warnings:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6dl-savageboard.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-savageboard.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warnings:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6dl-sabresd.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-sabresd.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qp-sabresd.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warnings:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6dl-sabrelite.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6dl-sabrelite.dtb: pwm@2088000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6dl-sabrelite.dtb: pwm@208c000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-sabrelite.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-sabrelite.dtb: pwm@2088000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-sabrelite.dtb: pwm@208c000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warnings:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6dl-sabreauto.dtb: pwm@2088000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-sabreauto.dtb: pwm@2088000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qp-sabreauto.dtb: pwm@2088000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warnings:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6dl-phytec-mira-rdk-nand.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-phytec-mira-rdk-emmc.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-phytec-mira-rdk-nand.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qp-phytec-mira-rdk-nand.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warnings:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6dl-nitrogen6x.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6dl-nitrogen6x.dtb: pwm@208c000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-nitrogen6x.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-nitrogen6x.dtb: pwm@208c000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warnings:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-nitrogen6_som2.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-nitrogen6_som2.dtb: pwm@208c000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qp-nitrogen6_som2.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qp-nitrogen6_som2.dtb: pwm@208c000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warnings:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-nitrogen6_max.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-nitrogen6_max.dtb: pwm@2084000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-nitrogen6_max.dtb: pwm@208c000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qp-nitrogen6_max.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qp-nitrogen6_max.dtb: pwm@2084000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qp-nitrogen6_max.dtb: pwm@208c000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warnings:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6dl-nit6xlite.dtb: pwm@2080000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6dl-nit6xlite.dtb: pwm@208c000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warnings:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6dl-icore.dtb: pwm@2088000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6dl-icore-mipi.dtb: pwm@2088000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-icore.dtb: pwm@2088000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-icore-mipi.dtb: pwm@2088000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-icore-ofcap10.dtb: pwm@2088000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-icore-ofcap12.dtb: pwm@2088000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
|
The binding dictates using 3 pwm-cells. Adhere to that.
This fixes the following dtbs_check warnings:
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6dl-gw5904.dtb: pwm@208c000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-gw5904.dtb: pwm@208c000: #pwm-cells:0:0: 3 was expected
from schema : http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/imx-pwm.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
|
