| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This patch adds test to exercise the bpf_sk_storage_get()
and bpf_sk_storage_delete() helper from the bpf_dctcp.c.
The setup and check on the sk_storage is done immediately
before and after the connect().
This patch also takes this chance to move the pthread_create()
after the connect() has been done. That will remove the need of
the "wait_thread" label.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200320152107.2169904-1-kafai@fb.com
|
|
This patch adds bpf_sk_storage_get() and bpf_sk_storage_delete()
helper to the bpf_tcp_ca's struct_ops. That would allow
bpf-tcp-cc to:
1) share sk private data with other bpf progs.
2) use bpf_sk_storage as a private storage for a bpf-tcp-cc
if the existing icsk_ca_priv is not big enough.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200320152101.2169498-1-kafai@fb.com
|
|
THUNK_TARGET defines [thunk_target] as having "rm" input constraints
when CONFIG_RETPOLINE is not set, which isn't constrained enough for
this specific case.
For inline assembly that modifies the stack pointer before using this
input, the underspecification of constraints is dangerous, and results
in an indirect call to a previously pushed flags register.
In this case `entry`'s stack slot is good enough to satisfy the "m"
constraint in "rm", but the inline assembly in
handle_external_interrupt_irqoff() modifies the stack pointer via
push+pushf before using this input, which in this case results in
calling what was the previous state of the flags register, rather than
`entry`.
Be more specific in the constraints by requiring `entry` be in a
register, and not a memory operand.
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+3f29ca2efb056a761e38@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Debugged-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Debugged-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Debugged-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Message-Id: <20200323191243.30002-1-ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200320232515.GA24800@embeddedor.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200320232556.GA24989@embeddedor.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
CONFIG_GENERIC_GETTIMEOFDAY is a sufficient condition to verify if an
architecture implements asm/vdso/clocksource.h or not. The current
implementation wrongly assumes that the same is true for the config
option CONFIG_ARCH_CLOCKSOURCE_DATA.
This results in a series of build errors on ia64/sparc/sparc64 like this:
In file included from ./include/linux/clocksource.h:31,
from ./include/linux/clockchips.h:14,
from ./include/linux/tick.h:8,
from fs/proc/stat.c:15:
./include/vdso/clocksource.h:9:10: fatal error: asm/vdso/clocksource.h:
No such file or directory
9 | #include <asm/vdso/clocksource.h>
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fix the issue removing the unneeded config condition.
Fixes: 14ee2ac618e4 ("linux/clocksource.h: Extract common header for vDSO")
Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200323133920.46546-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com
|
|
When handling auto-connected devices, we should execute the rest of the
connection complete when it was previously discovered and it is an ACL
connection.
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
|
|
If Bluetooth fails to enter the suspended state correctly, restore the
state to running (re-enabling scans). PM_POST_SUSPEND is only sent to
notifiers that successfully return from PM_PREPARE_SUSPEND notification
so we should recover gracefully if it fails.
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
|
|
User Mode Linux is a flavor of x86 that from the vDSO prospective always
falls back on system calls. This implies that it does not require any
of the unified vDSO definitions and their inclusion causes side effects
like this:
In file included from include/vdso/processor.h:10:0,
from include/vdso/datapage.h:17,
from arch/x86/include/asm/vgtod.h:7,
from arch/x86/um/../kernel/sys_ia32.c:49:
>> arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/processor.h:11:29: error: redefinition of 'rep_nop'
static __always_inline void rep_nop(void)
^~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/rcupdate.h:30:0,
from include/linux/rculist.h:11,
from include/linux/pid.h:5,
from include/linux/sched.h:14,
from arch/x86/um/../kernel/sys_ia32.c:25:
arch/x86/um/asm/processor.h:24:20: note: previous definition of 'rep_nop' was here
static inline void rep_nop(void)
Make sure that the unnecessary headers are not included when um is built
to address the problem.
Fixes: abc22418db02 ("x86/vdso: Enable x86 to use common headers")
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200323124109.7104-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com
|
|
The warning was intended to spot complete_all() users from hardirq
context on PREEMPT_RT. The warning as-is will also trigger in interrupt
handlers, which are threaded on PREEMPT_RT, which was not intended.
Use lockdep_assert_RT_in_threaded_ctx() which triggers in non-preemptive
context on PREEMPT_RT.
Fixes: a5c6234e1028 ("completion: Use simple wait queues")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200323152019.4qjwluldohuh3by5@linutronix.de
|
|
Fix the warning reported by sparse as:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c:4819:17: sparse: sparse: cast from restricted __le16
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c:4892:17: sparse: sparse: cast from restricted __le16
Signed-off-by: Chris Chiu <chiu@endlessm.com>
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jes Sorensen <jes@trained-monkey.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319064341.49500-1-chiu@endlessm.com
|
|
Add mt7615_mcu_wait_response declaration in mt7615.h since it will be
reused adding usb support to mt7615 driver
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes: 044a43256a35 ("mt76: mt7615: introduce mt7615_mcu_wait_response")
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d341335a636b6ccd088dd2cfeec2d296eb4dc8c7.1584534454.git.lorenzo@kernel.org
|
|
Fix cid field endianness in unified mt7615_uni_txd header
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes: 323d7daad363 ("mt76: mt7615: introduce uni cmd command types")
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2447b399d3c63885d43f65ba988c057fa96f5236.1584534454.git.lorenzo@kernel.org
|
|
Convert fields in mt7663_fw_trailer and mt7663_fw_buf to little-endian
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes: f40ac0f3d3c0 ("mt76: mt7615: introduce mt7663e support")
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d14dfd7cd91a4dda8c5dcd03e8a70ff11314182e.1584534454.git.lorenzo@kernel.org
|
|
After MAC switched power, the hardware's RF registers will have
its default value, but the default value for path B is incorrect.
So, load RF path B first, to decrease the period between MAC on
and RF path B config.
By test, if we load path A first, then there's ~300ms that the
path B is incorrect, it could lead to BT coex's A2DP glitch.
But if we configure path B first, there will only have ~3ms,
significantly lower possibility to have A2DP sound glitch.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200318095224.12940-1-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
|
Driver used to kick off every TX packets, that will waste some
time while we can do better to kick off the TX packets once after
they are all prepared to be transmitted.
For PCI, it uses DMA engine to transfer the SKBs to the device,
and the transition of the state of the DMA engine could be a cost.
Driver can save some time to kick off multiple SKBs once so that
the DMA engine will have only one transition.
So, split rtw_hci_ops::tx() to rtw_hci_ops::tx_write() and
rtw_hci_ops::tx_kick_off() to explicitly kick the SKBs off after
they are written to the prepared buffer. For packets come from
ieee80211_ops::tx(), write one and then kick it off immediately.
For packets queued in TX queue, which come from
ieee80211_ops::wake_tx_queue(), we can dequeue them, write them
to the buffer, and then kick them off together.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312080852.16684-6-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
|
Add a macro TRX_BD_IDX_MASK for access the TX/RX BD indexes.
The hardware has only 12 bits for TX/RX BD indexes, we should not
initialize a TX/RX ring or access the TX/RX BD index with a length
that is larger than TRX_BD_IDX_MASK.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312080852.16684-5-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
|
Each device has only one reserved page shared with all of the
vifs, so it seems not reasonable to pass vif as one of the
arguments to rtw_fw_download_rsvd_page(). If driver is going
to run more than one vif, the content of reserved page could
not be built for all of the vifs.
To fix it, let each vif maintain its own reserved page list,
and build the final reserved page to download to the firmware
from all of the vifs. Hence driver should add reserved pages
to each vif according to the vif->type when adding the vif.
For station mode, add reserved page with rtw_add_rsvd_page_sta().
If the station mode is going to suspend in PNO (net-detect)
mode, remove the reserved pages used for normal mode, and add
new one for wowlan mode with rtw_add_rsvd_page_pno().
For beacon mode, only beacon is required to be added using
rtw_add_rsvd_page_bcn().
This would make the code flow simpler as we don't need to
add reserved pages when vif is running, just add/remove them
when ieee80211_ops::[add|remove]_interface.
When driver is going to download the reserved page, it will
collect pages from all of the vifs, this list is maintained
by rtwdev, with build_list as the pages' member. That way, we
can still build a list of reserved pages to be downloaded.
Also we can get the location of the pages from the list that
is maintained by rtwdev.
The biggest problem is that the first page should always be
beacon, if other type of reserved page is put in the first
page, the tx descriptor and offset could be wrong.
But station mode vif does not add beacon into its list, so
we need to add a dummy page in front of the list, to make
sure other pages will not be put in the first page. As the
dummy page is allocated when building the list, we must free
it before building a new list of reserved pages to firmware.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312080852.16684-4-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
|
Extract skb allocation routines for rsvd_page and h2c.
These routines should also be used by USB and SDIO.
This should not change the logic at all.
memset() for pkt_info is unnecessary, just declare as {0}.
Also skb_put()/memcpy() can be replaced by skb_put_data().
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312080852.16684-3-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
|
This driver generally only needs to ensure that
(a) it doesn't try to process TX interrupts at the same time as
power-save operations (and similar)
(b) the device interrupt gets disabled while we're still handling the
last set of interrupts
For (a), all the operations (e.g., PS transitions, packet handling)
happens in non-atomic contexts (e.g., threaded IRQ).
For (b), we only need mutual exclusion for brief sections (i.e., while
we're actually manipulating the interrupt mask/status).
So, we can introduce a separate lock for handling (b), disabling IRQs
while we do it. For (a), we can demote the locking to BH only, now that
(b) (the only steps done in atomic context) and that has its own lock.
This helps reduce the amount of time this driver spends with IRQs off.
Notably, transitioning out of power-save modes can take >3 milliseconds,
and this transition is done under the protection of 'irq_lock'.
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312080852.16684-2-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319230617.GA15035@embeddedor.com
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319230525.GA14835@embeddedor.com
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319225133.GA29672@embeddedor.com
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319225002.GA28673@embeddedor.com
|
|
snprintf() is a hard-to-use function, and it's especially difficult to
use it properly for concatenating substrings in a buffer with a limited
size. Since snprintf() returns the would-be-output size, not the actual
size, the subsequent use of snprintf() may point to the incorrect
position easily. Also, returning the value from snprintf() directly to
sysfs show function would pass a bogus value that is higher than the
actually truncated string.
That said, although the current code doesn't actually overflow the
buffer with PAGE_SIZE, it's a usage that shouldn't be done. Or it's
worse; this gives a wrong confidence as if it were doing safe
operations.
This patch replaces such snprintf() calls with a safer version,
scnprintf(). It returns the actual output size, hence it's more
intuitive and the code does what's expected.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200305111401.GA25126@embeddedor
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200305111216.GA24982@embeddedor
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Acked-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225020804.GA9428@embeddedor
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Acked-by: Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi.bhat@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225020413.GA8057@embeddedor
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225011846.GA2773@embeddedor
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225011709.GA601@embeddedor
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225011415.GA31868@embeddedor
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225011151.GA30675@embeddedor
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225003408.GA28675@embeddedor
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225002746.GA26789@embeddedor
|
|
The GEO_TX_POWER_LIMIT command was sent although
there is no wgds table, so the fw got wrong SAR values
from the driver.
Fix this by avoiding sending the command if no wgds
tables are available.
Signed-off-by: Golan Ben Ami <golan.ben.ami@intel.com>
Fixes: 39c1a9728f93 ("iwlwifi: refactor the SAR tables from mvm to acpi")
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Tested-By: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
Tested-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20200318081237.46db40617cc6.Id5cf852ec8c5dbf20ba86bad7b165a0c828f8b2e@changeid
|
|
Three devices, with PCI device ID 0x2526 and subdevice IDs 0x4010,
0x4018 and 0x401C were removed accidentally. Add them back.
Reported-by: Brett Hassal <brett.hassal@gmail.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206661
Fixes: 0b295a1eb81f ("iwlwifi: add device name to device_info")
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20200317123331.16762b29f26c.I928bcaa799e7b3d33838c0667714eeb9fa665290@changeid
|
|
Zygo reported a deadlock where a task was stuck in the inode logical
resolve code. The deadlock looks like this
Task 1
btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino
->iterate_inodes_from_logical
->iterate_extent_inodes
->path->search_commit_root isn't set, so a transaction is started
->resolve_indirect_ref for a root that's being deleted
->search for our key, attempt to lock a node, DEADLOCK
Task 2
btrfs_drop_snapshot
->walk down to a leaf, lock it, walk up, lock node
->end transaction
->start transaction
-> wait_cur_trans
Task 3
btrfs_commit_transaction
->wait_event(cur_trans->write_wait, num_writers == 1) DEADLOCK
We are holding a transaction open in btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino while we
try to resolve our references. btrfs_drop_snapshot() holds onto its
locks while it stops and starts transaction handles, because it assumes
nobody is going to touch the root now. Commit just does what commit
does, waiting for the writers to finish, blocking any new trans handles
from starting.
Fix this by making the backref code not try to resolve backrefs of roots
that are currently being deleted. This will keep us from walking into a
snapshot that's currently being deleted.
This problem was harder to hit before because we rarely broke out of the
snapshot delete halfway through, but with my delayed ref throttling code
it happened much more often. However we've always been able to do this,
so it's not a new problem.
Fixes: 8da6d5815c59 ("Btrfs: added btrfs_find_all_roots()")
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We always search the commit root of the extent tree for looking up back
references, however we track the reloc roots based on their current
bytenr.
This is wrong, if we commit the transaction between relocating tree
blocks we could end up in this code in build_backref_tree
if (key.objectid == key.offset) {
/*
* Only root blocks of reloc trees use backref
* pointing to itself.
*/
root = find_reloc_root(rc, cur->bytenr);
ASSERT(root);
cur->root = root;
break;
}
find_reloc_root() is looking based on the bytenr we had in the commit
root, but if we've COWed this reloc root we will not find that bytenr,
and we will trip over the ASSERT(root).
Fix this by using the commit_root->start bytenr for indexing the commit
root. Then we change the __update_reloc_root() caller to be used when
we switch the commit root for the reloc root during commit.
This fixes the panic I was seeing when we started throttling relocation
for delayed refs.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
There are two bugs here, but fixing them independently would just result
in pain if you happened to bisect between the two patches.
First is how we handle the -EAGAIN from relocate_tree_block(). We don't
set error, unless we happen to be the first node, which makes no sense,
I have no idea what the code was trying to accomplish here.
We in fact _do_ want err set here so that we know we need to restart in
relocate_block_group(). Also we need finish_pending_nodes() to not
actually call link_to_upper(), because we didn't actually relocate the
block.
And then if we do get -EAGAIN we do not want to set our backref cache
last_trans to the one before ours. This would force us to update our
backref cache if we didn't cross transaction ids, which would mean we'd
have some nodes updated to their new_bytenr, but still able to find
their old bytenr because we're searching the same commit root as the
last time we went through relocate_tree_blocks.
Fixing these two things keeps us from panicing when we start breaking
out of relocate_tree_blocks() either for delayed ref flushing or enospc.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Since we're not only checking for metadata reservations but also if we
need to throttle our delayed ref generation, reorder
reserve_metadata_space() above the select_one_root() call in
relocate_tree_block().
The reason we want this is because select_reloc_root() will mess with
the backref cache, and if we're going to bail we want to be able to
cleanly remove this node from the backref cache and come back along to
regenerate it. Move it up so this is the first thing we do to make
restarting cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Here we are just searching down to the bytenr we're building the backref
tree for, and all of it's paths to the roots. These bytenrs are not
guaranteed to be anywhere near each other, so readahead just generates
extra latency.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Readahead will generate a lot of extra reads for adjacent nodes, but
when running delayed refs we have no idea if the next ref is going to be
adjacent or not, so this potentially just generates a lot of extra IO.
To make matters worse each ref is truly just looking for one item, it
doesn't generally search forward, so we simply don't need it here.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
With BTRFS_SUBVOL_CREATE_ASYNC support remove it's no longer required to
pass the async_transid parameter so remove it and any code using it.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid no longer takes a transid argument, so
remove it and rename the function to __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create to
reflect it's an internal, worker function.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This functionality was deprecated in kernel 5.4. Since no one has
complained of the impending removal it's time we did so.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add comment ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Now that we have proper root ref counting everywhere we can kill the
subvol_srcu.
* removal of fs_info::subvol_srcu reduces size of fs_info by 1176 bytes
* the refcount_t used for the references checks for accidental 0->1
in cases where the root lifetime would not be properly protected
* there's a leak detector for roots to catch unfreed roots at umount
time
* SRCU served us well over the years but is was not a proper
synchronization mechanism for some cases
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The radix root is primarily protected by the fs_roots_radix_lock, so use
that to lookup and get a ref on all of our fs roots in
btrfs_cleanup_fs_roots. The tree reference is taken in the protected
section as before.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Now that all the users of roots take references for them we can drop the
extra root ref we've been taking. Before we had roots at 2 refs for the
life of the file system, one for the radix tree, and one simply for
existing. Now that we have proper ref accounting in all places that use
roots we can drop this extra ref simply for existing as we no longer
need it.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
At the point we add a root to the dead roots list we have no open inodes
for that root, so we need to hold a ref on that root to keep it from
disappearing.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
