| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
REG_32BIT_ZERO_EX and REG_64BIT are always handled in exactly the same
way, and reg_val_propagate_range() never actually sets any register to
type REG_32BIT_ZERO_EX.
Remove the redundant & unused REG_32BIT_ZERO_EX.
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
The function prototype used to call JITed eBPF code (ie. the type of the
struct bpf_prog bpf_func field) returns an unsigned int. The MIPS n64
ABI that MIPS64 kernels target defines that 32 bit integers should
always be sign extended when passed in registers as either arguments or
return values.
This means that when returning any value which may not already be sign
extended (ie. of type REG_64BIT or REG_32BIT_ZERO_EX) we need to perform
that sign extension in order to comply with the n64 ABI. Without this we
see strange looking test failures from test_bpf.ko, such as:
test_bpf: #65 ALU64_MOV_X:
dst = 4294967295 jited:1 ret -1 != -1 FAIL (1 times)
Although the return value printed matches the expected value, this is
only because printf is only examining the least significant 32 bits of
the 64 bit register value we returned. The register holding the expected
value is sign extended whilst the v0 register was set to a zero extended
value by our JITed code, so when compared by a conditional branch
instruction the values are not equal.
We already handle this when the return value register is of type
REG_32BIT_ZERO_EX, so simply extend this to also cover REG_64BIT.
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
Fixes: b6bd53f9c4e8 ("MIPS: Add missing file for eBPF JIT.")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.13+
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
Jitting of BPF_K is supported already, but not BPF_X. This patch complete
the support for the latter on both MIPS and microMIPS.
Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
The ool_skb_header_pointer() and size_to_len() is unused same as
tmp_offset, therefore remove all of them.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Since LD_ABS/LD_IND instructions are now removed from the core and
reimplemented through a combination of inlined BPF instructions and
a slow-path helper, we can get rid of the complexity from mips64 JIT.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
The verifier in both cBPF and eBPF reject div/mod by 0 imm,
so this can never load. Remove emitting such test and reject
it from being JITed instead (the latter is actually also not
needed, but given practice in sparc64, ppc64 today, so
doesn't hurt to add it here either).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Reviewed-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Since we've changed div/mod exception handling for src_reg in
eBPF verifier itself, remove the leftovers from mips64 JIT.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Reviewed-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Having a pure_initcall() callback just to permanently enable BPF
JITs under CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is unnecessary and could leave
a small race window in future where JIT is still disabled on boot.
Since we know about the setting at compilation time anyway, just
initialize it properly there. Also consolidate all the individual
bpf_jit_enable variables into a single one and move them under one
location. Moreover, don't allow for setting unspecified garbage
values on them.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
global bpf_jit_enable variable is tested multiple times in JITs,
blinding and verifier core. The malicious root can try to toggle
it while loading the programs. This race condition was accounted
for and there should be no issues, but it's safer to avoid
this race condition.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
Fix a typo in build_one_insn().
Fixes: b6bd53f9c4e8 ("MIPS: Add missing file for eBPF JIT.")
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.13+
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/17491/
Signed-off-by: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
|
|
Compiling ebpf_jit.c with gcc 4.9 results in a (likely spurious)
compiler warning, as gcc has detected that the variable "target" may be
used uninitialised. Since -Werror is active, this is treated as an error
and causes a kernel build failure whenever CONFIG_MIPS_EBPF_JIT is
enabled.
arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c: In function 'build_one_insn':
arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c:1118:80: error: 'target' may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
emit_instr(ctx, j, target);
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Fix this by initialising "target" to 0. If it really is used
uninitialised this would result in a jump to 0 and a detectable run time
failure.
Signed-off-by: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com>
Fixes: b6bd53f9c4e8 ("MIPS: Add missing file for eBPF JIT.")
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.13+
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/17375/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
|
|
There is a missing break causing a fall-through and setting
ctx.use_bbit_insns to the wrong value. Fix this by adding the
missing break.
Detected with cppcheck:
"Variable 'ctx.use_bbit_insns' is reassigned a value before the old
one has been used. 'break;' missing?"
Fixes: 8d8d18c3283f ("MIPS,bpf: Fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible splat.")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Acked-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
The code looks a little cleaner if we replace BPF_OP(insn->code) with
the local variable bpf_op. Caching the value this way also saves 300
bytes (about 1%) in the code size of the JIT.
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
If the kernel is configured with preemption enabled we were getting
warning stack traces for use of current_cpu_type().
Fix by moving the test between preempt_disable()/preempt_enable() and
caching the results of the CPU type tests for use during code
generation.
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Inexplicably, commit f381bf6d82f0 ("MIPS: Add support for eBPF JIT.")
lost a file somewhere on its path to Linus' tree. Add back the
missing ebpf_jit.c so that we can build with CONFIG_BPF_JIT selected.
This version of ebpf_jit.c is identical to the original except for two
minor change need to resolve conflicts with changes merged from the
BPF branch:
A) Set prog->jited_len = image_size;
B) Use BPF_TAIL_CALL instead of BPF_CALL | BPF_X
Fixes: f381bf6d82f0 ("MIPS: Add support for eBPF JIT.")
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
