| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Driver used to kick off every TX packets, that will waste some
time while we can do better to kick off the TX packets once after
they are all prepared to be transmitted.
For PCI, it uses DMA engine to transfer the SKBs to the device,
and the transition of the state of the DMA engine could be a cost.
Driver can save some time to kick off multiple SKBs once so that
the DMA engine will have only one transition.
So, split rtw_hci_ops::tx() to rtw_hci_ops::tx_write() and
rtw_hci_ops::tx_kick_off() to explicitly kick the SKBs off after
they are written to the prepared buffer. For packets come from
ieee80211_ops::tx(), write one and then kick it off immediately.
For packets queued in TX queue, which come from
ieee80211_ops::wake_tx_queue(), we can dequeue them, write them
to the buffer, and then kick them off together.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312080852.16684-6-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
|
Add a macro TRX_BD_IDX_MASK for access the TX/RX BD indexes.
The hardware has only 12 bits for TX/RX BD indexes, we should not
initialize a TX/RX ring or access the TX/RX BD index with a length
that is larger than TRX_BD_IDX_MASK.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312080852.16684-5-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
|
Each device has only one reserved page shared with all of the
vifs, so it seems not reasonable to pass vif as one of the
arguments to rtw_fw_download_rsvd_page(). If driver is going
to run more than one vif, the content of reserved page could
not be built for all of the vifs.
To fix it, let each vif maintain its own reserved page list,
and build the final reserved page to download to the firmware
from all of the vifs. Hence driver should add reserved pages
to each vif according to the vif->type when adding the vif.
For station mode, add reserved page with rtw_add_rsvd_page_sta().
If the station mode is going to suspend in PNO (net-detect)
mode, remove the reserved pages used for normal mode, and add
new one for wowlan mode with rtw_add_rsvd_page_pno().
For beacon mode, only beacon is required to be added using
rtw_add_rsvd_page_bcn().
This would make the code flow simpler as we don't need to
add reserved pages when vif is running, just add/remove them
when ieee80211_ops::[add|remove]_interface.
When driver is going to download the reserved page, it will
collect pages from all of the vifs, this list is maintained
by rtwdev, with build_list as the pages' member. That way, we
can still build a list of reserved pages to be downloaded.
Also we can get the location of the pages from the list that
is maintained by rtwdev.
The biggest problem is that the first page should always be
beacon, if other type of reserved page is put in the first
page, the tx descriptor and offset could be wrong.
But station mode vif does not add beacon into its list, so
we need to add a dummy page in front of the list, to make
sure other pages will not be put in the first page. As the
dummy page is allocated when building the list, we must free
it before building a new list of reserved pages to firmware.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312080852.16684-4-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
|
Extract skb allocation routines for rsvd_page and h2c.
These routines should also be used by USB and SDIO.
This should not change the logic at all.
memset() for pkt_info is unnecessary, just declare as {0}.
Also skb_put()/memcpy() can be replaced by skb_put_data().
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312080852.16684-3-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
|
This driver generally only needs to ensure that
(a) it doesn't try to process TX interrupts at the same time as
power-save operations (and similar)
(b) the device interrupt gets disabled while we're still handling the
last set of interrupts
For (a), all the operations (e.g., PS transitions, packet handling)
happens in non-atomic contexts (e.g., threaded IRQ).
For (b), we only need mutual exclusion for brief sections (i.e., while
we're actually manipulating the interrupt mask/status).
So, we can introduce a separate lock for handling (b), disabling IRQs
while we do it. For (a), we can demote the locking to BH only, now that
(b) (the only steps done in atomic context) and that has its own lock.
This helps reduce the amount of time this driver spends with IRQs off.
Notably, transitioning out of power-save modes can take >3 milliseconds,
and this transition is done under the protection of 'irq_lock'.
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312080852.16684-2-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319230617.GA15035@embeddedor.com
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319230525.GA14835@embeddedor.com
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319225133.GA29672@embeddedor.com
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319225002.GA28673@embeddedor.com
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200305111401.GA25126@embeddedor
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200305111216.GA24982@embeddedor
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Acked-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225020804.GA9428@embeddedor
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Acked-by: Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi.bhat@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225020413.GA8057@embeddedor
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225011846.GA2773@embeddedor
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225011709.GA601@embeddedor
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225011415.GA31868@embeddedor
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225011151.GA30675@embeddedor
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225003408.GA28675@embeddedor
|
|
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225002746.GA26789@embeddedor
|
|
The GEO_TX_POWER_LIMIT command was sent although
there is no wgds table, so the fw got wrong SAR values
from the driver.
Fix this by avoiding sending the command if no wgds
tables are available.
Signed-off-by: Golan Ben Ami <golan.ben.ami@intel.com>
Fixes: 39c1a9728f93 ("iwlwifi: refactor the SAR tables from mvm to acpi")
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Tested-By: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
Tested-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20200318081237.46db40617cc6.Id5cf852ec8c5dbf20ba86bad7b165a0c828f8b2e@changeid
|
|
Three devices, with PCI device ID 0x2526 and subdevice IDs 0x4010,
0x4018 and 0x401C were removed accidentally. Add them back.
Reported-by: Brett Hassal <brett.hassal@gmail.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206661
Fixes: 0b295a1eb81f ("iwlwifi: add device name to device_info")
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20200317123331.16762b29f26c.I928bcaa799e7b3d33838c0667714eeb9fa665290@changeid
|
|
Use SMBIOS_ENTRY_POINT_SCAN_START instead of 0xF0000, because other
archtecture maybe use a special start address such as 0xFFFE000 for
Loongson platform.
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm
Pull ARM cpufreq drivers updates for v5.7 from Viresh Kumar:
"This pull request contains:
- update to imx cpufreq drivers to improve their support (Anson Huang,
Christoph Niedermaier, and Peng Fan).
- Update to qcom cpufreq to support other krait based SoCs (Ansuel
Smith).
- Update ti cpufreq driver to support OPP_PLUS (Lokesh Vutla).
- Update cpufreq-dt driver to allow platfoem specific intermediate
callbacks (Peng Fan)."
* 'cpufreq/arm/linux-next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm:
cpufreq: qcom: Add support for krait based socs
cpufreq: imx6q-cpufreq: Improve the logic of -EPROBE_DEFER handling
cpufreq: dt: Allow platform specific intermediate callbacks
cpufreq: imx-cpufreq-dt: Correct i.MX8MP's market segment fuse location
cpufreq: imx6q: read OCOTP through nvmem for imx6q
cpufreq: imx6q: fix error handling
cpufreq: imx-cpufreq-dt: Add "cpu-supply" property check
cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: Add support for OPP_PLUS
cpufreq: imx6q: Fixes unwanted cpu overclocking on i.MX6ULL
|
|
Reformat multi-line dereferencing of function arguments
&cmd->scan_begin_arg. Also reformat another call to the same function to
follow the same argument formatting structure. Problem detected by
checkpatch script.
Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200322185932.GA12594@deeUbuntu
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add space around operator + to improve code readability.
Reported by checkpatch.pl
Signed-off-by: Soumyajit Deb <debsoumyajit100@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200323054836.48816-2-debsoumyajit100@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Checkpatch would flash a check message around a stringified macro
argument containing a '-' character. Add comment to indicate the
argument is legitimate and doesn't need fixing.
Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/469bf8db1c228913e72841367182fba2168fe795.1584904896.git.mh12gx2825@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Re-indent enum labels as per coding style guidelines. Problem
detected by checkpatch script.
Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5c6bef6462d135b748f58f8c2645c60234482f52.1584904896.git.mh12gx2825@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Create a new 'status' variable to store the value of a long argument
that goes over 80 characters. The status variable is also used for
an if check. Replacing that long statement in both places makes the
code much easier to read.
Note: the status variable is assigned after a needed byte order
conversion for usbin->rxfrm.desc.status, which uses a reference.
Issue reported by checkpatch.
Suggested-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: John B. Wyatt IV <jbwyatt4@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200321225808.2494564-1-jbwyatt4@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Dropping a user-defined pr_warn() and using the kernel
message printing functions implemented in <linux/printk.h>.
Since both have the same functionality, using the standard
kernel functions is better.
Signed-off-by: Sam Muhammed <jane.pnx9@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200322143322.29098-1-jane.pnx9@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This patch fixes the check reported by checkpatch.pl
for braces {} should be used on all arms of this statement.
Signed-off-by: Simran Singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200322173045.GA24700@simran-Inspiron-5558
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Setting up kernel resource 'iomem_resource' for PCI with
addresses parsed from device tree gots into a conflict within
the usb xhci driver:
xhci-mtk 1e1c0000.xhci: can't request region for resource [mem 0x1e1c0000-0x1e1c0fff]
xhci-mtk: probe of 1e1c0000.xhci failed with error -16
Don't assign it and maintain the default addresses for this
resource seems to fix the problem. Checking legacy driver it
is being only setting the 'ioport_resource'.
Fixes: 09dd629eeabb ("staging: mt7621-pci: fix io space and properly set resource limits")
Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200322072128.4454-1-sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Remove space after * in pointer declaration to improve code readability
and to adhere to the standard coding style.
Reported by checkpatch.pl
Signed-off-by: Soumyajit Deb <debsoumyajit100@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200323054836.48816-3-debsoumyajit100@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This replaces printk(KERN_WARNING ..) with netdev_warn(),
as the use of printk() isn't preferred when
a struct net_device is available.
Signed-off-by: Sam Muhammed <jane.pnx9@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200322115051.2767-1-jane.pnx9@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The ASUS USB-N10 Nano B1 has been reported as a new RTL8188EU device.
Add it to the device tables.
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Reported-by: kovi <zraetn@gmail.com>
Cc: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200321180011.26153-1-Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Detection of the Xtal mode is using magic numbers that
can be avoided using properly some definitions and a more
accurate variable name from 'reg' into 'xtal_mode'. This
increase readability.
Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200321133624.31388-4-sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Macro builtin_platform_driver can be used for builtin drivers
that don't do anything in driver init. So, use the macro
builtin_platform_driver and remove some boilerplate code.
Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200321133624.31388-3-sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Macro builtin_platform_driver can be used for builtin drivers
that don't do anything in driver init. So, use the macro
builtin_platform_driver and remove some boilerplate code.
Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200321133624.31388-1-sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
We need the USB fixes in here as well.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
We need the tty fixes in here as well.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
We need the staging/iio fixes in here as well
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
'k3_udma_glue_cfg_rx_flow()'
All but one error handling paths in the 'k3_udma_glue_cfg_rx_flow()'
function 'goto err' and call 'k3_udma_glue_release_rx_flow()'.
This not correct because this function has a 'channel->flows_ready--;' at
the end, but 'flows_ready' has not been incremented here, when we branch to
the error handling path.
In order to keep a correct value in 'flows_ready', un-roll
'k3_udma_glue_release_rx_flow()', simplify it, add some labels and branch
at the correct places when an error is detected.
Doing so, we also NULLify 'flow->udma_rflow' in a path that was lacking it.
Fixes: d70241913413 ("dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: Add glue layer for non DMAengine user")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200318191209.1267-1-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
The refcount check for dedicated workqueue (dwq) is off by one and allows
more than 1 user to open the char device. Fix check so only a single user
can open the device.
Fixes: 42d279f9137a ("dmaengine: idxd: add char driver to expose submission portal to userland")
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/158403020187.10208.14117394394540710774.stgit@djiang5-desk3.ch.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
|
|
Extend the isl68137 driver to provide support for 2nd generation Renesas
digital multiphase voltage regulators.
Signed-off-by: Grant Peltier <grantpeltier93@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/62c000adf0108aeb65d3f275f28eb26b690384aa.1584720563.git.grantpeltier93@gmail.com
[groeck: Adjusted for new PMBus API function parameters]
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
|
|
Merge misc fixes from Andrew Morton:
"10 fixes"
* emailed patches from Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>:
x86/mm: split vmalloc_sync_all()
mm, slub: prevent kmalloc_node crashes and memory leaks
mm/mmu_notifier: silence PROVE_RCU_LIST warnings
epoll: fix possible lost wakeup on epoll_ctl() path
mm: do not allow MADV_PAGEOUT for CoW pages
mm, memcg: throttle allocators based on ancestral memory.high
mm, memcg: fix corruption on 64-bit divisor in memory.high throttling
page-flags: fix a crash at SetPageError(THP_SWAP)
mm/hotplug: fix hot remove failure in SPARSEMEM|!VMEMMAP case
memcg: fix NULL pointer dereference in __mem_cgroup_usage_unregister_event
|
|
The driver forgets to disable and unprepare clk when remove.
Add a call to clk_disable_unprepare to fix it.
Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
|
|
The idea of this patch is from Davidlohr Bueso, he posts a patch
for bcache to optimize barrier usage for read-modify-write atomic
bitops. Indeed such optimization can also apply on other locations
where smp_mb() is used before or after an atomic operation.
This patch replaces smp_mb() with smp_mb__before_atomic() or
smp_mb__after_atomic() in btree.c and writeback.c, where it is used
to synchronize memory cache just earlier on other cores. Although
the locations are not on hot code path, it is always not bad to mkae
things a little better.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
|
We can avoid the unnecessary barrier on non LL/SC architectures,
such as x86. Instead, use the smp_mb__after_atomic().
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
|
Since snprintf() returns the would-be-output size instead of the
actual output size, the succeeding calls may go beyond the given
buffer limit. Fix it by replacing with scnprintf().
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
|
When attaching a cached device (a.k.a backing device) to a cache
device, bch_sectors_dirty_init() is called to count dirty sectors
and stripes (see what bcache_dev_sectors_dirty_add() does) on the
cache device.
The counting is done by a single thread recursive function
bch_btree_map_keys() to iterate all the bcache btree nodes.
If the btree has huge number of nodes, bch_sectors_dirty_init() will
take quite long time. In my testing, if the registering cache set has
a existed UUID which matches a already registered cached device, the
automatical attachment during the registration may take more than
55 minutes. This is too long for waiting the bcache to work in real
deployment.
Fortunately when bch_sectors_dirty_init() is called, no other thread
will access the btree yet, it is safe to do a read-only parallelized
dirty sectors counting by multiple threads.
This patch tries to create multiple threads, and each thread tries to
one-by-one count dirty sectors from the sub-tree indexed by a root
node key which the thread fetched. After the sub-tree is counted, the
counting thread will continue to fetch another root node key, until
the fetched key is NULL. How many threads in parallel depends on
the number of keys from the btree root node, and the number of online
CPU core. The thread number will be the less number but no more than
BCH_DIRTY_INIT_THRD_MAX. If there are only 2 keys in root node, it
can only be 2x times faster by this patch. But if there are 10 keys
in the root node, with this patch it can be 10x times faster.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
|
When registering a cache device, bch_btree_check() is called to check
all btree nodes, to make sure the btree is consistent and not
corrupted.
bch_btree_check() is recursively executed in a single thread, when there
are a lot of data cached and the btree is huge, it may take very long
time to check all the btree nodes. In my testing, I observed it took
around 50 minutes to finish bch_btree_check().
When checking the bcache btree nodes, the cache set is not running yet,
and indeed the whole tree is in read-only state, it is safe to create
multiple threads to check the btree in parallel.
This patch tries to create multiple threads, and each thread tries to
one-by-one check the sub-tree indexed by a key from the btree root node.
The parallel thread number depends on how many keys in the btree root
node. At most BCH_BTR_CHKTHREAD_MAX (64) threads can be created, but in
practice is should be min(cpu-number/2, root-node-keys-number).
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
