summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-03-23drm/vmwgfx: Add SM5 param for userspaceDeepak Rawat
Add a new param for user-space to determine if kernel module is SM5 capable. Signed-off-by: Deepak Rawat <drawat.floss@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström (VMware) <thomas_os@shipmail.org> Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>
2020-03-23drm/vmwgfx: Add surface define v4 commandDeepak Rawat
Surface define v4 added new member buffer_byte_stride. With this patch add buffer_byte_stride in surface metadata and create surface using new command if support is available. Also with this patch replace device specific data types with kernel types. Signed-off-by: Deepak Rawat <drawat.floss@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström (VMware) <thomas_os@shipmail.org> Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>
2020-03-23drm/vmwgfx: Refactor surface_define to use vmw_surface_metadataDeepak Rawat
Makes surface_define cleaner by sending vmw_surface_metadata instead of all the arguments individually. v2: fix uninitialized return value, error message Signed-off-by: Deepak Rawat <drawat.floss@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <brianp@vmware.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström (VMware) <thomas_os@shipmail.org> Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>
2020-03-23drm/vmwgfx: Split surface metadata from struct vmw_surfaceDeepak Rawat
Create a new structure vmw_surface_metadata representing the metadata used for creating surface. With this can make the surface_define_priv a bit cleaner. Signed-off-by: Deepak Rawat <drawat.floss@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <brianp@vmware.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström (VMware) <thomas_os@shipmail.org> Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>
2020-03-23drm/vmwgfx: Add support for streamoutput with mob commandsDeepak Rawat
With SM5 capability a new version of streamoutput is supported by device which need backing mob and a new field. With this change the new command is supported in command buffer. v2: Also track streamoutput context binding in binding manager. v3: Track only one streamoutput as only one can be set to context. v4: Fix comment typos Signed-off-by: Deepak Rawat <drawat.floss@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Neha Bhende <bhenden@vmware.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström (VMware) <thomas_os@shipmail.org> Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>
2020-03-23drm/vmwgfx: Rename stream output target binding tracker structDeepak Rawat
Previous name vmw_ctx_bindinfo_so is misleading because it actually represent so target and stream output is a new resource type that needs tracking for SM5 capable device. Also rename binding type enum and internal functions to reflect these belongs to so targets. Signed-off-by: Deepak Rawat <drawat.floss@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström (VMware) <thomas_os@shipmail.org> Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>
2020-03-23drm/vmwgfx: Add support for indirect and dispatch commandsDeepak Rawat
Validate indirect and dispatch commands in command buffer. Signed-off-by: Deepak Rawat <drawat.floss@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström (VMware) <thomas_os@shipmail.org> Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>
2020-03-23drm/vmwgfx: Add support for UA view commandsDeepak Rawat
Virtual device now support new commands to manage unordered access views. Allow them as part of user-space command buffer. This involves adding UA view cotable, binding tracker info, new view type and command verifier functions. v2: fix comment typo v3: style fixes (don't use deprecated PTR_RET) Signed-off-by: Deepak Rawat <drawat.floss@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Neha Bhende <bhenden@vmware.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström (VMware) <thomas_os@shipmail.org> Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>
2020-03-23drm/vmwgfx: Support SM5 shader type in command bufferDeepak Rawat
Virtual device now supports new shader types, allow them as valid shader type in command buffer. Also add per shader bind info in binding manager state for new shader type. Signed-off-by: Deepak Rawat <drawat.floss@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström (VMware) <thomas_os@shipmail.org> Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>
2020-03-23drm/vmwgfx: Read new register for GB memory when availableDeepak Rawat
Virtual device added new register for suggested GB memory, read the new register when available. Signed-off-by: Deepak Rawat <drawat.floss@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström (VMware) <thomas_os@shipmail.org> Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>
2020-03-23drm/vmwgfx: Add a new enum for SM5 graphics context capabilityDeepak Rawat
A new enum to represent new SM5 graphics context capability in vmwgfx. v2: use new correct cap bits (merged several later commits into it). Signed-off-by: Deepak Rawat <drawat.floss@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström (VMware) <thomas_os@shipmail.org> Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>
2020-03-23drm/vmwgfx: Sync virtual device headers for new featureDeepak Rawat
Get the latest device headers for SM5 and other features development. v2: sync to newer bits (merge later commits) v3: sync to even newer bits Co-developed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Deepak Rawat <drawat.floss@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Neha Bhende <bhenden@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Charmaine Lee <charmainel@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström (VMware) <thomas_os@shipmail.org>
2020-03-23drm/vmwgfx: Use enum to represent graphics context capabilitiesDeepak Rawat
Instead of having different bool in device private to represent incremental graphics context capabilities, add a new sm type enum. v2: Use enum instead of bit flag. v3: Incorporated review comments. Signed-off-by: Deepak Rawat <drawat.floss@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström (VMware) <thomas_os@shipmail.org> Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>
2020-03-23drm/vmwgfx: Deprecate logic ops commandsDeepak Rawat
Logic ops commands are marked as deprecated by virtual device and were never used by vmwgfx. Signed-off-by: Deepak Rawat <drawat.floss@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström (VMware) <thomas_os@shipmail.org> Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>
2020-03-23drm/vmwgfx: Sync legacy multisampling device capabilityDeepak Rawat
In favor of SM4.1 multisampling capability, virtual device deprecated old multisampling device capability. Mark legacy multisampling device capability as dead. Rename the function that masks legacy multisample capability to reflect that now it is masking a deprecated feature. Signed-off-by: Deepak Rawat <drawat.floss@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström (VMware) <thomas_os@shipmail.org> Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>
2020-03-23drm/vmwgfx: Also check for SVGA_CAP_DX before reading DX context supportDeepak Rawat
Virtual device consider SVGA_CAP_DX and SVGA3D_DEVCAP_DXCONTEXT independent of each other. Some of the commands in cmd_buf depends on SVGA_CAP_DX, so better to check for that as well. Signed-off-by: Deepak Rawat <drawat.floss@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström (VMware) <thomas_os@shipmail.org> Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>
2020-03-23rtc: class: support hctosys from modular RTC driversSteve Muckle
Due to distribution constraints it may not be possible to statically compile the required RTC driver into the kernel. Expand RTC_HCTOSYS support to cover all RTC devices (statically compiled or not) by checking at the end of RTC device registration whether the time should be synced. Signed-off-by: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191106194625.116692-1-smuckle@google.com Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
2020-03-23enetc: Remove unused variable 'enetc_drv_name'YueHaibing
commit ed0a72e0de16 ("net/freescale: Clean drivers from static versions") leave behind this, remove it . Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-03-23Crypto/chtls: add/delete TLS header in driverRohit Maheshwari
Kernel TLS forms TLS header in kernel during encryption and removes while decryption before giving packet back to user application. The similar logic is introduced in chtls code as well. v1->v2: - tls_proccess_cmsg() uses tls_handle_open_record() which is not required in TOE-TLS. Don't mix TOE with other TLS types. Signed-off-by: Vinay Kumar Yadav <vinay.yadav@chelsio.com> Signed-off-by: Rohit Maheshwari <rohitm@chelsio.com> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-03-23nvmem: mxs-ocotp: Use devm_add_action_or_reset() for cleanupAnson Huang
Use devm_add_action_or_reset() for cleanup to call clk_unprepare(), which can simplify the error handling in .probe, and .remove callback can be dropped. Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200323150007.7487-5-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-03-23nvmem: sprd: Determine double data programming from device dataBaolin Wang
We've saved the double data flag in the device data, so we should use it when programming a block. Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200323150007.7487-4-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-03-23nvmem: sprd: Optimize the block lock operationFreeman Liu
We have some cases that will programme the eFuse block partially multiple times, so we should allow the block to be programmed again if it was programmed partially. But we should lock the block if the whole block was programmed. Thus add a condition to validate if we need lock the block or not. Moreover we only enable the auto-check function when locking the block. Signed-off-by: Freeman Liu <freeman.liu@unisoc.com> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200323150007.7487-3-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-03-23nvmem: sprd: Fix the block lock operationFreeman Liu
According to the Spreadtrum eFuse specification, we should write 0 to the block to trigger the lock operation. Fixes: 096030e7f449 ("nvmem: sprd: Add Spreadtrum SoCs eFuse support") Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Freeman Liu <freeman.liu@unisoc.com> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200323150007.7487-2-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-03-23spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200320232515.GA24800@embeddedor.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-03-23spi: spi-s3c24xx: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200320232556.GA24989@embeddedor.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-03-23mtd: spi-nor: controllers: aspeed-smc: Replace zero-length array with ↵Gustavo A. R. Silva
flexible-array member The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
2020-03-23mtd: spi-nor: Clear WEL bit when erase or program errors occurTudor Ambarus
When an Erase or Program error occurs on a spansion/cypress or a micron flash, the WEL bit remains set to one and should be cleared with a WRDI command in order to protect against inadvertent writes that can possible corrupt the contents of the memory. Winbond, macronix, gd, etc., do not support the E_ERR and P_ERR bits in the Status Register and always clear the WEL bit regardless of the outcome of the erase or page program operation (ex w25q40bw, MX25L25635E). Issue a WRDI command when erase or page program errors occur. Reported-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
2020-03-23rtl8xxxu: Fix sparse warning: cast from restricted __le16Chris Chiu
Fix the warning reported by sparse as: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c:4819:17: sparse: sparse: cast from restricted __le16 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c:4892:17: sparse: sparse: cast from restricted __le16 Signed-off-by: Chris Chiu <chiu@endlessm.com> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Acked-by: Jes Sorensen <jes@trained-monkey.org> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319064341.49500-1-chiu@endlessm.com
2020-03-23mt76: mt7615: add missing declaration in mt7615.hLorenzo Bianconi
Add mt7615_mcu_wait_response declaration in mt7615.h since it will be reused adding usb support to mt7615 driver Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Fixes: 044a43256a35 ("mt76: mt7615: introduce mt7615_mcu_wait_response") Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d341335a636b6ccd088dd2cfeec2d296eb4dc8c7.1584534454.git.lorenzo@kernel.org
2020-03-23mt76: mt7615: fix endianness in unified commandLorenzo Bianconi
Fix cid field endianness in unified mt7615_uni_txd header Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Fixes: 323d7daad363 ("mt76: mt7615: introduce uni cmd command types") Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2447b399d3c63885d43f65ba988c057fa96f5236.1584534454.git.lorenzo@kernel.org
2020-03-23mt76: mt7615: fix mt7663e firmware struct endiannessLorenzo Bianconi
Convert fields in mt7663_fw_trailer and mt7663_fw_buf to little-endian Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Fixes: f40ac0f3d3c0 ("mt76: mt7615: introduce mt7663e support") Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d14dfd7cd91a4dda8c5dcd03e8a70ff11314182e.1584534454.git.lorenzo@kernel.org
2020-03-23rtw88: 8822c: config RF table path B before path AYan-Hsuan Chuang
After MAC switched power, the hardware's RF registers will have its default value, but the default value for path B is incorrect. So, load RF path B first, to decrease the period between MAC on and RF path B config. By test, if we load path A first, then there's ~300ms that the path B is incorrect, it could lead to BT coex's A2DP glitch. But if we configure path B first, there will only have ~3ms, significantly lower possibility to have A2DP sound glitch. Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200318095224.12940-1-yhchuang@realtek.com
2020-03-23rtw88: kick off TX packets once for higher efficiencyYan-Hsuan Chuang
Driver used to kick off every TX packets, that will waste some time while we can do better to kick off the TX packets once after they are all prepared to be transmitted. For PCI, it uses DMA engine to transfer the SKBs to the device, and the transition of the state of the DMA engine could be a cost. Driver can save some time to kick off multiple SKBs once so that the DMA engine will have only one transition. So, split rtw_hci_ops::tx() to rtw_hci_ops::tx_write() and rtw_hci_ops::tx_kick_off() to explicitly kick the SKBs off after they are written to the prepared buffer. For packets come from ieee80211_ops::tx(), write one and then kick it off immediately. For packets queued in TX queue, which come from ieee80211_ops::wake_tx_queue(), we can dequeue them, write them to the buffer, and then kick them off together. Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312080852.16684-6-yhchuang@realtek.com
2020-03-23rtw88: pci: define a mask for TX/RX BD indexesYan-Hsuan Chuang
Add a macro TRX_BD_IDX_MASK for access the TX/RX BD indexes. The hardware has only 12 bits for TX/RX BD indexes, we should not initialize a TX/RX ring or access the TX/RX BD index with a length that is larger than TRX_BD_IDX_MASK. Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312080852.16684-5-yhchuang@realtek.com
2020-03-23rtw88: associate reserved pages with each vifYan-Hsuan Chuang
Each device has only one reserved page shared with all of the vifs, so it seems not reasonable to pass vif as one of the arguments to rtw_fw_download_rsvd_page(). If driver is going to run more than one vif, the content of reserved page could not be built for all of the vifs. To fix it, let each vif maintain its own reserved page list, and build the final reserved page to download to the firmware from all of the vifs. Hence driver should add reserved pages to each vif according to the vif->type when adding the vif. For station mode, add reserved page with rtw_add_rsvd_page_sta(). If the station mode is going to suspend in PNO (net-detect) mode, remove the reserved pages used for normal mode, and add new one for wowlan mode with rtw_add_rsvd_page_pno(). For beacon mode, only beacon is required to be added using rtw_add_rsvd_page_bcn(). This would make the code flow simpler as we don't need to add reserved pages when vif is running, just add/remove them when ieee80211_ops::[add|remove]_interface. When driver is going to download the reserved page, it will collect pages from all of the vifs, this list is maintained by rtwdev, with build_list as the pages' member. That way, we can still build a list of reserved pages to be downloaded. Also we can get the location of the pages from the list that is maintained by rtwdev. The biggest problem is that the first page should always be beacon, if other type of reserved page is put in the first page, the tx descriptor and offset could be wrong. But station mode vif does not add beacon into its list, so we need to add a dummy page in front of the list, to make sure other pages will not be put in the first page. As the dummy page is allocated when building the list, we must free it before building a new list of reserved pages to firmware. Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312080852.16684-4-yhchuang@realtek.com
2020-03-23rtw88: extract alloc rsvd_page and h2c skb routinesYan-Hsuan Chuang
Extract skb allocation routines for rsvd_page and h2c. These routines should also be used by USB and SDIO. This should not change the logic at all. memset() for pkt_info is unnecessary, just declare as {0}. Also skb_put()/memcpy() can be replaced by skb_put_data(). Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312080852.16684-3-yhchuang@realtek.com
2020-03-23rtw88: don't hold all IRQs disabled for PS operationsBrian Norris
This driver generally only needs to ensure that (a) it doesn't try to process TX interrupts at the same time as power-save operations (and similar) (b) the device interrupt gets disabled while we're still handling the last set of interrupts For (a), all the operations (e.g., PS transitions, packet handling) happens in non-atomic contexts (e.g., threaded IRQ). For (b), we only need mutual exclusion for brief sections (i.e., while we're actually manipulating the interrupt mask/status). So, we can introduce a separate lock for handling (b), disabling IRQs while we do it. For (a), we can demote the locking to BH only, now that (b) (the only steps done in atomic context) and that has its own lock. This helps reduce the amount of time this driver spends with IRQs off. Notably, transitioning out of power-save modes can take >3 milliseconds, and this transition is done under the protection of 'irq_lock'. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312080852.16684-2-yhchuang@realtek.com
2020-03-23wl3501_cs: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319230617.GA15035@embeddedor.com
2020-03-23ray_cs: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319230525.GA14835@embeddedor.com
2020-03-23atmel: at76c50x: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319225133.GA29672@embeddedor.com
2020-03-23adm80211: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319225002.GA28673@embeddedor.com
2020-03-23cw1200: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200305111401.GA25126@embeddedor
2020-03-23zd1211rw: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200305111216.GA24982@embeddedor
2020-03-23brcmfmac: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Acked-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225020804.GA9428@embeddedor
2020-03-23wireless: marvell: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Acked-by: Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi.bhat@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225020413.GA8057@embeddedor
2020-03-23p54: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225011846.GA2773@embeddedor
2020-03-23libertas: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225011709.GA601@embeddedor
2020-03-23orinoco: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225011415.GA31868@embeddedor
2020-03-23hostap: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225011151.GA30675@embeddedor
2020-03-23wireless: ti: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225003408.GA28675@embeddedor
generated by cgit (git 2.34.1) at 2025-09-23 22:09:43 +0000