| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The BKL is only used in put_super, fill_super and remount_fs that are all
three protected by the superblocks s_umount rw_semaphore. Therefore it is
safe to remove the BKL entirely.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
|
The BKL is only used in fill_super, which is protected by the superblocks
s_umount rw_semaphorei, and in fasync, which does not do anything that
could require the BKL. Therefore it is safe to remove the BKL entirely.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com>
Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net
|
|
The BKL is only used in put_super and fill_super, which are both protected
by the superblocks s_umount rw_semaphore. Therefore it is safe to remove
the BKL entirely.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
|
|
autofs4 uses the BKL only to guard its ioctl operations.
This can be trivially converted to use a mutex, as we have
done with most device drivers before.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
|
|
As in other file systems, we can replace the big kernel lock
with a private mutex in isofs. This means we can now access
multiple file systems concurrently, but it also means that
we serialize readdir and lookup across sleeping operations
which previously released the big kernel lock. This should
not matter though, as these operations are in practice
serialized through the hardware access.
The isofs_get_blocks functions now does not take any lock
any more, it used to recursively get the BKL. After looking
at the code for hours, I convinced myself that it was never
needed here anyway, because it only reads constant fields
of the inode and writes to a buffer head array that is
at this time only visible to the caller.
The get_sb and fill_super operations do not need the locking
at all because they operate on a file system that is either
about to be created or to be destroyed but in either case
is not visible to other threads.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
The lock_kernel in fat_put_super is not needed because
it only protects the super block itself and we know that
no other thread can reach it because we are about to
kfree the object.
In the two fill_super functions, this converts the locking
to use lock_super like elsewhere in the fat code. This
is probably not needed either, but is consistent and puts
us on the safe side.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
|
|
The BKL is still used in ext2_put_super(), ext2_fill_super(), ext2_sync_fs()
ext2_remount() and ext2_write_inode(). From these calls ext2_put_super(),
ext2_fill_super() and ext2_remount() are protected against each other by
the struct super_block s_umount rw semaphore. The call in ext2_write_inode()
could only protect the modification of the ext2_sb_info through
ext2_update_dynamic_rev() against concurrent ext2_sync_fs() or ext2_remount().
ext2_fill_super() and ext2_put_super() can be left out because you need a
valid filesystem reference in all three cases, which you do not have when
you are one of these functions.
If the BKL is only protecting the modification of the ext2_sb_info it can
safely be removed since this is protected by the struct ext2_sb_info s_lock.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
After pushing down the BKL to the get_sb/fill_super operations of the
filesystems that still make usage of the BKL it is safe to remove it from
do_new_mount().
I've read through all the code formerly covered by the BKL inside
do_kern_mount() and have satisfied myself that it doesn't need the BKL
any more.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
The BKL is only used in put_super, fill_super and remount_fs that are all
three protected by the superblocks s_umount rw_semaphore. Therefore it is
safe to remove the BKL entirely.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
The BKL is only used in put_super, fill_super and remount_fs that are all
three protected by the superblocks s_umount rw_semaphore. Therefore it is
safe to remove the BKL entirely.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
The BKL is only used in put_super, fill_super and remount_fs that are all
three protected by the superblocks s_umount rw_semaphore. Therefore it is
safe to remove the BKL entirely.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
The BKL is only used in put_super and fill_super that are both protected by
the superblocks s_umount rw_semaphore. Therefore it is safe to remove the
BKL entirely.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
The BKL is still used in ext4_put_super(), ext4_fill_super() and
ext4_remount(). All three calles are protected against concurrent calls by
the s_umount rw semaphore of struct super_block.
Therefore the BKL is protecting nothing in this case.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Acked-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
The BKL lock is protecting the remounting against a potential call to
ext3_put_super(). This could not happen, since this is protected by the
s_umount rw semaphore of struct super_block.
Therefore I think the BKL is protecting nothing here.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
The BKL is protecting nothing than two memory allocations here.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
The BKL is only used in put_super and fill_super that are both protected by
the superblocks s_umount rw_semaphore. Therefore it is safe to remove the
BKL entirely.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Cc: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
The BKL is only used in put_super and fill_super that are both protected by
the superblocks s_umount rw_semaphore. Therefore it is safe to remove the BKL
entirely.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
The BKL is only used in put_super, fill_super and remount_fs that are all
three protected by the superblocks s_umount rw_semaphore. Therefore it is
safe to remove the BKL entirely.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
This patch is a preparation necessary to remove the BKL from do_new_mount().
It explicitly adds calls to lock_kernel()/unlock_kernel() around
get_sb/fill_super operations for filesystems that still uses the BKL.
I've read through all the code formerly covered by the BKL inside
do_kern_mount() and have satisfied myself that it doesn't need the BKL
any more.
do_kern_mount() is already called without the BKL when mounting the rootfs
and in nfsctl. do_kern_mount() calls vfs_kern_mount(), which is called
from various places without BKL: simple_pin_fs(), nfs_do_clone_mount()
through nfs_follow_mountpoint(), afs_mntpt_do_automount() through
afs_mntpt_follow_link(). Both later functions are actually the filesystems
follow_link inode operation. vfs_kern_mount() is calling the specified
get_sb function and lets the filesystem do its job by calling the given
fill_super function.
Therefore I think it is safe to push down the BKL from the VFS to the
low-level filesystems get_sb/fill_super operation.
[arnd: do not add the BKL to those file systems that already
don't use it elsewhere]
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
|
|
We currently use struct backing_dev_info for various different purposes.
Originally it was introduced to describe a backing device which includes
an unplug and congestion function and various bits of readahead information
and VM-relevant flags. We're also using for tracking dirty inodes for
writeback.
To make writeback properly find all inodes we need to only access the
per-filesystem backing_device pointed to by the superblock in ->s_bdi
inside the writeback code, and not the instances pointeded to by
inode->i_mapping->backing_dev which can be overriden by special devices
or might not be set at all by some filesystems.
Long term we should split out the writeback-relevant bits of struct
backing_device_info (which includes more than the current bdi_writeback)
and only point to it from the superblock while leaving the traditional
backing device as a separate structure that can be overriden by devices.
The one exception for now is the block device filesystem which really
wants different writeback contexts for it's different (internal) inodes
to handle the writeout more efficiently. For now we do this with
a hack in fs-writeback.c because we're so late in the cycle, but in
the future I plan to replace this with a superblock method that allows
for multiple writeback contexts per filesystem.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
|
|
fs/fuse/dev.c:1357: warning: ‘total_len’ may be used uninitialized in this
function
Initialize total_len to zero, else its value will be undefined.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
|
|
Commit 78155ed75f470710f2aecb3e75e3d97107ba8374 "nfsd4: distinguish
expired from stale stateids" attempted to distinguish expired and stale
stateid's using time information that may not have been completely
reliable, so I reverted it.
That was throwing out the baby with the bathwater; we still do want to
return expired, but let's do that using the simpler approach of just
assuming any stateid is expired if it looks like it was given out by the
current server instance, but we can't find it any more.
This may help clients that are recovering from network partitions.
Reported-by: Bian Naimeng <biannm@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|
|
As long as we're not implementing any session security, we should just
automatically add any new connections that come along to the list of
sessions associated with the session.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|
|
Remove connections from the list when they go down.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
|
|
The spec requires us in various places to keep track of the connections
associated with each session.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
|
|
Changes:
- make sure session memory reservation is released on failure
path.
- use min_t()/min() for more compact code in several places.
- break alloc_init_session into smaller pieces.
- miscellaneous other cleanup.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
|
|
This returns an nfs error, not -ERRNO.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|
|
Note we're allocating an array of nfsd4_slot *'s, not nfsd4_slot's.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|
|
Instead of creating the new rpc client from a regular server thread,
set a flag, kick off a null call, and allow the null call to do the work
of setting up the client on the callback workqueue.
Use a spinlock to ensure the callback work gets a consistent view of the
callback parameters.
This allows, for example, changing the callback from contexts where
sleeping is not allowed. I hope it will also keep the locking simple as
we add more session and trunking features, by serializing most of the
callback-specific work.
This also closes a small race where the the new cb_ident could be used
with an old connection (or vice-versa).
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
|
|
I don't see the point of the separate struct. It seems to just be
getting in the way.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
|
|
This will eventually allow us, for example, to kick off null callback
from contexts where we can't sleep.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
|
|
Make the recall callback code more generic, so that other callbacks
will be able to use it too.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
|
|
With apologies for the gratuitous rename, the new name seems more
helpful to me.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
|
|
These two structs don't really need to be distinct as far as I can tell.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
|
|
Now that we have both nfsd4_callback and nfsd4_cb_conn structures, I get
confused if variables of both types are always named cb....
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
|
|
* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfrench/cifs-2.6:
cifs: prevent infinite recursion in cifs_reconnect_tcon
cifs: set backing_dev_info on new S_ISREG inodes
|
|
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|
|
The existing code adjusted it based on the worst case scenario for the returned
bitmap and the best case scenario for the supported attrs attribute.
Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
[bfields@redhat.com: removed likely/unlikely's]
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
|
|
Prevent from recursively locking the reiserfs lock in reiserfs_unpack()
because we may call journal_begin() that requires the lock to be taken
only once, otherwise it won't be able to release the lock while taking
other mutexes, ending up in inverted dependencies between the journal
mutex and the reiserfs lock for example.
This fixes:
=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.35.4.4a #3
-------------------------------------------------------
lilo/1620 is trying to acquire lock:
(&journal->j_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<d0325bff>] do_journal_begin_r+0x7f/0x340 [reiserfs]
but task is already holding lock:
(&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<d032a278>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x28/0x40 [reiserfs]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}:
[<c10562b7>] lock_acquire+0x67/0x80
[<c12facad>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x410
[<c12fb0c8>] mutex_lock_nested+0x18/0x20
[<d032a278>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x28/0x40 [reiserfs]
[<d0325c06>] do_journal_begin_r+0x86/0x340 [reiserfs]
[<d0325f77>] journal_begin+0x77/0x140 [reiserfs]
[<d0315be4>] reiserfs_remount+0x224/0x530 [reiserfs]
[<c10b6a20>] do_remount_sb+0x60/0x110
[<c10cee25>] do_mount+0x625/0x790
[<c10cf014>] sys_mount+0x84/0xb0
[<c12fca3d>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
-> #0 (&journal->j_mutex){+.+...}:
[<c10560f6>] __lock_acquire+0x1026/0x1180
[<c10562b7>] lock_acquire+0x67/0x80
[<c12facad>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x410
[<c12fb0c8>] mutex_lock_nested+0x18/0x20
[<d0325bff>] do_journal_begin_r+0x7f/0x340 [reiserfs]
[<d0325f77>] journal_begin+0x77/0x140 [reiserfs]
[<d0326271>] reiserfs_persistent_transaction+0x41/0x90 [reiserfs]
[<d030d06c>] reiserfs_get_block+0x22c/0x1530 [reiserfs]
[<c10db9db>] __block_prepare_write+0x1bb/0x3a0
[<c10dbbe6>] block_prepare_write+0x26/0x40
[<d030b738>] reiserfs_prepare_write+0x88/0x170 [reiserfs]
[<d03294d6>] reiserfs_unpack+0xe6/0x120 [reiserfs]
[<d0329782>] reiserfs_ioctl+0x272/0x320 [reiserfs]
[<c10c3188>] vfs_ioctl+0x28/0xa0
[<c10c3bbd>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x32d/0x5c0
[<c10c3eb3>] sys_ioctl+0x63/0x70
[<c12fca3d>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by lilo/1620:
#0: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){+.+.+.}, at: [<d032945a>] reiserfs_unpack+0x6a/0x120 [reiserfs]
#1: (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<d032a278>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x28/0x40 [reiserfs]
stack backtrace:
Pid: 1620, comm: lilo Not tainted 2.6.35.4.4a #3
Call Trace:
[<c10560f6>] __lock_acquire+0x1026/0x1180
[<c10562b7>] lock_acquire+0x67/0x80
[<c12facad>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x410
[<c12fb0c8>] mutex_lock_nested+0x18/0x20
[<d0325bff>] do_journal_begin_r+0x7f/0x340 [reiserfs]
[<d0325f77>] journal_begin+0x77/0x140 [reiserfs]
[<d0326271>] reiserfs_persistent_transaction+0x41/0x90 [reiserfs]
[<d030d06c>] reiserfs_get_block+0x22c/0x1530 [reiserfs]
[<c10db9db>] __block_prepare_write+0x1bb/0x3a0
[<c10dbbe6>] block_prepare_write+0x26/0x40
[<d030b738>] reiserfs_prepare_write+0x88/0x170 [reiserfs]
[<d03294d6>] reiserfs_unpack+0xe6/0x120 [reiserfs]
[<d0329782>] reiserfs_ioctl+0x272/0x320 [reiserfs]
[<c10c3188>] vfs_ioctl+0x28/0xa0
[<c10c3bbd>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x32d/0x5c0
[<c10c3eb3>] sys_ioctl+0x63/0x70
[<c12fca3d>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Reported-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: All since 2.6.32 <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The reiserfs mutex already depends on the inode mutex, so we can't lock
the inode mutex in reiserfs_unpack() without using the safe locking API,
because reiserfs_unpack() is always called with the reiserfs mutex locked.
This fixes:
=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.35c #13
-------------------------------------------------------
lilo/1606 is trying to acquire lock:
(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){+.+.+.}, at: [<d0329450>] reiserfs_unpack+0x60/0x110 [reiserfs]
but task is already holding lock:
(&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<d032a268>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x28/0x40 [reiserfs]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}:
[<c1056347>] lock_acquire+0x67/0x80
[<c12f083d>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x410
[<c12f0c58>] mutex_lock_nested+0x18/0x20
[<d032a268>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x28/0x40 [reiserfs]
[<d0329e9a>] reiserfs_lookup_privroot+0x2a/0x90 [reiserfs]
[<d0316b81>] reiserfs_fill_super+0x941/0xe60 [reiserfs]
[<c10b7d17>] get_sb_bdev+0x117/0x170
[<d0313e21>] get_super_block+0x21/0x30 [reiserfs]
[<c10b74ba>] vfs_kern_mount+0x6a/0x1b0
[<c10b7659>] do_kern_mount+0x39/0xe0
[<c10cebe0>] do_mount+0x340/0x790
[<c10cf0b4>] sys_mount+0x84/0xb0
[<c12f25cd>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
-> #0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){+.+.+.}:
[<c1056186>] __lock_acquire+0x1026/0x1180
[<c1056347>] lock_acquire+0x67/0x80
[<c12f083d>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x410
[<c12f0c58>] mutex_lock_nested+0x18/0x20
[<d0329450>] reiserfs_unpack+0x60/0x110 [reiserfs]
[<d0329772>] reiserfs_ioctl+0x272/0x320 [reiserfs]
[<c10c3228>] vfs_ioctl+0x28/0xa0
[<c10c3c5d>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x32d/0x5c0
[<c10c3f53>] sys_ioctl+0x63/0x70
[<c12f25cd>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
other info that might help us debug this:
1 lock held by lilo/1606:
#0: (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<d032a268>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x28/0x40 [reiserfs]
stack backtrace:
Pid: 1606, comm: lilo Not tainted 2.6.35c #13
Call Trace:
[<c1056186>] __lock_acquire+0x1026/0x1180
[<c1056347>] lock_acquire+0x67/0x80
[<c12f083d>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x410
[<c12f0c58>] mutex_lock_nested+0x18/0x20
[<d0329450>] reiserfs_unpack+0x60/0x110 [reiserfs]
[<d0329772>] reiserfs_ioctl+0x272/0x320 [reiserfs]
[<c10c3228>] vfs_ioctl+0x28/0xa0
[<c10c3c5d>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x32d/0x5c0
[<c10c3f53>] sys_ioctl+0x63/0x70
[<c12f25cd>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Reported-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.32 and later]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Having the limits file world readable will ease the task of system
management on systems where root privileges might be restricted.
Having admin restricted with root priviledges, he/she could not check
other users process' limits.
Also it'd align with most of the /proc stat files.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Eugene Teo <eugene@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
cifs_reconnect_tcon is called from smb_init. After a successful
reconnect, cifs_reconnect_tcon will call reset_cifs_unix_caps. That
function will, in turn call CIFSSMBQFSUnixInfo and CIFSSMBSetFSUnixInfo.
Those functions also call smb_init.
It's possible for the session and tcon reconnect to succeed, and then
for another cifs_reconnect to occur before CIFSSMBQFSUnixInfo or
CIFSSMBSetFSUnixInfo to be called. That'll cause those functions to call
smb_init and cifs_reconnect_tcon again, ad infinitum...
Break the infinite recursion by having those functions use a new
smb_init variant that doesn't attempt to perform a reconnect.
Reported-and-Tested-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
|
|
When renaming over a directory we need to use hfsplus_rmdir instead of
hfsplus_unlink to evict the victim. This makes sure we properly error out
on non-empty directory as required by Posix (BZ #16571), and it also makes
sure we do the right thing in case i_nlink will every be set correctly for
directories on hfsplus.
Reported-by: Vlado Plaga <rechner@vlado-do.de>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
|
|
tree_lock is used as mutex so make it a mutex.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
|
|
Most of the extent handling code already does proper SMP locking, but
hfsplus_write_inode was calling into hfsplus_ext_write_extent without
taking the extents_lock. Fix this by splitting hfsplus_ext_write_extent
into an internal helper that expects the lock, and a public interface
that first acquires it.
Also add a few locking asserts and document the locking rules in
hfsplus_fs.h.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
|
|
We already have i_mutex for readdir and the namespace operations that add
entries to open_dir_list, the only thing that was missing was the removal
in hfsplus_dir_release.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
|
|
The flags in the HFS+-specific superlock do get modified during runtime,
use atomic bitops to make the modifications SMP safe.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
|
|
Lock updates to the mutal fields in the volume header, and document the
locing in the hfsplus_sb_info structure.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@tuxera.com>
|
