| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Currently, an imbalance is only allowed when a destination node
is almost completely idle. This solved one basic class of problems
and was the cautious approach.
This patch revisits the possibility that NUMA nodes can be imbalanced
until 25% of the CPUs are occupied. The reasoning behind 25% is somewhat
superficial -- it's half the cores when HT is enabled. At higher
utilisations, balancing should continue as normal and keep things even
until scheduler domains are fully busy or over utilised.
Note that this is not expected to be a universal win. Any benchmark
that prefers spreading as wide as possible with limited communication
will favour the old behaviour as there is more memory bandwidth.
Workloads that communicate heavily in pairs such as netperf or tbench
benefit. For the tests I ran, the vast majority of workloads saw
a benefit so it seems to be a worthwhile trade-off.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120090630.3286-4-mgorman@techsingularity.net
|
|
In find_idlest_group(), the load imbalance is only relevant when the group
is either overloaded or fully busy but it is calculated unconditionally.
This patch moves the imbalance calculation to the context it is required.
Technically, it is a micro-optimisation but really the benefit is avoiding
confusing one type of imbalance with another depending on the group_type
in the next patch.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120090630.3286-3-mgorman@techsingularity.net
|
|
This is simply a preparation patch to make the following patches easier
to read. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120090630.3286-2-mgorman@techsingularity.net
|
|
We call arch_cpu_idle() with RCU disabled, but then use
local_irq_{en,dis}able(), which invokes tracing, which relies on RCU.
Switch all arch_cpu_idle() implementations to use
raw_local_irq_{en,dis}able() and carefully manage the
lockdep,rcu,tracing state like we do in entry.
(XXX: we really should change arch_cpu_idle() to not return with
interrupts enabled)
Reported-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120114925.594122626@infradead.org
|
|
Instead of storing the map per CPU provide and use per task storage. That
prepares for local kmaps which are preemptible.
The context switch code is preparatory and not yet in use because
kmap_atomic() runs with preemption disabled. Will be made usable in the
next step.
The context switch logic is safe even when an interrupt happens after
clearing or before restoring the kmaps. The kmap index in task struct is
not modified so any nesting kmap in an interrupt will use unused indices
and on return the counter is the same as before.
Also add an assert into the return to user space code. Going back to user
space with an active kmap local is a nono.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201118204007.372935758@linutronix.de
|
|
Pull the migrate disable mechanics which is a prerequisite for preemptible
kmap_local().
|
|
Now that the scheduler can deal with migrate disable properly, there is no
real compelling reason to make it only available for RT.
There are quite some code pathes which needlessly disable preemption in
order to prevent migration and some constructs like kmap_atomic() enforce
it implicitly.
Making it available independent of RT allows to provide a preemptible
variant of kmap_atomic() and makes the code more consistent in general.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Grudgingly-Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201118204007.269943012@linutronix.de
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull scheduler fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
"A couple of scheduler fixes:
- Make the conditional update of the overutilized state work
correctly by caching the relevant flags state before overwriting
them and checking them afterwards.
- Fix a data race in the wakeup path which caused loadavg on ARM64
platforms to become a random number generator.
- Fix the ordering of the iowaiter accounting operations so it can't
be decremented before it is incremented.
- Fix a bug in the deadline scheduler vs. priority inheritance when a
non-deadline task A has inherited the parameters of a deadline task
B and then blocks on a non-deadline task C.
The second inheritance step used the static deadline parameters of
task A, which are usually 0, instead of further propagating task
B's parameters. The zero initialized parameters trigger a bug in
the deadline scheduler"
* tag 'sched-urgent-2020-11-22' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
sched/deadline: Fix priority inheritance with multiple scheduling classes
sched: Fix rq->nr_iowait ordering
sched: Fix data-race in wakeup
sched/fair: Fix overutilized update in enqueue_task_fair()
|
|
In order to make accurate predictions across CPUs and for all performance
states, Energy Aware Scheduling (EAS) needs frequency-invariant load
tracking signals.
EAS task placement aims to minimize energy consumption, and does so in
part by limiting the search space to only CPUs with the highest spare
capacity (CPU capacity - CPU utilization) in their performance domain.
Those candidates are the placement choices that will keep frequency at
its lowest possible and therefore save the most energy.
But without frequency invariance, a CPU's utilization is relative to the
CPU's current performance level, and not relative to its maximum
performance level, which determines its capacity. As a result, it will
fail to correctly indicate any potential spare capacity obtained by an
increase in a CPU's performance level. Therefore, a non-invariant
utilization signal would render the EAS task placement logic invalid.
Now that we properly report support for the Frequency Invariance Engine
(FIE) through arch_scale_freq_invariant() for arm and arm64 systems,
while also ensuring a re-evaluation of the EAS use conditions for
possible invariance status change, we can assert this is the case when
initializing EAS. Warn and bail out otherwise.
Suggested-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201027180713.7642-4-ionela.voinescu@arm.com
|
|
Add the rebuild_sched_domains_energy() function to wrap the functionality
that rebuilds the scheduling domains if any of the Energy Aware Scheduling
(EAS) initialisation conditions change. This functionality is used when
schedutil is added or removed or when EAS is enabled or disabled
through the sched_energy_aware sysctl.
Therefore, create a single function that is used in both these cases and
that can be later reused.
Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201027180713.7642-2-ionela.voinescu@arm.com
|
|
In case the user wants to stop controlling a uclamp constraint value
for a task, use the magic value -1 in sched_util_{min,max} with the
appropriate sched_flags (SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP_{MIN,MAX}) to indicate
the reset.
The advantage over the 'additional flag' approach (i.e. introducing
SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP_RESET) is that no additional flag has to be
exported via uapi. This avoids the need to document how this new flag
has be used in conjunction with the existing uclamp related flags.
The following subtle issue is fixed as well. When a uclamp constraint
value is set on a !user_defined uclamp_se it is currently first reset
and then set.
Fix this by AND'ing !user_defined with !SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP which
stands for the 'sched class change' case.
The related condition 'if (uc_se->user_defined)' moved from
__setscheduler_uclamp() into uclamp_reset().
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Yun Hsiang <hsiang023167@gmail.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201113113454.25868-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201113005156.GA8408@charmander
|
|
NUMA topologies where the shortest path between some two nodes requires
three or more hops (i.e. diameter > 2) end up being misrepresented in the
scheduler topology structures.
This is currently detected when booting a kernel with CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y
+ sched_debug on the cmdline, although this will only yield a warning about
sched_group spans not matching sched_domain spans:
ERROR: groups don't span domain->span
Add an explicit warning for that case, triggered regardless of
CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG, and decorate it with an appropriate comment.
The topology described in the comment can be booted up on QEMU by appending
the following to your usual QEMU incantation:
-smp cores=4 \
-numa node,cpus=0,nodeid=0 -numa node,cpus=1,nodeid=1, \
-numa node,cpus=2,nodeid=2, -numa node,cpus=3,nodeid=3, \
-numa dist,src=0,dst=1,val=20, -numa dist,src=0,dst=2,val=30, \
-numa dist,src=0,dst=3,val=40, -numa dist,src=1,dst=2,val=20, \
-numa dist,src=1,dst=3,val=30, -numa dist,src=2,dst=3,val=20
A somewhat more realistic topology (6-node mesh) with the same affliction
can be conjured with:
-smp cores=6 \
-numa node,cpus=0,nodeid=0 -numa node,cpus=1,nodeid=1, \
-numa node,cpus=2,nodeid=2, -numa node,cpus=3,nodeid=3, \
-numa node,cpus=4,nodeid=4, -numa node,cpus=5,nodeid=5, \
-numa dist,src=0,dst=1,val=20, -numa dist,src=0,dst=2,val=30, \
-numa dist,src=0,dst=3,val=40, -numa dist,src=0,dst=4,val=30, \
-numa dist,src=0,dst=5,val=20, \
-numa dist,src=1,dst=2,val=20, -numa dist,src=1,dst=3,val=30, \
-numa dist,src=1,dst=4,val=20, -numa dist,src=1,dst=5,val=30, \
-numa dist,src=2,dst=3,val=20, -numa dist,src=2,dst=4,val=30, \
-numa dist,src=2,dst=5,val=40, \
-numa dist,src=3,dst=4,val=20, -numa dist,src=3,dst=5,val=30, \
-numa dist,src=4,dst=5,val=20
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/jhjtux5edo2.mognet@arm.com
|
|
Oleksandr reported hitting the WARN in the 'task_rq(p) != rq' branch
of migration_cpu_stop(). Valentin noted that using cpu_of(rq) in that
case is just plain wrong to begin with, since per the earlier branch
that isn't the actual CPU of the task.
Replace both instances of is_cpu_allowed() by a direct p->cpus_mask
test using task_cpu().
Reported-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Debugged-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
|
|
Qian reported that some fuzzer issuing sched_setaffinity() ends up stuck on
a wait_for_completion(). The problematic pattern seems to be:
affine_move_task()
// task_running() case
stop_one_cpu();
wait_for_completion(&pending->done);
Combined with, on the stopper side:
migration_cpu_stop()
// Task moved between unlocks and scheduling the stopper
task_rq(p) != rq &&
// task_running() case
dest_cpu >= 0
=> no complete_all()
This can happen with both PREEMPT and !PREEMPT, although !PREEMPT should
be more likely to see this given the targeted task has a much bigger window
to block and be woken up elsewhere before the stopper runs.
Make migration_cpu_stop() always look at pending affinity requests; signal
their completion if the stopper hits a rq mismatch but the task is
still within its allowed mask. When Migrate-Disable isn't involved, this
matches the previous set_cpus_allowed_ptr() vs migration_cpu_stop()
behaviour.
Fixes: 6d337eab041d ("sched: Fix migrate_disable() vs set_cpus_allowed_ptr()")
Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8b62fd1ad1b18def27f18e2ee2df3ff5b36d0762.camel@redhat.com
|
|
!HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING_OFFSTACK archs
schedule_user() was traditionally used by the entry code's tail to
preempt userspace after the call to user_enter(). Indeed the call to
user_enter() used to be performed upon syscall exit slow path which was
right before the last opportunity to schedule() while resuming to
userspace. The context tracking state had to be saved on the task stack
and set back to CONTEXT_KERNEL temporarily in order to safely switch to
another task.
Only a few archs use it now (namely sparc64 and powerpc64) and those
implementing HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING_OFFSTACK definetly can't rely on it.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201117151637.259084-5-frederic@kernel.org
|
|
Detect calls to schedule() between user_enter() and user_exit(). Those
are symptoms of early entry code that either forgot to protect a call
to schedule() inside exception_enter()/exception_exit() or, in the case
of HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING_OFFSTACK, enabled interrupts or preemption in
a wrong spot.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201117151637.259084-4-frederic@kernel.org
|
|
Glenn reported that "an application [he developed produces] a BUG in
deadline.c when a SCHED_DEADLINE task contends with CFS tasks on nested
PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT mutexes. I believe the bug is triggered when a CFS
task that was boosted by a SCHED_DEADLINE task boosts another CFS task
(nested priority inheritance).
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at kernel/sched/deadline.c:1462!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
CPU: 12 PID: 19171 Comm: dl_boost_bug Tainted: ...
Hardware name: ...
RIP: 0010:enqueue_task_dl+0x335/0x910
Code: ...
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000c2bbc68 EFLAGS: 00010002
RAX: 0000000000000009 RBX: ffff888c0af94c00 RCX: ffffffff81e12500
RDX: 000000000000002e RSI: ffff888c0af94c00 RDI: ffff888c10b22600
RBP: ffffc9000c2bbd08 R08: 0000000000000009 R09: 0000000000000078
R10: ffffffff81e12440 R11: ffffffff81e1236c R12: ffff888bc8932600
R13: ffff888c0af94eb8 R14: ffff888c10b22600 R15: ffff888bc8932600
FS: 00007fa58ac55700(0000) GS:ffff888c10b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fa58b523230 CR3: 0000000bf44ab003 CR4: 00000000007606e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
? intel_pstate_update_util_hwp+0x13/0x170
rt_mutex_setprio+0x1cc/0x4b0
task_blocks_on_rt_mutex+0x225/0x260
rt_spin_lock_slowlock_locked+0xab/0x2d0
rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x50/0x80
hrtimer_grab_expiry_lock+0x20/0x30
hrtimer_cancel+0x13/0x30
do_nanosleep+0xa0/0x150
hrtimer_nanosleep+0xe1/0x230
? __hrtimer_init_sleeper+0x60/0x60
__x64_sys_nanosleep+0x8d/0xa0
do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x100
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
RIP: 0033:0x7fa58b52330d
...
---[ end trace 0000000000000002 ]—
He also provided a simple reproducer creating the situation below:
So the execution order of locking steps are the following
(N1 and N2 are non-deadline tasks. D1 is a deadline task. M1 and M2
are mutexes that are enabled * with priority inheritance.)
Time moves forward as this timeline goes down:
N1 N2 D1
| | |
| | |
Lock(M1) | |
| | |
| Lock(M2) |
| | |
| | Lock(M2)
| | |
| Lock(M1) |
| (!!bug triggered!) |
Daniel reported a similar situation as well, by just letting ksoftirqd
run with DEADLINE (and eventually block on a mutex).
Problem is that boosted entities (Priority Inheritance) use static
DEADLINE parameters of the top priority waiter. However, there might be
cases where top waiter could be a non-DEADLINE entity that is currently
boosted by a DEADLINE entity from a different lock chain (i.e., nested
priority chains involving entities of non-DEADLINE classes). In this
case, top waiter static DEADLINE parameters could be null (initialized
to 0 at fork()) and replenish_dl_entity() would hit a BUG().
Fix this by keeping track of the original donor and using its parameters
when a task is boosted.
Reported-by: Glenn Elliott <glenn@aurora.tech>
Reported-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201117061432.517340-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com
|
|
schedule() ttwu()
deactivate_task(); if (p->on_rq && ...) // false
atomic_dec(&task_rq(p)->nr_iowait);
if (prev->in_iowait)
atomic_inc(&rq->nr_iowait);
Allows nr_iowait to be decremented before it gets incremented,
resulting in more dodgy IO-wait numbers than usual.
Note that because we can now do ttwu_queue_wakelist() before
p->on_cpu==0, we lose the natural ordering and have to further delay
the decrement.
Fixes: c6e7bd7afaeb ("sched/core: Optimize ttwu() spinning on p->on_cpu")
Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201117093829.GD3121429@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
|
|
enqueue_task_fair() attempts to skip the overutilized update for new
tasks as their util_avg is not accurate yet. However, the flag we check
to do so is overwritten earlier on in the function, which makes the
condition pretty much a nop.
Fix this by saving the flag early on.
Fixes: 2802bf3cd936 ("sched/fair: Add over-utilization/tipping point indicator")
Reported-by: Rick Yiu <rickyiu@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201112111201.2081902-1-qperret@google.com
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull scheduler fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
"A set of scheduler fixes:
- Address a load balancer regression by making the load balancer use
the same logic as the wakeup path to spread tasks in the LLC domain
- Prefer the CPU on which a task run last over the local CPU in the
fast wakeup path for asymmetric CPU capacity systems to align with
the symmetric case. This ensures more locality and prevents massive
migration overhead on those asymetric systems
- Fix a memory corruption bug in the scheduler debug code caused by
handing a modified buffer pointer to kfree()"
* tag 'sched-urgent-2020-11-15' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
sched/debug: Fix memory corruption caused by multiple small reads of flags
sched/fair: Prefer prev cpu in asymmetric wakeup path
sched/fair: Ensure tasks spreading in LLC during LB
|
|
This allows an exclusive wait_queue_entry to be added at the head of the
queue, instead of the tail as normal. Thus, it gets to consume events
first without allowing non-exclusive waiters to be woken at all.
The (first) intended use is for KVM IRQFD, which currently has
inconsistent behaviour depending on whether posted interrupts are
available or not. If they are, KVM will bypass the eventfd completely
and deliver interrupts directly to the appropriate vCPU. If not, events
are delivered through the eventfd and userspace will receive them when
polling on the eventfd.
By using add_wait_queue_priority(), KVM will be able to consistently
consume events within the kernel without accidentally exposing them
to userspace when they're supposed to be bypassed. This, in turn, means
that userspace doesn't have to jump through hoops to avoid listening
on the erroneously noisy eventfd and injecting duplicate interrupts.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Message-Id: <20201027143944.648769-2-dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
The CFS wakeup code will only ever go through EAS / its fast path on
"regular" wakeups (i.e. not on forks or execs). These are currently gated
by a check against 'sd_flag', which would be SD_BALANCE_WAKE at wakeup.
However, we now have a flag that explicitly tells us whether a wakeup is a
"regular" one, so hinge those conditions on that flag instead.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201102184514.2733-4-valentin.schneider@arm.com
|
|
Only select_task_rq_fair() uses that parameter to do an actual domain
search, other classes only care about what kind of wakeup is happening
(fork, exec, or "regular") and thus just translate the flag into a wakeup
type.
WF_TTWU and WF_EXEC have just been added, use these along with WF_FORK to
encode the wakeup types we care about. For select_task_rq_fair(), we can
simply use the shiny new WF_flag : SD_flag mapping.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201102184514.2733-3-valentin.schneider@arm.com
|
|
To remove the sd_flag parameter of select_task_rq(), we need another way of
encoding wakeup types. There already is a WF_FORK flag, add the missing two.
With that said, we still need an easy way to turn WF_foo into
SD_bar (e.g. WF_TTWU into SD_BALANCE_WAKE). As suggested by Peter, let's
make our lives easier and make them match exactly, and throw in some
compile-time checks for good measure.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201102184514.2733-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com
|
|
Since ab93a4bc955b ("sched/fair: Remove distribute_running fromCFS
bandwidth"), there is nothing to protect between
raw_spin_lock_irqsave/store() in do_sched_cfs_slack_timer().
Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201030144621.GA96974@rlk
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201013140116.26651-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com
|
|
migrate_disable();
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, {something excluding task_cpu(current)});
affine_move_task(); <-- never returns
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201013140116.26651-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com
|
|
In order to minimize the interference of migrate_disable() on lower
priority tasks, which can be deprived of runtime due to being stuck
below a higher priority task. Teach the RT/DL balancers to push away
these higher priority tasks when a lower priority task gets selected
to run on a freshly demoted CPU (pull).
This adds migration interference to the higher priority task, but
restores bandwidth to system that would otherwise be irrevocably lost.
Without this it would be possible to have all tasks on the system
stuck on a single CPU, each task preempted in a migrate_disable()
section with a single high priority task running.
This way we can still approximate running the M highest priority tasks
on the system.
Migrating the top task away is (ofcourse) still subject to
migrate_disable() too, which means the lower task is subject to an
interference equivalent to the worst case migrate_disable() section.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102347.499155098@infradead.org
|
|
There's a valid ->pi_lock recursion issue where the actual PI code
tries to wake up the stop task. Make lockdep aware so it doesn't
complain about this.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102347.406912197@infradead.org
|
|
We want migrate_disable() tasks to get PULLs in order for them to PUSH
away the higher priority task.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102347.310519774@infradead.org
|
|
Replace a bunch of cpumask_any*() instances with
cpumask_any*_distribute(), by injecting this little bit of random in
cpu selection, we reduce the chance two competing balance operations
working off the same lowest_mask pick the same CPU.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102347.190759694@infradead.org
|
|
On CPU unplug tasks which are in a migrate disabled region cannot be pushed
to a different CPU until they returned to migrateable state.
Account the number of tasks on a runqueue which are in a migrate disabled
section and make the hotplug wait mechanism respect that.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102347.067278757@infradead.org
|
|
Concurrent migrate_disable() and set_cpus_allowed_ptr() has
interesting features. We rely on set_cpus_allowed_ptr() to not return
until the task runs inside the provided mask. This expectation is
exported to userspace.
This means that any set_cpus_allowed_ptr() caller must wait until
migrate_enable() allows migrations.
At the same time, we don't want migrate_enable() to schedule, due to
patterns like:
preempt_disable();
migrate_disable();
...
migrate_enable();
preempt_enable();
And:
raw_spin_lock(&B);
spin_unlock(&A);
this means that when migrate_enable() must restore the affinity
mask, it cannot wait for completion thereof. Luck will have it that
that is exactly the case where there is a pending
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(), so let that provide storage for the async stop
machine.
Much thanks to Valentin who used TLA+ most effective and found lots of
'interesting' cases.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102346.921768277@infradead.org
|
|
Add the base migrate_disable() support (under protest).
While migrate_disable() is (currently) required for PREEMPT_RT, it is
also one of the biggest flaws in the system.
Notably this is just the base implementation, it is broken vs
sched_setaffinity() and hotplug, both solved in additional patches for
ease of review.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102346.818170844@infradead.org
|
|
Thread a u32 flags word through the *set_cpus_allowed*() callchain.
This will allow adding behavioural tweaks for future users.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102346.729082820@infradead.org
|
|
Since we now migrate tasks away before DYING, we should also move
bandwidth unthrottle, otherwise we can gain tasks from unthrottle
after we expect all tasks to be gone already.
Also; it looks like the RT balancers don't respect cpu_active() and
instead rely on rq->online in part, complete this. This too requires
we do set_rq_offline() earlier to match the cpu_active() semantics.
(The bigger patch is to convert RT to cpu_active() entirely)
Since set_rq_online() is called from sched_cpu_activate(), place
set_rq_offline() in sched_cpu_deactivate().
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102346.639538965@infradead.org
|
|
With the new mechanism which kicks tasks off the outgoing CPU at the end of
schedule() the situation on an outgoing CPU right before the stopper thread
brings it down completely is:
- All user tasks and all unbound kernel threads have either been migrated
away or are not running and the next wakeup will move them to a online CPU.
- All per CPU kernel threads, except cpu hotplug thread and the stopper
thread have either been unbound or parked by the responsible CPU hotplug
callback.
That means that at the last step before the stopper thread is invoked the
cpu hotplug thread is the last legitimate running task on the outgoing
CPU.
Add a final wait step right before the stopper thread is kicked which
ensures that any still running tasks on the way to park or on the way to
kick themself of the CPU are either sleeping or gone.
This allows to remove the migrate_tasks() crutch in sched_cpu_dying(). If
sched_cpu_dying() detects that there is still another running task aside of
the stopper thread then it will explode with the appropriate fireworks.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102346.547163969@infradead.org
|
|
RT kernels need to ensure that all tasks which are not per CPU kthreads
have left the outgoing CPU to guarantee that no tasks are force migrated
within a migrate disabled section.
There is also some desire to (ab)use fine grained CPU hotplug control to
clear a CPU from active state to force migrate tasks which are not per CPU
kthreads away for power control purposes.
Add a mechanism which waits until all tasks which should leave the CPU
after the CPU active flag is cleared have moved to a different online CPU.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102346.377836842@infradead.org
|
|
In preparation for migrate_disable(), make sure only per-cpu kthreads
are allowed to run on !active CPUs.
This is ran (as one of the very first steps) from the cpu-hotplug
task which is a per-cpu kthread and completion of the hotplug
operation only requires such tasks.
This constraint enables the migrate_disable() implementation to wait
for completion of all migrate_disable regions on this CPU at hotplug
time without fear of any new ones starting.
This replaces the unlikely(rq->balance_callbacks) test at the tail of
context_switch with an unlikely(rq->balance_work), the fast path is
not affected.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102346.292709163@infradead.org
|
|
The intent of balance_callback() has always been to delay executing
balancing operations until the end of the current rq->lock section.
This is because balance operations must often drop rq->lock, and that
isn't safe in general.
However, as noted by Scott, there were a few holes in that scheme;
balance_callback() was called after rq->lock was dropped, which means
another CPU can interleave and touch the callback list.
Rework code to call the balance callbacks before dropping rq->lock
where possible, and otherwise splice the balance list onto a local
stack.
This guarantees that the balance list must be empty when we take
rq->lock. IOW, we'll only ever run our own balance callbacks.
Reported-by: Scott Wood <swood@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102346.203901269@infradead.org
|
|
Crashes in stop-machine are hard to connect to the calling code, add a
little something to help with that.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102346.116513635@infradead.org
|
|
Reading /proc/sys/kernel/sched_domain/cpu*/domain0/flags mutliple times
with small reads causes oopses with slub corruption issues because the kfree is
free'ing an offset from a previous allocation. Fix this by adding in a new
pointer 'buf' for the allocation and kfree and use the temporary pointer tmp
to handle memory copies of the buf offsets.
Fixes: 5b9f8ff7b320 ("sched/debug: Output SD flag names rather than their values")
Reported-by: Jeff Bastian <jbastian@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201029151103.373410-1-colin.king@canonical.com
|
|
During fast wakeup path, scheduler always check whether local or prev
cpus are good candidates for the task before looking for other cpus in
the domain. With commit b7a331615d25 ("sched/fair: Add asymmetric CPU
capacity wakeup scan") the heterogenous system gains a dedicated path
but doesn't try to reuse prev cpu whenever possible. If the previous
cpu is idle and belong to the LLC domain, we should check it 1st
before looking for another cpu because it stays one of the best
candidate and this also stabilizes task placement on the system.
This change aligns asymmetric path behavior with symmetric one and reduces
cases where the task migrates across all cpus of the sd_asym_cpucapacity
domains at wakeup.
This change does not impact normal EAS mode but only the overloaded case or
when EAS is not used.
- On hikey960 with performance governor (EAS disable)
./perf bench sched pipe -T -l 50000
mainline w/ patch
# migrations 999364 0
ops/sec 149313(+/-0.28%) 182587(+/- 0.40) +22%
- On hikey with performance governor
./perf bench sched pipe -T -l 50000
mainline w/ patch
# migrations 0 0
ops/sec 47721(+/-0.76%) 47899(+/- 0.56) +0.4%
According to test on hikey, the patch doesn't impact symmetric system
compared to current implementation (only tested on arm64)
Also read the uclamped value of task's utilization at most twice instead
instead each time we compare task's utilization with cpu's capacity.
Fixes: b7a331615d25 ("sched/fair: Add asymmetric CPU capacity wakeup scan")
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201029161824.26389-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
|
|
schbench shows latency increase for 95 percentile above since:
commit 0b0695f2b34a ("sched/fair: Rework load_balance()")
Align the behavior of the load balancer with the wake up path, which tries
to select an idle CPU which belongs to the LLC for a waking task.
calculate_imbalance() will use nr_running instead of the spare
capacity when CPUs share resources (ie cache) at the domain level. This
will ensure a better spread of tasks on idle CPUs.
Running schbench on a hikey (8cores arm64) shows the problem:
tip/sched/core :
schbench -m 2 -t 4 -s 10000 -c 1000000 -r 10
Latency percentiles (usec)
50.0th: 33
75.0th: 45
90.0th: 51
95.0th: 4152
*99.0th: 14288
99.5th: 14288
99.9th: 14288
min=0, max=14276
tip/sched/core + patch :
schbench -m 2 -t 4 -s 10000 -c 1000000 -r 10
Latency percentiles (usec)
50.0th: 34
75.0th: 47
90.0th: 52
95.0th: 78
*99.0th: 94
99.5th: 94
99.9th: 94
min=0, max=94
Fixes: 0b0695f2b34a ("sched/fair: Rework load_balance()")
Reported-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Suggested-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Tested-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201102102457.28808-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
|
|
A new cpufreq governor flag will be added subsequently, so replace
the bool dynamic_switching fleid in struct cpufreq_governor with a
flags field and introduce CPUFREQ_GOV_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING to set for
the "dynamic switching" governors instead of it.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
|
|
As commit:
39f23ce07b93 ("sched/fair: Fix unthrottle_cfs_rq() for leaf_cfs_rq list")
does in unthrottle_cfs_rq(), throttle_cfs_rq() can also use the same
pattern as dequeue_task_fair().
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Peng Wang <rocking@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f11dd2e3ab35cc538e2eb57bf0c99b6eaffce127.1604973978.git.rocking@linux.alibaba.com
|
|
The cpufreq policy's frequency limits (min/max) can get changed at any
point of time, while schedutil is trying to update the next frequency.
Though the schedutil governor has necessary locking and support in place
to make sure we don't miss any of those updates, there is a corner case
where the governor will find that the CPU is already running at the
desired frequency and so may skip an update.
For example, consider that the CPU can run at 1 GHz, 1.2 GHz and 1.4 GHz
and is running at 1 GHz currently. Schedutil tries to update the
frequency to 1.2 GHz, during this time the policy limits get changed as
policy->min = 1.4 GHz. As schedutil (and cpufreq core) does clamp the
frequency at various instances, we will eventually set the frequency to
1.4 GHz, while we will save 1.2 GHz in sg_policy->next_freq.
Now lets say the policy limits get changed back at this time with
policy->min as 1 GHz. The next time schedutil is invoked by the
scheduler, we will reevaluate the next frequency (because
need_freq_update will get set due to limits change event) and lets say
we want to set the frequency to 1.2 GHz again. At this point
sugov_update_next_freq() will find the next_freq == current_freq and
will abort the update, while the CPU actually runs at 1.4 GHz.
Until now need_freq_update was used as a flag to indicate that the
policy's frequency limits have changed, and that we should consider the
new limits while reevaluating the next frequency.
This patch fixes the above mentioned issue by extending the purpose of
the need_freq_update flag. If this flag is set now, the schedutil
governor will not try to abort a frequency change even if next_freq ==
current_freq.
As similar behavior is required in the case of
CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS flag as well, need_freq_update will never be
set to false if that flag is set for the driver.
We also don't need to consider the need_freq_update flag in
sugov_update_single() anymore to handle the special case of busy CPU, as
we won't abort a frequency update anymore.
Reported-by: zhuguangqing <zhuguangqing@xiaomi.com>
Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Rearrange code to avoid a branch ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Because sugov_update_next_freq() may skip a frequency update even if
the need_freq_update flag has been set for the policy at hand, policy
limits updates may not take effect as expected.
For example, if the intel_pstate driver operates in the passive mode
with HWP enabled, it needs to update the HWP min and max limits when
the policy min and max limits change, respectively, but that may not
happen if the target frequency does not change along with the limit
at hand. In particular, if the policy min is changed first, causing
the target frequency to be adjusted to it, and the policy max limit
is changed later to the same value, the HWP max limit will not be
updated to follow it as expected, because the target frequency is
still equal to the policy min limit and it will not change until
that limit is updated.
To address this issue, modify get_next_freq() to let the driver
callback run if the CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS cpufreq driver flag
is set regardless of whether or not the new frequency to set is
equal to the previous one.
Fixes: f6ebbcf08f37 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement passive mode with HWP enabled")
Reported-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: 5.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.9+: 1c534352f47f cpufreq: Introduce CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS ...
Cc: 5.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.9+: a62f68f5ca53 cpufreq: Introduce cpufreq_driver_test_flags()
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
