summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-11-01bpf: Add alignment padding for "map_extra" + consolidate holesJoanne Koong
This patch makes 2 changes regarding alignment padding for the "map_extra" field. 1) In the kernel header, "map_extra" and "btf_value_type_id" are rearranged to consolidate the hole. Before: struct bpf_map { ... u32 max_entries; /* 36 4 */ u32 map_flags; /* 40 4 */ /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */ u64 map_extra; /* 48 8 */ int spin_lock_off; /* 56 4 */ int timer_off; /* 60 4 */ /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */ u32 id; /* 64 4 */ int numa_node; /* 68 4 */ ... bool frozen; /* 117 1 */ /* XXX 10 bytes hole, try to pack */ /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) --- */ ... struct work_struct work; /* 144 72 */ /* --- cacheline 3 boundary (192 bytes) was 24 bytes ago --- */ struct mutex freeze_mutex; /* 216 144 */ /* --- cacheline 5 boundary (320 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */ u64 writecnt; /* 360 8 */ /* size: 384, cachelines: 6, members: 26 */ /* sum members: 354, holes: 2, sum holes: 14 */ /* padding: 16 */ /* forced alignments: 2, forced holes: 1, sum forced holes: 10 */ } __attribute__((__aligned__(64))); After: struct bpf_map { ... u32 max_entries; /* 36 4 */ u64 map_extra; /* 40 8 */ u32 map_flags; /* 48 4 */ int spin_lock_off; /* 52 4 */ int timer_off; /* 56 4 */ u32 id; /* 60 4 */ /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */ int numa_node; /* 64 4 */ ... bool frozen /* 113 1 */ /* XXX 14 bytes hole, try to pack */ /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) --- */ ... struct work_struct work; /* 144 72 */ /* --- cacheline 3 boundary (192 bytes) was 24 bytes ago --- */ struct mutex freeze_mutex; /* 216 144 */ /* --- cacheline 5 boundary (320 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */ u64 writecnt; /* 360 8 */ /* size: 384, cachelines: 6, members: 26 */ /* sum members: 354, holes: 1, sum holes: 14 */ /* padding: 16 */ /* forced alignments: 2, forced holes: 1, sum forced holes: 14 */ } __attribute__((__aligned__(64))); 2) Add alignment padding to the bpf_map_info struct More details can be found in commit 36f9814a494a ("bpf: fix uapi hole for 32 bit compat applications") Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211029224909.1721024-3-joannekoong@fb.com
2021-11-01selftests/bpf: Add test cases for struct_ops progHou Tao
Running a BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS prog for dummy_st_ops::test_N() through bpf_prog_test_run(). Four test cases are added: (1) attach dummy_st_ops should fail (2) function return value of bpf_dummy_ops::test_1() is expected (3) pointer argument of bpf_dummy_ops::test_1() works as expected (4) multiple arguments passed to bpf_dummy_ops::test_2() are correct Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211025064025.2567443-5-houtao1@huawei.com
2021-11-01selftests, bpf: Fix broken riscv buildBjörn Töpel
This patch is closely related to commit 6016df8fe874 ("selftests/bpf: Fix broken riscv build"). When clang includes the system include directories, but targeting BPF program, __BITS_PER_LONG defaults to 32, unless explicitly set. Work around this problem, by explicitly setting __BITS_PER_LONG to __riscv_xlen. Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028161057.520552-5-bjorn@kernel.org
2021-11-01riscv, libbpf: Add RISC-V (RV64) support to bpf_tracing.hBjörn Töpel
Add macros for 64-bit RISC-V PT_REGS to bpf_tracing.h. Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028161057.520552-4-bjorn@kernel.org
2021-11-01tools, build: Add RISC-V to HOSTARCH parsingBjörn Töpel
Add RISC-V to the HOSTARCH parsing, so that ARCH is "riscv", and not "riscv32" or "riscv64". This affects the perf and libbpf builds, so that arch specific includes are correctly picked up for RISC-V. Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028161057.520552-3-bjorn@kernel.org
2021-11-01selftests, bpf: Add one test for sockmap with strparserLiu Jian
Add the test to check sockmap with strparser is working well. Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211029141216.211899-3-liujian56@huawei.com
2021-11-01selftests, bpf: Fix test_txmsg_ingress_parser errorLiu Jian
After "skmsg: lose offset info in sk_psock_skb_ingress", the test case with ktls failed. This because ktls parser(tls_read_size) return value is 285 not 256. The case like this: tls_sk1 --> redir_sk --> tls_sk2 tls_sk1 sent out 512 bytes data, after tls related processing redir_sk recved 570 btyes data, and redirect 512 (skb_use_parser) bytes data to tls_sk2; but tls_sk2 needs 285 * 2 bytes data, receive timeout occurred. Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211029141216.211899-2-liujian56@huawei.com
2021-11-01selftests/bpf: Fix strobemeta selftest regressionAndrii Nakryiko
After most recent nightly Clang update strobemeta selftests started failing with the following error (relevant portion of assembly included): 1624: (85) call bpf_probe_read_user_str#114 1625: (bf) r1 = r0 1626: (18) r2 = 0xfffffffe 1628: (5f) r1 &= r2 1629: (55) if r1 != 0x0 goto pc+7 1630: (07) r9 += 104 1631: (6b) *(u16 *)(r9 +0) = r0 1632: (67) r0 <<= 32 1633: (77) r0 >>= 32 1634: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -456) 1635: (0f) r1 += r0 1636: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -456) = r1 1637: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -368) 1638: (c5) if r1 s< 0x1 goto pc+778 1639: (bf) r6 = r8 1640: (0f) r6 += r7 1641: (b4) w1 = 0 1642: (6b) *(u16 *)(r6 +108) = r1 1643: (79) r3 = *(u64 *)(r10 -352) 1644: (79) r9 = *(u64 *)(r10 -456) 1645: (bf) r1 = r9 1646: (b4) w2 = 1 1647: (85) call bpf_probe_read_user_str#114 R1 unbounded memory access, make sure to bounds check any such access In the above code r0 and r1 are implicitly related. Clang knows that, but verifier isn't able to infer this relationship. Yonghong Song narrowed down this "regression" in code generation to a recent Clang optimization change ([0]), which for BPF target generates code pattern that BPF verifier can't handle and loses track of register boundaries. This patch works around the issue by adding an BPF assembly-based helper that helps to prove to the verifier that upper bound of the register is a given constant by controlling the exact share of generated BPF instruction sequence. This fixes the immediate issue for strobemeta selftest. [0] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/acabad9ff6bf13e00305d9d8621ee8eafc1f8b08 Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211029182907.166910-1-andrii@kernel.org
2021-10-29selftests/bpf: Fix fclose/pclose mismatch in test_progsAndrea Righi
Make sure to use pclose() to properly close the pipe opened by popen(). Fixes: 81f77fd0deeb ("bpf: add selftest for stackmap with BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID") Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026143409.42666-1-andrea.righi@canonical.com
2021-10-28selftests/bpf: Fix memory leak in test_imaKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
The allocated ring buffer is never freed, do so in the cleanup path. Fixes: f446b570ac7e ("bpf/selftests: Update the IMA test to use BPF ring buffer") Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028063501.2239335-9-memxor@gmail.com
2021-10-28selftests/bpf: Fix fd cleanup in sk_lookup testKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Similar to the fix in commit: e31eec77e4ab ("bpf: selftests: Fix fd cleanup in get_branch_snapshot") We use designated initializer to set fds to -1 without breaking on future changes to MAX_SERVER constant denoting the array size. The particular close(0) occurs on non-reuseport tests, so it can be seen with -n 115/{2,3} but not 115/4. This can cause problems with future tests if they depend on BTF fd never being acquired as fd 0, breaking internal libbpf assumptions. Fixes: 0ab5539f8584 ("selftests/bpf: Tests for BPF_SK_LOOKUP attach point") Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028063501.2239335-8-memxor@gmail.com
2021-10-28selftests/bpf: Add weak/typeless ksym test for light skeletonKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Also, avoid using CO-RE features, as lskel doesn't support CO-RE, yet. Include both light and libbpf skeleton in same file to test both of them together. In c48e51c8b07a ("bpf: selftests: Add selftests for module kfunc support"), I added support for generating both lskel and libbpf skel for a BPF object, however the name parameter for bpftool caused collisions when included in same file together. This meant that every test needed a separate file for a libbpf/light skeleton separation instead of subtests. Change that by appending a "_lskel" suffix to the name for files using light skeleton, and convert all existing users. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028063501.2239335-7-memxor@gmail.com
2021-10-28libbpf: Use O_CLOEXEC uniformly when opening fdsKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
There are some instances where we don't use O_CLOEXEC when opening an fd, fix these up. Otherwise, it is possible that a parallel fork causes these fds to leak into a child process on execve. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028063501.2239335-6-memxor@gmail.com
2021-10-28libbpf: Ensure that BPF syscall fds are never 0, 1, or 2Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Add a simple wrapper for passing an fd and getting a new one >= 3 if it is one of 0, 1, or 2. There are two primary reasons to make this change: First, libbpf relies on the assumption a certain BPF fd is never 0 (e.g. most recently noticed in [0]). Second, Alexei pointed out in [1] that some environments reset stdin, stdout, and stderr if they notice an invalid fd at these numbers. To protect against both these cases, switch all internal BPF syscall wrappers in libbpf to always return an fd >= 3. We only need to modify the syscall wrappers and not other code that assumes a valid fd by doing >= 0, to avoid pointless churn, and because it is still a valid assumption. The cost paid is two additional syscalls if fd is in range [0, 2]. [0]: e31eec77e4ab ("bpf: selftests: Fix fd cleanup in get_branch_snapshot") [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQKVKY8o_3aU8Gzke443+uHa-eGoM0h7W4srChMXU1S4Bg@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028063501.2239335-5-memxor@gmail.com
2021-10-28libbpf: Add weak ksym support to gen_loaderKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
This extends existing ksym relocation code to also support relocating weak ksyms. Care needs to be taken to zero out the src_reg (currently BPF_PSEUOD_BTF_ID, always set for gen_loader by bpf_object__relocate_data) when the BTF ID lookup fails at runtime. This is not a problem for libbpf as it only sets ext->is_set when BTF ID lookup succeeds (and only proceeds in case of failure if ext->is_weak, leading to src_reg remaining as 0 for weak unresolved ksym). A pattern similar to emit_relo_kfunc_btf is followed of first storing the default values and then jumping over actual stores in case of an error. For src_reg adjustment, we also need to perform it when copying the populated instruction, so depending on if copied insn[0].imm is 0 or not, we decide to jump over the adjustment. We cannot reach that point unless the ksym was weak and resolved and zeroed out, as the emit_check_err will cause us to jump to cleanup label, so we do not need to recheck whether the ksym is weak before doing the adjustment after copying BTF ID and BTF FD. This is consistent with how libbpf relocates weak ksym. Logging statements are added to show the relocation result and aid debugging. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028063501.2239335-4-memxor@gmail.com
2021-10-28libbpf: Add typeless ksym support to gen_loaderKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
This uses the bpf_kallsyms_lookup_name helper added in previous patches to relocate typeless ksyms. The return value ENOENT can be ignored, and the value written to 'res' can be directly stored to the insn, as it is overwritten to 0 on lookup failure. For repeating symbols, we can simply copy the previously populated bpf_insn. Also, we need to take care to not close fds for typeless ksym_desc, so reuse the 'off' member's space to add a marker for typeless ksym and use that to skip them in cleanup_relos. We add a emit_ksym_relo_log helper that avoids duplicating common logging instructions between typeless and weak ksym (for future commit). Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028063501.2239335-3-memxor@gmail.com
2021-10-28bpf: Add bpf_kallsyms_lookup_name helperKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
This helper allows us to get the address of a kernel symbol from inside a BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL prog (used by gen_loader), so that we can relocate typeless ksym vars. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028063501.2239335-2-memxor@gmail.com
2021-10-28bpf/benchs: Add benchmarks for comparing hashmap lookups w/ vs. w/out bloom ↵Joanne Koong
filter This patch adds benchmark tests for comparing the performance of hashmap lookups without the bloom filter vs. hashmap lookups with the bloom filter. Checking the bloom filter first for whether the element exists should overall enable a higher throughput for hashmap lookups, since if the element does not exist in the bloom filter, we can avoid a costly lookup in the hashmap. On average, using 5 hash functions in the bloom filter tended to perform the best across the widest range of different entry sizes. The benchmark results using 5 hash functions (running on 8 threads on a machine with one numa node, and taking the average of 3 runs) were roughly as follows: value_size = 4 bytes - 10k entries: 30% faster 50k entries: 40% faster 100k entries: 40% faster 500k entres: 70% faster 1 million entries: 90% faster 5 million entries: 140% faster value_size = 8 bytes - 10k entries: 30% faster 50k entries: 40% faster 100k entries: 50% faster 500k entres: 80% faster 1 million entries: 100% faster 5 million entries: 150% faster value_size = 16 bytes - 10k entries: 20% faster 50k entries: 30% faster 100k entries: 35% faster 500k entres: 65% faster 1 million entries: 85% faster 5 million entries: 110% faster value_size = 40 bytes - 10k entries: 5% faster 50k entries: 15% faster 100k entries: 20% faster 500k entres: 65% faster 1 million entries: 75% faster 5 million entries: 120% faster Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211027234504.30744-6-joannekoong@fb.com
2021-10-28bpf/benchs: Add benchmark tests for bloom filter throughput + false positiveJoanne Koong
This patch adds benchmark tests for the throughput (for lookups + updates) and the false positive rate of bloom filter lookups, as well as some minor refactoring of the bash script for running the benchmarks. These benchmarks show that as the number of hash functions increases, the throughput and the false positive rate of the bloom filter decreases. >From the benchmark data, the approximate average false-positive rates are roughly as follows: 1 hash function = ~30% 2 hash functions = ~15% 3 hash functions = ~5% 4 hash functions = ~2.5% 5 hash functions = ~1% 6 hash functions = ~0.5% 7 hash functions = ~0.35% 8 hash functions = ~0.15% 9 hash functions = ~0.1% 10 hash functions = ~0% For reference data, the benchmarks run on one thread on a machine with one numa node for 1 to 5 hash functions for 8-byte and 64-byte values are as follows: 1 hash function: 50k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 51.1 M/s operations Updates - 33.6 M/s operations False positive rate: 24.15% 64-byte value Lookups - 15.7 M/s operations Updates - 15.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 24.2% 100k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 51.0 M/s operations Updates - 33.4 M/s operations False positive rate: 24.04% 64-byte value Lookups - 15.6 M/s operations Updates - 14.6 M/s operations False positive rate: 24.06% 500k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 50.5 M/s operations Updates - 33.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 27.45% 64-byte value Lookups - 15.6 M/s operations Updates - 14.2 M/s operations False positive rate: 27.42% 1 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 49.7 M/s operations Updates - 32.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 27.45% 64-byte value Lookups - 15.4 M/s operations Updates - 13.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 27.58% 2.5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 47.2 M/s operations Updates - 31.8 M/s operations False positive rate: 30.94% 64-byte value Lookups - 15.3 M/s operations Updates - 13.2 M/s operations False positive rate: 30.95% 5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 41.1 M/s operations Updates - 28.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 31.01% 64-byte value Lookups - 13.3 M/s operations Updates - 11.4 M/s operations False positive rate: 30.98% 2 hash functions: 50k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 34.1 M/s operations Updates - 20.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 9.13% 64-byte value Lookups - 8.4 M/s operations Updates - 7.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 9.21% 100k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 33.7 M/s operations Updates - 18.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 9.13% 64-byte value Lookups - 8.4 M/s operations Updates - 7.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 9.19% 500k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 32.7 M/s operations Updates - 18.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 12.61% 64-byte value Lookups - 8.4 M/s operations Updates - 7.5 M/s operations False positive rate: 12.61% 1 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 30.6 M/s operations Updates - 18.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 12.54% 64-byte value Lookups - 8.0 M/s operations Updates - 7.0 M/s operations False positive rate: 12.52% 2.5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 25.3 M/s operations Updates - 16.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 16.77% 64-byte value Lookups - 7.9 M/s operations Updates - 6.5 M/s operations False positive rate: 16.88% 5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 20.8 M/s operations Updates - 14.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 16.78% 64-byte value Lookups - 7.0 M/s operations Updates - 6.0 M/s operations False positive rate: 16.78% 3 hash functions: 50k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 25.1 M/s operations Updates - 14.6 M/s operations False positive rate: 7.65% 64-byte value Lookups - 5.8 M/s operations Updates - 5.5 M/s operations False positive rate: 7.58% 100k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 24.7 M/s operations Updates - 14.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 7.71% 64-byte value Lookups - 5.8 M/s operations Updates - 5.3 M/s operations False positive rate: 7.62% 500k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 22.9 M/s operations Updates - 13.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 2.62% 64-byte value Lookups - 5.6 M/s operations Updates - 4.8 M/s operations False positive rate: 2.7% 1 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 19.8 M/s operations Updates - 12.6 M/s operations False positive rate: 2.60% 64-byte value Lookups - 5.3 M/s operations Updates - 4.4 M/s operations False positive rate: 2.69% 2.5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 16.2 M/s operations Updates - 10.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 4.49% 64-byte value Lookups - 4.9 M/s operations Updates - 4.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 4.41% 5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 18.8 M/s operations Updates - 9.2 M/s operations False positive rate: 4.45% 64-byte value Lookups - 5.2 M/s operations Updates - 3.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 4.54% 4 hash functions: 50k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 19.7 M/s operations Updates - 11.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.01% 64-byte value Lookups - 4.4 M/s operations Updates - 4.0 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.00% 100k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 19.5 M/s operations Updates - 10.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.00% 64-byte value Lookups - 4.3 M/s operations Updates - 3.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.97% 500k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 18.2 M/s operations Updates - 10.6 M/s operations False positive rate: 2.05% 64-byte value Lookups - 4.3 M/s operations Updates - 3.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 2.05% 1 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 15.5 M/s operations Updates - 9.6 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.99% 64-byte value Lookups - 4.0 M/s operations Updates - 3.4 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.99% 2.5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 13.8 M/s operations Updates - 7.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 3.91% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.7 M/s operations Updates - 3.6 M/s operations False positive rate: 3.78% 5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 13.0 M/s operations Updates - 6.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 3.93% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.5 M/s operations Updates - 3.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 3.39% 5 hash functions: 50k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 16.4 M/s operations Updates - 9.1 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.78% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.5 M/s operations Updates - 3.2 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.77% 100k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 16.3 M/s operations Updates - 9.0 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.79% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.5 M/s operations Updates - 3.2 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.78% 500k entries 8-byte value Lookups - 15.1 M/s operations Updates - 8.8 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.82% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.4 M/s operations Updates - 3.0 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.78% 1 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 13.2 M/s operations Updates - 7.8 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.81% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.2 M/s operations Updates - 2.8 M/s operations False positive rate: 1.80% 2.5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 10.5 M/s operations Updates - 5.9 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.29% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.2 M/s operations Updates - 2.4 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.28% 5 mil entries 8-byte value Lookups - 9.6 M/s operations Updates - 5.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.30% 64-byte value Lookups - 3.2 M/s operations Updates - 2.7 M/s operations False positive rate: 0.30% Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211027234504.30744-5-joannekoong@fb.com
2021-10-28selftests/bpf: Add bloom filter map test casesJoanne Koong
This patch adds test cases for bpf bloom filter maps. They include tests checking against invalid operations by userspace, tests for using the bloom filter map as an inner map, and a bpf program that queries the bloom filter map for values added by a userspace program. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211027234504.30744-4-joannekoong@fb.com
2021-10-28libbpf: Add "map_extra" as a per-map-type extra flagJoanne Koong
This patch adds the libbpf infrastructure for supporting a per-map-type "map_extra" field, whose definition will be idiosyncratic depending on map type. For example, for the bloom filter map, the lower 4 bits of map_extra is used to denote the number of hash functions. Please note that until libbpf 1.0 is here, the "bpf_create_map_params" struct is used as a temporary means for propagating the map_extra field to the kernel. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211027234504.30744-3-joannekoong@fb.com
2021-10-28bpf: Add bloom filter map implementationJoanne Koong
This patch adds the kernel-side changes for the implementation of a bpf bloom filter map. The bloom filter map supports peek (determining whether an element is present in the map) and push (adding an element to the map) operations.These operations are exposed to userspace applications through the already existing syscalls in the following way: BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_ELEM -> peek BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM -> push The bloom filter map does not have keys, only values. In light of this, the bloom filter map's API matches that of queue stack maps: user applications use BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_ELEM/BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM which correspond internally to bpf_map_peek_elem/bpf_map_push_elem, and bpf programs must use the bpf_map_peek_elem and bpf_map_push_elem APIs to query or add an element to the bloom filter map. When the bloom filter map is created, it must be created with a key_size of 0. For updates, the user will pass in the element to add to the map as the value, with a NULL key. For lookups, the user will pass in the element to query in the map as the value, with a NULL key. In the verifier layer, this requires us to modify the argument type of a bloom filter's BPF_FUNC_map_peek_elem call to ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE; as well, in the syscall layer, we need to copy over the user value so that in bpf_map_peek_elem, we know which specific value to query. A few things to please take note of: * If there are any concurrent lookups + updates, the user is responsible for synchronizing this to ensure no false negative lookups occur. * The number of hashes to use for the bloom filter is configurable from userspace. If no number is specified, the default used will be 5 hash functions. The benchmarks later in this patchset can help compare the performance of using different number of hashes on different entry sizes. In general, using more hashes decreases both the false positive rate and the speed of a lookup. * Deleting an element in the bloom filter map is not supported. * The bloom filter map may be used as an inner map. * The "max_entries" size that is specified at map creation time is used to approximate a reasonable bitmap size for the bloom filter, and is not otherwise strictly enforced. If the user wishes to insert more entries into the bloom filter than "max_entries", they may do so but they should be aware that this may lead to a higher false positive rate. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211027234504.30744-2-joannekoong@fb.com
2021-10-27selftests/bpf: Adding a namespace reset for tc_redirectYucong Sun
This patch delete ns_src/ns_dst/ns_redir namespaces before recreating them, making the test more robust. Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211025223345.2136168-5-fallentree@fb.com
2021-10-27selftests/bpf: Fix attach_probe in parallel modeYucong Sun
This patch makes attach_probe uses its own method as attach point, avoiding conflict with other tests like bpf_cookie. Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211025223345.2136168-4-fallentree@fb.com
2021-10-27selfetests/bpf: Update vmtest.sh defaultsYucong Sun
Increase memory to 4G, 8 SMP core with host cpu passthrough. This make it run faster in parallel mode and more likely to succeed. Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211025223345.2136168-2-fallentree@fb.com
2021-10-27libbpf: Deprecate bpf_objects_listJoe Burton
Add a flag to `enum libbpf_strict_mode' to disable the global `bpf_objects_list', preventing race conditions when concurrent threads call bpf_object__open() or bpf_object__close(). bpf_object__next() will return NULL if this option is set. Callers may achieve the same workflow by tracking bpf_objects in application code. [0] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/293 Signed-off-by: Joe Burton <jevburton@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026223528.413950-1-jevburton.kernel@gmail.com
2021-10-25selftests/bpf: Guess function end for test_get_branch_snapshotSong Liu
Function in modules could appear in /proc/kallsyms in random order. ffffffffa02608a0 t bpf_testmod_loop_test ffffffffa02600c0 t __traceiter_bpf_testmod_test_writable_bare ffffffffa0263b60 d __tracepoint_bpf_testmod_test_write_bare ffffffffa02608c0 T bpf_testmod_test_read ffffffffa0260d08 t __SCT__tp_func_bpf_testmod_test_writable_bare ffffffffa0263300 d __SCK__tp_func_bpf_testmod_test_read ffffffffa0260680 T bpf_testmod_test_write ffffffffa0260860 t bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc Therefore, we cannot reliably use kallsyms_find_next() to find the end of a function. Replace it with a simple guess (start + 128). This is good enough for this test. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211022234814.318457-1-songliubraving@fb.com
2021-10-25selftests/bpf: Skip all serial_test_get_branch_snapshot in vmSong Liu
Skipping the second half of the test is not enough to silent the warning in dmesg. Skip the whole test before we can either properly silent the warning in kernel, or fix LBR snapshot for VM. Fixes: 025bd7c753aa ("selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_get_branch_snapshot") Fixes: aa67fdb46436 ("selftests/bpf: Skip the second half of get_branch_snapshot in vm") Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026000733.477714-1-songliubraving@fb.com
2021-10-25selftests/bpf: Fix test_core_reloc_mods on big-endian machinesIlya Leoshkevich
This is the same as commit d164dd9a5c08 ("selftests/bpf: Fix test_core_autosize on big-endian machines"), but for test_core_reloc_mods. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026010831.748682-7-iii@linux.ibm.com
2021-10-25selftests/seccomp: Use __BYTE_ORDER__Ilya Leoshkevich
Use the compiler-defined __BYTE_ORDER__ instead of the libc-defined __BYTE_ORDER for consistency. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026010831.748682-6-iii@linux.ibm.com
2021-10-25selftests/bpf: Use __BYTE_ORDER__Ilya Leoshkevich
Use the compiler-defined __BYTE_ORDER__ instead of the libc-defined __BYTE_ORDER for consistency. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026010831.748682-4-iii@linux.ibm.com
2021-10-25libbpf: Use __BYTE_ORDER__Ilya Leoshkevich
Use the compiler-defined __BYTE_ORDER__ instead of the libc-defined __BYTE_ORDER for consistency. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026010831.748682-3-iii@linux.ibm.com
2021-10-25libbpf: Fix endianness detection in BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD_PROBED()Ilya Leoshkevich
__BYTE_ORDER is supposed to be defined by a libc, and __BYTE_ORDER__ - by a compiler. bpf_core_read.h checks __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN, which is true if neither are defined, leading to incorrect behavior on big-endian hosts if libc headers are not included, which is often the case. Fixes: ee26dade0e3b ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026010831.748682-2-iii@linux.ibm.com
2021-10-25libbpf: Deprecate ambiguously-named bpf_program__size() APIAndrii Nakryiko
The name of the API doesn't convey clearly that this size is in number of bytes (there needed to be a separate comment to make this clear in libbpf.h). Further, measuring the size of BPF program in bytes is not exactly the best fit, because BPF programs always consist of 8-byte instructions. As such, bpf_program__insn_cnt() is a better alternative in pretty much any imaginable case. So schedule bpf_program__size() deprecation starting from v0.7 and it will be removed in libbpf 1.0. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211025224531.1088894-5-andrii@kernel.org
2021-10-25libbpf: Deprecate multi-instance bpf_program APIsAndrii Nakryiko
Schedule deprecation of a set of APIs that are related to multi-instance bpf_programs: - bpf_program__set_prep() ([0]); - bpf_program__{set,unset}_instance() ([1]); - bpf_program__nth_fd(). These APIs are obscure, very niche, and don't seem to be used much in practice. bpf_program__set_prep() is pretty useless for anything but the simplest BPF programs, as it doesn't allow to adjust BPF program load attributes, among other things. In short, it already bitrotted and will bitrot some more if not removed. With bpf_program__insns() API, which gives access to post-processed BPF program instructions of any given entry-point BPF program, it's now possible to do whatever necessary adjustments were possible with set_prep() API before, but also more. Given any such use case is automatically an advanced use case, requiring users to stick to low-level bpf_prog_load() APIs and managing their own prog FDs is reasonable. [0] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/299 [1] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/300 Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211025224531.1088894-4-andrii@kernel.org
2021-10-25libbpf: Add ability to fetch bpf_program's underlying instructionsAndrii Nakryiko
Add APIs providing read-only access to bpf_program BPF instructions ([0]). This is useful for diagnostics purposes, but it also allows a cleaner support for cloning BPF programs after libbpf did all the FD resolution and CO-RE relocations, subprog instructions appending, etc. Currently, cloning BPF program is possible only through hijacking a half-broken bpf_program__set_prep() API, which doesn't really work well for anything but most primitive programs. For instance, set_prep() API doesn't allow adjusting BPF program load parameters which are necessary for loading fentry/fexit BPF programs (the case where BPF program cloning is a necessity if doing some sort of mass-attachment functionality). Given bpf_program__set_prep() API is set to be deprecated, having a cleaner alternative is a must. libbpf internally already keeps track of linear array of struct bpf_insn, so it's not hard to expose it. The only gotcha is that libbpf previously freed instructions array during bpf_object load time, which would make this API much less useful overall, because in between bpf_object__open() and bpf_object__load() a lot of changes to instructions are done by libbpf. So this patch makes libbpf hold onto prog->insns array even after BPF program loading. I think this is a small price for added functionality and improved introspection of BPF program code. See retsnoop PR ([1]) for how it can be used in practice and code savings compared to relying on bpf_program__set_prep(). [0] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/298 [1] https://github.com/anakryiko/retsnoop/pull/1 Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211025224531.1088894-3-andrii@kernel.org
2021-10-25libbpf: Fix off-by-one bug in bpf_core_apply_relo()Andrii Nakryiko
Fix instruction index validity check which has off-by-one error. Fixes: 3ee4f5335511 ("libbpf: Split bpf_core_apply_relo() into bpf_program independent helper.") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211025224531.1088894-2-andrii@kernel.org
2021-10-25bpftool: Switch to libbpf's hashmap for PIDs/names referencesQuentin Monnet
In order to show PIDs and names for processes holding references to BPF programs, maps, links, or BTF objects, bpftool creates hash maps to store all relevant information. This commit is part of a set that transitions from the kernel's hash map implementation to the one coming with libbpf. The motivation is to make bpftool less dependent of kernel headers, to ease the path to a potential out-of-tree mirror, like libbpf has. This is the third and final step of the transition, in which we convert the hash maps used for storing the information about the processes holding references to BPF objects (programs, maps, links, BTF), and at last we drop the inclusion of tools/include/linux/hashtable.h. Note: Checkpatch complains about the use of __weak declarations, and the missing empty lines after the bunch of empty function declarations when compiling without the BPF skeletons (none of these were introduced in this patch). We want to keep things as they are, and the reports should be safe to ignore. Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211023205154.6710-6-quentin@isovalent.com
2021-10-25bpftool: Switch to libbpf's hashmap for programs/maps in BTF listingQuentin Monnet
In order to show BPF programs and maps using BTF objects when the latter are being listed, bpftool creates hash maps to store all relevant items. This commit is part of a set that transitions from the kernel's hash map implementation to the one coming with libbpf. The motivation is to make bpftool less dependent of kernel headers, to ease the path to a potential out-of-tree mirror, like libbpf has. This commit focuses on the two hash maps used by bpftool when listing BTF objects to store references to programs and maps, and convert them to the libbpf's implementation. Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211023205154.6710-5-quentin@isovalent.com
2021-10-25bpftool: Switch to libbpf's hashmap for pinned paths of BPF objectsQuentin Monnet
In order to show pinned paths for BPF programs, maps, or links when listing them with the "-f" option, bpftool creates hash maps to store all relevant paths under the bpffs. So far, it would rely on the kernel implementation (from tools/include/linux/hashtable.h). We can make bpftool rely on libbpf's implementation instead. The motivation is to make bpftool less dependent of kernel headers, to ease the path to a potential out-of-tree mirror, like libbpf has. This commit is the first step of the conversion: the hash maps for pinned paths for programs, maps, and links are converted to libbpf's hashmap.{c,h}. Other hash maps used for the PIDs of process holding references to BPF objects are left unchanged for now. On the build side, this requires adding a dependency to a second header internal to libbpf, and making it a dependency for the bootstrap bpftool version as well. The rest of the changes are a rather straightforward conversion. Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211023205154.6710-4-quentin@isovalent.com
2021-10-25bpftool: Do not expose and init hash maps for pinned path in main.cQuentin Monnet
BPF programs, maps, and links, can all be listed with their pinned paths by bpftool, when the "-f" option is provided. To do so, bpftool builds hash maps containing all pinned paths for each kind of objects. These three hash maps are always initialised in main.c, and exposed through main.h. There appear to be no particular reason to do so: we can just as well make them static to the files that need them (prog.c, map.c, and link.c respectively), and initialise them only when we want to show objects and the "-f" switch is provided. This may prevent unnecessary memory allocations if the implementation of the hash maps was to change in the future. Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211023205154.6710-3-quentin@isovalent.com
2021-10-25bpftool: Remove Makefile dep. on $(LIBBPF) for $(LIBBPF_INTERNAL_HDRS)Quentin Monnet
The dependency is only useful to make sure that the $(LIBBPF_HDRS_DIR) directory is created before we try to install locally the required libbpf internal header. Let's create this directory properly instead. This is in preparation of making $(LIBBPF_INTERNAL_HDRS) a dependency to the bootstrap bpftool version, in which case we want no dependency on $(LIBBPF). Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211023205154.6710-2-quentin@isovalent.com
2021-10-25selftests/bpf: Split out bpf_verif_scale selftests into multiple testsAndrii Nakryiko
Instead of using subtests in bpf_verif_scale selftest, turn each scale sub-test into its own test. Each subtest is compltely independent and just reuses a bit of common test running logic, so the conversion is trivial. For convenience, keep all of BPF verifier scale tests in one file. This conversion shaves off a significant amount of time when running test_progs in parallel mode. E.g., just running scale tests (-t verif_scale): BEFORE ====== Summary: 24/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED real 0m22.894s user 0m0.012s sys 0m22.797s AFTER ===== Summary: 24/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED real 0m12.044s user 0m0.024s sys 0m27.869s Ten second saving right there. test_progs -j is not yet ready to be turned on by default, unfortunately, and some tests fail almost every time, but this is a good improvement nevertheless. Ignoring few failures, here is sequential vs parallel run times when running all tests now: SEQUENTIAL ========== Summary: 206/953 PASSED, 4 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED real 1m5.625s user 0m4.211s sys 0m31.650s PARALLEL ======== Summary: 204/952 PASSED, 4 SKIPPED, 2 FAILED real 0m35.550s user 0m4.998s sys 0m39.890s Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211022223228.99920-5-andrii@kernel.org
2021-10-25selftests/bpf: Mark tc_redirect selftest as serialAndrii Nakryiko
It seems to cause a lot of harm to kprobe/tracepoint selftests. Yucong mentioned before that it does manipulate sysfs, which might be the reason. So let's mark it as serial, though ideally it would be less intrusive on the system at test. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211022223228.99920-4-andrii@kernel.org
2021-10-25selftests/bpf: Support multiple tests per fileAndrii Nakryiko
Revamp how test discovery works for test_progs and allow multiple test entries per file. Any global void function with no arguments and serial_test_ or test_ prefix is considered a test. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211022223228.99920-3-andrii@kernel.org
2021-10-25selftests/bpf: Normalize selftest entry pointsAndrii Nakryiko
Ensure that all test entry points are global void functions with no input arguments. Mark few subtest entry points as static. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211022223228.99920-2-andrii@kernel.org
2021-10-22libbpf: Fix BTF header parsing checksAndrii Nakryiko
Original code assumed fixed and correct BTF header length. That's not always the case, though, so fix this bug with a proper additional check. And use actual header length instead of sizeof(struct btf_header) in sanity checks. Fixes: 8a138aed4a80 ("bpf: btf: Add BTF support to libbpf") Reported-by: Evgeny Vereshchagin <evvers@ya.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211023003157.726961-2-andrii@kernel.org
2021-10-22libbpf: Fix overflow in BTF sanity checksAndrii Nakryiko
btf_header's str_off+str_len or type_off+type_len can overflow as they are u32s. This will lead to bypassing the sanity checks during BTF parsing, resulting in crashes afterwards. Fix by using 64-bit signed integers for comparison. Fixes: d8123624506c ("libbpf: Fix BTF data layout checks and allow empty BTF") Reported-by: Evgeny Vereshchagin <evvers@ya.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211023003157.726961-1-andrii@kernel.org
2021-10-22selftests/bpf: Add BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG typedef example in tag.cYonghong Song
Change value type in progs/tag.c to a typedef with a btf_decl_tag. With `bpftool btf dump file tag.o`, we have ... [14] TYPEDEF 'value_t' type_id=17 [15] DECL_TAG 'tag1' type_id=14 component_idx=-1 [16] DECL_TAG 'tag2' type_id=14 component_idx=-1 [17] STRUCT '(anon)' size=8 vlen=2 'a' type_id=2 bits_offset=0 'b' type_id=2 bits_offset=32 ... The btf_tag selftest also succeeded: $ ./test_progs -t tag #21 btf_tag:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021195643.4020315-1-yhs@fb.com
2021-10-22selftests/bpf: Test deduplication for BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG typedefYonghong Song
Add unit tests for deduplication of BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG to typedef types. Also changed a few comments from "tag" to "decl_tag" to match BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG enum value name. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021195638.4019770-1-yhs@fb.com