From d4dfc5700e867b22ab94f960f9a9972696a637d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:38:49 -0700 Subject: bpf: pass whole link instead of prog when triggering raw tracepoint Instead of passing prog as an argument to bpf_trace_runX() helpers, that are called from tracepoint triggering calls, store BPF link itself (struct bpf_raw_tp_link for raw tracepoints). This will allow to pass extra information like BPF cookie into raw tracepoint registration. Instead of replacing `struct bpf_prog *prog = __data;` with corresponding `struct bpf_raw_tp_link *link = __data;` assignment in `__bpf_trace_##call` I just passed `__data` through into underlying bpf_trace_runX() call. This works well because we implicitly cast `void *`, and it also avoids naming clashes with arguments coming from tracepoint's "proto" list. We could have run into the same problem with "prog", we just happened to not have a tracepoint that has "prog" input argument. We are less lucky with "link", as there are tracepoints using "link" argument name already. So instead of trying to avoid naming conflicts, let's just remove intermediate local variable. It doesn't hurt readibility, it's either way a bit of a maze of calls and macros, that requires careful reading. Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Message-ID: <20240319233852.1977493-3-andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 9 ++------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/bpf/syscall.c') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index ae2ff73bde7e..1cb4c3809af4 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -3469,17 +3469,12 @@ out_put_prog: return err; } -struct bpf_raw_tp_link { - struct bpf_link link; - struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp; -}; - static void bpf_raw_tp_link_release(struct bpf_link *link) { struct bpf_raw_tp_link *raw_tp = container_of(link, struct bpf_raw_tp_link, link); - bpf_probe_unregister(raw_tp->btp, raw_tp->link.prog); + bpf_probe_unregister(raw_tp->btp, raw_tp); bpf_put_raw_tracepoint(raw_tp->btp); } @@ -3833,7 +3828,7 @@ static int bpf_raw_tp_link_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog, goto out_put_btp; } - err = bpf_probe_register(link->btp, prog); + err = bpf_probe_register(link->btp, link); if (err) { bpf_link_cleanup(&link_primer); goto out_put_btp; -- cgit From 68ca5d4eebb8c4de246ee5f634eee26bc689562d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:38:50 -0700 Subject: bpf: support BPF cookie in raw tracepoint (raw_tp, tp_btf) programs Wire up BPF cookie for raw tracepoint programs (both BTF and non-BTF aware variants). This brings them up to part w.r.t. BPF cookie usage with classic tracepoint and fentry/fexit programs. Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Message-ID: <20240319233852.1977493-4-andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/bpf/syscall.c') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 1cb4c3809af4..e44c276e8617 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -3774,7 +3774,7 @@ static int bpf_perf_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pro #endif /* CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS */ static int bpf_raw_tp_link_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog, - const char __user *user_tp_name) + const char __user *user_tp_name, u64 cookie) { struct bpf_link_primer link_primer; struct bpf_raw_tp_link *link; @@ -3821,6 +3821,7 @@ static int bpf_raw_tp_link_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog, bpf_link_init(&link->link, BPF_LINK_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, &bpf_raw_tp_link_lops, prog); link->btp = btp; + link->cookie = cookie; err = bpf_link_prime(&link->link, &link_primer); if (err) { @@ -3841,11 +3842,13 @@ out_put_btp: return err; } -#define BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN_LAST_FIELD raw_tracepoint.prog_fd +#define BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN_LAST_FIELD raw_tracepoint.cookie static int bpf_raw_tracepoint_open(const union bpf_attr *attr) { struct bpf_prog *prog; + void __user *tp_name; + __u64 cookie; int fd; if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN)) @@ -3855,7 +3858,9 @@ static int bpf_raw_tracepoint_open(const union bpf_attr *attr) if (IS_ERR(prog)) return PTR_ERR(prog); - fd = bpf_raw_tp_link_attach(prog, u64_to_user_ptr(attr->raw_tracepoint.name)); + tp_name = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->raw_tracepoint.name); + cookie = attr->raw_tracepoint.cookie; + fd = bpf_raw_tp_link_attach(prog, tp_name, cookie); if (fd < 0) bpf_prog_put(prog); return fd; @@ -5193,7 +5198,7 @@ static int link_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr) goto out; } if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP) - ret = bpf_raw_tp_link_attach(prog, NULL); + ret = bpf_raw_tp_link_attach(prog, NULL, attr->link_create.tracing.cookie); else if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_ITER) ret = bpf_iter_link_attach(attr, uattr, prog); else if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_LSM_CGROUP) -- cgit From 699c23f02c65cbfc3e638f14ce0d70c23a2e1f02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yonghong Song Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 21:35:27 -0700 Subject: bpf: Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb progs Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb programs. We have an internal request to support bpf_link for sk_msg programs so user space can have a uniform handling with bpf_link based libbpf APIs. Using bpf_link based libbpf API also has a benefit which makes system robust by decoupling prog life cycle and attachment life cycle. Reviewed-by: John Fastabend Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240410043527.3737160-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) (limited to 'kernel/bpf/syscall.c') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index e44c276e8617..7d392ec83655 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -5213,6 +5213,10 @@ static int link_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr) case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP: ret = netns_bpf_link_create(attr, prog); break; + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG: + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB: + ret = sock_map_link_create(attr, prog); + break; #ifdef CONFIG_NET case BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP: ret = bpf_xdp_link_attach(attr, prog); -- cgit From d56b63cf0c0f71e1b2e04dd8220b408f049e67ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Benjamin Tissoires Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 11:09:05 +0200 Subject: bpf: add support for bpf_wq user type Mostly a copy/paste from the bpf_timer API, without the initialization and free, as they will be done in a separate patch. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240420-bpf_wq-v2-5-6c986a5a741f@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/bpf/syscall.c') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 7d392ec83655..0848e4141b00 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -559,6 +559,7 @@ void btf_record_free(struct btf_record *rec) case BPF_SPIN_LOCK: case BPF_TIMER: case BPF_REFCOUNT: + case BPF_WORKQUEUE: /* Nothing to release */ break; default: @@ -608,6 +609,7 @@ struct btf_record *btf_record_dup(const struct btf_record *rec) case BPF_SPIN_LOCK: case BPF_TIMER: case BPF_REFCOUNT: + case BPF_WORKQUEUE: /* Nothing to acquire */ break; default: @@ -679,6 +681,8 @@ void bpf_obj_free_fields(const struct btf_record *rec, void *obj) case BPF_TIMER: bpf_timer_cancel_and_free(field_ptr); break; + case BPF_WORKQUEUE: + break; case BPF_KPTR_UNREF: WRITE_ONCE(*(u64 *)field_ptr, 0); break; @@ -1085,7 +1089,7 @@ static int map_check_btf(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_token *token, map->record = btf_parse_fields(btf, value_type, BPF_SPIN_LOCK | BPF_TIMER | BPF_KPTR | BPF_LIST_HEAD | - BPF_RB_ROOT | BPF_REFCOUNT, + BPF_RB_ROOT | BPF_REFCOUNT | BPF_WORKQUEUE, map->value_size); if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(map->record)) { int i; -- cgit From 246331e3f1eac905170a923f0ec76725c2558232 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Benjamin Tissoires Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 11:09:09 +0200 Subject: bpf: allow struct bpf_wq to be embedded in arraymaps and hashmaps Currently bpf_wq_cancel_and_free() is just a placeholder as there is no memory allocation for bpf_wq just yet. Again, duplication of the bpf_timer approach Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240420-bpf_wq-v2-9-6c986a5a741f@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) (limited to 'kernel/bpf/syscall.c') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 0848e4141b00..63e368337483 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -661,6 +661,13 @@ void bpf_obj_free_timer(const struct btf_record *rec, void *obj) bpf_timer_cancel_and_free(obj + rec->timer_off); } +void bpf_obj_free_workqueue(const struct btf_record *rec, void *obj) +{ + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!btf_record_has_field(rec, BPF_WORKQUEUE))) + return; + bpf_wq_cancel_and_free(obj + rec->wq_off); +} + void bpf_obj_free_fields(const struct btf_record *rec, void *obj) { const struct btf_field *fields; @@ -682,6 +689,7 @@ void bpf_obj_free_fields(const struct btf_record *rec, void *obj) bpf_timer_cancel_and_free(field_ptr); break; case BPF_WORKQUEUE: + bpf_wq_cancel_and_free(field_ptr); break; case BPF_KPTR_UNREF: WRITE_ONCE(*(u64 *)field_ptr, 0); @@ -1119,6 +1127,7 @@ static int map_check_btf(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_token *token, } break; case BPF_TIMER: + case BPF_WORKQUEUE: if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH && map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_HASH && map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY) { -- cgit From 535a3692ba7245792e6f23654507865d4293c850 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiri Olsa Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 13:28:24 +0200 Subject: bpf: Add support for kprobe session attach Adding support to attach bpf program for entry and return probe of the same function. This is common use case which at the moment requires to create two kprobe multi links. Adding new BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION attach type that instructs kernel to attach single link program to both entry and exit probe. It's possible to control execution of the bpf program on return probe simply by returning zero or non zero from the entry bpf program execution to execute or not the bpf program on return probe respectively. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240430112830.1184228-2-jolsa@kernel.org --- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/bpf/syscall.c') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index f655adf42e39..13ad74ecf2cd 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -4016,11 +4016,15 @@ static int bpf_prog_attach_check_attach_type(const struct bpf_prog *prog, if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI && attach_type != BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI) return -EINVAL; + if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION && + attach_type != BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION) + return -EINVAL; if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI && attach_type != BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI) return -EINVAL; if (attach_type != BPF_PERF_EVENT && attach_type != BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI && + attach_type != BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION && attach_type != BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI) return -EINVAL; return 0; @@ -5281,7 +5285,8 @@ static int link_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr) case BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE: if (attr->link_create.attach_type == BPF_PERF_EVENT) ret = bpf_perf_link_attach(attr, prog); - else if (attr->link_create.attach_type == BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI) + else if (attr->link_create.attach_type == BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI || + attr->link_create.attach_type == BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION) ret = bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(attr, prog); else if (attr->link_create.attach_type == BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_MULTI) ret = bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach(attr, prog); -- cgit