From 49afb806cb650dd1f06f191994f3aa657d264009 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tuong Lien Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 09:18:15 +0700 Subject: tipc: fix link overflow issue at socket shutdown When a socket is suddenly shutdown or released, it will reject all the unreceived messages in its receive queue. This applies to a connected socket too, whereas there is only one 'FIN' message required to be sent back to its peer in this case. In case there are many messages in the queue and/or some connections with such messages are shutdown at the same time, the link layer will easily get overflowed at the 'TIPC_SYSTEM_IMPORTANCE' backlog level because of the message rejections. As a result, the link will be taken down. Moreover, immediately when the link is re-established, the socket layer can continue to reject the messages and the same issue happens... The commit refactors the '__tipc_shutdown()' function to only send one 'FIN' in the situation mentioned above. For the connectionless case, it is unavoidable but usually there is no rejections for such socket messages because they are 'dest-droppable' by default. In addition, the new code makes the other socket states clear (e.g.'TIPC_LISTEN') and treats as a separate case to avoid misbehaving. Acked-by: Ying Xue Acked-by: Jon Maloy Signed-off-by: Tuong Lien Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/tipc/socket.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/tipc/socket.c') diff --git a/net/tipc/socket.c b/net/tipc/socket.c index 6552f986774c..6ebd809ef207 100644 --- a/net/tipc/socket.c +++ b/net/tipc/socket.c @@ -287,12 +287,12 @@ static void tipc_sk_respond(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int err) * * Caller must hold socket lock */ -static void tsk_rej_rx_queue(struct sock *sk) +static void tsk_rej_rx_queue(struct sock *sk, int error) { struct sk_buff *skb; while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&sk->sk_receive_queue))) - tipc_sk_respond(sk, skb, TIPC_ERR_NO_PORT); + tipc_sk_respond(sk, skb, error); } static bool tipc_sk_connected(struct sock *sk) @@ -545,34 +545,45 @@ static void __tipc_shutdown(struct socket *sock, int error) /* Remove pending SYN */ __skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_write_queue); - /* Reject all unreceived messages, except on an active connection - * (which disconnects locally & sends a 'FIN+' to peer). - */ - while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) != NULL) { - if (TIPC_SKB_CB(skb)->bytes_read) { - kfree_skb(skb); - continue; - } - if (!tipc_sk_type_connectionless(sk) && - sk->sk_state != TIPC_DISCONNECTING) { - tipc_set_sk_state(sk, TIPC_DISCONNECTING); - tipc_node_remove_conn(net, dnode, tsk->portid); - } - tipc_sk_respond(sk, skb, error); + /* Remove partially received buffer if any */ + skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue); + if (skb && TIPC_SKB_CB(skb)->bytes_read) { + __skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue); + kfree_skb(skb); } - if (tipc_sk_type_connectionless(sk)) + /* Reject all unreceived messages if connectionless */ + if (tipc_sk_type_connectionless(sk)) { + tsk_rej_rx_queue(sk, error); return; + } - if (sk->sk_state != TIPC_DISCONNECTING) { + switch (sk->sk_state) { + case TIPC_CONNECTING: + case TIPC_ESTABLISHED: + tipc_set_sk_state(sk, TIPC_DISCONNECTING); + tipc_node_remove_conn(net, dnode, tsk->portid); + /* Send a FIN+/- to its peer */ + skb = __skb_dequeue(&sk->sk_receive_queue); + if (skb) { + __skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_receive_queue); + tipc_sk_respond(sk, skb, error); + break; + } skb = tipc_msg_create(TIPC_CRITICAL_IMPORTANCE, TIPC_CONN_MSG, SHORT_H_SIZE, 0, dnode, tsk_own_node(tsk), tsk_peer_port(tsk), tsk->portid, error); if (skb) tipc_node_xmit_skb(net, skb, dnode, tsk->portid); - tipc_node_remove_conn(net, dnode, tsk->portid); - tipc_set_sk_state(sk, TIPC_DISCONNECTING); + break; + case TIPC_LISTEN: + /* Reject all SYN messages */ + tsk_rej_rx_queue(sk, error); + break; + default: + __skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_receive_queue); + break; } } @@ -2643,7 +2654,7 @@ static int tipc_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *new_sock, int flags, * Reject any stray messages received by new socket * before the socket lock was taken (very, very unlikely) */ - tsk_rej_rx_queue(new_sk); + tsk_rej_rx_queue(new_sk, TIPC_ERR_NO_PORT); /* Connect new socket to it's peer */ tipc_sk_finish_conn(new_tsock, msg_origport(msg), msg_orignode(msg)); -- cgit From 9546a0b7ce0077d827470f603f2522b845ce5954 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tuong Lien Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 09:19:00 +0700 Subject: tipc: fix wrong connect() return code The current 'tipc_wait_for_connect()' function does a wait-loop for the condition 'sk->sk_state != TIPC_CONNECTING' to conclude if the socket connecting has done. However, when the condition is met, it returns '0' even in the case the connecting is actually failed, the socket state is set to 'TIPC_DISCONNECTING' (e.g. when the server socket has closed..). This results in a wrong return code for the 'connect()' call from user, making it believe that the connection is established and go ahead with building, sending a message, etc. but finally failed e.g. '-EPIPE'. This commit fixes the issue by changing the wait condition to the 'tipc_sk_connected(sk)', so the function will return '0' only when the connection is really established. Otherwise, either the socket 'sk_err' if any or '-ETIMEDOUT'/'-EINTR' will be returned correspondingly. Acked-by: Ying Xue Acked-by: Jon Maloy Signed-off-by: Tuong Lien Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/tipc/socket.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/tipc/socket.c') diff --git a/net/tipc/socket.c b/net/tipc/socket.c index 6ebd809ef207..f9b4fb92c0b1 100644 --- a/net/tipc/socket.c +++ b/net/tipc/socket.c @@ -2443,8 +2443,8 @@ static int tipc_wait_for_connect(struct socket *sock, long *timeo_p) return sock_intr_errno(*timeo_p); add_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait); - done = sk_wait_event(sk, timeo_p, - sk->sk_state != TIPC_CONNECTING, &wait); + done = sk_wait_event(sk, timeo_p, tipc_sk_connected(sk), + &wait); remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait); } while (!done); return 0; -- cgit