From 3d66718cd62d45f3210f047248eab9e76d227e47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Heiko Carstens Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 14:52:42 +0100 Subject: s390/extable: convert to relative table with data Follow arm64, riscv, and x86 and change extable layout to common "relative table with data". This allows to get rid of s390 specific code in sorttable.c. The main difference to before is that extable entries do not contain a relative function pointer anymore. Instead data and type fields are added. The type field is used to indicate which exception handler needs to be called, while the data field is currently unused. Acked-by: Alexander Gordeev Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik --- scripts/sorttable.c | 43 +------------------------------------------ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 42 deletions(-) (limited to 'scripts/sorttable.c') diff --git a/scripts/sorttable.c b/scripts/sorttable.c index 3a8ea5ed553d..d00504c5f530 100644 --- a/scripts/sorttable.c +++ b/scripts/sorttable.c @@ -261,45 +261,6 @@ static void sort_relative_table_with_data(char *extab_image, int image_size) } } -static void s390_sort_relative_table(char *extab_image, int image_size) -{ - int i; - - for (i = 0; i < image_size; i += 16) { - char *loc = extab_image + i; - uint64_t handler; - - w(r((uint32_t *)loc) + i, (uint32_t *)loc); - w(r((uint32_t *)(loc + 4)) + (i + 4), (uint32_t *)(loc + 4)); - /* - * 0 is a special self-relative handler value, which means that - * handler should be ignored. It is safe, because it means that - * handler field points to itself, which should never happen. - * When creating extable-relative values, keep it as 0, since - * this should never occur either: it would mean that handler - * field points to the first extable entry. - */ - handler = r8((uint64_t *)(loc + 8)); - if (handler) - handler += i + 8; - w8(handler, (uint64_t *)(loc + 8)); - } - - qsort(extab_image, image_size / 16, 16, compare_relative_table); - - for (i = 0; i < image_size; i += 16) { - char *loc = extab_image + i; - uint64_t handler; - - w(r((uint32_t *)loc) - i, (uint32_t *)loc); - w(r((uint32_t *)(loc + 4)) - (i + 4), (uint32_t *)(loc + 4)); - handler = r8((uint64_t *)(loc + 8)); - if (handler) - handler -= i + 8; - w8(handler, (uint64_t *)(loc + 8)); - } -} - static int do_file(char const *const fname, void *addr) { int rc = -1; @@ -340,12 +301,10 @@ static int do_file(char const *const fname, void *addr) case EM_386: case EM_AARCH64: case EM_RISCV: + case EM_S390: case EM_X86_64: custom_sort = sort_relative_table_with_data; break; - case EM_S390: - custom_sort = s390_sort_relative_table; - break; case EM_PARISC: case EM_PPC: case EM_PPC64: -- cgit From 08145b087e4481458f6075f3af58021a3cf8a940 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Huacai Chen Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 18:04:10 +0800 Subject: LoongArch: Add ELF-related definitions Add ELF-related definitions for LoongArch, including: EM_LOONGARCH, KEXEC_ARCH_LOONGARCH, AUDIT_ARCH_LOONGARCH32, AUDIT_ARCH_LOONGARCH64 and NT_LOONGARCH_*. Reviewed-by: WANG Xuerui Reviewed-by: Jiaxun Yang Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen --- scripts/sorttable.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) (limited to 'scripts/sorttable.c') diff --git a/scripts/sorttable.c b/scripts/sorttable.c index d00504c5f530..fba40e99f354 100644 --- a/scripts/sorttable.c +++ b/scripts/sorttable.c @@ -60,6 +60,10 @@ #define EM_RISCV 243 #endif +#ifndef EM_LOONGARCH +#define EM_LOONGARCH 258 +#endif + static uint32_t (*r)(const uint32_t *); static uint16_t (*r2)(const uint16_t *); static uint64_t (*r8)(const uint64_t *); @@ -313,6 +317,7 @@ static int do_file(char const *const fname, void *addr) case EM_ARCOMPACT: case EM_ARCV2: case EM_ARM: + case EM_LOONGARCH: case EM_MICROBLAZE: case EM_MIPS: case EM_XTENSA: -- cgit