From ee96d25f2fa657a29ab59345898dc4ff616cfe84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Latypov Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:20:35 -0800 Subject: kunit: tool: refactor how we plumb metadata into JSON When using --json, kunit.py run/exec/parse will produce results in KernelCI json format. As part of that, we include the build_dir that was used, and we (incorrectly) hardcode in the arch, etc. We'll want a way to plumb more values (as well as the correct `arch`), so this patch groups those fields into kunit_json.Metadata type. This patch should have no user visible changes. And since we only used build_dir in KunitParseRequest for json, we can now move it out of that struct and add it into KunitExecRequest, which needs it and used to get it via inheritance. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan --- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py') diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py index a3c036a620b2..60806994683c 100755 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py @@ -468,8 +468,7 @@ class KUnitJsonTest(unittest.TestCase): test_result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file) json_obj = kunit_json.get_json_result( test=test_result, - def_config='kunit_defconfig', - build_dir='.kunit') + metadata=kunit_json.Metadata()) return json.loads(json_obj) def test_failed_test_json(self): @@ -691,7 +690,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.return_value = ['TAP version 14', 'init: random output'] + want got = kunit._list_tests(self.linux_source_mock, - kunit.KunitExecRequest(None, '.kunit', None, 300, False, 'suite*', None, 'suite')) + kunit.KunitExecRequest(None, None, '.kunit', 300, False, 'suite*', None, 'suite')) self.assertEqual(got, want) # Should respect the user's filter glob when listing tests. @@ -706,7 +705,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): # Should respect the user's filter glob when listing tests. mock_tests.assert_called_once_with(mock.ANY, - kunit.KunitExecRequest(None, '.kunit', None, 300, False, 'suite*.test*', None, 'suite')) + kunit.KunitExecRequest(None, None, '.kunit', 300, False, 'suite*.test*', None, 'suite')) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_has_calls([ mock.call(args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='suite.test*', timeout=300), mock.call(args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='suite2.test*', timeout=300), @@ -719,7 +718,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): # Should respect the user's filter glob when listing tests. mock_tests.assert_called_once_with(mock.ANY, - kunit.KunitExecRequest(None, '.kunit', None, 300, False, 'suite*', None, 'test')) + kunit.KunitExecRequest(None, None, '.kunit', 300, False, 'suite*', None, 'test')) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_has_calls([ mock.call(args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='suite.test1', timeout=300), mock.call(args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='suite.test2', timeout=300), -- cgit