summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com>2019-11-07 13:37:57 +0200
committerSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>2019-11-20 12:33:04 -0800
commitb6a4ac24c14be1247b0fd896737a01b8fa121318 (patch)
tree365d90958ed35165576c95f23f2ac856aaa8f444
parent7b83355f6df9ead2f8c4b06c105505a2999f5dc1 (diff)
net/mlx5e: Reorder mirrer action parsing to check for encap first
Mirred action parsing code in parse_tc_fdb_actions() first checks if out_dev has same parent id, and only verifies that there is a pending encap action that was parsed before. Recent change in vxlan module made function netdev_port_same_parent_id() to return true when called for mlx5 eswitch representor and vxlan device created explicitly on mlx5 representor device (vxlan devices created with "external" flag without explicitly specifying parent interface are not affected). With call to netdev_port_same_parent_id() returning true, incorrect code path is chosen and encap rules fail to offload because vxlan dev is not a valid eswitch forwarding dev. Dmesg log of error: [ 1784.389797] devices ens1f0_0 vxlan1 not on same switch HW, can't offload forwarding In order to fix the issue, rearrange conditional in parse_tc_fdb_actions() to check for pending encap action before checking if out_dev has the same parent id. Fixes: 0ce1822c2a08 ("vxlan: add adjacent link to limit depth level") Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c28
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
index b7889d93ddca..f90a9f8e0fc6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
@@ -3268,7 +3268,20 @@ static int parse_tc_fdb_actions(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
action |= MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_FWD_DEST |
MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_COUNT;
- if (netdev_port_same_parent_id(priv->netdev, out_dev)) {
+ if (encap) {
+ parse_attr->mirred_ifindex[attr->out_count] =
+ out_dev->ifindex;
+ parse_attr->tun_info[attr->out_count] = dup_tun_info(info);
+ if (!parse_attr->tun_info[attr->out_count])
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ encap = false;
+ attr->dests[attr->out_count].flags |=
+ MLX5_ESW_DEST_ENCAP;
+ attr->out_count++;
+ /* attr->dests[].rep is resolved when we
+ * handle encap
+ */
+ } else if (netdev_port_same_parent_id(priv->netdev, out_dev)) {
struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = priv->mdev->priv.eswitch;
struct net_device *uplink_dev = mlx5_eswitch_uplink_get_proto_dev(esw, REP_ETH);
struct net_device *uplink_upper;
@@ -3310,19 +3323,6 @@ static int parse_tc_fdb_actions(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
attr->dests[attr->out_count].rep = rpriv->rep;
attr->dests[attr->out_count].mdev = out_priv->mdev;
attr->out_count++;
- } else if (encap) {
- parse_attr->mirred_ifindex[attr->out_count] =
- out_dev->ifindex;
- parse_attr->tun_info[attr->out_count] = dup_tun_info(info);
- if (!parse_attr->tun_info[attr->out_count])
- return -ENOMEM;
- encap = false;
- attr->dests[attr->out_count].flags |=
- MLX5_ESW_DEST_ENCAP;
- attr->out_count++;
- /* attr->dests[].rep is resolved when we
- * handle encap
- */
} else if (parse_attr->filter_dev != priv->netdev) {
/* All mlx5 devices are called to configure
* high level device filters. Therefore, the