Merge tag 'docs-5.5a' of git://git.lwn.net/linux

Pull Documentation updates from Jonathan Corbet:
 "Here are the main documentation changes for 5.5:

   - Various kerneldoc script enhancements.

   - More RST conversions; those are slowing down as we run out of
     things to convert, but we're a ways from done still.

   - Dan's "maintainer profile entry" work landed at last. Now we just
     need to get maintainers to fill in the profiles...

   - A reworking of the parallel build setup to work better with a
     variety of systems (and to not take over huge systems entirely in
     particular).

   - The MAINTAINERS file is now converted to RST during the build.
     Hopefully nobody ever tries to print this thing, or they will need
     to load a lot of paper.

   - A script and documentation making it easy for maintainers to add
     Link: tags at commit time.

  Also included is the removal of a bunch of spurious CR characters"

* tag 'docs-5.5a' of git://git.lwn.net/linux: (91 commits)
  docs: remove a bunch of stray CRs
  docs: fix up the maintainer profile document
  libnvdimm, MAINTAINERS: Maintainer Entry Profile
  Maintainer Handbook: Maintainer Entry Profile
  MAINTAINERS: Reclaim the P: tag for Maintainer Entry Profile
  docs, parallelism: Rearrange how jobserver reservations are made
  docs, parallelism: Do not leak blocking mode to other readers
  docs, parallelism: Fix failure path and add comment
  Documentation: Remove bootmem_debug from kernel-parameters.txt
  Documentation: security: core.rst: fix warnings
  Documentation/process/howto/kokr: Update for 4.x -> 5.x versioning
  Documentation/translation: Use Korean for Korean translation title
  docs/memory-barriers.txt: Remove remaining references to mmiowb()
  docs/memory-barriers.txt/kokr: Update I/O section to be clearer about CPU vs thread
  docs/memory-barriers.txt/kokr: Fix style, spacing and grammar in I/O section
  Documentation/kokr: Kill all references to mmiowb()
  docs/memory-barriers.txt/kokr: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section
  docs: Add initial documentation for devfreq
  Documentation: Document how to get links with git am
  docs: Add request_irq() documentation
  ...

1 files changed, 59 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/nvdimm/maintainer-entry-profile.rst b/Documentation/nvdimm/maintainer-entry-profile.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..77081fd9be95
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/nvdimm/maintainer-entry-profile.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+LIBNVDIMM Maintainer Entry Profile
+==================================
+
+Overview
+--------
+The libnvdimm subsystem manages persistent memory across multiple
+architectures. The mailing list, is tracked by patchwork here:
+https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-nvdimm/list/
+...and that instance is configured to give feedback to submitters on
+patch acceptance and upstream merge. Patches are merged to either the
+'libnvdimm-fixes', or 'libnvdimm-for-next' branch. Those branches are
+available here:
+https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nvdimm/nvdimm.git/
+
+In general patches can be submitted against the latest -rc, however if
+the incoming code change is dependent on other pending changes then the
+patch should be based on the libnvdimm-for-next branch. However, since
+persistent memory sits at the intersection of storage and memory there
+are cases where patches are more suitable to be merged through a
+Filesystem or the Memory Management tree. When in doubt copy the nvdimm
+list and the maintainers will help route.
+
+Submissions will be exposed to the kbuild robot for compile regression
+testing. It helps to get a success notification from that infrastructure
+before submitting, but it is not required.
+
+
+Submit Checklist Addendum
+-------------------------
+There are unit tests for the subsystem via the ndctl utility:
+https://github.com/pmem/ndctl
+Those tests need to be passed before the patches go upstream, but not
+necessarily before initial posting. Contact the list if you need help
+getting the test environment set up.
+
+### ACPI Device Specific Methods (_DSM)
+Before patches enabling for a new _DSM family will be considered it must
+be assigned a format-interface-code from the NVDIMM Sub-team of the ACPI
+Specification Working Group. In general, the stance of the subsystem is
+to push back on the proliferation of NVDIMM command sets, do strongly
+consider implementing support for an existing command set. See
+drivers/acpi/nfit/nfit.h for the set of support command sets.
+
+
+Key Cycle Dates
+---------------
+New submissions can be sent at any time, but if they intend to hit the
+next merge window they should be sent before -rc4, and ideally
+stabilized in the libnvdimm-for-next branch by -rc6. Of course if a
+patch set requires more than 2 weeks of review -rc4 is already too late
+and some patches may require multiple development cycles to review.
+
+
+Review Cadence
+--------------
+In general, please wait up to one week before pinging for feedback. A
+private mail reminder is preferred. Alternatively ask for other
+developers that have Reviewed-by tags for libnvdimm changes to take a
+look and offer their opinion.