summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-alcatel-idol347.dts
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorStephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>2023-05-29 14:46:59 +0200
committerBjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>2023-05-29 14:37:01 -0700
commitc310ca82e229124e7b373125d82ea8fdbf2f9f81 (patch)
treef3ce31a6a84caee9ed9c8447c27e9d59f27639f3 /arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-alcatel-idol347.dts
parent41e22c2ff38eaea777f1158071539e659aa7980d (diff)
arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN). This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs. Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_'). End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels. There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant. Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-alcatel-idol347.dts')
-rw-r--r--arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-alcatel-idol347.dts4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-alcatel-idol347.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-alcatel-idol347.dts
index d2abbdec5fe6..47580bd243eb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-alcatel-idol347.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-alcatel-idol347.dts
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
chassis-type = "handset";
aliases {
- serial0 = &blsp1_uart2;
+ serial0 = &blsp_uart2;
};
chosen {
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
};
};
-&blsp1_uart2 {
+&blsp_uart2 {
status = "okay";
};