summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_ras.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>2019-01-29 18:48:50 +0000
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2019-02-07 23:10:45 +0100
commitd44f1b8dd7e66d80cc4205809e5ace866bd851da (patch)
tree102c993327b0f620c9d1aefcc95ad3d7819fd68c /arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_ras.h
parent0db5e0223035b2c84e6186831fc27511270af812 (diff)
arm64: KVM/mm: Move SEA handling behind a single 'claim' interface
To split up APEIs in_nmi() path, the caller needs to always be in_nmi(). Add a helper to do the work and claim the notification. When KVM or the arch code takes an exception that might be a RAS notification, it asks the APEI firmware-first code whether it wants to claim the exception. A future kernel-first mechanism may be queried afterwards, and claim the notification, otherwise we fall through to the existing default behaviour. The NOTIFY_SEA code was merged before considering multiple, possibly interacting, NMI-like notifications and the need to consider kernel first in the future. Make the 'claiming' behaviour explicit. Restructuring the APEI code to allow multiple NMI-like notifications means any notification that might interrupt interrupts-masked code must always be wrapped in nmi_enter()/nmi_exit(). This will allow APEI to use in_nmi() to use the right fixmap entries. Mask SError over this window to prevent an asynchronous RAS error arriving and tripping 'nmi_enter()'s BUG_ON(in_nmi()). Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_ras.h')
-rw-r--r--arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_ras.h16
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_ras.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_ras.h
index 6096f0251812..8ac6ee77437c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_ras.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_ras.h
@@ -4,8 +4,22 @@
#ifndef __ARM64_KVM_RAS_H__
#define __ARM64_KVM_RAS_H__
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
+#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
-int kvm_handle_guest_sea(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned int esr);
+#include <asm/acpi.h>
+
+/*
+ * Was this synchronous external abort a RAS notification?
+ * Returns '0' for errors handled by some RAS subsystem, or -ENOENT.
+ */
+static inline int kvm_handle_guest_sea(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned int esr)
+{
+ /* apei_claim_sea(NULL) expects to mask interrupts itself */
+ lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
+
+ return apei_claim_sea(NULL);
+}
#endif /* __ARM64_KVM_RAS_H__ */