diff options
| author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2019-08-16 10:51:47 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2019-08-16 10:51:47 -0700 |
| commit | b7e7c85dc7b0ea5ff821756c331489e3b151eed1 (patch) | |
| tree | 60113a949e3a35025323e7fe8e45fb62b1a9c87d /arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | |
| parent | 2d63ba3e41db3ceb0d23924ed2879b910276e24c (diff) | |
| parent | b6143d10d23ebb4a77af311e8b8b7f019d0163e6 (diff) | |
Merge tag 'arm64-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux
Pull arm64 fixes from Catalin Marinas:
- Don't taint the kernel if CPUs have different sets of page sizes
supported (other than the one in use).
- Issue I-cache maintenance for module ftrace trampoline.
* tag 'arm64-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux:
arm64: ftrace: Ensure module ftrace trampoline is coherent with I-side
arm64: cpufeature: Don't treat granule sizes as strict
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index d19d14ba9ae4..b1fdc486aed8 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -184,9 +184,17 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64zfr0[] = { }; static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64mmfr0[] = { - S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN4_SHIFT, 4, ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN4_NI), - S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN64_SHIFT, 4, ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN64_NI), - ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN16_SHIFT, 4, ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN16_NI), + /* + * We already refuse to boot CPUs that don't support our configured + * page size, so we can only detect mismatches for a page size other + * than the one we're currently using. Unfortunately, SoCs like this + * exist in the wild so, even though we don't like it, we'll have to go + * along with it and treat them as non-strict. + */ + S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN4_SHIFT, 4, ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN4_NI), + S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN64_SHIFT, 4, ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN64_NI), + ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN16_SHIFT, 4, ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN16_NI), + ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR0_BIGENDEL0_SHIFT, 4, 0), /* Linux shouldn't care about secure memory */ ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR0_SNSMEM_SHIFT, 4, 0), |