summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>2021-08-24 16:34:17 +0100
committerCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>2021-08-24 16:44:30 +0100
commit7559b7d7d651d397debbcd838bd49ec4b9e0a4a4 (patch)
treebe2dc4ad68f306fdb35c22c47cb3ed6663a462ee /arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
parente3849765037b85e61b2432ded488ee9fb3ff126d (diff)
arm64/sve: Better handle failure to allocate SVE register storage
Currently we "handle" failure to allocate the SVE register storage by doing a BUG_ON() and hoping for the best. This is obviously not great and the memory allocation failure will already be loud enough without the BUG_ON(). As the comment says it is a corner case but let's try to do a bit better, remove the BUG_ON() and add code to handle the failure in the callers. For the ptrace and signal code we can return -ENOMEM gracefully however we have no real error reporting path available to us for the SVE access trap so instead generate a SIGKILL if the allocation fails there. This at least means that we won't try to soldier on and end up trying to access the nonexistant state and while it's obviously not ideal for userspace SIGKILL doesn't allow any handling so minimises the ABI impact, making it easier to improve the interface later if we come up with a better idea. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210824153417.18371-1-broonie@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c10
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
index eb8d972ad3d2..5a294f20e9de 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
@@ -520,12 +520,6 @@ void sve_alloc(struct task_struct *task)
/* This is a small allocation (maximum ~8KB) and Should Not Fail. */
task->thread.sve_state =
kzalloc(sve_state_size(task), GFP_KERNEL);
-
- /*
- * If future SVE revisions can have larger vectors though,
- * this may cease to be true:
- */
- BUG_ON(!task->thread.sve_state);
}
@@ -945,6 +939,10 @@ void do_sve_acc(unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
}
sve_alloc(current);
+ if (!current->thread.sve_state) {
+ force_sig(SIGKILL);
+ return;
+ }
get_cpu_fpsimd_context();