diff options
| author | Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> | 2023-02-07 09:43:21 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> | 2023-02-07 13:55:23 +0000 |
| commit | 67d953d4d7bec5333c1036258753573d9904753b (patch) | |
| tree | e2d5752e479893e2646cd77311611c080742afd9 /arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | |
| parent | d2365054781908bd0bd43b08dd471b40db14b6f4 (diff) | |
KVM: arm64: Fix non-kerneldoc comments
The robots amongts us have started spitting out irritating emails about
random errors such as:
<quote>
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c:2207: warning: expecting prototype for Initialize Hyp().
Prototype was for kvm_arm_init() instead
</quote>
which makes little sense until you finally grok what they are on about:
comments that look like a kerneldoc, but that aren't.
Let's address this before I get even more irritated... ;-)
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/63e139e1.J5AHO6vmxaALh7xv%25lkp@intel.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230207094321.1238600-1-maz@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c index 9c5573bc4614..6b59d89811be 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c @@ -1909,9 +1909,7 @@ static int kvm_hyp_init_protection(u32 hyp_va_bits) return 0; } -/** - * Inits Hyp-mode on all online CPUs - */ +/* Inits Hyp-mode on all online CPUs */ static int init_hyp_mode(void) { u32 hyp_va_bits; @@ -2187,9 +2185,7 @@ void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_start(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons) kvm_arm_resume_guest(irqfd->kvm); } -/** - * Initialize Hyp-mode and memory mappings on all CPUs. - */ +/* Initialize Hyp-mode and memory mappings on all CPUs */ int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque) { int err; |