summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>2018-05-05 03:19:31 +1000
committerMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>2018-06-03 20:40:27 +1000
commit3f984620f9a4fe089c0a3c951b75a460211394bb (patch)
treedf13a8c219ca5d8cdafb8ac51b92769ec4ba18f4 /arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
parent3d3a6021ddcbe9c31520e4e7b65e5ce5dc58274d (diff)
powerpc: generic clockevents broadcast receiver call tick_receive_broadcast
The broadcast tick recipient can call tick_receive_broadcast rather than re-running the full timer interrupt. It does not have to check for the next event time, because the sender already determined the timer has expired. It does not have to test irq_work_pending, because that's a direct decrementer interrupt and does not go through the clock events subsystem. And it does not have to read PURR because that was removed with the previous patch. This results in no code size change, but both the decrementer and broadcast path lengths are reduced. Cc: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c84
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 45 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
index 1fe6a24357e7..ad876906f847 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
@@ -567,47 +567,16 @@ void arch_irq_work_raise(void)
#endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_WORK */
-static void __timer_interrupt(void)
-{
- struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs();
- u64 *next_tb = this_cpu_ptr(&decrementers_next_tb);
- struct clock_event_device *evt = this_cpu_ptr(&decrementers);
- u64 now;
-
- trace_timer_interrupt_entry(regs);
-
- if (test_irq_work_pending()) {
- clear_irq_work_pending();
- irq_work_run();
- }
-
- now = get_tb_or_rtc();
- if (now >= *next_tb) {
- *next_tb = ~(u64)0;
- if (evt->event_handler)
- evt->event_handler(evt);
- __this_cpu_inc(irq_stat.timer_irqs_event);
- } else {
- now = *next_tb - now;
- if (now <= decrementer_max)
- set_dec(now);
- /* We may have raced with new irq work */
- if (test_irq_work_pending())
- set_dec(1);
- __this_cpu_inc(irq_stat.timer_irqs_others);
- }
-
- trace_timer_interrupt_exit(regs);
-}
-
/*
* timer_interrupt - gets called when the decrementer overflows,
* with interrupts disabled.
*/
-void timer_interrupt(struct pt_regs * regs)
+void timer_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- struct pt_regs *old_regs;
+ struct clock_event_device *evt = this_cpu_ptr(&decrementers);
u64 *next_tb = this_cpu_ptr(&decrementers_next_tb);
+ struct pt_regs *old_regs;
+ u64 now;
/* Ensure a positive value is written to the decrementer, or else
* some CPUs will continue to take decrementer exceptions.
@@ -638,13 +607,47 @@ void timer_interrupt(struct pt_regs * regs)
old_regs = set_irq_regs(regs);
irq_enter();
+ trace_timer_interrupt_entry(regs);
+
+ if (test_irq_work_pending()) {
+ clear_irq_work_pending();
+ irq_work_run();
+ }
+
+ now = get_tb_or_rtc();
+ if (now >= *next_tb) {
+ *next_tb = ~(u64)0;
+ if (evt->event_handler)
+ evt->event_handler(evt);
+ __this_cpu_inc(irq_stat.timer_irqs_event);
+ } else {
+ now = *next_tb - now;
+ if (now <= decrementer_max)
+ set_dec(now);
+ /* We may have raced with new irq work */
+ if (test_irq_work_pending())
+ set_dec(1);
+ __this_cpu_inc(irq_stat.timer_irqs_others);
+ }
- __timer_interrupt();
+ trace_timer_interrupt_exit(regs);
irq_exit();
set_irq_regs(old_regs);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(timer_interrupt);
+void timer_broadcast_interrupt(void)
+{
+ u64 *next_tb = this_cpu_ptr(&decrementers_next_tb);
+ struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs();
+
+ trace_timer_interrupt_entry(regs);
+ *next_tb = ~(u64)0;
+ tick_receive_broadcast();
+ __this_cpu_inc(irq_stat.timer_irqs_event);
+ trace_timer_interrupt_exit(regs);
+}
+
/*
* Hypervisor decrementer interrupts shouldn't occur but are sometimes
* left pending on exit from a KVM guest. We don't need to do anything
@@ -992,15 +995,6 @@ static int decrementer_shutdown(struct clock_event_device *dev)
return 0;
}
-/* Interrupt handler for the timer broadcast IPI */
-void tick_broadcast_ipi_handler(void)
-{
- u64 *next_tb = this_cpu_ptr(&decrementers_next_tb);
-
- *next_tb = get_tb_or_rtc();
- __timer_interrupt();
-}
-
static void register_decrementer_clockevent(int cpu)
{
struct clock_event_device *dec = &per_cpu(decrementers, cpu);