diff options
| author | Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> | 2019-04-24 16:20:34 -0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> | 2019-04-24 16:20:34 -0300 |
| commit | 449a224c10a48d047c799c5c5d3b22d6aec98c60 (patch) | |
| tree | 7ecff2cce22ad3875b70a772eae55a443752cfce /arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | |
| parent | 3c176c9d72446217f6451543452692141eb665dc (diff) | |
| parent | 4eb6ab13b99148b5bf9bfdae7977fe139b4452f8 (diff) | |
Merge branch 'rdma_mmap' into rdma.git for-next
Jason Gunthorpe says:
====================
Upon review it turns out there are some long standing problems in BAR
mapping area:
* BAR pages intended for read-only can be switched to writable via mprotect.
* Missing use of rdma_user_mmap_io for the mlx5 clock BAR page.
* Disassociate causes SIGBUS when touching the pages.
* CPU pages are being mapped through to the process via remap_pfn_range
instead of the more appropriate vm_insert_page, causing weird behaviors
during disassociation.
This series adds the missing VM_* flag manipulation, adds faulting a zero
page for disassociation and revises the CPU page mappings to use
vm_insert_page.
====================
For dependencies this branch is based on for-rc from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git
* branch 'rdma_mmap':
RDMA: Remove rdma_user_mmap_page
RDMA/mlx5: Use get_zeroed_page() for clock_info
RDMA/ucontext: Fix regression with disassociate
RDMA/mlx5: Use rdma_user_map_io for mapping BAR pages
RDMA/mlx5: Do not allow the user to write to the clock page
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index 4194d3cfb60c..21a1dcd4b156 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 * if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) * goto out; */ - PPC_LD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt(ctx)); + PPC_BPF_LL(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt(ctx)); PPC_CMPLWI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT); PPC_BCC(COND_GT, out); @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 /* prog = array->ptrs[index]; */ PPC_MULI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p_index, 8); PPC_ADD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p_bpf_array); - PPC_LD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], offsetof(struct bpf_array, ptrs)); + PPC_BPF_LL(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], offsetof(struct bpf_array, ptrs)); /* * if (prog == NULL) @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 PPC_BCC(COND_EQ, out); /* goto *(prog->bpf_func + prologue_size); */ - PPC_LD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], offsetof(struct bpf_prog, bpf_func)); + PPC_BPF_LL(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], offsetof(struct bpf_prog, bpf_func)); #ifdef PPC64_ELF_ABI_v1 /* skip past the function descriptor */ PPC_ADDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ bpf_alu32_trunc: * the instructions generated will remain the * same across all passes */ - PPC_STD(dst_reg, 1, bpf_jit_stack_local(ctx)); + PPC_BPF_STL(dst_reg, 1, bpf_jit_stack_local(ctx)); PPC_ADDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1, bpf_jit_stack_local(ctx)); PPC_LDBRX(dst_reg, 0, b2p[TMP_REG_1]); break; @@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ emit_clear: PPC_LI32(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm); src_reg = b2p[TMP_REG_1]; } - PPC_STD(src_reg, dst_reg, off); + PPC_BPF_STL(src_reg, dst_reg, off); break; /* @@ -709,7 +709,7 @@ emit_clear: break; /* dst = *(u64 *)(ul) (src + off) */ case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW: - PPC_LD(dst_reg, src_reg, off); + PPC_BPF_LL(dst_reg, src_reg, off); break; /* |