summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>2015-07-17 12:28:11 +0200
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2015-07-18 03:42:35 +0200
commit0c8c0f03e3a292e031596484275c14cf39c0ab7a (patch)
treec1d012c83722e9fa3b7bc152e64697828f6cbc35 /arch/x86/include/asm/fpu
parenta97439aa1aec10387797b4abae3cf117de1c90d7 (diff)
x86/fpu, sched: Dynamically allocate 'struct fpu'
The FPU rewrite removed the dynamic allocations of 'struct fpu'. But, this potentially wastes massive amounts of memory (2k per task on systems that do not have AVX-512 for instance). Instead of having a separate slab, this patch just appends the space that we need to the 'task_struct' which we dynamically allocate already. This saves from doing an extra slab allocation at fork(). The only real downside here is that we have to stick everything and the end of the task_struct. But, I think the BUILD_BUG_ON()s I stuck in there should keep that from being too fragile. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1437128892-9831-2-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/include/asm/fpu')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h72
1 files changed, 38 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h
index 0637826292de..c49c5173158e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h
@@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ union fpregs_state {
struct fxregs_state fxsave;
struct swregs_state soft;
struct xregs_state xsave;
+ u8 __padding[PAGE_SIZE];
};
/*
@@ -198,40 +199,6 @@ union fpregs_state {
*/
struct fpu {
/*
- * @state:
- *
- * In-memory copy of all FPU registers that we save/restore
- * over context switches. If the task is using the FPU then
- * the registers in the FPU are more recent than this state
- * copy. If the task context-switches away then they get
- * saved here and represent the FPU state.
- *
- * After context switches there may be a (short) time period
- * during which the in-FPU hardware registers are unchanged
- * and still perfectly match this state, if the tasks
- * scheduled afterwards are not using the FPU.
- *
- * This is the 'lazy restore' window of optimization, which
- * we track though 'fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx' and 'fpu->last_cpu'.
- *
- * We detect whether a subsequent task uses the FPU via setting
- * CR0::TS to 1, which causes any FPU use to raise a #NM fault.
- *
- * During this window, if the task gets scheduled again, we
- * might be able to skip having to do a restore from this
- * memory buffer to the hardware registers - at the cost of
- * incurring the overhead of #NM fault traps.
- *
- * Note that on modern CPUs that support the XSAVEOPT (or other
- * optimized XSAVE instructions), we don't use #NM traps anymore,
- * as the hardware can track whether FPU registers need saving
- * or not. On such CPUs we activate the non-lazy ('eagerfpu')
- * logic, which unconditionally saves/restores all FPU state
- * across context switches. (if FPU state exists.)
- */
- union fpregs_state state;
-
- /*
* @last_cpu:
*
* Records the last CPU on which this context was loaded into
@@ -288,6 +255,43 @@ struct fpu {
* deal with bursty apps that only use the FPU for a short time:
*/
unsigned char counter;
+ /*
+ * @state:
+ *
+ * In-memory copy of all FPU registers that we save/restore
+ * over context switches. If the task is using the FPU then
+ * the registers in the FPU are more recent than this state
+ * copy. If the task context-switches away then they get
+ * saved here and represent the FPU state.
+ *
+ * After context switches there may be a (short) time period
+ * during which the in-FPU hardware registers are unchanged
+ * and still perfectly match this state, if the tasks
+ * scheduled afterwards are not using the FPU.
+ *
+ * This is the 'lazy restore' window of optimization, which
+ * we track though 'fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx' and 'fpu->last_cpu'.
+ *
+ * We detect whether a subsequent task uses the FPU via setting
+ * CR0::TS to 1, which causes any FPU use to raise a #NM fault.
+ *
+ * During this window, if the task gets scheduled again, we
+ * might be able to skip having to do a restore from this
+ * memory buffer to the hardware registers - at the cost of
+ * incurring the overhead of #NM fault traps.
+ *
+ * Note that on modern CPUs that support the XSAVEOPT (or other
+ * optimized XSAVE instructions), we don't use #NM traps anymore,
+ * as the hardware can track whether FPU registers need saving
+ * or not. On such CPUs we activate the non-lazy ('eagerfpu')
+ * logic, which unconditionally saves/restores all FPU state
+ * across context switches. (if FPU state exists.)
+ */
+ union fpregs_state state;
+ /*
+ * WARNING: 'state' is dynamically-sized. Do not put
+ * anything after it here.
+ */
};
#endif /* _ASM_X86_FPU_H */