diff options
| author | Angelo Ruocco <angelo.ruocco.90@gmail.com> | 2019-04-08 17:35:34 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> | 2019-04-08 10:05:43 -0600 |
| commit | 636b8fe86bede8c9f797365986b8406ff2183f13 (patch) | |
| tree | 41abc32d7167012dce42755cf1f67aa629126be5 /block/bfq-wf2q.c | |
| parent | d0b0a81acbd809228b57fb27a89028ecd0fc542a (diff) | |
block, bfq: fix some typos in comments
Some of the comments in the bfq files had typos. This patch fixes them.
Signed-off-by: Angelo Ruocco <angeloruocco90@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Diffstat (limited to 'block/bfq-wf2q.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | block/bfq-wf2q.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/block/bfq-wf2q.c b/block/bfq-wf2q.c index 51ef1f00df80..d2ea98ef26a3 100644 --- a/block/bfq-wf2q.c +++ b/block/bfq-wf2q.c @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static bool bfq_update_parent_budget(struct bfq_entity *next_in_service); * bfq_update_next_in_service - update sd->next_in_service * @sd: sched_data for which to perform the update. * @new_entity: if not NULL, pointer to the entity whose activation, - * requeueing or repositionig triggered the invocation of + * requeueing or repositioning triggered the invocation of * this function. * @expiration: id true, this function is being invoked after the * expiration of the in-service entity @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static bool bfq_update_next_in_service(struct bfq_sched_data *sd, /* * If this update is triggered by the activation, requeueing - * or repositiong of an entity that does not coincide with + * or repositioning of an entity that does not coincide with * sd->next_in_service, then a full lookup in the active tree * can be avoided. In fact, it is enough to check whether the * just-modified entity has the same priority as @@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ left: * In this first case, update the virtual time in @st too (see the * comments on this update inside the function). * - * In constrast, if there is an in-service entity, then return the + * In contrast, if there is an in-service entity, then return the * entity that would be set in service if not only the above * conditions, but also the next one held true: the currently * in-service entity, on expiration, @@ -1479,12 +1479,12 @@ static struct bfq_entity *bfq_lookup_next_entity(struct bfq_sched_data *sd, * is being invoked as a part of the expiration path * of the in-service queue. In this case, even if * sd->in_service_entity is not NULL, - * sd->in_service_entiy at this point is actually not + * sd->in_service_entity at this point is actually not * in service any more, and, if needed, has already * been properly queued or requeued into the right * tree. The reason why sd->in_service_entity is still * not NULL here, even if expiration is true, is that - * sd->in_service_entiy is reset as a last step in the + * sd->in_service_entity is reset as a last step in the * expiration path. So, if expiration is true, tell * __bfq_lookup_next_entity that there is no * sd->in_service_entity. |