ACPI: PM: Simplify and fix PM domain hibernation callbacks

First, after a previous change causing all runtime-suspended devices
in the ACPI PM domain (and ACPI LPSS devices) to be resumed before
creating a snapshot image of memory during hibernation, it is not
necessary to worry about the case in which them might be left in
runtime-suspend any more, so get rid of the code related to that from
ACPI PM domain and ACPI LPSS hibernation callbacks.

Second, it is not correct to use pm_generic_resume_early() and
acpi_subsys_resume_noirq() in hibernation "restore" callbacks (which
currently happens in the ACPI PM domain and ACPI LPSS), so introduce
proper _restore_late and _restore_noirq callbacks for the ACPI PM
domain and ACPI LPSS.

Fixes: 05087360fd7a (ACPI / PM: Take SMART_SUSPEND driver flag into account)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 52 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
index cf768608437e..8ea836857691 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
@@ -1094,16 +1094,62 @@ static int acpi_lpss_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
 	struct lpss_private_data *pdata = acpi_driver_data(ACPI_COMPANION(dev));
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = acpi_subsys_resume_noirq(dev);
+	/* Follow acpi_subsys_resume_noirq(). */
+	if (dev_pm_may_skip_resume(dev))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (dev_pm_smart_suspend_and_suspended(dev))
+		pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
+
+	ret = pm_generic_resume_noirq(dev);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	if (!dev_pm_may_skip_resume(dev) && pdata->dev_desc->resume_from_noirq)
-		ret = acpi_lpss_do_resume_early(dev);
+	if (!pdata->dev_desc->resume_from_noirq)
+		return 0;
 
-	return ret;
+	/*
+	 * The driver's ->resume_early callback will be invoked by
+	 * acpi_lpss_do_resume_early(), with the assumption that the driver
+	 * really wanted to run that code in ->resume_noirq, but it could not
+	 * run before acpi_dev_resume() and the driver expected the latter to be
+	 * called in the "early" phase.
+	 */
+	return acpi_lpss_do_resume_early(dev);
+}
+
+static int acpi_lpss_do_restore_early(struct device *dev)
+{
+	int ret = acpi_lpss_resume(dev);
+
+	return ret ? ret : pm_generic_restore_early(dev);
+}
+
+static int acpi_lpss_restore_early(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct lpss_private_data *pdata = acpi_driver_data(ACPI_COMPANION(dev));
+
+	if (pdata->dev_desc->resume_from_noirq)
+		return 0;
+
+	return acpi_lpss_do_restore_early(dev);
 }
 
+static int acpi_lpss_restore_noirq(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct lpss_private_data *pdata = acpi_driver_data(ACPI_COMPANION(dev));
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = pm_generic_restore_noirq(dev);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (!pdata->dev_desc->resume_from_noirq)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* This is analogous to what happens in acpi_lpss_resume_noirq(). */
+	return acpi_lpss_do_restore_early(dev);
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
 
 static int acpi_lpss_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
@@ -1137,14 +1183,11 @@ static struct dev_pm_domain acpi_lpss_pm_domain = {
 		.resume_noirq = acpi_lpss_resume_noirq,
 		.resume_early = acpi_lpss_resume_early,
 		.freeze = acpi_subsys_freeze,
-		.freeze_late = acpi_subsys_freeze_late,
-		.freeze_noirq = acpi_subsys_freeze_noirq,
-		.thaw_noirq = acpi_subsys_thaw_noirq,
 		.poweroff = acpi_subsys_suspend,
 		.poweroff_late = acpi_lpss_suspend_late,
 		.poweroff_noirq = acpi_lpss_suspend_noirq,
-		.restore_noirq = acpi_lpss_resume_noirq,
-		.restore_early = acpi_lpss_resume_early,
+		.restore_noirq = acpi_lpss_restore_noirq,
+		.restore_early = acpi_lpss_restore_early,
 #endif
 		.runtime_suspend = acpi_lpss_runtime_suspend,
 		.runtime_resume = acpi_lpss_runtime_resume,