diff options
author | Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> | 2022-08-16 13:25:24 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> | 2022-09-15 09:31:58 -0700 |
commit | 1234a2c40b8cf16041fb9acd730160e6c5b4ba13 (patch) | |
tree | c167dbf4381d5d31b67e148ecf0d19b7877c0869 /drivers/clk/clk_test.c | |
parent | 666650b25ac43700a1cce96e51a32fc89c973d28 (diff) |
clk: Introduce clk_core_has_parent()
We will need to know if a clk_core pointer has a given parent in other
functions, so let's create a clk_core_has_parent() function that
clk_has_parent() will call into.
For good measure, let's add some unit tests as well to make sure it
works properly.
Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> # imx8mp
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> # exynos4210, meson g12b
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816112530.1837489-20-maxime@cerno.tech
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
[sboyd@kernel.org: Move tmp declaration, fix conditional to check for
current parent]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/clk/clk_test.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/clk/clk_test.c | 43 |
1 files changed, 43 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c index d1b1372f7aaa..7068517428e2 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c @@ -491,8 +491,32 @@ clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_get_parent(struct kunit *test) clk_put(clk); } +/* + * Test that for a clock with a multiple parents, clk_has_parent() + * actually reports all of them as parents. + */ +static void +clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_has_parent(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk *parent; + + parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw, NULL); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_has_parent(clk, parent)); + clk_put(parent); + + parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_has_parent(clk, parent)); + clk_put(parent); + + clk_put(clk); +} + static struct kunit_case clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_cases[] = { KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_get_parent), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_has_parent), {} }; @@ -919,6 +943,24 @@ clk_test_single_parent_mux_get_parent(struct kunit *test) } /* + * Test that for a clock with a single parent, clk_has_parent() actually + * reports it as a parent. + */ +static void +clk_test_single_parent_mux_has_parent(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL); + struct clk *parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parent_ctx.hw, NULL); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_has_parent(clk, parent)); + + clk_put(parent); + clk_put(clk); +} + +/* * Test that for a clock that can't modify its rate and with a single * parent, if we set disjoints range on the parent and then the child, * the second will return an error. @@ -1022,6 +1064,7 @@ clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate_child_smaller(struct kunit *test static struct kunit_case clk_single_parent_mux_test_cases[] = { KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_get_parent), + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_has_parent), KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_child_last), KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_parent_last), KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate_child_smaller), |