summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>2021-03-04 09:21:33 +0200
committerDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>2021-04-08 13:23:41 +0200
commit212709926c5493a566ca4086ad4f4b0d4e66b553 (patch)
tree0c6b25566ff5d3429433fe92efda716bfe16624e /drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c
parent446e1a943554e07a4e6431fff6dd06c0f130895a (diff)
clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Fix posted mode status check order
When the timer is configured in posted mode, we need to check the write- posted status register (TWPS) before writing to the register. We now check TWPS after the write starting with commit 52762fbd1c47 ("clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Add clockevent and clocksource support"). For example, in the TRM for am571x the following is documented in chapter "22.2.4.13.1.1 Write Posting Synchronization Mode": "For each register, a status bit is provided in the timer write-posted status (TWPS) register. In this mode, it is mandatory that software check this status bit before any write access. If a write is attempted to a register with a previous access pending, the previous access is discarded without notice." The regression happened when I updated the code to use standard read/write accessors for the driver instead of using __omap_dm_timer_load_start(). We have__omap_dm_timer_load_start() check the TWPS status correctly using __omap_dm_timer_write(). Fixes: 52762fbd1c47 ("clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Add clockevent and clocksource support") Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210304072135.52712-2-tony@atomide.com
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c12
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c
index 614c8380f3e9..3a654349623e 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c
@@ -449,13 +449,13 @@ static int dmtimer_set_next_event(unsigned long cycles,
struct dmtimer_systimer *t = &clkevt->t;
void __iomem *pend = t->base + t->pend;
- writel_relaxed(0xffffffff - cycles, t->base + t->counter);
while (readl_relaxed(pend) & WP_TCRR)
cpu_relax();
+ writel_relaxed(0xffffffff - cycles, t->base + t->counter);
- writel_relaxed(OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_ST, t->base + t->ctrl);
while (readl_relaxed(pend) & WP_TCLR)
cpu_relax();
+ writel_relaxed(OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_ST, t->base + t->ctrl);
return 0;
}
@@ -490,18 +490,18 @@ static int dmtimer_set_periodic(struct clock_event_device *evt)
dmtimer_clockevent_shutdown(evt);
/* Looks like we need to first set the load value separately */
- writel_relaxed(clkevt->period, t->base + t->load);
while (readl_relaxed(pend) & WP_TLDR)
cpu_relax();
+ writel_relaxed(clkevt->period, t->base + t->load);
- writel_relaxed(clkevt->period, t->base + t->counter);
while (readl_relaxed(pend) & WP_TCRR)
cpu_relax();
+ writel_relaxed(clkevt->period, t->base + t->counter);
- writel_relaxed(OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_AR | OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_ST,
- t->base + t->ctrl);
while (readl_relaxed(pend) & WP_TCLR)
cpu_relax();
+ writel_relaxed(OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_AR | OMAP_TIMER_CTRL_ST,
+ t->base + t->ctrl);
return 0;
}