summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/cxl/mem.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>2022-03-14 18:22:22 -0700
committerDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>2022-04-12 19:11:57 -0700
commite08063fb87944b1db963e94b833608318179708d (patch)
treeb0a2ff24bfb9e0a50cc7d33c84a15b91da8ecef7 /drivers/cxl/mem.c
parentc43e036d6f861f4c68b50eea49ab55b539eaab02 (diff)
cxl/mem: Drop DVSEC vs EFI Memory Map sanity check
When the driver finds legacy DVSEC ranges active on a CXL Memory Expander it indicates that platform firmware is not aware of, or is deliberately disabling common CXL 2.0 operation. In this case Linux generally has no choice, but to leave the device alone. The driver attempts to validate that the DVSEC range is in the EFI memory map. Remove that logic since there is no requirement that the BIOS publish DVSEC ranges in the EFI Memory Map. In the future the driver will want to permanently reserve this capacity out of the available CFMWS capacity and hide it from request_free_mem_region(), but it serves no purpose to warn about the range not appearing in the EFI Memory Map. Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164730734246.3806189.13995924771963139898.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cxl/mem.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/cxl/mem.c24
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 23 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cxl/mem.c b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
index 49a4b1c47299..cd4e8bba82aa 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/mem.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
@@ -158,30 +158,8 @@ static int cxl_mem_probe(struct device *dev)
* is no use in trying to manage those.
*/
if (!cxl_dvsec_decode_init(cxlds)) {
- struct cxl_endpoint_dvsec_info *info = &cxlds->info;
- int i;
-
- /* */
- for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
- u64 base, size;
-
- /*
- * Give a nice warning to the user that BIOS has really
- * botched things for them if it didn't place DVSEC
- * ranges in the memory map.
- */
- base = info->dvsec_range[i].start;
- size = range_len(&info->dvsec_range[i]);
- if (size && !region_intersects(base, size,
- IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
- IORES_DESC_NONE)) {
- dev_err(dev,
- "DVSEC range %#llx-%#llx must be reserved by BIOS, but isn't\n",
- base, base + size - 1);
- }
- }
dev_err(dev,
- "Active DVSEC range registers in use. Will not bind.\n");
+ "Legacy range registers configuration prevents HDM operation.\n");
return -EBUSY;
}