summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorQiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>2017-09-13 18:42:14 +0800
committerBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>2017-09-27 12:15:43 +0200
commit15cc3ae001873845b5d842e212478a6570c7d938 (patch)
tree42bf230985ce374df078317918e68c804f8f12d1 /drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
parent301375e764324b8048704eaf2c46fe1ee290830e (diff)
EDAC, sb_edac: Don't create a second memory controller if HA1 is not present
Yi Zhang reported the following failure on a 2-socket Haswell (E5-2603v3) server (DELL PowerEdge 730xd): EDAC sbridge: Some needed devices are missing EDAC MC: Removed device 0 for sb_edac.c Haswell SrcID#0_Ha#0: DEV 0000:7f:12.0 EDAC MC: Removed device 1 for sb_edac.c Haswell SrcID#1_Ha#0: DEV 0000:ff:12.0 EDAC sbridge: Couldn't find mci handler EDAC sbridge: Couldn't find mci handler EDAC sbridge: Failed to register device with error -19. The refactored sb_edac driver creates the IMC1 (the 2nd memory controller) if any IMC1 device is present. In this case only HA1_TA of IMC1 was present, but the driver expected to find HA1/HA1_TM/HA1_TAD[0-3] devices too, leading to the above failure. The document [1] says the 'E5-2603 v3' CPU has 4 memory channels max. Yi Zhang inserted one DIMM per channel for each CPU, and did random error address injection test with this patch: 4024 addresses fell in TOLM hole area 12715 addresses fell in CPU_SrcID#0_Ha#0_Chan#0_DIMM#0 12774 addresses fell in CPU_SrcID#0_Ha#0_Chan#1_DIMM#0 12798 addresses fell in CPU_SrcID#0_Ha#0_Chan#2_DIMM#0 12913 addresses fell in CPU_SrcID#0_Ha#0_Chan#3_DIMM#0 12674 addresses fell in CPU_SrcID#1_Ha#0_Chan#0_DIMM#0 12686 addresses fell in CPU_SrcID#1_Ha#0_Chan#1_DIMM#0 12882 addresses fell in CPU_SrcID#1_Ha#0_Chan#2_DIMM#0 12934 addresses fell in CPU_SrcID#1_Ha#0_Chan#3_DIMM#0 106400 addresses were injected totally. The test result shows that all the 4 channels belong to IMC0 per CPU, so the server really only has one IMC per CPU. In the 1st page of chapter 2 in datasheet [2], it also says 'E5-2600 v3' implements either one or two IMCs. For CPUs with one IMC, IMC1 is not used and should be ignored. Thus, do not create a second memory controller if the key HA1 is absent. [1] http://ark.intel.com/products/83349/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E5-2603-v3-15M-Cache-1_60-GHz [2] https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/xeon-e5-v3-datasheet-vol-2.pdf Reported-and-tested-by: Yi Zhang <yizhan@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org> Fixes: e2f747b1f42a ("EDAC, sb_edac: Assign EDAC memory controller per h/w controller") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170913104214.7325-1-qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com [ Massage commit message. ] Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/edac/sb_edac.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/edac/sb_edac.c9
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
index 3ea90fc5978b..54d9d179cb77 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
@@ -462,6 +462,7 @@ static const struct pci_id_table pci_dev_descr_sbridge_table[] = {
static const struct pci_id_descr pci_dev_descr_ibridge[] = {
/* Processor Home Agent */
{ PCI_DESCR(PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IBRIDGE_IMC_HA0, 0, IMC0) },
+ { PCI_DESCR(PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IBRIDGE_IMC_HA1, 1, IMC1) },
/* Memory controller */
{ PCI_DESCR(PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IBRIDGE_IMC_HA0_TA, 0, IMC0) },
@@ -472,7 +473,6 @@ static const struct pci_id_descr pci_dev_descr_ibridge[] = {
{ PCI_DESCR(PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IBRIDGE_IMC_HA0_TAD3, 0, IMC0) },
/* Optional, mode 2HA */
- { PCI_DESCR(PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IBRIDGE_IMC_HA1, 1, IMC1) },
{ PCI_DESCR(PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IBRIDGE_IMC_HA1_TA, 1, IMC1) },
{ PCI_DESCR(PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IBRIDGE_IMC_HA1_RAS, 1, IMC1) },
{ PCI_DESCR(PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IBRIDGE_IMC_HA1_TAD0, 1, IMC1) },
@@ -2291,6 +2291,13 @@ static int sbridge_get_onedevice(struct pci_dev **prev,
next_imc:
sbridge_dev = get_sbridge_dev(bus, dev_descr->dom, multi_bus, sbridge_dev);
if (!sbridge_dev) {
+ /* If the HA1 wasn't found, don't create EDAC second memory controller */
+ if (dev_descr->dom == IMC1 && devno != 1) {
+ edac_dbg(0, "Skip IMC1: %04x:%04x (since HA1 was absent)\n",
+ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, dev_descr->dev_id);
+ pci_dev_put(pdev);
+ return 0;
+ }
if (dev_descr->dom == SOCK)
goto out_imc;