diff options
| author | Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> | 2018-11-09 11:00:12 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> | 2018-11-09 12:27:25 -0500 |
| commit | 23d8003907d094f77cf959228e2248d6db819fa7 (patch) | |
| tree | 2a6e48e2f540a4127e182126d7a060e0988474c6 /drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | |
| parent | cf3d02a185edf449d30465dae8d22a4979545829 (diff) | |
drm/dp_mst: Check if primary mstb is null
Unfortunately drm_dp_get_mst_branch_device which is called from both
drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep and drm_dp_mst_handle_up_rep seem to rely
on that mgr->mst_primary is not NULL, which seem to be wrong as it can be
cleared with simultaneous mode set, if probing fails or in other case.
mgr->lock mutex doesn't protect against that as it might just get
assigned to NULL right before, not simultaneously.
There are currently bugs 107738, 108616 bugs which crash in
drm_dp_get_mst_branch_device, caused by this issue.
v2: Refactored the code, as it was nicely noticed.
Fixed Bugzilla bug numbers(second was 108616, but not 108816)
and added links.
[changed title and added stable cc]
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108616
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107738
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181109090012.24438-1-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c index 5ff1d79b86c4..0e0df398222d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c @@ -1275,6 +1275,9 @@ static struct drm_dp_mst_branch *drm_dp_get_mst_branch_device(struct drm_dp_mst_ mutex_lock(&mgr->lock); mstb = mgr->mst_primary; + if (!mstb) + goto out; + for (i = 0; i < lct - 1; i++) { int shift = (i % 2) ? 0 : 4; int port_num = (rad[i / 2] >> shift) & 0xf; |