summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>2020-04-17 10:39:27 +0100
committerChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>2020-04-17 14:47:15 +0100
commit9d7e560f432766e5894bfbac41d6faa5f3daf1b7 (patch)
tree2f754fbb8e8d4fade81ae28d4a0ffb595db90ebd /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c
parent23122a4d992b5d5a660155e2c4640e5a93cc957d (diff)
drm/i915/selftests: Delay spinner before waiting for an interrupt
It seems that although (perhaps because of the memory stall?) the spinner has signaled that it has started, it still takes some time to spin up to 100% utilisation of the HW. Since the test depends on the full utilisation of the HW to trigger the RPS interrupt, wait a little bit and flush the interrupt status to be sure that the event we see if from the spinner. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200417093928.17822-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c28
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c
index 26aadc2ae3be..199d608aa763 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rps.c
@@ -14,6 +14,20 @@ static void dummy_rps_work(struct work_struct *wrk)
{
}
+static void sleep_for_ei(struct intel_rps *rps, int timeout_us)
+{
+ /* Flush any previous EI */
+ usleep_range(timeout_us, 2 * timeout_us);
+
+ /* Reset the interrupt status */
+ rps_disable_interrupts(rps);
+ GEM_BUG_ON(rps->pm_iir);
+ rps_enable_interrupts(rps);
+
+ /* And then wait for the timeout, for real this time */
+ usleep_range(2 * timeout_us, 3 * timeout_us);
+}
+
static int __rps_up_interrupt(struct intel_rps *rps,
struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
struct igt_spinner *spin)
@@ -28,7 +42,6 @@ static int __rps_up_interrupt(struct intel_rps *rps,
intel_gt_pm_wait_for_idle(engine->gt);
GEM_BUG_ON(rps->active);
- rps->pm_iir = 0;
rps->cur_freq = rps->min_freq;
rq = igt_spinner_create_request(spin, engine->kernel_context, MI_NOOP);
@@ -71,7 +84,7 @@ static int __rps_up_interrupt(struct intel_rps *rps,
timeout = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_RP_UP_EI);
timeout = GT_PM_INTERVAL_TO_US(engine->i915, timeout);
- usleep_range(2 * timeout, 3 * timeout);
+ sleep_for_ei(rps, timeout);
GEM_BUG_ON(i915_request_completed(rq));
igt_spinner_end(spin);
@@ -122,16 +135,7 @@ static int __rps_down_interrupt(struct intel_rps *rps,
timeout = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_RP_DOWN_EI);
timeout = GT_PM_INTERVAL_TO_US(engine->i915, timeout);
- /* Flush any previous EI */
- usleep_range(timeout, 2 * timeout);
-
- /* Reset the interrupt status */
- rps_disable_interrupts(rps);
- GEM_BUG_ON(rps->pm_iir);
- rps_enable_interrupts(rps);
-
- /* And then wait for the timeout, for real this time */
- usleep_range(2 * timeout, 3 * timeout);
+ sleep_for_ei(rps, timeout);
if (rps->cur_freq != rps->max_freq) {
pr_err("%s: Frequency unexpectedly changed [down], now %d!\n",