summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>2016-07-06 12:39:00 +0100
committerChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>2016-07-06 12:44:20 +0100
commit04171313cb25311acf82279284d722fed7b70d53 (patch)
tree314a2dc85967ed2a366f91f87b3545e4973d7428 /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
parent91c8a326a192117219d5b9b980244c3662e35404 (diff)
drm/i915: Always double check for a missed interrupt for new bottom halves
After assigning ourselves as the new bottom-half, we must perform a cursory check to prevent a missed interrupt. Either we miss the interrupt whilst programming the hardware, or if there was a previous waiter (for a later seqno) they may be woken instead of us (due to the inherent race in the unlocked read of b->tasklet in the irq handler) and so we miss the wake up. Spotted-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96806 Fixes: 688e6c725816 ("drm/i915: Slaughter the thundering... herd") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467805142-22219-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c16
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
index 009d6e121767..6fcbb52e50fb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static void irq_disable(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
engine->irq_posted = false;
}
-static bool __intel_breadcrumbs_enable_irq(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
+static void __intel_breadcrumbs_enable_irq(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
{
struct intel_engine_cs *engine =
container_of(b, struct intel_engine_cs, breadcrumbs);
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static bool __intel_breadcrumbs_enable_irq(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
assert_spin_locked(&b->lock);
if (b->rpm_wakelock)
- return false;
+ return;
/* Since we are waiting on a request, the GPU should be busy
* and should have its own rpm reference. For completeness,
@@ -93,8 +93,6 @@ static bool __intel_breadcrumbs_enable_irq(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
if (!b->irq_enabled ||
test_bit(engine->id, &i915->gpu_error.missed_irq_rings))
mod_timer(&b->fake_irq, jiffies + 1);
-
- return engine->irq_posted;
}
static void __intel_breadcrumbs_disable_irq(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
@@ -233,7 +231,15 @@ static bool __intel_engine_add_wait(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
GEM_BUG_ON(rb_first(&b->waiters) != &wait->node);
b->first_wait = wait;
smp_store_mb(b->tasklet, wait->tsk);
- first = __intel_breadcrumbs_enable_irq(b);
+ /* After assigning ourselves as the new bottom-half, we must
+ * perform a cursory check to prevent a missed interrupt.
+ * Either we miss the interrupt whilst programming the hardware,
+ * or if there was a previous waiter (for a later seqno) they
+ * may be woken instead of us (due to the inherent race
+ * in the unlocked read of b->tasklet in the irq handler) and
+ * so we miss the wake up.
+ */
+ __intel_breadcrumbs_enable_irq(b);
}
GEM_BUG_ON(!b->tasklet);
GEM_BUG_ON(!b->first_wait);