diff options
author | Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> | 2018-12-07 13:40:37 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> | 2018-12-07 15:15:24 +0000 |
commit | a889580c087a9cf91fddb3832ece284174214183 (patch) | |
tree | 50b67fef76b204d5b5fa6c7a0a63feb32730bf42 /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | |
parent | e6154e4cb8b0d3692f84ca0d66b4e1ba0389b134 (diff) |
drm/i915: Flush GPU relocs harder for gen3
Adding an extra MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM to the gpu relocation path for gen3
was good, but still not good enough. To survive 24+ hours under test we
needed to perform not one, not two but three extra store-dw. Doing so
for each GPU relocation was a little unsightly and since we need to
worry about userspace hitting the same issues, we should apply the dummy
store-dw into the EMIT_FLUSH.
Fixes: 7dd4f6729f92 ("drm/i915: Async GPU relocation processing")
References: 7fa28e146994 ("drm/i915: Write GPU relocs harder with gen3")
Testcase: igt/gem_tiled_fence_blits # blb/pnv
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181207134037.11848-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 15 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index 74a4d587c312..02f6a9b81083 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c @@ -69,19 +69,28 @@ unsigned int intel_ring_update_space(struct intel_ring *ring) static int gen2_render_ring_flush(struct i915_request *rq, u32 mode) { + unsigned int num_store_dw; u32 cmd, *cs; cmd = MI_FLUSH; - + num_store_dw = 0; if (mode & EMIT_INVALIDATE) cmd |= MI_READ_FLUSH; + if (mode & EMIT_FLUSH) + num_store_dw = 4; - cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 2); + cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 2 + 3 * num_store_dw); if (IS_ERR(cs)) return PTR_ERR(cs); *cs++ = cmd; - *cs++ = MI_NOOP; + while (num_store_dw--) { + *cs++ = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM | MI_MEM_VIRTUAL; + *cs++ = i915_scratch_offset(rq->i915); + *cs++ = 0; + } + *cs++ = MI_FLUSH | MI_NO_WRITE_FLUSH; + intel_ring_advance(rq, cs); return 0; |