drm/i915: split out stepping info to a new file

gt/intel_workarounds.c is decidedly the wrong place for handling
stepping info. Add new intel_step.[ch] for the data, and move the
stepping arrays there. No functional changes.

v2: Rename stepping->step

Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/f69baf82819a8a35815fca25a520de5c38a7e1b5.1616764798.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

1 files changed, 46 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e19820cbe8e3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
+/*
+ * Copyright © 2020,2021 Intel Corporation
+ */
+
+#include "i915_drv.h"
+#include "intel_step.h"
+
+/*
+ * KBL revision ID ordering is bizarre; higher revision ID's map to lower
+ * steppings in some cases.  So rather than test against the revision ID
+ * directly, let's map that into our own range of increasing ID's that we
+ * can test against in a regular manner.
+ */
+
+const struct i915_rev_steppings kbl_revids[] = {
+	[0] = { .gt_stepping = KBL_REVID_A0, .disp_stepping = KBL_REVID_A0 },
+	[1] = { .gt_stepping = KBL_REVID_B0, .disp_stepping = KBL_REVID_B0 },
+	[2] = { .gt_stepping = KBL_REVID_C0, .disp_stepping = KBL_REVID_B0 },
+	[3] = { .gt_stepping = KBL_REVID_D0, .disp_stepping = KBL_REVID_B0 },
+	[4] = { .gt_stepping = KBL_REVID_F0, .disp_stepping = KBL_REVID_C0 },
+	[5] = { .gt_stepping = KBL_REVID_C0, .disp_stepping = KBL_REVID_B1 },
+	[6] = { .gt_stepping = KBL_REVID_D1, .disp_stepping = KBL_REVID_B1 },
+	[7] = { .gt_stepping = KBL_REVID_G0, .disp_stepping = KBL_REVID_C0 },
+};
+
+const struct i915_rev_steppings tgl_uy_revid_step_tbl[] = {
+	[0] = { .gt_stepping = STEP_A0, .disp_stepping = STEP_A0 },
+	[1] = { .gt_stepping = STEP_B0, .disp_stepping = STEP_C0 },
+	[2] = { .gt_stepping = STEP_B1, .disp_stepping = STEP_C0 },
+	[3] = { .gt_stepping = STEP_C0, .disp_stepping = STEP_D0 },
+};
+
+/* Same GT stepping between tgl_uy_revids and tgl_revids don't mean the same HW */
+const struct i915_rev_steppings tgl_revid_step_tbl[] = {
+	[0] = { .gt_stepping = STEP_A0, .disp_stepping = STEP_B0 },
+	[1] = { .gt_stepping = STEP_B0, .disp_stepping = STEP_D0 },
+};
+
+const struct i915_rev_steppings adls_revid_step_tbl[] = {
+	[0x0] = { .gt_stepping = STEP_A0, .disp_stepping = STEP_A0 },
+	[0x1] = { .gt_stepping = STEP_A0, .disp_stepping = STEP_A2 },
+	[0x4] = { .gt_stepping = STEP_B0, .disp_stepping = STEP_B0 },
+	[0x8] = { .gt_stepping = STEP_C0, .disp_stepping = STEP_B0 },
+	[0xC] = { .gt_stepping = STEP_D0, .disp_stepping = STEP_C0 },
+};