summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorZack Rusin <zackr@vmware.com>2021-12-06 12:26:09 -0500
committerZack Rusin <zackr@vmware.com>2021-12-09 13:16:10 -0500
commit8aadeb8ad874b3b13431fd08c1ddb6d5e0212c7f (patch)
tree4bd896d30ca6a6a60c17f1edf34e10d4ebbc84bc /drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c
parent21a6732f464894fa43fa1d43fdc7570b454b970c (diff)
drm/vmwgfx: Remove the dedicated memory accounting
vmwgfx shared very elaborate memory accounting with ttm. It was moved from ttm to vmwgfx in change f07069da6b4c ("drm/ttm: move memory accounting into vmwgfx v4") but because of complexity it was hard to maintain. Some parts of the code weren't freeing memory correctly and some were missing accounting all together. While those would be fairly easy to fix the fundamental reason for memory accounting in the driver was the ability to invoke shrinker which is part of TTM code as well (with support for unified memory hopefully coming soon). That meant that vmwgfx had a lot of code that was either unused or duplicating code from TTM. Removing this code also prevents excessive calls to global swapout which were common during memory pressure because both vmwgfx and TTM would invoke the shrinker when memory usage reached half of RAM. Fixes: f07069da6b4c ("drm/ttm: move memory accounting into vmwgfx v4") Signed-off-by: Zack Rusin <zackr@vmware.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Krastev <krastevm@vmware.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211206172620.3139754-2-zack@kde.org
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c30
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 30 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c
index 9fe12329a4d5..c9afd070c11b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c
@@ -37,9 +37,6 @@ struct vmw_fence_manager {
spinlock_t lock;
struct list_head fence_list;
struct work_struct work;
- u32 user_fence_size;
- u32 fence_size;
- u32 event_fence_action_size;
bool fifo_down;
struct list_head cleanup_list;
uint32_t pending_actions[VMW_ACTION_MAX];
@@ -304,11 +301,6 @@ struct vmw_fence_manager *vmw_fence_manager_init(struct vmw_private *dev_priv)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fman->cleanup_list);
INIT_WORK(&fman->work, &vmw_fence_work_func);
fman->fifo_down = true;
- fman->user_fence_size = ttm_round_pot(sizeof(struct vmw_user_fence)) +
- TTM_OBJ_EXTRA_SIZE;
- fman->fence_size = ttm_round_pot(sizeof(struct vmw_fence_obj));
- fman->event_fence_action_size =
- ttm_round_pot(sizeof(struct vmw_event_fence_action));
mutex_init(&fman->goal_irq_mutex);
fman->ctx = dma_fence_context_alloc(1);
@@ -560,14 +552,8 @@ static void vmw_user_fence_destroy(struct vmw_fence_obj *fence)
{
struct vmw_user_fence *ufence =
container_of(fence, struct vmw_user_fence, fence);
- struct vmw_fence_manager *fman = fman_from_fence(fence);
ttm_base_object_kfree(ufence, base);
- /*
- * Free kernel space accounting.
- */
- ttm_mem_global_free(vmw_mem_glob(fman->dev_priv),
- fman->user_fence_size);
}
static void vmw_user_fence_base_release(struct ttm_base_object **p_base)
@@ -590,23 +576,8 @@ int vmw_user_fence_create(struct drm_file *file_priv,
struct ttm_object_file *tfile = vmw_fpriv(file_priv)->tfile;
struct vmw_user_fence *ufence;
struct vmw_fence_obj *tmp;
- struct ttm_mem_global *mem_glob = vmw_mem_glob(fman->dev_priv);
- struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = {
- .interruptible = false,
- .no_wait_gpu = false
- };
int ret;
- /*
- * Kernel memory space accounting, since this object may
- * be created by a user-space request.
- */
-
- ret = ttm_mem_global_alloc(mem_glob, fman->user_fence_size,
- &ctx);
- if (unlikely(ret != 0))
- return ret;
-
ufence = kzalloc(sizeof(*ufence), GFP_KERNEL);
if (unlikely(!ufence)) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -646,7 +617,6 @@ out_err:
tmp = &ufence->fence;
vmw_fence_obj_unreference(&tmp);
out_no_object:
- ttm_mem_global_free(mem_glob, fman->user_fence_size);
return ret;
}