summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/iommu/intel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>2021-06-10 10:01:09 +0800
committerJoerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>2021-06-10 09:06:13 +0200
commit606636dcbdbb73b1a4ed61be77c76ea1087f042d (patch)
tree12e585b1e8f76f55df07c69dbb4e3ea2da5e4331 /drivers/iommu/intel
parent0f4834ab255bf488f20544e120713decfa77843e (diff)
iommu/vt-d: Fix out-bounds-warning in intel/svm.c
Replace a couple of calls to memcpy() with simple assignments in order to fix the following out-of-bounds warning: drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c:1198:4: warning: 'memcpy' offset [25, 32] from the object at 'desc' is out of the bounds of referenced subobject 'qw2' with type 'long long unsigned int' at offset 16 [-Warray-bounds] The problem is that the original code is trying to copy data into a couple of struct members adjacent to each other in a single call to memcpy(). This causes a legitimate compiler warning because memcpy() overruns the length of &desc.qw2 and &resp.qw2, respectively. This helps with the ongoing efforts to globally enable -Warray-bounds and get us closer to being able to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE routines on memcpy(). Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/109 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210414201403.GA392764@embeddedor Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210610020115.1637656-18-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/iommu/intel')
-rw-r--r--drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c26
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
index 6bff9a7f9133..9b0f22bc0514 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
@@ -870,8 +870,8 @@ static int intel_svm_prq_report(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct device *dev,
*/
event.fault.prm.flags |= IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_LAST_PAGE;
event.fault.prm.flags |= IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_PRIV_DATA;
- memcpy(event.fault.prm.private_data, desc->priv_data,
- sizeof(desc->priv_data));
+ event.fault.prm.private_data[0] = desc->priv_data[0];
+ event.fault.prm.private_data[1] = desc->priv_data[1];
} else if (dmar_latency_enabled(iommu, DMAR_LATENCY_PRQ)) {
/*
* If the private data fields are not used by hardware, use it
@@ -910,11 +910,15 @@ static void handle_bad_prq_event(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
QI_PGRP_RESP_TYPE;
desc.qw1 = QI_PGRP_IDX(req->prg_index) |
QI_PGRP_LPIG(req->lpig);
- desc.qw2 = 0;
- desc.qw3 = 0;
- if (req->priv_data_present)
- memcpy(&desc.qw2, req->priv_data, sizeof(req->priv_data));
+ if (req->priv_data_present) {
+ desc.qw2 = req->priv_data[0];
+ desc.qw3 = req->priv_data[1];
+ } else {
+ desc.qw2 = 0;
+ desc.qw3 = 0;
+ }
+
qi_submit_sync(iommu, &desc, 1, 0);
}
@@ -1176,12 +1180,14 @@ int intel_svm_page_response(struct device *dev,
desc.qw1 = QI_PGRP_IDX(prm->grpid) | QI_PGRP_LPIG(last_page);
desc.qw2 = 0;
desc.qw3 = 0;
- if (private_present)
- memcpy(&desc.qw2, prm->private_data,
- sizeof(prm->private_data));
- else if (prm->private_data[0])
+
+ if (private_present) {
+ desc.qw2 = prm->private_data[0];
+ desc.qw3 = prm->private_data[1];
+ } else if (prm->private_data[0]) {
dmar_latency_update(iommu, DMAR_LATENCY_PRQ,
ktime_to_ns(ktime_get()) - prm->private_data[0]);
+ }
qi_submit_sync(iommu, &desc, 1, 0);
}